GetWiki
dinosaur
ARTICLE SUBJECTS
being →
database →
ethics →
fiction →
history →
internet →
language →
linux →
logic →
method →
news →
policy →
purpose →
religion →
science →
software →
truth →
unix →
wiki →
ARTICLE TYPES
essay →
feed →
help →
system →
wiki →
ARTICLE ORIGINS
critical →
forked →
imported →
original →
dinosaur
please note:
- the content below is remote from Wikipedia
- it has been imported raw for GetWiki
{{Short description|Archosaurian reptiles that dominated the Mesozoic Era}}{{Other uses}}{{Distinguish|Dinosaurus}}{{pp-semi-indef}}{{pp-move}}{{Use mdy dates|date=January 2022}}{{Automatic taxobox| name = Dinosaurs- the content below is remote from Wikipedia
- it has been imported raw for GetWiki
233.23 | Late TriassicâHolocene | , 233.23 â 0 Mya > | PS=(range includes birds) }} (possible Middle Triassic record)| image = {{Multiple image| perrow = 2/2/2| width = 145| caption_align = center| image1 = Stegosaurus ungulatus.jpg | Stegosaurus>Stegosaurus stenops(a stegosaur)| image2 = Frenguellisaurus ischigualastensis DSC 6185.jpg | Herrerasaurus>Herrerasaurus ischigualastensis(a carnivorous basal dinosaur)| image3 = Triceratops Specimen at the Houston Museum of Natural Science.JPG | Triceratops>Triceratops horridus(a ceratopsian)| image4 = Louisae.jpg | Apatosaurus>Apatosaurus louisae(a sauropod)| image5 = Hadrosauridae - Edmontosaurus annectens.JPG | Edmontosaurus>Edmontosaurus regalis(a hadrosaurid ornithopod)| image6 = MicroraptorGui-PaleozoologicalMuseumOfChina-May23-08.jpg | Microraptor>Microraptor gui(a dromaeosauridae | Theropoda>theropod)| border = infobox}}| display_parents = 7| taxon = Dinosauria | Richard Owen>Owen, 1842| subdivision_ranks = Major groups| subdivision = *{{extinct}}Ornithischia
DefinitionUnder phylogenetic nomenclature, dinosaurs are usually defined as the group consisting of the most recent common ancestor (MRCA) of Triceratops and modern birds (Neornithes), and all its descendants. It has also been suggested that Dinosauria be defined with respect to the MRCA of Megalosaurus and Iguanodon, because these were two of the three genera cited by Richard Owen when he recognized the Dinosauria. Both definitions cover the same known genera: Dinosauria = Ornithischia + Saurischia. This includes major groups such as ankylosaurians (armored herbivorous quadrupeds), stegosaurians (plated herbivorous quadrupeds), ceratopsians (bipedal or quadrupedal herbivores with neck frills), pachycephalosaurians (bipedal herbivores with thick skulls), ornithopods (bipedal or quadrupedal herbivores including “duck-bills“), theropods (mostly bipedal carnivores and birds), and sauropodomorphs (mostly large herbivorous quadrupeds with long necks and tails).Birds are the sole surviving dinosaurs. In traditional taxonomy, birds were considered a separate class that had evolved from dinosaurs, a distinct superorder. However, most contemporary paleontologists reject the traditional style of classification based on anatomical similarity, in favor of phylogenetic taxonomy based on deduced ancestry, in which each group is defined as all descendants of a given founding genus.WEB,evolution.berkeley.edu/evolibrary/article/evo_10, live, Using the tree for classification, Understanding Evolution, University of California, Berkeley, California, Berkeley,web.archive.org/web/20190831003846/https://evolution.berkeley.edu/evolibrary/article/evo_10, August 31, 2019, October 14, 2019, Birds belong to the dinosaur subgroup Maniraptora, which are coelurosaurs, which are theropods, which are saurischians.Research by Matthew G. Baron, David B. Norman, and Paul M. Barrett in 2017 suggested a radical revision of dinosaurian systematics. Phylogenetic analysis by Baron et al. recovered the Ornithischia as being closer to the Theropoda than the Sauropodomorpha, as opposed to the traditional union of theropods with sauropodomorphs. This would cause sauropods and kin to fall outside traditional dinosaurs, so they re-defined Dinosauria as the last common ancestor of Triceratops horridus, Passer domesticus and Diplodocus carnegii, and all of its descendants, to ensure that sauropods and kin remain included as dinosaurs. They also resurrected the clade Ornithoscelida to refer to the group containing Ornithischia and Theropoda.NEWS, Wade, Nicholas, Nicholas Wade, Shaking Up the Dinosaur Family Tree, March 22, 2017,www.nytimes.com/2017/03/22/science/dinosaur-family-tree.html, live, registration, The New York Times, New York City, New York, 0362-4331,web.archive.org/web/20180407234942/https://www.nytimes.com/2017/03/22/science/dinosaur-family-tree.html, April 7, 2018, October 30, 2019, “A version of this article appears in print on March 28, 2017, on Page D6 of the New York edition with the headline: Shaking Up the Dinosaur Family Tree.“JOURNAL, Baron, Matthew G., Norman, David B., David B. Norman, Barrett, Paul M., 2017, A new hypothesis of dinosaur relationships and early dinosaur evolution, Nature (journal), Nature, London, Nature Research, 543, 7646, 501â506, 10.1038/nature21700, 28332513, 2017Natur.543..501B, 205254710, 0028-0836, “This file contains Supplementary Text and Data, Supplementary Tables 1-3 and additional references.”: Supplementary Information{{Dead link|date=June 2022 |bot=InternetArchiveBot |fix-attempted=yes }}General descriptionFile:LA-Triceratops mount-2.jpg|thumb|upright=1.15|left|Triceratops skeleton, Natural History Museum of Los Angeles CountyNatural History Museum of Los Angeles CountyUsing one of the above definitions, dinosaurs can be generally described as archosaurs with hind limbs held erect beneath the body. Other prehistoric animals, including pterosaurs, mosasaurs, ichthyosaurs, plesiosaurs, and Dimetrodon, while often popularly conceived of as dinosaurs, are not taxonomically classified as dinosaurs.WEB,www.forbes.com/sites/jvchamary/2014/09/30/dinosaurs/, live, Dinosaurs, Pterosaurs And Other Saurs â Big Differences, Chamary, JV, September 30, 2014, Forbes, Jersey City, New Jersey, Jersey City, NJ, 0015-6914,web.archive.org/web/20141110172257/https://www.forbes.com/sites/jvchamary/2014/09/30/dinosaurs/, November 10, 2014, October 2, 2018, Pterosaurs are distantly related to dinosaurs, being members of the clade Ornithodira. The other groups mentioned are, like dinosaurs and pterosaurs, members of Sauropsida (the reptile and bird clade), except Dimetrodon (which is a synapsid). None of them had the erect hind limb posture characteristic of true dinosaurs.Dinosaurs were the dominant terrestrial vertebrates of the Mesozoic Era, especially the Jurassic and Cretaceous periods. Other groups of animals were restricted in size and niches; mammals, for example, rarely exceeded the size of a domestic cat, and were generally rodent-sized carnivores of small prey. Dinosaurs have always been recognized as an extremely varied group: over 900 non-avian dinosaur genera have been confidently identified (2018) with 1124 species (2016). Estimates put the total number of dinosaur genera preserved in the fossil record at 1850, nearly 75% still undiscovered,JOURNAL, Tennant, Jonathan P., Chiarenza, Alfio Alessandro, Baron, Matthew, How has our knowledge of dinosaur diversity through geologic time changed through research history?, PeerJ, 19 February 2018, 6, e4417, 10.7717/peerj.4417, 29479504, 5822849, free, JOURNAL, Starrfelt, Jostein, Liow, Lee Hsiang, How many dinosaur species were there? Fossil bias and true richness estimated using a Poisson sampling model, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 2016, 371, 1691, 20150219, 10.1098/rstb.2015.0219, 26977060, 4810813, and the number that ever existed (in or out of the fossil record) at 3,400. A 2016 estimate put the number of dinosaur species living in the Mesozoic at 1,543â2,468,JOURNAL, Starrfelt, Jostein, Liow, Lee Hsiang, 2016, How many dinosaur species were there? Fossil bias and true richness estimated using a Poisson sampling model, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, London, Royal Society, 371, 1691, 20150219, 10.1098/rstb.2015.0219, 0962-8436, 4810813, 26977060, WEB,www.nationalgeographic.com/science/article/most-dinosaur-species-are-still-undiscovered/, dead, registration, Black, Riley, Most Dinosaur Species Are Still Undiscovered, National Geographic News, March 23, 2016,web.archive.org/web/20210306214843/https://www.nationalgeographic.com/science/article/most-dinosaur-species-are-still-undiscovered/, March 6, 2021, June 6, 2021, compared to the number of modern-day birds (avian dinosaurs) at 10,806 species.JOURNAL, Gill, F., Donsker, D., Rasmussen, P., Welcome, 2021, IOC World Bird List 11.1.,www.worldbirdnames.org/new/, Extinct dinosaurs, as well as modern birds, include genera which are herbivorous and others carnivorous, including seed-eaters, fish-eaters, insectivores, and omnivores. While dinosaurs were ancestrally bipedal (as are all modern birds), some evolved into quadrupeds, and others, such as Anchisaurus and Iguanodon, could walk as easily on two or four legs. Cranial modifications like horns and crests are common dinosaurian traits, and some extinct species had bony armor. Although the best-known genera are remarkable for their large size, many Mesozoic dinosaurs were human-sized or smaller, and modern birds are generally small in size. Dinosaurs today inhabit every continent, and fossils show that they had achieved global distribution by the Early Jurassic epoch at latest.JOURNAL, MacLeod, Norman, Rawson, Peter F., Forey, Peter L., Banner, FT, Boudagher-Fadel, MK, Bown, PR, Burnett, JA, Chambers, P, Culver, S, Evans, SE, Jeffery, C, Kaminski, MA, Lord, AR, Milner, AC, Milner, AR, Morris, N, Owen, E, Rosen, BR, Smith, AB, Taylor, PD, Urquhart, E, Young, JR, 3, 1997, The CretaceousâTertiary biotic transition, Journal of the Geological Society, London, Geological Society of London, 154, 2, 265â292, 10.1144/gsjgs.154.2.0265, 1997JGSoc.154..265M, 129654916, 0016-7649, Modern birds inhabit most available habitats, from terrestrial to marine, and there is evidence that some non-avian dinosaurs (such as Microraptor) could fly or at least glide, and others, such as spinosaurids, had semiaquatic habits.Distinguishing anatomical featuresWhile recent discoveries have made it more difficult to present a universally agreed-upon list of their distinguishing features, nearly all dinosaurs discovered so far share certain modifications to the ancestral archosaurian skeleton, or are clearly descendants of older dinosaurs showing these modifications. Although some later groups of dinosaurs featured further modified versions of these traits, they are considered typical for Dinosauria; the earliest dinosaurs had them and passed them on to their descendants. Such modifications, originating in the most recent common ancestor of a certain taxonomic group, are called the synapomorphies of such a group.File:Dromaeosaurus skull en.svg|thumb|right|Labeled diagram of a typical archosaur skull, the skull of DromaeosaurusDromaeosaurusA detailed assessment of archosaur interrelations by Sterling Nesbitt confirmed or found the following twelve unambiguous synapomorphies, some previously known:
History of study{{Further|History of paleontology}}Pre-scientific historyDinosaur fossils have been known for millennia, although their true nature was not recognized. The Chinese considered them to be dragon bones and documented them as such. For example, Huayang Guo Zhi ({{zh|t=è¯é½åå¿|labels=no}}), a gazetteer compiled by Chang Qu ({{zh|t=常ç©|labels=no}}) during the Western Jin Dynasty (265â316), reported the discovery of dragon bones at Wucheng in Sichuan Province. Villagers in central China have long unearthed fossilized “dragon bones” for use in traditional medicines. In Europe, dinosaur fossils were generally believed to be the remains of giants and other biblical creatures.{{harvnb|Paul|2000|pp=10â44|loc=chpt. 1: “A Brief History of Dinosaur Paleontology” by Michael J. Benton.}}Early dinosaur researchFile:William Buckland c1845.jpg|thumb|upright|left|William BucklandWilliam BucklandScholarly descriptions of what would now be recognized as dinosaur bones first appeared in the late 17th century in England. Part of a bone, now known to have been the femur of a Megalosaurus, was recovered from a limestone quarry at Cornwell near Chipping Norton, Oxfordshire, in 1676. The fragment was sent to Robert Plot, Professor of Chemistry at the University of Oxford and first curator of the Ashmolean Museum, who published a description in his The Natural History of Oxford-shire (1677).{{harvnb|Plot|1677|pp=131â139; illus. opp. p. 142, fig. 4}} He correctly identified the bone as the lower extremity of the femur of a large animal, and recognized that it was too large to belong to any known species. He, therefore, concluded it to be the femur of a huge human, perhaps a Titan or another type of giant featured in legends.{{harvnb|Plot|1677|p=weblink}}WEB,www.oum.ox.ac.uk/learning/pdfs/plot.pdf, Robert Plot, 2006, Learning more, Oxford University Museum of Natural History, Oxford,www.oum.ox.ac.uk/learning/pdfs/plot.pdf," title="web.archive.org/web/20061001094736www.oum.ox.ac.uk/learning/pdfs/plot.pdf,">web.archive.org/web/20061001094736www.oum.ox.ac.uk/learning/pdfs/plot.pdf, October 1, 2006, November 14, 2019, Edward Lhuyd, a friend of Sir Isaac Newton, published Lithophylacii Britannici ichnographia (1699), the first scientific treatment of what would now be recognized as a dinosaur when he described and named a sauropod tooth, “Rutellum impicatum”, that had been found in Caswell, near Witney, Oxfordshire.File:Dinosaur coining of the word in 1841.jpg|thumb|Sir Richard Owen’s coining of the word dinosaur, in the 1842 revised version of his talk at an 1841 meeting of the British Association for the Advancement of Science.]]Between 1815 and 1824, the Rev William Buckland, the first Reader of Geology at the University of Oxford, collected more fossilized bones of Megalosaurus and became the first person to describe a non-avian dinosaur in a scientific journal. The second non-avian dinosaur genus to be identified, Iguanodon, was according to legend discovered in 1822 by Mary Ann Mantell â the wife of English geologist Gideon Mantell who in fact had required remains years earlier. Gideon Mantell recognized similarities between his fossils and the bones of modern iguanas. He published his findings in 1825.The study of these “great fossil lizards” soon became of great interest to European and American scientists, and in 1842 the English paleontologist Sir Richard Owen coined the term “dinosaur”, using it to refer to the “distinct tribe or sub-order of Saurian Reptiles” that were then being recognized in England and around the world.MERRIAM-WEBSTER, Dinosauria, November 10, 2019, The term is derived {{ety|grc|(wikt:δεινÏÏ|δεινÏÏ) (deinos)|terrible, potent or fearfully great||(wikt:ÏαῦÏοÏ|ÏαῦÏοÏ) (sauros)|lizard or reptile}}. Though the taxonomic name has often been interpreted as a reference to dinosaurs’ teeth, claws, and other fearsome characteristics, Owen intended it also to evoke their size and majesty. Owen recognized that the remains that had been found so far, Iguanodon, Megalosaurus and Hylaeosaurus, shared distinctive features, and so decided to present them as a distinct taxonomic group. As clarified by British geologist and historian Hugh Torrens, Owen had given a presentation about fossil reptiles to the British Association for the Advancement of Science in 1841, but reports of the time show that Owen did not mention the word “dinosaur”, nor recognize dinosaurs as a distinct group of reptiles in his address. He introduced the Dinosauria only in the revised text version of his talk published in April 1842. With the backing of Prince Albert, the husband of Queen Victoria, Owen established the Natural History Museum, London, to display the national collection of dinosaur fossils and other biological and geological exhibits.{{harvnb|Rupke|1994}}Discoveries in North America{{multiple image| align = left| perrow = 2/1| total_width = 300| caption_align = center| image1 = Edcope.jpg| caption1 = Edward Drinker Cope| image2 = OthnielCharlesMarsh.jpg| caption2 = Othniel Charles Marsh}}In 1858, William Parker Foulke discovered the first known American dinosaur, in marl pits in the small town of Haddonfield, New Jersey. (Although fossils had been found before, their nature had not been correctly discerned.) The creature was named Hadrosaurus foulkii. It was an extremely important find: Hadrosaurus was one of the first nearly complete dinosaur skeletons found (the first was in 1834, in Maidstone, England), and it was clearly a bipedal creature. This was a revolutionary discovery as, until that point, most scientists had believed dinosaurs walked on four feet, like other lizards. Foulke’s discoveries sparked a wave of interests in dinosaurs in the United States, known as dinosaur mania.JOURNAL, Prieto-Marquez, Albert, Weishampel, David B., Horner, John R., March 2006, The dinosaur Hadrosaurus foulkii, from the Campanian of the East Coast of North America, with a reevaluation of the genus,app.pan.pl/archive/published/app51/app51-077.pdf, live, Acta Palaeontologica Polonica, Warsaw, Institute of Paleobiology, Polish Academy of Sciences, 51, 1, 77â98, 0567-7920,web.archive.org/web/20190622113255/https://app.pan.pl/archive/published/app51/app51-077.pdf, June 22, 2019, November 5, 2019, Dinosaur mania was exemplified by the fierce rivalry between Edward Drinker Cope and Othniel Charles Marsh, both of whom raced to be the first to find new dinosaurs in what came to be known as the Bone Wars. This fight between the two scientists lasted for over 30 years, ending in 1897 when Cope died after spending his entire fortune on the dinosaur hunt. Many valuable dinosaur specimens were damaged or destroyed due to the pair’s rough methods: for example, their diggers often used dynamite to unearth bones. Modern paleontologists would find such methods crude and unacceptable, since blasting easily destroys fossil and stratigraphic evidence. Despite their unrefined methods, the contributions of Cope and Marsh to paleontology were vast: Marsh unearthed 86 new species of dinosaur and Cope discovered 56, a total of 142 new species. Cope’s collection is now at the American Museum of Natural History in New York City, while Marsh’s is at the Peabody Museum of Natural History at Yale University.“Dinosaur renaissance” and beyondFile:Bulletin (1969) (19798844494).jpg|thumb|John Ostrom’s original restoration of DeinonychusDeinonychusWorld War II caused a pause in palaeontological research; after the war, research attention was also diverted increasingly to fossil mammals rather than dinosaurs, which were seen as sluggish and cold-blooded.JOURNAL, Taylor, M.P., Sauropod dinosaur research: a historical review, Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 2010, 343, 1, 361â386, 10.1144/SP343.22, 2010GSLSP.343..361T, 910635, BOOK, Naish, D., 2009, The Great Dinosaur Discoveries, 89â93, A & C Black Publishers Ltd., London, UK, 978-1-4081-1906-8, At the end of the 1960s, however, the field of dinosaur research experienced a surge in activity that remains ongoing.JOURNAL, Arbour, V., 2018, Results roll in from the dinosaur renaissance, Science, 360, 6389, 611, 10.1126/science.aat0451, 2018Sci...360..611A, 46887409, Several seminal studies led to this activity. First, John Ostrom discovered the bird-like dromaeosaurid theropod Deinonychus and described it in 1969. Its anatomy indicated that it was an active predator that was likely warm-blooded, in marked contrast to the then-prevailing image of dinosaurs. Concurrently, Robert T. Bakker published a series of studies that likewise argued for active lifestyles in dinosaurs based on anatomical and ecological evidence (see {{section link||Physiology}}), which were subsequently summarized in his 1986 book The Dinosaur Heresies.{{harvnb|Bakker|1986}}File:Dr. Bob Bakker with Dino.jpg|thumb|left|Paleontologist Robert T. Bakker with a mounted skeleton of a tyrannosaurid (Gorgosaurus libratus)]]New revelations were supported by an increase in dinosaur discoveries. Major new dinosaur discoveries have been made by paleontologists working in previously unexplored regions, including India, South America, Madagascar, Antarctica, and most significantly China. Across theropods, sauropodomorphs, and ornithischians, the number of named genera began to increase exponentially in the 1990s. {{as of|2008|post=,}} over 30 new species of dinosaurs were named each year. At least sauropodomorphs experienced a further increase in the number of named species in the 2010s, with an average of 9.3 new species having been named each year between 2009 and 2020. As a consequence, more sauropodomorphs were named between 1990 and 2020 than in all previous years combined.JOURNAL, Cashmore, D.D., Mannion, P.D., Upchurch, P., Butler, R.J., 2020, Ten more years of discovery: revisiting the quality of the sauropodomorph dinosaur fossil record, Palaeontology, 63, 6, 951â978, 10.1111/pala.12496, 2020Palgy..63..951C, 219090716, free, These new localities also led to improvements in overall specimen quality, with new species being increasingly named not on scrappy fossils but on more complete skeletons, sometimes from multiple individuals. Better specimens also led to new species being invalidated less frequently.JOURNAL, Benton, M.J., 2008, Fossil quality and naming dinosaurs, Biology Letters, 4, 6, 729â732, 10.1098/rsbl.2008.0402, 18796391, 2614166, Asian localities have produced the most complete theropod specimens,JOURNAL, Cashmore, D.D., Butler, R.J., 2019, Skeletal completeness of the non-avian theropod dinosaur fossil record, Palaeontology, 62, 6, 951â981, 10.1111/pala.12436, 197571209, free, 2019Palgy..62..951C, while North American localities have produced the most complete sauropodomorph specimens.Prior to the dinosaur renaissance, dinosaurs were mostly classified using the traditional rank-based system of Linnaean taxonomy. The renaissance was also accompanied by the increasingly widespread application of cladistics, a more objective method of classification based on ancestry and shared traits, which has proved tremendously useful in the study of dinosaur systematics and evolution. Cladistic analysis, among other techniques, helps to compensate for an often incomplete and fragmentary fossil record.BOOK, Holtz, T.R. Jr., Brett-Surman, M.K., 1997, The Taxonomy and Systematics of Dinosaurs, The Complete Dinosaur, Indiana University Press, Bloomington, 209â223, 978-0-253-33349-0,books.google.com/books?id=Hk5ecvEv0GcC&pg=PA209, NEWS, St. Fleur, Nicholas, That Thing With Feathers Trapped in Amber? It Was a Dinosaur Tail,www.nytimes.com/2016/12/08/science/dinosaur-feathers-amber.html, live, registration, December 8, 2016, Trilobites, The New York Times, New York, 0362-4331,web.archive.org/web/20170831181949/https://www.nytimes.com/2016/12/08/science/dinosaur-feathers-amber.html, August 31, 2017, December 8, 2016, Reference books summarizing the state of dinosaur research, such as David B. Weishampel and colleagues’ The Dinosauria, made knowledge more accessibleJOURNAL, Lockley, M.G., Wright, J.L., 2000, Reading About Dinosaurs â An Annotated Bibliography of Books, Journal of Geoscience Education, 48, 2, 167â178, 10.5408/1089-9995-48.2.167, 2000JGeEd..48..167L, 151426669, and spurred further interest in dinosaur research. The release of the first and second editions of The Dinosauria in 1990 and 2004, and of a review paper by Paul Sereno in 1998, were accompanied by increases in the number of published phylogenetic trees for dinosaurs.JOURNAL, Lloyd, G.T., Davis, K.E., Pisani, D., Tarver, J.E., Ruta, R., Sakamoto, M., Hone, D.W.E., Jennings, R., Benton, M.J., 2008, Dinosaurs and the Cretaceous Terrestrial Revolution, Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 275, 1650, 2483â2490, 10.1098/rspb.2008.0715, 18647715, 2603200,Soft tissue and molecular preservationFile:Dakota skin impression.jpg|thumb|An EdmontosaurusEdmontosaurusDinosaur fossils are not limited to bones, but also include imprints or mineralized remains of skin coverings, organs, and other tissues. Of these, skin coverings based on keratin proteins are most easily preserved because of their cross-linked, hydrophobic molecular structure.JOURNAL, Schweitzer, M.H., 2011, Soft Tissue Preservation in Terrestrial Mesozoic Vertebrates, Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences, 39, 187â216, 10.1146/annurev-earth-040610-133502, 2011AREPS..39..187S, Fossils of keratin-based skin coverings or bony skin coverings are known from most major groups of dinosaurs. Dinosaur fossils with scaly skin impressions have been found since the 19th century. Samuel Beckles discovered a sauropod forelimb with preserved skin in 1852 that was incorrectly attributed to a crocodile; it was correctly attributed by Marsh in 1888 and subject to further study by Reginald Hooley in 1917. Among ornithischians, in 1884 Jacob Wortman found skin impressions on the first known specimen of Edmontosaurus annectens, which were largely destroyed during the specimen’s excavation.JOURNAL, H.F., Osborn, 1912, Integument of the iguanodont dinosaur Trachodon, Memoirs of the American Museum of Natural History, 1, 33â54, Owen and Hooley subsequently described skin impressions of Hypsilophodon and Iguanodon in 1885 and 1917.JOURNAL, Hooley, R.W., 1917, IIâOn the Integument of Iguanodon bernissartensis, Boulenger, and of Morosaurus becklesii, Mantell, Geological Magazine, 4, 4, 148â150, 10.1017/s0016756800192386, 1917GeoM....4..148H, 129640665,zenodo.org/record/1537494, Since then, scale impressions have been most frequently found among hadrosaurids, where the impressions are known from nearly the entire body across multiple specimens.BOOK, Bell, P.R., 2014, A review of hadrosaur skin impressions, Eberth, D., Evans, D., The Hadrosaurs: Proceedings of the International Hadrosaur Symposium, 572â590, Bloomington, Princeton University Press, {{multiple image|align=left|perrow=1/2|caption_align=center | caption1=Colour restoration of Sinosauropteryx | caption2=Colour restoration of Psittacosaurus}}Starting from the 1990s, major discoveries of exceptionally preserved fossils in deposits known as conservation Lagerstätten contributed to research on dinosaur soft tissues.JOURNAL, Eliason, C.M., Hudson, L., Watts, T., Garza, H., Clarke, J.A., 2017, Exceptional preservation and the fossil record of tetrapod integument, Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 284, 1862, 1â10, 10.1098/rspb.2017.0556, 28878057, 5597822, JOURNAL, Benton, M.J., 1998, Dinosaur fossils with soft parts, Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 13, 8, 303â304, 10.1016/s0169-5347(98)01420-7, 21238317,doc.rero.ch/record/14715/files/PAL_E1646.pdf, Chiefly among these were the rocks that produced the Jehol (Early Cretaceous) and Yanliao (Mid-to-Late Jurassic) biotas of northeastern China, from which hundreds of dinosaur specimens bearing impressions of feather-like structures (both closely related to birds and otherwise, see {{section link||Origin of birds}}) have been described by Xing Xu and colleagues.JOURNAL, Zhou, Z.-H., Wang, Y., 2017, Vertebrate assemblages of the Jurassic Yanliao Biota and the Early Cretaceous Jehol Biota: Comparisons and implications, Palaeoworld, 26, 2, 241â252, 10.1016/j.palwor.2017.01.002, JOURNAL, Norell, M.A., Xu, X., 2005, Feathered Dinosaurs, Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences, 33, 277â299, 10.1146/annurev.earth.33.092203.122511, 2005AREPS..33..277N, In living reptiles and mammals, pigment-storing cellular structures known as melanosomes are partially responsible for producing colouration.JOURNAL, Vinther, J., 2020, Reconstructing Vertebrate Paleocolor, Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences, 48, 345â375, 10.1146/annurev-earth-073019-045641, 2020AREPS..48..345V, 219768255, free, Both chemical traces of melanin and characteristically shaped melanosomes have been reported from feathers and scales of Jehol and Yanliao dinosaurs, including both theropods and ornithischians.JOURNAL, Zhang, F., Kearns, S.L., Orr, P.J., Benton, M.J., Zhou, Z., Johnson, D., Xu, X., Wang, X., 2010, Fossilized melanosomes and the colour of Cretaceous dinosaurs and birds, Nature, 463, 7284, 1075â1078, 10.1038/nature08740, 20107440, 2010Natur.463.1075Z, 205219587,oro.open.ac.uk/22432/2/41064696.pdf, This has enabled multiple full-body reconstructions of dinosaur colouration, such as for SinosauropteryxJOURNAL, Smithwick, F.M., Nicholls, R., Cuthill, I.C., Vinther, J., 2017, Countershading and Stripes in the Theropod Dinosaur Sinosauropteryx Reveal Heterogeneous Habitats in the Early Cretaceous Jehol Biota, Current Biology, 27, 21, 3337â3343.e2, 10.1016/j.cub.2017.09.032, 29107548, free, 2017CBio...27E3337S, 1983/8ee95b15-5793-42ad-8e57-da6524635349, free, and PsittacosaurusJOURNAL, Vinther, J., Nicholls, R., Lautenschlager, S., Pittman, M., Kaye, T.G., Rayfield, E., Mayr, G., Cuthill, I.C., 2016, 3D Camouflage in an Ornithischian Dinosaur, Current Biology, 26, 18, 2456â2462, 10.1016/j.cub.2016.06.065, 27641767, 5049543, 2016CBio...26.2456V, by Jakob Vinther and colleagues, and similar techniques have also been extended to dinosaur fossils from other localities.JOURNAL, Roy, A., Pittman, M., Saitta, E.T., Kaye, T.G., Xu, X., 2020, Recent advances in amniote palaeocolour reconstruction and a framework for future research, Biological Reviews, 95, 1, 22â50, 10.1111/brv.12552, 31538399, 7004074, (However, some researchers have also suggested that fossilized melanosomes represent bacterial remains.JOURNAL, Lindgren, J., Moyer, A., Schweitzer, M.H., Sjövall, P., Uvdal, P., Nilsson, D.E., Heimdal, J., Engdahl, A., Gren, J.A., Schultz, B.P., Kear, B.P., 2015, Interpreting melanin-based coloration through deep time: a critical review, Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 282, 1813, 20150614, 26290071, 10.1098/rspb.2015.0614, 4632609, JOURNAL, Schweitzer, M.H., Lindgren, J., Moyer, A.E., 2015, Melanosomes and ancient coloration re-examined: a response to Vinther 2015 (DOI 10.1002/bies.201500018), BioEssays, 37, 11, 1174â1183, 10.1002/bies.201500061, 26434749, 45178498, ) Stomach contents in some Jehol and Yanliao dinosaurs closely related to birds have also provided indirect indications of diet and digestive system anatomy (e.g., crops).JOURNAL, Zhou, Z., 2014, The Jehol Biota, an Early Cretaceous terrestrial Lagerstätte: new discoveries and implications, National Science Review, 1, 4, 543â559, 10.1093/nsr/nwu055, free, JOURNAL, O’Connor, J.K., Zhou, Z., 2019, The evolution of the modern avian digestive system: insights from paravian fossils from the Yanliao and Jehol biotas, Palaeontology, 63, 1, 13â27, 10.1111/pala.12453, 210265348, More concrete evidence of internal anatomy has been reported in Scipionyx from the Pietraroja Plattenkalk of Italy. It preserves portions of the intestines, colon, liver, muscles, and windpipe.File:9121 - Milano, Museo storia naturale - Scipionyx samniticus - Foto Giovanni Dall’Orto 22-Apr-2007a.jpg|thumb|Scipionyx fossil with intestines, Natural History Museum of Milan ]]Concurrently, a line of work led by Mary Higby Schweitzer, Jack Horner, and colleagues reported various occurrences of preserved soft tissues and proteins within dinosaur bone fossils. Various mineralized structures that likely represented red blood cells and collagen fibres had been found by Schweitzer and others in tyrannosaurid bones as early as 1991.JOURNAL, Morell, V., 1993, Dino DNA: the Hunt and the Hype, Science, 261, 5118, 160â162, 10.1126/science.8327889, 8327889, 1993Sci...261..160M, JOURNAL, Pawlicki, R., Korbel, A., Kubiak, H., 1996, Cells, Collagen Fibrils and Vessels in Dinosaur Bone, Nature, 211, 5049, 655â657, 10.1038/211655a0, 5968744, 4181847, JOURNAL, Pawlicki, R., Nowogrodzka-Zagórska, M., 1998, Blood vessels and red blood cells preserved in dinosaur bones, Annals of Anatomy â Anatomischer Anzeiger, 180, 1, 73â77, 10.1016/S0940-9602(98)80140-4, 9488909, However, in 2005, Schweitzer and colleagues reported that a femur of Tyrannosaurus preserved soft, flexible tissue within, including blood vessels, bone matrix, and connective tissue (bone fibers) that had retained their microscopic structure. This discovery suggested that original soft tissues could be preserved over geological time, with multiple mechanisms having been proposed.JOURNAL, Anderson, L.A., 2023, A chemical framework for the preservation of fossil vertebrate cells and soft tissues, Earth-Science Reviews, 240, 104367, 10.1016/j.earscirev.2023.104367, 2023ESRv..24004367A, 257326012, free, Later, in 2009, Schweitzer and colleagues reported that a Brachylophosaurus femur preserved similar microstructures, and immunohistochemical techniques (based on antibody binding) demonstrated the presence of proteins such as collagen, elastin, and laminin.JOURNAL, Schweitzer, M.H., Zheng, W., Organ, C.L., Avci, R., Suo, Z., Freimark, L.M., LeBleu, V.S., Duncan, M.B., van der Heiden, M.G., Neveu, J.M., Lane, W.S., Cottrell, J.S., Horner, J.R., Cantley, L.C., Kalluri, R., Asara, J.M., 2009, Biomolecular characterization and protein sequences of the Campanian hadrosaur B. canadensis, Science, 324, 5927, 626â631, 10.1126/science.1165069, 19407199, 2009Sci...324..626S, 5358680, Both specimens yielded collagen protein sequences that were viable for molecular phylogenetic analyses, which grouped them with birds as would be expected.JOURNAL, Organ, C.L., Schweitzer, M.H., Zheng, W., Freimark, L.M., Cantley, L.C., Asara, J.M., 2008, Molecular Phylogenetics of Mastodon and Tyrannosaurus rex, Science, 320, 5875, 499, 10.1126/science.1154284, 18436782, 2008Sci...320..499O, 24971064, The extraction of fragmentary DNA has also been reported for both of these fossils,JOURNAL, Schweitzer, M.H., Zheng, W., Cleland, T.P., Bern, M., 2013, Molecular analyses of dinosaur osteocytes support the presence of endogenous molecules, Bone (journal), Bone, Amsterdam, Elsevier, 52, 1, 414â423, 10.1016/j.bone.2012.10.010, 8756-3282, 23085295, along with a specimen of Hypacrosaurus.JOURNAL, Bailleul, A.M., Zheng, W., Horner, J.R., Hall, B.K., Holliday, C.M., Schweitzer, M.H., 2020, Evidence of proteins, chromosomes and chemical markers of DNA in exceptionally preserved dinosaur cartilage, National Science Review, 7, 4, 815â822, 10.1093/nsr/nwz206, 34692099, 8289162, In 2015, Sergio Bertazzo and colleagues reported the preservation of collagen fibres and red blood cells in eight Cretaceous dinosaur specimens that did not show any signs of exceptional preservation, indicating that soft tissue may be preserved more commonly than previously thought.JOURNAL, Bertazzo, S., Maidment, S.C.R., Susannah Maidment, Kallepitis, C., Fearn, S., Stevens, M.M., Xie, H.-N., 3, 2015, Fibres and cellular structures preserved in 75-million-year-old dinosaur specimens, Nature Communications, 6, 7352, 2015NatCo...6.7352B, 10.1038/ncomms8352, 2041-1723, 4468865, 26056764, Suggestions that these structures represent bacterial biofilmsJOURNAL, Kaye, T.G., Gaugler, G., Sawlowicz, Z., 2008, Dinosaurian Soft Tissues Interpreted as Bacterial Biofilms, PLOS ONE, 3, 7, e2808, 10.1371/journal.pone.0002808, 18665236, 2483347, 2008PLoSO...3.2808K, free, have been rejected,JOURNAL, Peterson, J.E., Lenczewski, M.E., Scherer, R.P., 2010, Influence of Microbial Biofilms on the Preservation of Primary Soft Tissue in Fossil and Extant Archosaurs, PLOS ONE, 5, 10, e13334, 2010PLoSO...513334P, 10.1371/journal.pone.0013334, free, 1932-6203, 2953520, 20967227, but cross-contamination remains a possibility that is difficult to detect.JOURNAL, Buckley, M., Warwood, S., van Dongen, B., Kitchener, A.C., Manning, P.L., 2017, A fossil protein chimera; difficulties in discriminating dinosaur peptide sequences from modern cross-contamination, Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 284, 1855, 10.1098/rspb.2017.0544, 28566488, 5454271, Evolutionary historyOrigins and early evolutionFile:Herrerasaurusskeleton.jpg|thumb|alt=Full skeleton of an early carnivorous dinosaur, displayed in a glass case in a museum|The early dinosaurs Herrerasaurus (large), Eoraptor (small) and a Plateosaurus skull, from the TriassicTriassicDinosaurs diverged from their archosaur ancestors during the Middle to Late Triassic epochs, roughly 20 million years after the devastating PermianâTriassic extinction event wiped out an estimated 96% of all marine species and 70% of terrestrial vertebrate species approximately 252 million years ago. The oldest dinosaur fossils known from substantial remains date to the Carnian epoch of the Triassic period and have been found primarily in the Ischigualasto and Santa Maria Formations of Argentina and Brazil, and the Pebbly Arkose Formation of Zimbabwe.JOURNAL, Griffin, C.T., Wynd, B.M., Munyikwa, D., Broderick, T.J., Zondo, M., Tolan, S., Langer, M.C., Nesbitt, S.J., Taruvinga, H.R., 2022, Africa’s oldest dinosaurs reveal early suppression of dinosaur distribution, Nature, 609, 7926, 313â319, 10.1038/s41586-022-05133-x, 36045297, 2022Natur.609..313G, 251977824, 0028-0836, The Ischigualasto Formation (radiometrically dated at 231-230 million years oldJOURNAL, Desojo, J.B., Fiorelli, L.E., Ezcurra, M.D., Martinelli, A.G., Ramezani, J., Da Rosa, A.A.S., Belén von Baczko, M., Jimena Trotteyn, M., Montefeltro, F.C., Ezpeleta, M., Langer, M.C., 2020, The Late Triassic Ischigualasto Formation at Cerro Las Lajas (La Rioja, Argentina): fossil tetrapods, high-resolution chronostratigraphy, and faunal correlations, Scientific Reports, 10, 1, 12782, 10.1038/s41598-020-67854-1, 32728077, 7391656, 2020NatSR..1012782D, ) has produced the early saurischian Eoraptor, originally considered a member of the HerrerasauridaeJOURNAL, Alcober, Oscar A., Martinez, Ricardo N., 2010, A new herrerasaurid (Dinosauria, Saurischia) from the Upper Triassic Ischigualasto Formation of northwestern Argentina, ZooKeys, Sofia, Pensoft Publishers, 63, 55â81, 10.3897/zookeys.63.550, 3088398, 1313-2989, 21594020, 2010ZooK...63...55A, free, but now considered to be an early sauropodomorph, along with the herrerasaurids Herrerasaurus and Sanjuansaurus, and the sauropodomorphs Chromogisaurus, Eodromaeus, and Panphagia.JOURNAL, Novas, F.E., Agnolin, F.L., Ezcurra, M.D., Müller, R.T., Martinelli, A., Langer, M., 2021, Review of the fossil record of early dinosaurs from South America, and its phylogenetic implications, Journal of South American Earth Sciences, 110, 103341, 10.1016/j.jsames.2021.103341, 0895-9811, 2021JSAES.11003341N, Eoraptor{{’s}} likely resemblance to the common ancestor of all dinosaurs suggests that the first dinosaurs would have been small, bipedal predators.JOURNAL, Nesbitt, Sterling J, Sues, Hans-Dieter, The osteology of the early-diverging dinosaur Daemonosaurus chauliodus (Archosauria: Dinosauria) from the Coelophysis Quarry (Triassic: Rhaetian) of New Mexico and its relationships to other early dinosaurs, Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 2021, 191, 1, 150â179, 10.1093/zoolinnean/zlaa080, free, The Santa Maria Formation (radiometrically dated to be older, at 233.23 million years oldJOURNAL, Langer, Max C., Ramezani, Jahandar, Da Rosa, Ãtila A.S., U-Pb age constraints on dinosaur rise from south Brazil, May 2018, Gondwana Research, Amsterdam, Elsevier, 57, 133â140, 10.1016/j.gr.2018.01.005, 2018GondR..57..133L, 1342-937X, ) has produced the herrerasaurids Gnathovorax and Staurikosaurus, along with the sauropodomorphs Bagualosaurus, Buriolestes, Guaibasaurus, Macrocollum, Nhandumirim, Pampadromaeus, Saturnalia, and Unaysaurus. The Pebbly Arkose Formation, which is of uncertain age but was likely comparable to the other two, has produced the sauropodomorph Mbiresaurus, along with an unnamed herrerasaurid.Less well-preserved remains of the sauropodomorphs Jaklapallisaurus and Nambalia, along with the early saurischian Alwalkeria, are known from the Upper Maleri and Lower Maleri Formations of India.JOURNAL, Novas, F.E., Ezcurra, M.D., Chatterjee, S., Kutty, T.S., 2011, New dinosaur species from the Upper Triassic Upper Maleri and Lower Dharmaram formations of central India, Earth and Environmental Science Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh, 101, 3â4, 333â349, 10.1017/S1755691011020093, 2010EESTR.101..333N, 128620874, The Carnian-aged Chañares Formation of Argentina preserves primitive, dinosaur-like ornithodirans such as Lagosuchus and Lagerpeton in Argentina, making it another important site for understanding dinosaur evolution. These ornithodirans support the model of early dinosaurs as small, bipedal predators.JOURNAL, Marsicano, C.A., Irmis, R.B., Mancuso, A.C., Mundil, R., Chemale, F., 2016, The precise temporal calibration of dinosaur origins, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 113, 3, 509â513, 10.1073/pnas.1512541112, 26644579, 4725541, 2016PNAS..113..509M, free, Dinosaurs may have appeared as early as the Anisian epoch of the Triassic, approximately 243 million years ago, which is the age of Nyasasaurus from the Manda Formation of Tanzania. However, its known fossils are too fragmentary to identify it as a dinosaur or only a close relative.JOURNAL, Nesbitt, Sterling J., Barrett, Paul M., Werning, Sarah, Sidor, Christian A., Christian Sidor, Charig, Alan J., Alan J. Charig, 3, 2012, The oldest dinosaur? A Middle Triassic dinosauriform from Tanzania, Biology Letters, 9, 1, 20120949, London, Royal Society, 10.1098/rsbl.2012.0949, 1744-9561, 3565515, 23221875, The referral of the Manda Formation to the Anisian is also uncertain. Regardless, dinosaurs existed alongside non-dinosaurian ornithodirans for a period of time, with estimates ranging from 5â10 million yearsJOURNAL, Marsicano, C.A., Irmis, R.B., Mancuso, A.C., Mundil, R., Chemale, F., 2015, The precise temporal calibration of dinosaur origins, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 113, 3, 509â513, 10.1073/pnas.1512541112, 26644579, 4725541, 2016PNAS..113..509M, 0027-8424, free, to 21 million years.When dinosaurs appeared, they were not the dominant terrestrial animals. The terrestrial habitats were occupied by various types of archosauromorphs and therapsids, like cynodonts and rhynchosaurs. Their main competitors were the pseudosuchians, such as aetosaurs, ornithosuchids and rauisuchians, which were more successful than the dinosaurs.JOURNAL, Brusatte, Stephen L., Stephen L. Brusatte, Benton, Michael J., Ruta, Marcello, Marcello Ruta, Lloyd, Graeme T., 2008, Superiority, Competition, and Opportunism in the Evolutionary Radiation of Dinosaurs,www.pure.ed.ac.uk/ws/files/8232088/PDF_Brusatteetal2008SuperiorityCompetition.pdf,web.archive.org/web/20180719005836/https://www.pure.ed.ac.uk/ws/files/8232088/PDF_Brusatteetal2008SuperiorityCompetition.pdf, 2018-07-19, live, Science, Washington, D.C., American Association for the Advancement of Science, 321, 5895, 1485â1488, 10.1126/science.1161833, 2008Sci...321.1485B, 0036-8075, 18787166, October 22, 2019, 20.500.11820/00556baf-6575-44d9-af39-bdd0b072ad2b, 13393888, Most of these other animals became extinct in the Triassic, in one of two events. First, at about 215 million years ago, a variety of basal archosauromorphs, including the protorosaurs, became extinct. This was followed by the TriassicâJurassic extinction event (about 201 million years ago), that saw the end of most of the other groups of early archosaurs, like aetosaurs, ornithosuchids, phytosaurs, and rauisuchians. Rhynchosaurs and dicynodonts survived (at least in some areas) at least as late as earlyââmid Norian and late Norian or earliest Rhaetian stages, respectively,{{harvnb|Tanner|Spielmann|Lucas|2013|pp=562â566|loc=“The first Norian (Revueltian) rhynchosaur: Bull Canyon Formation, New Mexico, U.S.A.” by Justin A. Spielmann, Spencer G. Lucas and Adrian P. Hunt.}}JOURNAL, Sulej, Tomasz, Niedźwiedzki, Grzegorz, 2019, An elephant-sized Late Triassic synapsid with erect limbs, Science, Washington, D.C., American Association for the Advancement of Science, 363, 6422, 78â80, 10.1126/science.aal4853, 0036-8075, 30467179, 2019Sci...363...78S, 53716186, free, and the exact date of their extinction is uncertain. These losses left behind a land fauna of crocodylomorphs, dinosaurs, mammals, pterosaurians, and turtles. The first few lines of early dinosaurs diversified through the Carnian and Norian stages of the Triassic, possibly by occupying the niches of the groups that became extinct. Also notably, there was a heightened rate of extinction during the Carnian pluvial event.NEWS, April 19, 2018, Fossil tracks in the Alps help explain dinosaur evolution,www.economist.com/science-and-technology/2018/04/19/fossil-tracks-in-the-alps-help-explain-dinosaur-evolution, registration, Science and Technology, The Economist, London, 0013-0613, May 24, 2018,Evolution and paleobiogeographyFile:Pangaea 200Ma.jpg|thumb|upright=1.5|The supercontinent Pangaea in the early MesozoicMesozoicDinosaur evolution after the Triassic followed changes in vegetation and the location of continents. In the Late Triassic and Early Jurassic, the continents were connected as the single landmass Pangaea, and there was a worldwide dinosaur fauna mostly composed of coelophysoid carnivores and early sauropodomorph herbivores. Gymnosperm plants (particularly conifers), a potential food source, radiated in the Late Triassic. Early sauropodomorphs did not have sophisticated mechanisms for processing food in the mouth, and so must have employed other means of breaking down food farther along the digestive tract. The general homogeneity of dinosaurian faunas continued into the Middle and Late Jurassic, where most localities had predators consisting of ceratosaurians, megalosauroids, and allosauroids, and herbivores consisting of stegosaurian ornithischians and large sauropods. Examples of this include the Morrison Formation of North America and Tendaguru Beds of Tanzania. Dinosaurs in China show some differences, with specialized metriacanthosaurid theropods and unusual, long-necked sauropods like Mamenchisaurus. Ankylosaurians and ornithopods were also becoming more common, but primitive sauropodomorphs had become extinct. Conifers and pteridophytes were the most common plants. Sauropods, like earlier sauropodomorphs, were not oral processors, but ornithischians were evolving various means of dealing with food in the mouth, including potential cheek-like organs to keep food in the mouth, and jaw motions to grind food. Another notable evolutionary event of the Jurassic was the appearance of true birds, descended from maniraptoran coelurosaurians.By the Early Cretaceous and the ongoing breakup of Pangaea, dinosaurs were becoming strongly differentiated by landmass. The earliest part of this time saw the spread of ankylosaurians, iguanodontians, and brachiosaurids through Europe, North America, and northern Africa. These were later supplemented or replaced in Africa by large spinosaurid and carcharodontosaurid theropods, and rebbachisaurid and titanosaurian sauropods, also found in South America. In Asia, maniraptoran coelurosaurians like dromaeosaurids, troodontids, and oviraptorosaurians became the common theropods, and ankylosaurids and early ceratopsians like Psittacosaurus became important herbivores. Meanwhile, Australia was home to a fauna of basal ankylosaurians, hypsilophodonts, and iguanodontians. The stegosaurians appear to have gone extinct at some point in the late Early Cretaceous or early Late Cretaceous. A major change in the Early Cretaceous, which would be amplified in the Late Cretaceous, was the evolution of flowering plants. At the same time, several groups of dinosaurian herbivores evolved more sophisticated ways to orally process food. Ceratopsians developed a method of slicing with teeth stacked on each other in batteries, and iguanodontians refined a method of grinding with dental batteries, taken to its extreme in hadrosaurids. Some sauropods also evolved tooth batteries, best exemplified by the rebbachisaurid Nigersaurus.There were three general dinosaur faunas in the Late Cretaceous. In the northern continents of North America and Asia, the major theropods were tyrannosaurids and various types of smaller maniraptoran theropods, with a predominantly ornithischian herbivore assemblage of hadrosaurids, ceratopsians, ankylosaurids, and pachycephalosaurians. In the southern continents that had made up the now-splitting supercontinent Gondwana, abelisaurids were the common theropods, and titanosaurian sauropods the common herbivores. Finally, in Europe, dromaeosaurids, rhabdodontid iguanodontians, nodosaurid ankylosaurians, and titanosaurian sauropods were prevalent. Flowering plants were greatly radiating, with the first grasses appearing by the end of the Cretaceous. Grinding hadrosaurids and shearing ceratopsians became very diverse across North America and Asia. Theropods were also radiating as herbivores or omnivores, with therizinosaurians and ornithomimosaurians becoming common.The CretaceousâPaleogene extinction event, which occurred approximately 66 million years ago at the end of the Cretaceous, caused the extinction of all dinosaur groups except for the neornithine birds. Some other diapsid groups, including crocodilians, dyrosaurs, sebecosuchians, turtles, lizards, snakes, sphenodontians, and choristoderans, also survived the event.The surviving lineages of neornithine birds, including the ancestors of modern ratites, ducks and chickens, and a variety of waterbirds, diversified rapidly at the beginning of the Paleogene period, entering ecological niches left vacant by the extinction of Mesozoic dinosaur groups such as the arboreal enantiornithines, aquatic hesperornithines, and even the larger terrestrial theropods (in the form of Gastornis, eogruiids, bathornithids, ratites, geranoidids, mihirungs, and “terror birds“). It is often stated that mammals out-competed the neornithines for dominance of most terrestrial niches but many of these groups co-existed with rich mammalian faunas for most of the Cenozoic Era.{{harvnb|Dyke|Kaiser|2011|loc=chpt. 14: “Bird Evolution Across the KâPg Boundary and the Basal Neornithine Diversification” by Bent E. K. Lindow. {{doi|10.1002/9781119990475.ch14}}}} Terror birds and bathornithids occupied carnivorous guilds alongside predatory mammals,JOURNAL, Cracraft, Joel, Joel Cracraft, 1968, A Review of the Bathornithidae (Aves, Gruiformes), with Remarks on the Relationships of the Suborder Cariamae,digitallibrary.amnh.org/bitstream/handle/2246/253v2/dspace/ingest/pdfSource/nov/N2326.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y, American Museum Novitates, New York, American Museum of Natural History, 2326, 1â46, 0003-0082, 2246/2536, October 22, 2019, JOURNAL, Alvarenga, Herculano, Herculano Marcos Ferraz de Alvarenga, Jones, Washington W., Rinderknecht, Andrés, May 2010, The youngest record of phorusrhacid birds (Aves, Phorusrhacidae) from the late Pleistocene of Uruguay, https:www.researchgate.net/publication/233512584, Neues Jahrbuch für Geologie und Paläontologie, Stuttgart, E. Schweizerbart, 256, 2, 229â234, 10.1127/0077-7749/2010/0052, 0077-7749, October 22, 2019, and ratites are still fairly successful as mid-sized herbivores; eogruiids similarly lasted from the Eocene to Pliocene, becoming extinct only very recently after over 20 million years of co-existence with many mammal groups.{{harvnb|Mayr|2009}}Classification{{multiple image|align = right|perrow=2/2|total_width = 350|image1 = Saurischia pelvis.png|alt1 = |caption1 = Saurischian pelvis structure (left side)|image2 = Tyrannosaurus pelvis left.jpg|alt2 = |caption2 = Tyrannosaurus pelvis (showing saurischian structure â left side)|image3 = Ornithischia pelvis.png|alt3 = |caption3 = Ornithischian pelvis structure (left side)|image4 = Edmontosaurus pelvis left.jpg|alt4 = |caption4 = Edmontosaurus pelvis (showing ornithischian structure â left side)}}Dinosaurs belong to a group known as archosaurs, which also includes modern crocodilians. Within the archosaur group, dinosaurs are differentiated most noticeably by their gait. Dinosaur legs extend directly beneath the body, whereas the legs of lizards and crocodilians sprawl out to either side.Collectively, dinosaurs as a clade are divided into two primary branches, Saurischia and Ornithischia. Saurischia includes those taxa sharing a more recent common ancestor with birds than with Ornithischia, while Ornithischia includes all taxa sharing a more recent common ancestor with Triceratops than with Saurischia. Anatomically, these two groups can be distinguished most noticeably by their pelvic structure. Early saurischiansâ“lizard-hipped”, from the Greek ’ () meaning “lizard” and ’ () meaning “hip joint“âretained the hip structure of their ancestors, with a pubis bone directed cranially, or forward. This basic form was modified by rotating the pubis backward to varying degrees in several groups (Herrerasaurus, therizinosauroids, dromaeosaurids, and birds). Saurischia includes the theropods (exclusively bipedal and with a wide variety of diets) and sauropodomorphs (long-necked herbivores which include advanced, quadrupedal groups).JOURNAL, Taylor, Michael P., Michael P. Taylor, Wedel, Mathew J., Matt Wedel, 2013, Why sauropods had long necks; and why giraffes have short necks, PeerJ, Corte Madera, California, Corte Madera, CA; London, 1, e36, 10.7717/peerj.36, 2167-8359, 23638372, 3628838, free, By contrast, ornithischiansâ“bird-hipped”, from the Greek ornitheios (á½ÏνίθειοÏ) meaning “of a bird” and ischion (á¼°ÏÏίον) meaning “hip joint“âhad a pelvis that superficially resembled a bird’s pelvis: the pubic bone was oriented caudally (rear-pointing). Unlike birds, the ornithischian pubis also usually had an additional forward-pointing process. Ornithischia includes a variety of species that were primarily herbivores.Despite the terms “bird hip” (Ornithischia) and “lizard hip” (Saurischia), birds are not part of Ornithischia. Birds instead belong to Saurischia, the “lizard-hipped” dinosaursâbirds evolved from earlier dinosaurs with “lizard hips”.TaxonomyThe following is a simplified classification of dinosaur groups based on their evolutionary relationships, and those of the main dinosaur groups Theropoda, Sauropodomorpha and Ornithischia, compiled by Justin Tweet.WEB, Justin Tweet,equatorialminnesota.blogspot.com/p/blog-page_20.html, Classification diagrams, Equatorial Minnesota, 2022-09-06, Further details and other hypotheses of classification may be found on individual articles.
*â Ornithischia (“bird-hipped”; diverse bipedal and quadrupedal herbivores) File:Ceratopsidae-BW-003.png|thumb|Restoration of four ceratopsids: top left â Triceratops, top right â Styracosaurus, bottom left â Anchiceratops, bottom right â ChasmosaurusChasmosaurus
*â Heterodontosauridae (small herbivores/omnivores with prominent canine-like teeth)
*â Genasauria (“cheeked lizards“)
*â Thyreophora (armored dinosaurs; bipeds and quadrupeds)
*â Eurypoda (heavy, quadrupedal thyreophorans)
*â Neornithischia (“new ornithischians“)
*â Stegosauria (spikes and plates as primary armor)
*â Huayangosauridae (small stegosaurs with flank osteoderms and tail clubs)
*â Stegosauridae (large stegosaurs)
*â Ankylosauria (scutes as primary armor)
*â Parankylosauria (small, southern ankylosaurs with macuahuitl-like tails)
*â Nodosauridae (mostly spiky, club-less ankylosaurs)
*â Ankylosauridae (characterized by flat scutes)
*â Ankylosaurinae (club-tailed ankylosaurids)
*â Cerapoda (“horned feet“)
*â Marginocephalia (characterized by a cranial growth)
*â Pachycephalosauria (bipeds with domed or knobby growth on skulls)
*â Ceratopsia (bipeds and quadrupeds; many had neck frills and horns)
*â Ornithopoda (various sizes; bipeds and quadrupeds; evolved a method of chewing using skull flexibility and numerous teeth)
*â Chaoyangsauridae (small, frill-less basal ceratopsians)
*â Neoceratopsia (“new ceratopsians“)
*â Leptoceratopsidae (little to no frills, hornless, with robust jaws)
*â Protoceratopsidae (basal ceratopsians with small frills and stubby horns)
*â Ceratopsoidea (large-horned ceratopsians)
*â Ceratopsidae (large, elaborately ornamented ceratopsians)
*â Chasmosaurinae (ceratopsids with enlarged brow horns)
*â Centrosaurinae (ceratopsids mostly characterized by frill and nasal ornamentation)
*â Nasutoceratopsini (centrosaurines with enlarged nasal cavities)
*â Centrosaurini (centrosaurines with enlarged nasal horns)
*â Pachyrhinosaurini (mostly had nasal bosses instead of horns)
*â Jeholosauridae (small Asian neornithischians)
*â Thescelosauridae (“wondrous lizards“)
*â Orodrominae (burrowers)
*â Thescelosaurinae (large thescelosaurids)
*â Iguanodontia (“iguana teeth”; advanced ornithopods)
*â Elasmaria (mostly southern ornithopods with mineralized plates along the ribs; may be thescelosaurids)
*â Rhabdodontomorpha (with distinctive dentition)
*â Rhabdodontidae (European rhabdodontomorphs)
*â Dryosauridae (mid-sized, small headed)
*â Ankylopollexia (early members mid-sized, stocky)
*â Styracosterna (“spiked sterna“)
*â Hadrosauriformes (ancestrally had a thumb spike; large quadrupedal herbivores, with teeth merged into dental batteries)
*â Hadrosauromorpha (hadrosaurids and their closest relatives)
*â Hadrosauridae (“duck-billed dinosaurs”; often with crests)
*â Saurolophinae (hadrosaurids with solid, small, no crests)
*â Brachylophosaurini (short-crested)
*â Kritosaurini (enlarged, solid nasal crests)
*â Saurolophini (small, spike-like crests)
*â Edmontosaurini (flat-headed saurolophines)
*â Lambeosaurinae (hadrosaurids often with hollow crests)
*â Aralosaurini (solid-crested)
*â Tsintaosaurini (vertical, tube-like crests)
*â Parasaurolophini (long, backwards-arcing crests)
*â Lambeosaurini (usually rounded crests)
*â Herrerasauridae (early bipedal carnivores)
*â Sauropodomorpha (herbivores with small heads, long necks, and long tails)
*â Unaysauridae (primitive, strictly bipedal “prosauropods“)
*â Plateosauria (diverse; bipeds and quadrupeds)
*Theropoda (carnivorous)
*â Massospondylidae (long-necked, primitive sauropodomorphs)
*â Riojasauridae (large, primitive sauropodomorphs)
*â Sauropodiformes (heavy, bipeds and quadrupeds)
*â Sauropoda (very large and heavy; quadrupedal)
*â Lessemsauridae (gigantic yet lacking several weight-saving adaptations)
*â Gravisauria (“heavy lizards“)
*â Eusauropoda (“true sauropods“)
*â Turiasauria (often large, widespread sauropods)
*â Neosauropoda (“new sauropods”; columnar limbs)
*â Diplodocoidea (skulls and tails elongated; teeth typically narrow and pencil-like)
*â Rebbachisauridae (short-necked, low-browsing diplodocoids often with high backs)
*â Flagellicaudata (whip-tailed)
*â Macronaria (boxy skulls; spoon- or pencil-shaped teeth)
*â Dicraeosauridae (small, short-necked diplodocoids with enlarged cervical and dorsal vertebrae)
*â Diplodocidae (extremely long-necked)
*â Apatosaurinae (robust cervical vertebrae)
*â Diplodocinae (long, thin necks)
*â Titanosauriformes (“titan lizard forms“)
*â Brachiosauridae (long-necked, long-armed macronarians)
*â Somphospondyli (“porous vertebrae“)
*â Euhelopodidae (stocky, mostly Asian)
*â Titanosauria (diverse; stocky, with wide hips; most common in the Late Cretaceous of southern continents)
*Neotheropoda (“new theropods“)
*â Coelophysoidea (early theropods; includes Coelophysis and close relatives)
*â “Dilophosaur-grade neotheropods” (larger kink-snouted dinosaurs)
*Averostra (“bird snouts“)
*â Ceratosauria (generally elaborately horned carnivores that existed from the Jurassic to Cretaceous periods, originally included Coelophysoidea)
*â Ceratosauridae (ceratosaurs with large teeth)
*â Abelisauroidea (ceratosaurs exemplified by reduced arms and hands)
*Tetanurae (stiff-tailed dinosaurs)
*â Abelisauridae (large abelisauroids with short arms and oftentimes elaborate facial ornamentation)
*â Noasauridae (diverse, generally light theropods; may include several obscure taxa)
*â Elaphrosaurinae (bird-like; omnivorous as juveniles but herbivorous as adults)
*â Noasaurinae (small carnivores)
*â Megalosauroidea (early group of large carnivores)
*â Piatnitzkysauridae (small basal megalosauroids endemic to the Americas)
*â Megalosauridae (large megalosauroids with powerful arms and hands)
*â Spinosauridae (crocodile-like, semiaquatic carnivores)
*Avetheropoda (“bird theropods“)
*â Carnosauria (large meat-eating dinosaurs; megalosauroids sometimes included)
*â Metriacanthosauridae (primitive Asian allosauroids)
*â Allosauridae (Allosaurus and its very closest relatives)
*â Carcharodontosauria (robust allosauroids)
*Coelurosauria (feathered theropods, with a range of body sizes and niches)
*â Carcharodontosauridae (includes some of the largest purely terrestrial carnivores)
*â Neovenatoridae (“new hunters”; may include megaraptorans)
*â “Nexus of basal coelurosaurs” (used by Tweet to denote well-known taxa with unstable positions at the base of Coelurosauria)
*â Megaraptora? (theropods with large hand claws; potentially tyrannosauroids)
*Tyrannoraptora (“tyrant thieves“)
*â Tyrannosauroidea (mostly large, primitive coelurosaurs)
*â Proceratosauridae (tyrannosauroids with head crests)
*â Tyrannosauridae (Tyrannosaurus and close relatives)
*Maniraptoriformes (bird-like dinosaurs)
*â Ornithomimosauria (small-headed, mostly toothless, omnivorous or possible herbivores)
*â Ornithomimidae (very ostrich-like dinosaurs)
*Maniraptora (dinosaurs with pennaceous feathers)
*â Alvarezsauroidea (small hunters with reduced forelimbs)
*â Alvarezsauridae (insectivores with only one enlarged digit)
*â Therizinosauria (tall, long-necked theropods; omnivores and herbivores)
*â Therizinosauroidea (larger therizinosaurs)
*â Oviraptorosauria (omnivorous, beaked dinosaurs)
*â Therizinosauridae (sloth-like herbivores, often with enlarged claws)
*â Caudipteridae (bird-like, basal oviraptorosaurs)
*â Caenagnathoidea (cassowary-like oviraptorosaurs)
*Paraves (avialans and their closest relatives)
*â Caenagnathidae (toothless oviraptorosaurs known from North America and Asia)
*â Oviraptoridae (characterized by two bony projections at the back of the mouth; exclusive to Asia)
*â Scansoriopterygidae (small tree-climbing theropods with membranous wings)
*â Deinonychosauria (toe-clawed dinosaurs; may not form a natural group)
*â Archaeopterygidae (small, winged theropods or primitive birds)
*â Troodontidae (omnivores; enlarged brain cavities)
*â Dromaeosauridae (“raptors“)
*Avialae (modern birds and extinct relatives)
*â Microraptoria (characterized by large wings on both the arms and legs; may have been capable of powered flight)
*â Eudromaeosauria (hunters with greatly enlarged sickle claws)
*â Unenlagiidae (piscivores; may be dromaeosaurids)
*â Halszkaraptorinae (duck-like; potentially semiaquatic)
*â Unenlagiinae (long-snouted) Timeline of major groupsTimeline of major dinosaur groups per {{harvcoltxt|Holtz|2007}}.ImageSize = width:1000px height:auto barincrement:15pxPlotArea = left:10px bottom:50px top:10px right:10pxPeriod = from:-251 till:0TimeAxis = orientation:horizontalScaleMajor = unit:year increment:10 start:-250ScaleMinor = unit:year increment:1 start:-251TimeAxis = orientation:horAlignBars = justifyLegend = orientation:vertical position:bottom columns:1Colors =
#legends
Legend = columns:1 left:100 top:20 columnwidth:100
id:CAR value:claret id:ANK value:rgb(0.4,0.3,0.196) id:HER value:teal id:HAD value:green id:OMN value:blue id:black value:black id:white value:white id:mesozoic value:rgb(0.54,0.54,0.258) id:triassic value:rgb(0.51,0.17,0.57) id:earlytriassic value:rgb(0.6,0.22,0.61) id:middletriassic value:rgb(0.73,0.53,0.71) id:latetriassic value:rgb(0.78,0.65,0.8) id:jurassic value:rgb(0.2,0.7,0.79) id:earlyjurassic value:rgb(0,0.69,0.89) id:middlejurassic value:rgb(0.52,0.81,0.91) id:latejurassic value:rgb(0.74,0.89,0.97) id:cretaceous value:rgb(0.5,0.78,0.31) id:earlycretaceous value:rgb(0.63,0.78,0.65) id:latecretaceous value:rgb(0.74,0.82,0.37) id:cenozoic value:rgb(0.54,0.54,0.258) id:paleogene value:rgb(0.99,0.6,0.32) id:paleocene value:rgb(0.99,0.65,0.37) id:eocene value:rgb(0.99,0.71,0.42) id:oligocene value:rgb(0.99,0.75,0.48) id:neogene value:rgb(0.999999,0.9,0.1) id:miocene value:rgb(0.999999,0.999999,0) id:pliocene value:rgb(0.97,0.98,0.68) id:quaternary value:rgb(0.98,0.98,0.5) id:pleistocene value:rgb(0.999999,0.95,0.68) id:holocene value:rgb(0.999,0.95,0.88) id:her value:red Legend:Herrerasauria id:pur value:purple Legend:Sauropodomorpha id:ther value:orange Legend:Theropoda id:orn value:green Legend:Ornithischia
bar:eratop
bar:space bar:periodtop bar:space bar:NAM1 bar:NAM2 bar:NAM3 bar:NAM4 bar:NAM5 bar:NAM6 bar:NAM7 bar:NAM8 bar:NAM9 bar:NAM10 bar:NAM11 bar:NAM12 bar:NAM13 bar:NAM14 bar:NAM15 bar:NAM16 bar:NAM17 bar:NAM18 bar:NAM19 bar:NAM20 bar:NAM21 bar:NAM22 bar:NAM23 bar:NAM24 bar:NAM25 bar:NAM26 bar:NAM27 bar:NAM28 bar:NAM29 bar:NAM30
bar:space
PlotData=
bar:period bar:space bar:era
align:center textcolor:black fontsize:M mark:(line,black) width:25
shift:(2,-5) bar:periodtop from: -251 till: -245 color:earlytriassic text:Ear. from: -245 till: -228 color:middletriassic text:Middle from: -228 till: -199.6 color:latetriassic text:Late from: -199.6 till: -175.6 color:earlyjurassic text:Early from: -175.6 till: -161.2 color:middlejurassic text:Middle from: -161.2 till: -145.5 color:latejurassic text:Late from: -145.5 till: -99.6 color:earlycretaceous text:Early from: -99.6 till: -65.5 color:latecretaceous text:Late from: -65.5 till: -55.8 color:paleocene text:Paleo. from: -55.8 till: -33.9 color:eocene text:Eocene from: -33.9 till: -23.03 color:oligocene text:Oligo. from: -23.03 till: -5.332 color:miocene text:Mio. from: -5.332 till: -2.588 color:pliocene text:Pl. from: -2.588 till: -0.0117 color:pleistocene text:Pl. from: -0.0117 till: 0 color:holocene text:H.
bar:eratop
PlotData=
from: -251 till: -199.6 color:triassic text:Triassic from: -199.6 till: -145.5 color:jurassic text:Jurassic from: -145.5 till: -65.5 color:cretaceous text:Cretaceous from: -65.5 till: -23.03 color:paleogene text:Paleogene from: -23.03 till: -2.588 color:neogene text:Neogene from: -2.588 till: 0 color:quaternary text:Q.
align:left fontsize:M mark:(line,white) width:5 anchor:till shift:(5,-4)
color:her bar:NAM1 from:-233.23 till:-210 text:Herrerasauridae
PlotData=
color:pur bar:NAM2 from:-231.4 till:-208 text:Guaibasauridae color:pur bar:NAM3 from:-225 till:-190 text:Plateosauridae color:pur bar:NAM4 from:-228 till:-213 text:Riojasauridae color:pur bar:NAM5 from:-227 till:-176 text:Massospondylidae color:pur bar:NAM6 from:-183 till:-175 text:Vulcanodontidae color:pur bar:NAM7 from:-168 till:-125 text:Turiasauria color:pur bar:NAM8 from:-175 till:-150 text:Cetiosauridae color:pur bar:NAM9 from:-174 till:-93 text:Diplodocoidea color:pur bar:NAM10 from:-157 till:-93 text:Brachiosauridae color:pur bar:NAM11 from:-140 till:-66 text:Titanosauria color:ther bar:NAM12 from:-221 till:-183 text:Coelophysoidea color:ther bar:NAM13 from:-199.3 till:-66 text:Ceratosauria color:ther bar:NAM14 from:-170 till:-85 text:Megalosauroidea color:ther bar:NAM15 from:-175.6 till:-88 text:Carnosauria color:ther bar:NAM16 from:-130 till:-66 text:Megaraptora color:ther bar:NAM17 from:-166 till:-66 text:Tyrannosauroidea color:ther bar:NAM18 from:-151.5 till:-108 text:Compsognathidae color:ther bar:NAM19 from:-140 till:-66 text:Ornithomimosauria color:ther bar:NAM20 from:-160 till:-66 text:Alvarezsauria color:ther bar:NAM21 from:-139 till:-66 text:Therizinosauria color:ther bar:NAM22 from:-130 till:-66 text:Oviraptorosauria color:ther bar:NAM23 from:-167 till:-66 text:Deinonychosauria color:ther bar:NAM24 from:-155 till:0 shift:(-45,5) text:Avialae color:orn bar:NAM25 from:-200 till:-140 text:Heterodontosauridae color:orn bar:NAM26 from:-169 till:-100 text:Stegosauria color:orn bar:NAM27 from:-170.3 till:-66 text:Ankylosauria color:orn bar:NAM28 from:-92 till:-66 text:Pachycephalosauria color:orn bar:NAM29 from:-161 till:-66 text:Ceratopsia color:orn bar:NAM30 from:-164 till:-66 text:Ornithopoda
align:center textcolor:black fontsize:M mark:(line,black) width:25
shift:(2,-5)
bar:period
from: -251 till: -245 color:earlytriassic text:Ear. from: -245 till: -228 color:middletriassic text:Middle from: -228 till: -199.6 color:latetriassic text:Late from: -199.6 till: -175.6 color:earlyjurassic text:Early from: -175.6 till: -161.2 color:middlejurassic text:Middle from: -161.2 till: -145.5 color:latejurassic text:Late from: -145.5 till: -99.6 color:earlycretaceous text:Early from: -99.6 till: -65.5 color:latecretaceous text:Late from: -65.5 till: -55.8 color:paleocene text:Paleo. from: -55.8 till: -33.9 color:eocene text:Eocene from: -33.9 till: -23.03 color:oligocene text:Oligo. from: -23.03 till: -5.332 color:miocene text:Mio. from: -5.332 till: -2.588 color:pliocene text:Pl. from: -2.588 till: -0.0117 color:pleistocene text:Pl. from: -0.0117 till: 0 color:holocene text:H.
bar:era
from: -251 till: -199.6 color:triassic text:Triassic from: -199.6 till: -145.5 color:jurassic text:Jurassic from: -145.5 till: -65.5 color:cretaceous text:Cretaceous from: -65.5 till: -23.03 color:paleogene text:Paleogene from: -23.03 till: -2.588 color:neogene text:Neogene from: -2.588 till: 0 color:quaternary text:Q. PaleobiologyKnowledge about dinosaurs is derived from a variety of fossil and non-fossil records, including fossilized bones, feces, trackways, gastroliths, feathers, impressions of skin, internal organs and other soft tissues.JOURNAL, Dal Sasso, Cristiano, Cristiano Dal Sasso, Signore, Marco, March 26, 1998, Exceptional soft-tissue preservation in a theropod dinosaur from Italy, Nature, London, Nature Research, 392, 6674, 383â387, 10.1038/32884, 1998Natur.392..383D, 4325093, 0028-0836,doc.rero.ch/record/14901/files/PAL_E2043.pdf,web.archive.org/web/20160920170653/https://doc.rero.ch/record/14901/files/PAL_E2043.pdf, 2016-09-20, live, Many fields of study contribute to our understanding of dinosaurs, including physics (especially biomechanics), chemistry, biology, and the Earth sciences (of which paleontology is a sub-discipline).JOURNAL, Farlow, James O., Dodson, Peter, Chinsamy, Anusuya, Anusuya Chinsamy-Turan, November 1995, Dinosaur Biology, Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics, Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, Palo Alto, California, Palo Alto, CA, Annual Reviews (publisher), Annual Reviews, 26, 445â471, 10.1146/annurev.es.26.110195.002305, 1545-2069, Two topics of particular interest and study have been dinosaur size and behavior.{{harvnb|Weishampel|Dodson|Osmólska|2004}}SizeFile:Longest dinosaur by clade.svg|alt=|thumb|upright=1.35 |Scale diagram comparing the average human to the longest known dinosaurs in five major clades:{{legend|#ae2032|Sauropoda (Supersaurus vivianae)}}{{legend|#cc48cc|Ornithopoda (Shantungosaurus giganteus)}}{{legend|#50da50|Theropoda (Spinosaurus aegyptiacus)}}{{legend|#f8863b|Thyreophora (Stegosaurus ungulatus)}}{{legend|#254c87|Marginocephalia (Triceratops prorsus)}}]]Current evidence suggests that dinosaur average size varied through the Triassic, Early Jurassic, Late Jurassic and Cretaceous. Predatory theropod dinosaurs, which occupied most terrestrial carnivore niches during the Mesozoic, most often fall into the {{convert|100|to|1000|kg|lb|abbr=on|comma=gaps}} category when sorted by estimated weight into categories based on order of magnitude, whereas recent predatory carnivoran mammals peak in the {{convert|10|to|100|kg|lb|abbr=on}} category. The mode of Mesozoic dinosaur body masses is between {{convert|1|and|10|MT|ST}}. This contrasts sharply with the average size of Cenozoic mammals, estimated by the National Museum of Natural History as about {{convert|2|to|5|kg|lb|abbr=on}}.The sauropods were the largest and heaviest dinosaurs. For much of the dinosaur era, the smallest sauropods were larger than anything else in their habitat, and the largest was an order of magnitude more massive than anything else that has since walked the Earth. Giant prehistoric mammals such as Paraceratherium (the largest land mammal ever) were dwarfed by the giant sauropods, and only modern whales approach or surpass them in size.JOURNAL, Sander, P. Martin, Christian, Andreas, Clauss, Marcus, Fechner, Regina, Gee, Carole T., Griebeler, Eva-Maria, Gunga, Hanns-Christian, Hummel, Jürgen, Mallison, Heinrich, 3, February 2011, Biology of the sauropod dinosaurs: the evolution of gigantism, Biological Reviews, Cambridge, Cambridge Philosophical Society, 86, 1, 117â155, 10.1111/j.1469-185X.2010.00137.x, 1464-7931, 21251189, 3045712, There are several proposed advantages for the large size of sauropods, including protection from predation, reduction of energy use, and longevity, but it may be that the most important advantage was dietary. Large animals are more efficient at digestion than small animals, because food spends more time in their digestive systems. This also permits them to subsist on food with lower nutritive value than smaller animals. Sauropod remains are mostly found in rock formations interpreted as dry or seasonally dry, and the ability to eat large quantities of low-nutrient browse would have been advantageous in such environments.Largest and smallestScientists will probably never be certain of the largest and smallest dinosaurs to have ever existed. This is because only a tiny percentage of animals were ever fossilized and most of these remain buried in the earth. Few non-avian dinosaur specimens that are recovered are complete skeletons, and impressions of skin and other soft tissues are rare. Rebuilding a complete skeleton by comparing the size and morphology of bones to those of similar, better-known species is an inexact art, and reconstructing the muscles and other organs of the living animal is, at best, a process of educated guesswork.{{harvnb|Paul|2010}}File:Argentinosaurus 9.svg|thumb|upright=1.15|left|Comparative size of ArgentinosaurusArgentinosaurusThe tallest and heaviest dinosaur known from good skeletons is Giraffatitan brancai (previously classified as a species of Brachiosaurus). Its remains were discovered in Tanzania between 1907 and 1912. Bones from several similar-sized individuals were incorporated into the skeleton now mounted and on display at the Museum für Naturkunde in Berlin; this mount is {{convert|12|m|ft|sp=us}} tall and {{convert|21.8|to|22.5|m|ft|sp=us}} long,JOURNAL, Mazzetta, Gerardo V., Christiansenb, Per, Fariñaa, Richard A., 2004, Giants and Bizarres: Body Size of Some Southern South American Cretaceous Dinosaurs,www.miketaylor.org.uk/tmp/papers/Mazzetta-et-al_04_SA-dino-body-size.pdf,www.miketaylor.org.uk/tmp/papers/Mazzetta-et-al_04_SA-dino-body-size.pdf," title="web.archive.org/web/20090225155217www.miketaylor.org.uk/tmp/papers/Mazzetta-et-al_04_SA-dino-body-size.pdf,">web.archive.org/web/20090225155217www.miketaylor.org.uk/tmp/papers/Mazzetta-et-al_04_SA-dino-body-size.pdf, 2009-02-25, live, Historical Biology, Milton Park, Oxfordshire, Taylor & Francis, 16, 2â4, 71â83, 10.1080/08912960410001715132, 2004HBio...16...71M, 10.1.1.694.1650, 56028251, 0891-2963, JOURNAL, Janensch, Werner, Werner Janensch, 1950, Translation by Gerhard Maier, Die Skelettrekonstruktion von Brachiosaurus brancai, The Skeleton Reconstruction of Brachiosaurus brancai,paleoglot.org/files/Janensch1950b.pdf, live, Palaeontographica, Stuttgart, E. Schweizerbart, Suplement VII, 1. Reihe, Teil 3, Lieferung 2, 97â103, 45923346,web.archive.org/web/20170711052046/https://paleoglot.org/files/Janensch1950b.pdf, July 11, 2017, October 24, 2019, and would have belonged to an animal that weighed between {{gaps|30|000}} and {{gaps|60|000}} kilograms ({{gaps|70|000}} and {{gaps|130|000}} lb). The longest complete dinosaur is the {{convert|27|m|ft|sp=us}} long Diplodocus, which was discovered in Wyoming in the United States and displayed in Pittsburgh’s Carnegie Museum of Natural History in 1907.CONFERENCE, Lucas, Spencer G., Herne, Matthew C., Hecket, Andrew B., Hunt, Adrian P., Sullivan, Robert M., 3, 2004, Reappraisal of Seismosaurus, a Late Jurassic Sauropod Dinosaur From New Mexico,gsa.confex.com/gsa/2004AM/finalprogram/abstract_77727.htm, live, 2004 Denver Annual Meeting (November 7â10, 2004),gsa.confex.com/gsa/2004AM/webprogram/start.html, 36, Geological Society of America, Boulder, CO, 422, Paper No. 181-4, 62334058,web.archive.org/web/20191008110318/https://gsa.confex.com/gsa/2004AM/finalprogram/abstract_77727.htm, October 8, 2019, October 25, 2019, The longest dinosaur known from good fossil material is Patagotitan: the skeleton mount in the American Museum of Natural History in New York is {{convert|37|meters|feet}} long. The Museo Municipal Carmen Funes in Plaza Huincul, Argentina, has an Argentinosaurus reconstructed skeleton mount that is {{convert|39.7|m|feet|sp=us}} long.JOURNAL, Sellers, William Irvin., Margetts, Lee, Coria, Rodolfo AnÃbal, Rodolfo Coria, Manning, Phillip Lars, 2013, Carrier, David, March of the Titans: The Locomotor Capabilities of Sauropod Dinosaurs, 10.1371/journal.pone.0078733, PLOS ONE, San Francisco, CA, PLOS, 8, 10, e78733, 24348896, 3864407, 2013PLoSO...878733S, 1932-6203, free, (File:Maraapunisaurus Skeletal V1.svg|thumb|upright=1.15|left|Maraapunisaurus, one of the largest animals to walk the earth.)(File:Bruhathkayosaurus matleyi updated.png|thumb|upright=1.15|right|Bruhathkayosaurus, potentially the largest terrestrial animal to ever exist.)There were larger dinosaurs, but knowledge of them is based entirely on a small number of fragmentary fossils. Most of the largest herbivorous specimens on record were discovered in the 1970s or later, and include the massive Argentinosaurus, which may have weighed {{convert|80000|to|100000|kg|ST|sp=us|abbr=off|comma=gaps}} and reached lengths of {{convert|30|to|40|m|ft|sp=us}}; some of the longest were the {{convert|33.5|m|ft|sp=us|adj=mid}} long Diplodocus hallorum (formerly Seismosaurus), the {{convert|33|to|34|m|ft|sp=us|adj=mid}} long Supersaurus, and {{convert|37|m|feet|sp=us|adj=mid}} long Patagotitan; and the tallest, the {{convert|18|m|ft|sp=us|adj=mid}} tall Sauroposeidon, which could have reached a sixth-floor window. There were a few dinosaurs that was considered either the heaviest and longest. The most famous one include Amphicoelias fragillimus, known only from a now lost partial vertebral neural arch described in 1878. Extrapolating from the illustration of this bone, the animal may have been {{convert|58|m|ft|sp=us}} long and weighed {{cvt|122400|kg|lb|comma=gaps}}. However, recent research have placed Amphicoelias from the long, gracile diplodocid to the shorter but much stockier rebbachisaurid. Now renamed as Maraapunisaurus, this sauropod now stands as much as {{convert|40|m|ft|sp=us}} long and weigh as much as {{cvt|120000|kg|lb|comma=gaps}}.JOURNAL, Maraapunisaurus fragillimus, N.G. (formerly Amphicoelias fragillimus), a basal Rebbachisaurid from the Morrison Formation (Upper Jurassic) of Colorado, Carpenter, Kenneth, Geology of the Intermountain West, 2018, 5, 227â244, 10.31711/giw.v5i0.28, free, JOURNAL, Paul, Gregory S., 2019, Determining the largest known land animal: A critical comparison of differing methods for restoring the volume and mass of extinct animals,www.gspauldino.com/Titanomass.pdf, Annals of the Carnegie Museum, 85, 4, 335â358, 10.2992/007.085.0403, 210840060, Another contender of this title includes Bruhathkayosaurus matleyi, an incredibly controversial taxon that was recently confirmed to exist after archived photos were uncovered.JOURNAL, Pal, Saurabh, Ayyasami, Krishnan, 27 June 2022, The lost titan of Cauvery, Geology Today, en, 38, 3, 112â116, 10.1111/gto.12390, 2022GeolT..38..112P, 250056201, 0266-6979, Bruhathkayosaurus was a titanosaur and would have most likely weighed more than even Marrapunisaurus. Recent size estimates in 2023 have placed this sauropod reaching lengths of up to {{cvt|44|m|ft}} long and a colossal weight range of around {{cvt|110000â170000|kg|lb|comma=gaps}}, if these upper estimates up true, Bruhathkayosaurus would have rivaled the blue whale and Perucetus colossus as one of the largest animals to have ever existed.JOURNAL, Paul, Gregory S., Larramendi, Asier, 11 April 2023, Body mass estimate of Bruhathkayosaurus and other fragmentary sauropod remains suggest the largest land animals were about as big as the greatest whales, Lethaia, en, 56, 2, 1â11, 10.18261/let.56.2.5, 2023Letha..56..2.5P, 259782734, 0024-1164, The largest carnivorous dinosaur was Spinosaurus, reaching a length of {{convert|12.6|to|18|m|ft|sp=us}}, and weighing {{convert|7|to|20.9|MT|ST}}. Other large carnivorous theropods included Giganotosaurus, Carcharodontosaurus and Tyrannosaurus. Therizinosaurus and Deinocheirus were among the tallest of the theropods. The largest ornithischian dinosaur was probably the hadrosaurid Shantungosaurus giganteus which measured {{convert|16.6|m|feet|sp=us}}.JOURNAL, Zhao, Xijin, Zhao Xijin, Li, Dunjing, Han, Gang, Zhao, Huaxi, Liu, Fengguang, Li, Laijin, Fang, Xiaosi, 3, 2007, Zhuchengosaurus maximus from Shandong Province, Acta Geoscientia Sinica, Beijing, Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences, 28, 2, 111â122, 1006-3021, The largest individuals may have weighed as much as {{convert|16|MT|ST}}.{{harvnb|Weishampel|Dodson|Osmólska|2004|pp=438â463|loc=chpt. 20: “Hadrosauridae” by John R. Horner David B. Weishampel, and Catherine A. Forster.}}File:Bee hummingbird (Mellisuga helenae) adult male in flight-cropped.jpg|thumb|An adult bee hummingbirdbee hummingbirdThe smallest dinosaur known is the bee hummingbird,{{harvnb|Norell|Gaffney|Dingus|2000}} with a length of only {{convert|5|cm|in|sp=us}} and mass of around {{convert|1.8|g|oz|abbr=on}}.WEB,www.birds.com/species/a-b/bee-hummingbird/, live, Bee Hummingbird (Mellisuga helenae), Birds.com, Paley Media,web.archive.org/web/20150403005328/https://www.birds.com/species/a-b/bee-hummingbird/, April 3, 2015, October 27, 2019, The smallest known non-avialan dinosaurs were about the size of pigeons and were those theropods most closely related to birds. For example, Anchiornis huxleyi is currently the smallest non-avialan dinosaur described from an adult specimen, with an estimated weight of {{convert|110|g|oz|abbr=on}} and a total skeletal length of {{convert|34|cm|ft|sp=us}}. The smallest herbivorous non-avialan dinosaurs included Microceratus and Wannanosaurus, at about {{convert|60|cm|ft|sp=us}} long each.BehaviorFile:Maiasaurusnest.jpg|thumb|left|A nesting ground of the hadrosaur Maiasaura peeblesorum was discovered in 1978]]Many modern birds are highly social, often found living in flocks. There is general agreement that some behaviors that are common in birds, as well as in crocodiles (closest living relatives of birds), were also common among extinct dinosaur groups. Interpretations of behavior in fossil species are generally based on the pose of skeletons and their habitat, computer simulations of their biomechanics, and comparisons with modern animals in similar ecological niches.The first potential evidence for herding or flocking as a widespread behavior common to many dinosaur groups in addition to birds was the 1878 discovery of 31 Iguanodon, ornithischians that were then thought to have perished together in Bernissart, Belgium, after they fell into a deep, flooded sinkhole and drowned. Other mass-death sites have been discovered subsequently. Those, along with multiple trackways, suggest that gregarious behavior was common in many early dinosaur species. Trackways of hundreds or even thousands of herbivores indicate that duck-billed (hadrosaurids) may have moved in great herds, like the American bison or the African springbok. Sauropod tracks document that these animals traveled in groups composed of several different species, at least in Oxfordshire, England, although there is no evidence for specific herd structures. Congregating into herds may have evolved for defense, for migratory purposes, or to provide protection for young. There is evidence that many types of slow-growing dinosaurs, including various theropods, sauropods, ankylosaurians, ornithopods, and ceratopsians, formed aggregations of immature individuals. One example is a site in Inner Mongolia that has yielded remains of over 20 Sinornithomimus, from one to seven years old. This assemblage is interpreted as a social group that was trapped in mud. The interpretation of dinosaurs as gregarious has also extended to depicting carnivorous theropods as pack hunters working together to bring down large prey. However, this lifestyle is uncommon among modern birds, crocodiles, and other reptiles, and the taphonomic evidence suggesting mammal-like pack hunting in such theropods as Deinonychus and Allosaurus can also be interpreted as the results of fatal disputes between feeding animals, as is seen in many modern diapsid predators.File:Centrosaurus dinosaur.png|thumb|upright=1.15|Restoration of two Centrosaurus apertus engaged in intra-specific combatintra-specific combatThe crests and frills of some dinosaurs, like the marginocephalians, theropods and lambeosaurines, may have been too fragile to be used for active defense, and so they were likely used for sexual or aggressive displays, though little is known about dinosaur mating and territorialism. Head wounds from bites suggest that theropods, at least, engaged in active aggressive confrontations.From a behavioral standpoint, one of the most valuable dinosaur fossils was discovered in the Gobi Desert in 1971. It included a Velociraptor attacking a Protoceratops, providing evidence that dinosaurs did indeed attack each other. Additional evidence for attacking live prey is the partially healed tail of an Edmontosaurus, a hadrosaurid dinosaur; the tail is damaged in such a way that shows the animal was bitten by a tyrannosaur but survived. Cannibalism amongst some species of dinosaurs was confirmed by tooth marks found in Madagascar in 2003, involving the theropod Majungasaurus.Comparisons between the scleral rings of dinosaurs and modern birds and reptiles have been used to infer daily activity patterns of dinosaurs. Although it has been suggested that most dinosaurs were active during the day, these comparisons have shown that small predatory dinosaurs such as dromaeosaurids, Juravenator, and Megapnosaurus were likely nocturnal. Large and medium-sized herbivorous and omnivorous dinosaurs such as ceratopsians, sauropodomorphs, hadrosaurids, ornithomimosaurs may have been cathemeral, active during short intervals throughout the day, although the small ornithischian Agilisaurus was inferred to be diurnal.Based on fossil evidence from dinosaurs such as Oryctodromeus, some ornithischian species seem to have led a partially fossorial (burrowing) lifestyle. Many modern birds are arboreal (tree climbing), and this was also true of many Mesozoic birds, especially the enantiornithines.{{harvnb|Chiappe|Witmer|2002}} While some early bird-like species may have already been arboreal as well (including dromaeosaurids) such as Microraptor) most non-avialan dinosaurs seem to have relied on land-based locomotion. A good understanding of how dinosaurs moved on the ground is key to models of dinosaur behavior; the science of biomechanics, pioneered by Robert McNeill Alexander, has provided significant insight in this area. For example, studies of the forces exerted by muscles and gravity on dinosaurs’ skeletal structure have investigated how fast dinosaurs could run, whether diplodocids could create sonic booms via whip-like tail snapping, and whether sauropods could float.CommunicationModern birds are known to communicate using visual and auditory signals, and the wide diversity of visual display structures among fossil dinosaur groups, such as horns, frills, crests, sails, and feathers, suggests that visual communication has always been important in dinosaur biology. Reconstruction of the plumage color of Anchiornis, suggest the importance of color in visual communication in non-avian dinosaurs. Vocalization in non-avian dinosaurs is less certain. In birds, the larynx plays no role in sound production. Instead they vocalize with a novel organ called the syrinx, located further down the trachea. The earliest remains of a syrinx was found in a specimen of the duck-like Vegavis iaai dated 69ââ66 million years ago, and this organ is unlikely to have existed in non-avian dinosaurs. File:Lambeosaurus magnicristatus DB.jpg|thumb|Restoration of a striking and unusual visual display in a Lambeosaurus magnicristatus. The crest could also have acted as a resonating chamber for sounds]]Paleontologist Phil Senter has suggested that since non-avian dinosaurs did not have a syrinx, and their next closest living relatives, crocodilians, use the larynx, they could not vocalize as the common ancestor would have been mute. He states that they mostly on visual displays and possibly non-vocal acoustic sounds like hissing, jaw grinding or clapping, splashing and wing beating (possible in winged maniraptoran dinosaurs). Other researchers have countered that vocalizations also exist in turtles, the closest relatives of archosaurs, suggesting that the trait is ancestral to their lineage. In addition, vocal communication in dinosaurs is indicated by the development of advanced hearing in nearly all major groups. Hence the syrinx may have supplemented and then replaced the larynx as a vocal organ rather than there being a “silent period” in bird evolution.In 2023, a fossilized larynx was described from a specimen of the ankylosaurid Pinacosaurus. The structure was composed of cricoid and arytenoid cartilages, similar to those of non-avian reptiles. However, the mobile cricoid-arytenoid joint and long arytenoid cartilages would have allowed for air-flow control similar to that of birds, and thus could have made bird-like vocalizations. In addition, the cartilages were ossified, implying that laryngeal ossification is a feature of some non-avian dinosaurs. A 2016 study concludes that some dinosaurs may have produced closed mouth vocalizations like cooing, hooting and booming. These occur in both reptiles and birds and involve inflating the esophagus or tracheal pouches. Such vocalizations evolved independently in extant archosaurs numerous times, following increases in body size. The crests of some hadrosaurids and the nasal chambers of ankylosaurids have been suggested to have functioned in acoustic resonance.Reproductive biology{{see also|Dinosaur egg}}File:Gniazdo sieweczki RB.JPG|left|thumb|alt=Three bluish eggs with black speckling sit atop a layer of white mollusk shell pieces, surrounded by sandy ground and small bits of bluish stone|Nest of a plover (CharadriusCharadriusAll dinosaurs laid amniotic eggs. Dinosaur eggs were usually laid in a nest. Most species create somewhat elaborate nests which can be cups, domes, plates, beds scrapes, mounds, or burrows.{{harvnb|Hansell|2000}} Some species of modern bird have no nests; the cliff-nesting common guillemot lays its eggs on bare rock, and male emperor penguins keep eggs between their body and feet. Primitive birds and many non-avialan dinosaurs often lay eggs in communal nests, with males primarily incubating the eggs. While modern birds have only one functional oviduct and lay one egg at a time, more primitive birds and dinosaurs had two oviducts, like crocodiles. Some non-avialan dinosaurs, such as Troodon, exhibited iterative laying, where the adult might lay a pair of eggs every one or two days, and then ensured simultaneous hatching by delaying brooding until all eggs were laid.JOURNAL, Varricchio, David J., Horner, John R., Jackson, Frankie D., 2002, Embryos and eggs for the Cretaceous theropod dinosaur Troodon formosus, Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology, Milton Park, Oxfordshire, Taylor & Francis for the Society of Vertebrate Paleontology, 22, 3, 564â576, 10.1671/0272-4634(2002)022[0564:EAEFTC]2.0.CO;2, 85728452, 0272-4634, When laying eggs, females grow a special type of bone between the hard outer bone and the marrow of their limbs. This medullary bone, which is rich in calcium, is used to make eggshells. A discovery of features in a Tyrannosaurus skeleton provided evidence of medullary bone in extinct dinosaurs and, for the first time, allowed paleontologists to establish the sex of a fossil dinosaur specimen. Further research has found medullary bone in the carnosaur Allosaurus and the ornithopod Tenontosaurus. Because the line of dinosaurs that includes Allosaurus and Tyrannosaurus diverged from the line that led to Tenontosaurus very early in the evolution of dinosaurs, this suggests that the production of medullary tissue is a general characteristic of all dinosaurs.File:Citipati IGM 100 979.jpg|thumb|Fossil interpreted as a nesting oviraptorid Citipati at the American Museum of Natural HistoryAmerican Museum of Natural HistoryAnother widespread trait among modern birds (but see below in regards to fossil groups and extant megapodes) is parental care for young after hatching. Jack Horner’s 1978 discovery of a Maiasaura (“good mother lizard“) nesting ground in Montana demonstrated that parental care continued long after birth among ornithopods. A specimen of the oviraptorid Citipati osmolskae was discovered in a chicken-like brooding position in 1993, which may indicate that they had begun using an insulating layer of feathers to keep the eggs warm.{{harvnb|Currie|Koppelhus|Shugar|Wright|2004|pp=234â250|loc=chpt. 11: “Dinosaur Brooding Behavior and the Origin of Flight Feathers” by Thomas P. Hopp and Mark J. Orsen.}} An embryo of the basal sauropodomorph Massospondylus was found without teeth, indicating that some parental care was required to feed the young dinosaurs. Trackways have also confirmed parental behavior among ornithopods from the Isle of Skye in northwestern Scotland.However, there is ample evidence of precociality or superprecociality among many dinosaur species, particularly theropods. For instance, non-ornithuromorph birds have been abundantly demonstrated to have had slow growth rates, megapode-like egg burying behavior and the ability to fly soon after birth.JOURNAL, Zhonghe, Zhou, Fucheng, Zhang, 2004, A Precocial Avian Embryo from the Lower Cretaceous of China, Science, Washington, D.C., American Association for the Advancement of Science, 306, 5696, 653, 10.1126/science.1100000, 0036-8075, 15499011, 34504916, JOURNAL,blogs.scientificamerican.com/tetrapod-zoology/drowned-cretaceous-bird-colony/, live, A drowned nesting colony of Late Cretaceous birds, Naish, Darren, Darren Naish, May 15, 2012, Science, 306, 5696, 653, Scientific American#Website, Scientific American, 10.1126/science.1100000, 15499011, 34504916,web.archive.org/web/20180925031243/https://blogs.scientificamerican.com/tetrapod-zoology/drowned-cretaceous-bird-colony/, September 25, 2018, November 16, 2019, JOURNAL, Fernández, Mariela S., GarcÃa, Rodolfo A., Fiorelli, Lucas, Scolaro, Alejandro, Salvador, Rodrigo B., Cotaro, Carlos N., Kaiser, Gary W., Dyke, Gareth J., Gareth J. Dyke, 3, 2013, A Large Accumulation of Avian Eggs from the Late Cretaceous of Patagonia (Argentina) Reveals a Novel Nesting Strategy in Mesozoic Birds, PLOS ONE, San Francisco, CA, PLOS, 8, 4, e61030, 10.1371/journal.pone.0061030, 23613776, 3629076, 2013PLoSO...861030F, 1932-6203, free, JOURNAL, Deeming, Denis Charles, Mayr, Gerald, Gerald Mayr, May 2018, Pelvis morphology suggests that early Mesozoic birds were too heavy to contact incubate their eggs, Journal of Evolutionary Biology, Hoboken, NJ, Wiley-Blackwell on behalf of the European Society for Evolutionary Biology, 31, 5, 701â709, 10.1111/jeb.13256, 29485191, 3588317, 1010-061X,eprints.lincoln.ac.uk/id/eprint/31436/13/31436%2031291%20Deeming_et_al-2018-Journal_of_Evolutionary_Biology.pdf,eprints.lincoln.ac.uk/id/eprint/31436/13/31436%2031291%20Deeming_et_al-2018-Journal_of_Evolutionary_Biology.pdf," title="web.archive.org/web/20200602094641eprints.lincoln.ac.uk/id/eprint/31436/13/31436%2031291%20Deeming_et_al-2018-Journal_of_Evolutionary_Biology.pdf,">web.archive.org/web/20200602094641eprints.lincoln.ac.uk/id/eprint/31436/13/31436%2031291%20Deeming_et_al-2018-Journal_of_Evolutionary_Biology.pdf, 2020-06-02, live, Both Tyrannosaurus and Troodon had juveniles with clear superprecociality and likely occupying different ecological niches than the adults. Superprecociality has been inferred for sauropods.JOURNAL, Myers, Timothy S., Fiorillo, Anthony R., 2009, Evidence for gregarious behavior and age segregation in sauropod dinosaurs, Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, Amsterdam, Elsevier, 274, 1â2, 96â104, 10.1016/j.palaeo.2009.01.002, 0031-0182, 2009PPP...274...96M,doc.rero.ch/record/16633/files/PAL_E962.pdf,doc.rero.ch/record/16633/files/PAL_E962.pdf," title="web.archive.org/web/20200529011847doc.rero.ch/record/16633/files/PAL_E962.pdf,">web.archive.org/web/20200529011847doc.rero.ch/record/16633/files/PAL_E962.pdf, 2020-05-29, live, Genital structures are unlikely to fossilize as they lack scales that may allow preservation via pigmentation or residual calcium phosphate salts. In 2021, the best preserved specimen of a dinosaur’s cloacal vent exterior was described for Psittacosaurus, demonstrating lateral swellings similar to crocodylian musk glands used in social displays by both sexes and pigmented regions which could also reflect a signalling function. However, this specimen on its own does not offer enough information to determine whether this dinosaur had sexual signalling functions; it only supports the possibility. Cloacal visual signalling can occur in either males or females in living birds, making it unlikely to be useful to determine sex for extinct dinosaurs.JOURNAL, 10.1016/j.cub.2020.12.039, A cloacal opening in a non-avian dinosaur, Jakob, Vinther, Robert, Nicholls, Diane A., Kelly, Current Biology, 31, R1âR3, February 22, 2021, 4, Elsevier, 33472049, 231644183, free, 2021CBio...31.R182V,PhysiologyBecause both modern crocodilians and birds have four-chambered hearts (albeit modified in crocodilians), it is likely that this is a trait shared by all archosaurs, including all dinosaurs. While all modern birds have high metabolisms and are endothermic (“warm-blooded“), a vigorous debate has been ongoing since the 1960s regarding how far back in the dinosaur lineage this trait extended. Various researchers have supported dinosaurs as being endothermic, ectothermic (“cold-blooded“), or somewhere in between.JOURNAL, Pontzer, H., Allen, V., Hutchinson, J.R., 2009, Biomechanics of running indicates endothermy in bipedal dinosaurs, PLOS ONE, 4, 11, e7783, 10.1371/journal.pone.0007783, free, 2772121, 19911059, 2009PLoSO...4.7783P, 1932-6203, An emerging consensus among researchers is that, while different lineages of dinosaurs would have had different metabolisms, most of them had higher metabolic rates than other reptiles but lower than living birds and mammals,JOURNAL, Benson, R.B.J., 2018, Dinosaur Macroevolution and Macroecology, Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics, 49, 379â408, 10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-110617-062231, 92837486, free, which is termed mesothermy by some.JOURNAL, Grady, J.M., Enquist, B.J., Dettweiler-Robinson, E., Wright, N.A., Smith, F.A., 2014, Evidence for mesothermy in dinosaurs, Science, 344, 6189, 1268â1272, 10.1126/science.1253143, 24926017, 2014Sci...344.1268G, 9806780, Evidence from crocodiles and their extinct relatives suggests that such elevated metabolisms could have developed in the earliest archosaurs, which were the common ancestors of dinosaurs and crocodiles.JOURNAL, Legendre, L.J., Guénard, G., Botha-Brink, J., Cubo, J., Palaeohistological Evidence for Ancestral High Metabolic Rate in Archosaurs, Systematic Biology, 2016, 65, 6, 989â996, 10.1093/sysbio/syw033, 27073251, free, JOURNAL, Seymour, R.S., Bennett-Stamper, C.L., Johnston, S.D., Carrier, D.R., Grigg, G.C., 2004, Evidence for endothermic ancestors of crocodiles at the stem of archosaur evolution, Physiological and Biochemical Zoology, 77, 6, 1051â1067, 10.1093/sysbio/syw033, 27073251, free, File:Pasta-Brontosaurus.jpg|thumb|left|This 1897 restoration of Brontosaurus as an aquatic, tail-dragging animal, by Charles R. KnightCharles R. KnightAfter non-avian dinosaurs were discovered, paleontologists first posited that they were ectothermic. This was used to imply that the ancient dinosaurs were relatively slow, sluggish organisms, even though many modern reptiles are fast and light-footed despite relying on external sources of heat to regulate their body temperature. The idea of dinosaurs as ectothermic remained a prevalent view until Robert T. Bakker, an early proponent of dinosaur endothermy, published an influential paper on the topic in 1968. Bakker specifically used anatomical and ecological evidence to argue that sauropods, which had hitherto been depicted as sprawling aquatic animals with their tails dragging on the ground, were endotherms that lived vigorous, terrestrial lives. In 1972, Bakker expanded on his arguments based on energy requirements and predator-prey ratios. This was one of the seminal results that led to the dinosaur renaissance.JOURNAL, Bakker, R.T., Robert T. Bakker, 1968, The Superiority of Dinosaurs, Discovery: Magazine of the Peabody Museum of Natural History, 3, 2, 11â22, 0012-3625, 297237777, JOURNAL, Bakker, R.T., Robert T. Bakker, 1972, Anatomical and Ecological Evidence of Endothermy in Dinosaurs, Nature, 238, 5359, 81â85, 10.1038/238081a0, 1972Natur.238...81B, 4176132, One of the greatest contributions to the modern understanding of dinosaur physiology has been paleohistology, the study of microscopic tissue structure in dinosaurs.JOURNAL, Erickson, G.M., 2014, On dinosaur growth, Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences, 42, 1, 675â697, 10.1146/annurev-earth-060313-054858, 2014AREPS..42..675E, JOURNAL, Bailleul, A.M., O’Connor, J., Schweitzer, M.H., 2019, Dinosaur paleohistology: review, trends and new avenues of investigation, PeerJ, 7, e7764, 10.7717/peerj.7764, 31579624, 6768056, free, From the 1960s forward, Armand de Ricqlès suggested that the presence of fibrolamellar boneâbony tissue with an irregular, fibrous texture and filled with blood vesselsâwas indicative of consistently fast growth and therefore endothermy. Fibrolamellar bone was common in both dinosaurs and pterosaurs,JOURNAL, De Ricqlès, A., 1974, Evolution of endothermy: histological evidence, Evolutionary Theory, 1, 2, 51â80,www.stuartsumida.com/BIOL622/Ricqles1974.pdf,www.stuartsumida.com/BIOL622/Ricqles1974.pdf," title="web.archive.org/web/20210417055907www.stuartsumida.com/BIOL622/Ricqles1974.pdf,">web.archive.org/web/20210417055907www.stuartsumida.com/BIOL622/Ricqles1974.pdf, 2021-04-17, live, BOOK, De Ricqlès, A., 1980, Tissue structures of dinosaur bone, functional significance and possible relation to dinosaur physiology, Thomas, R.D.K., Olson, E.C., A Cold Look at the Warm-Blooded Dinosaurs, New York, American Association for the Advancement of Science, 103â139, though not universally present.JOURNAL, Padian, K., Horner, J.R., de Ricqlès, A., 2004, Growth in small dinosaurs and pterosaurs: the evolution of archosaurian growth strategies, Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology, 24, 3, 555â571, 10.1671/0272-4634(2004)024[0555:GISDAP]2.0.CO;2, 86019906,doc.rero.ch/record/15191/files/PAL_E2467.pdf, JOURNAL, de Souza, G.A., Bento Soares, M., Souza Brum, A., Zucolotto, M., Sayão, J.M., Carlos Weinschütz, L., Kellner, A.W.A., 2020, Osteohistology and growth dynamics of the Brazilian noasaurid Vespersaurus paranaensis Langer et al., 2019 (Theropoda: Abelisauroidea), PeerJ, 8, e9771, 10.7717/peerj.9771, 32983636, 7500327, 221906765, free, This has led to a significant body of work in reconstructing growth curves and modeling the evolution of growth rates across various dinosaur lineages,For examples of this work conducted on different dinosaur lineages, see
Origin of birdsThe possibility that dinosaurs were the ancestors of birds was first suggested in 1868 by Thomas Henry Huxley. After the work of Gerhard Heilmann in the early 20th century, the theory of birds as dinosaur descendants was abandoned in favor of the idea of them being descendants of generalized thecodonts, with the key piece of evidence being the supposed lack of clavicles in dinosaurs. However, as later discoveries showed, clavicles (or a single fused wishbone, which derived from separate clavicles) were not actually absent; they had been found as early as 1924 in Oviraptor, but misidentified as an interclavicle. In the 1970s, Ostrom revived the dinosaurâbird theory, which gained momentum in the coming decades with the advent of cladistic analysis, and a great increase in the discovery of small theropods and early birds. Of particular note have been the fossils of the Jehol Biota, where a variety of theropods and early birds have been found, often with feathers of some type. Birds share over a hundred distinct anatomical features with theropod dinosaurs, which are now generally accepted to have been their closest ancient relatives. They are most closely allied with maniraptoran coelurosaurs. A minority of scientists, most notably Alan Feduccia and Larry Martin, have proposed other evolutionary paths, including revised versions of Heilmann’s basal archosaur proposal, or that maniraptoran theropods are the ancestors of birds but themselves are not dinosaurs, only convergent with dinosaurs.FeathersFile:Feathered non-avian Maniraptora.jpg|thumb|Various feathered non-avian dinosaurs, including Archaeopteryx, Anchiornis, Microraptor and ZhenyuanlongZhenyuanlongFeathers are one of the most recognizable characteristics of modern birds, and a trait that was also shared by several non-avian dinosaurs. Based on the current distribution of fossil evidence, it appears that feathers were an ancestral dinosaurian trait, though one that may have been selectively lost in some species.JOURNAL,www.nature.com/articles/nature.2012.10933, Rise of the fuzzy dinosaurs, Switek, Brian, July 2, 2012, News, Nature, Nature Research, London, 10.1038/nature.2012.10933, 123219913, 0028-0836, January 1, 2019, Direct fossil evidence of feathers or feather-like structures has been discovered in a diverse array of species in many non-avian dinosaur groups, both among saurischians and ornithischians. Simple, branched, feather-like structures are known from heterodontosaurids, primitive neornithischians,JOURNAL, Godefroit, P., Sinitsa, S.M., Dhouailly, D., Bolotsky, Y.L., Sizov, A.V., McNamara, M.E., Benton, M.J., Spagna, P., 2014, A Jurassic ornithischian dinosaur from Siberia with both feathers and scales,palaeo.gly.bris.ac.uk/Benton/reprints/2014Kulinda.pdf, Science, 345, 6195, 451â455, 10.1126/science.1253351, 25061209, 2014Sci...345..451G, 1983/a7ae6dfb-55bf-4ca4-bd8b-a5ea5f323103, 206556907, July 27, 2016,palaeo.gly.bris.ac.uk/Benton/reprints/2014Kulinda.pdf," title="web.archive.org/web/20190209232112palaeo.gly.bris.ac.uk/Benton/reprints/2014Kulinda.pdf,">web.archive.org/web/20190209232112palaeo.gly.bris.ac.uk/Benton/reprints/2014Kulinda.pdf, February 9, 2019, dead, and theropods, and primitive ceratopsians. Evidence for true, vaned feathers similar to the flight feathers of modern birds has been found only in the theropod subgroup Maniraptora, which includes oviraptorosaurs, troodontids, dromaeosaurids, and birds. Feather-like structures known as pycnofibres have also been found in pterosaurs.JOURNAL, Kellner, Alexander W. A., Alexander Kellner, Wang, Xiaolin, Tischlinger, Helmut, Campos, Diogenes de Almeida, Hone, David W. E., Meng, Xi, 3, 2010, The soft tissue of Jeholopterus (Pterosauria, Anurognathidae, Batrachognathinae) and the structure of the pterosaur wing membrane, Proceedings of the Royal Society B, London, Royal Society, 277, 1679, 321â329, 10.1098/rspb.2009.0846, 0962-8452, 2842671, 19656798, However, researchers do not agree regarding whether these structures share a common origin between lineages (i.e., they are homologous),JOURNAL, Mayr, G., Pittman, M., Saitta, E., Kaye, T.G., Vinther, J., 2016, Structure and homology of Psittacosaurus tail bristles, Palaeontology, 59, 6, 793â802, 10.1111/pala.12257, 2016Palgy..59..793M, 1983/029c668f-08b9-45f6-a0c5-30ce9256e593, 89156313,research-information.bris.ac.uk/en/publications/029c668f-08b9-45f6-a0c5-30ce9256e593, free, or if they were the result of widespread experimentation with skin coverings among ornithodirans.JOURNAL, Barrett, P.M., Evans, D.C., Campione, N.E., 2015, Evolution of dinosaur epidermal structures, Biology Letters, 11, 6, 20150229, 10.1098/rsbl.2015.0229, 4528472, 26041865, If the former is the case, filaments may have been common in the ornithodiran lineage and evolved before the appearance of dinosaurs themselves. Research into the genetics of American alligators has revealed that crocodylian scutes do possess feather-keratins during embryonic development, but these keratins are not expressed by the animals before hatching.JOURNAL, Alibardi, Lorenzo, Knapp, Loren W., Sawyer, Roger H., 2006, Beta-keratin localization in developing alligator scales and feathers in relation to the development and evolution of feathers, Journal of Submicroscopic Cytology and Pathology, Siena, Nuova Immagine Editrice, 38, 2â3, 175â192, 1122-9497, 17784647, The description of feathered dinosaurs has not been without controversy in general; perhaps the most vocal critics have been Alan Feduccia and Theagarten Lingham-Soliar, who have proposed that some purported feather-like fossils are the result of the decomposition of collagenous fiber that underlaid the dinosaurs’ skin, and that maniraptoran dinosaurs with vaned feathers were not actually dinosaurs, but convergent with dinosaurs. However, their views have for the most part not been accepted by other researchers, to the point that the scientific nature of Feduccia’s proposals has been questioned.Archaeopteryx was the first fossil found that revealed a potential connection between dinosaurs and birds. It is considered a transitional fossil, in that it displays features of both groups. Brought to light just two years after Charles Darwin’s seminal On the Origin of Species (1859), its discovery spurred the nascent debate between proponents of evolutionary biology and creationism. This early bird is so dinosaur-like that, without a clear impression of feathers in the surrounding rock, at least one specimen was mistaken for the small theropod Compsognathus. Since the 1990s, a number of additional feathered dinosaurs have been found, providing even stronger evidence of the close relationship between dinosaurs and modern birds. Many of these specimens were unearthed in the lagerstätten of the Jehol Biota.JOURNAL, Benton, M.J., Dhouailly, D., Jiang, B., McNamara, M., 2019, The Early Origin of Feathers, Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 34, 9, 856â869, 10.1016/j.tree.2019.04.018, 31164250, 10468/8068, 174811556, free, If feather-like structures were indeed widely present among non-avian dinosaurs, the lack of abundant fossil evidence for them may be due to the fact that delicate features like skin and feathers are seldom preserved by fossilization and thus often absent from the fossil record.JOURNAL, Schweitzer, Mary H., Watt, J.A., Avci, R., Knapp, L., Chiappe, L., Norell, M., Marshall, M., 3, 1999, Beta-keratin specific immunological reactivity in feather-like structures of the Cretaceous Alvarezsaurid, Shuvuuia deserti, Journal of Experimental Zoology, Journal of Experimental Zoology Part B, Hoboken, NJ, Wiley-Blackwell, 285, 2, 146â157, 10440726, 10.1002/(SICI)1097-010X(19990815)285:23.0.CO;2-A, 1999JEZ...285..146S, 1552-5007,SkeletonBecause feathers are often associated with birds, feathered dinosaurs are often touted as the missing link between birds and dinosaurs. However, the multiple skeletal features also shared by the two groups represent another important line of evidence for paleontologists. Areas of the skeleton with important similarities include the neck, pubis, wrist (semi-lunate carpal), arm and pectoral girdle, furcula (wishbone), and breast bone. Comparison of bird and dinosaur skeletons through cladistic analysis strengthens the case for the link.WEB,ucmp.berkeley.edu/diapsids/birds/archaeopteryx.html, Archaeopteryx: An Early Bird, University of California Museum of Paleontology, Berkeley, October 30, 2019,Soft anatomyFile:Pneumatopores on the left ilium of the theropod Aerosteon riocoloradensis.jpg|thumb|Pneumatopores on the left ilium of Aerosteon riocoloradensis]]Large meat-eating dinosaurs had a complex system of air sacs similar to those found in modern birds, according to a 2005 investigation led by Patrick M. O’Connor. The lungs of theropod dinosaurs (carnivores that walked on two legs and had bird-like feet) likely pumped air into hollow sacs in their skeletons, as is the case in birds. “What was once formally considered unique to birds was present in some form in the ancestors of birds”, O’Connor said.NEWS, Gibson, Andrea, July 13, 2005, Study: Predatory Dinosaurs had Bird-Like Pulmonary System,www.ohio.edu/research/communications/dinosaur_study.cfm, Research Communications, Athens, Ohio, Athens, OH, Ohio University, November 18, 2019, {{Dead link|date=October 2022 |bot=InternetArchiveBot |fix-attempted=yes }} In 2008, scientists described Aerosteon riocoloradensis, the skeleton of which supplies the strongest evidence to date of a dinosaur with a bird-like breathing system. CT scanning of Aerosteon’s fossil bones revealed evidence for the existence of air sacs within the animal’s body cavity.Behavioral evidenceFossils of the troodonts Mei and Sinornithoides demonstrate that some dinosaurs slept with their heads tucked under their arms. This behavior, which may have helped to keep the head warm, is also characteristic of modern birds. Several deinonychosaur and oviraptorosaur specimens have also been found preserved on top of their nests, likely brooding in a bird-like manner.JOURNAL, Norell, Mark A., Clark, James M., Chiappe, Luis M., Dashzeveg, Demberelyin, 3, 1995, A nesting dinosaur, Nature, London, Nature Research, 378, 6559, 774â776, 1995Natur.378..774N, 10.1038/378774a0, 4245228, 0028-0836, The ratio between egg volume and body mass of adults among these dinosaurs suggest that the eggs were primarily brooded by the male, and that the young were highly precocial, similar to many modern ground-dwelling birds.JOURNAL, Varricchio, David J., Moore, Jason R., Erickson, Gregory M., Gregory M. Erickson, Norell, Mark A., Jackson, Frankie D., Borkowski, John J., 3, 2008, Avian Paternal Care Had Dinosaur Origin, Science, Washington, D.C., American Association for the Advancement of Science, 322, 5909, 1826â1828, 2008Sci...322.1826V, 10.1126/science.1163245, 0036-8075, 19095938, 8718747, free, Some dinosaurs are known to have used gizzard stones like modern birds. These stones are swallowed by animals to aid digestion and break down food and hard fibers once they enter the stomach. When found in association with fossils, gizzard stones are called gastroliths.Extinction of major groupsAll non-avian dinosaurs and most lineages of birdsJOURNAL, Longrich, N.R., Tokaryk, T., Field, D.J., 2011, Mass extinction of birds at the CretaceousâPaleogene (KâPg) boundary, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108, 37, 15253â15257, 10.1073/pnas.1110395108, 21914849, 3174646, 2011PNAS..10815253L, free, became extinct in a mass extinction event, called the CretaceousâPaleogene (K-Pg) extinction event, at the end of the Cretaceous period. Above the CretaceousâPaleogene boundary, which has been dated to 66.038 ± 0.025 million years ago,JOURNAL, Renne, P.R., Deino, A.L., Hilgen, F.J., Kuiper, K.F., Mark, D.F., Mitchell, W.S., Morgan, L.E., Mundil, R., Smit, J., 2013, Time scales of critical events around the Cretaceous-Paleogene boundary, Science, 339, 6120, 684â687, 10.1126/science.1230492, 23393261, 2013Sci...339..684R, 6112274, fossils of non-avian dinosaurs disappear abruptly; the absence of dinosaur fossils was historically used to assign rocks to the ensuing Cenozoic. The nature of the event that caused this mass extinction has been extensively studied since the 1970s, leading to the development of two mechanisms that are thought to have played major roles: an extraterrestrial impact event in the Yucatán Peninsula, along with flood basalt volcanism in India. However, the specific mechanisms of the extinction event and the extent of its effects on dinosaurs are still areas of ongoing research.JOURNAL, Brusatte, S.L., Butler, R.J., Barrett, P.M., Carrano, M.T., Evans, D.C., Lloyd, G.T., Mannion, P.D., Norell, M.A., Peppe, D.J., Upchurch, P., Williamson, T.E., 2015, The extinction of the dinosaurs, Biological Reviews, 90, 2, 628â642, 10.1111/brv.12128, 25065505, 20.500.11820/176e5907-26ec-4959-867f-0f2e52335f88, 115134484,www.research.ed.ac.uk/en/publications/176e5907-26ec-4959-867f-0f2e52335f88, free, free, Alongside dinosaurs, many other groups of animals became extinct: pterosaurs, marine reptiles such as mosasaurs and plesiosaurs, several groups of mammals, ammonites (nautilus-like mollusks), rudists (reef-building bivalves), and various groups of marine plankton. In all, approximately 47% of genera and 76% of species on Earth became extinct during the K-Pg extinction event.JOURNAL, Jablonski, D., 1991, Extinctions: a paleontological perspective, Science, 253, 5021, 754â757, 10.1126/science.253.5021.754, 17835491, 1991Sci...253..754J, The relatively large size of most dinosaurs and the low diversity of small-bodied dinosaur species at the end of the Cretaceous may have contributed to their extinction;JOURNAL, Longrich, N.R., Bhullar, B.-A. S., Gauthier, J.A., 2012, Mass extinction of lizards and snakes at the CretaceousâPaleogene boundary, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109, 52, 21396â21401, 2012PNAS..10921396L, 10.1073/pnas.1211526110, 0027-8424, 3535637, 23236177, free, the extinction of the bird lineages that did not survive may also have been caused by a dependence on forest habitats or a lack of adaptations to eating seeds for survival.JOURNAL, Field, D.J., Bercovici, A., Berv, J.S., Dunn, R., Fastovsky, D.E., Lyson, T.R., Vajda, V., Gauthier, J.A., 2018, Early evolution of modern birds structured by global forest collapse at the end-Cretaceous mass extinction, Current Biology, 28, 11, 1825â1831, 10.1016/j.cub.2018.04.062, 29804807, 44075214, free, 2018CBio...28E1825F, JOURNAL, Larson, D.W., Brown, C.M., Evans, D.C., 2016, Dental disparity and ecological stability in bird-like dinosaurs prior to the end-Cretaceous mass extinction, Current Biology, 26, 10, 1325â1333, 10.1016/j.cub.2016.03.039, 27112293, 3937001, free, 2016CBio...26.1325L,Pre-extinction diversityJust before the K-Pg extinction event, the number of non-avian dinosaur species that existed globally has been estimated at between 628 and 1078.JOURNAL, Le Loeuff, J., 2012, Paleobiogeography and biodiversity of Late Maastrichtian dinosaurs: how many dinosaur species went extinct at the Cretaceous-Tertiary boundary?, Bulletin de la Société Géologique de France, 183, 6, 547â559, 10.2113/gssgfbull.183.6.547, 0037-9409, It remains uncertain whether the diversity of dinosaurs was in gradual decline before the K-Pg extinction event, or whether dinosaurs were actually thriving prior to the extinction. Rock formations from the Maastrichtian epoch, which directly preceded the extinction, have been found to have lower diversity than the preceding Campanian epoch, which led to the prevailing view of a long-term decline in diversity.JOURNAL, Archibald, J.D., Clemens, W.A., 1982, Late Cretaceous Extinctions, American Scientist, 70, 4, 377â385, 27851545, 1982AmSci..70..377A, JOURNAL, Carpenter, K., 1983, Evidence suggesting gradual extinction of latest Cretaceous dinosaurs, Naturwissenschaften, 70, 12, 611â612, 10.1007/BF00377404, 1983NW.....70..611C, 20078285, However, these comparisons did not account either for varying preservation potential between rock units or for different extents of exploration and excavation. In 1984, Dale Russell carried out an analysis to account for these biases, and found no evidence of a decline;JOURNAL, Russell, D.A., 1984, The gradual decline of the dinosaursâfact or fallacy?, Nature, 307, 5949, 360â361, 10.1038/307360a0, 1984Natur.307..360R, 4269426, another analysis by David Fastovsky and colleagues in 2004 even showed that dinosaur diversity continually increased until the extinction,JOURNAL, Fastovsky, D.E., Huang, Y., Hsu, J., Martin-McNaughton, J., Sheehan, P.M., Weishampel, D.B., 2004, Shape of Mesozoic dinosaur richness, Geology, 32, 10, 877â880, 10.1130/G20695.1, 2004Geo....32..877F,doc.rero.ch/record/14984/files/PAL_E2134.pdf, but this analysis has been rebutted.BOOK, Sullivan, R.M., 2006, The shape of Mesozoic dinosaur richness: a reassessment, Lucas, S.G., Sullivan, R.M., Late Cretaceous vertebrates from the Western Interior, New Mexico Museum of Natural History and Science Bulletin, 35, 403â405,books.google.com/books?id=rCDYCQAAQBAJ&pg=PA403, Since then, different approaches based on statistics and mathematical models have variously supported either a sudden extinctionJOURNAL, Chiarenza, A.A., Mannion, P.D., Lunt, D.J., Farnsworth, A., Jones, L.A., Kelland, S.J., Allison, P.A., 2019, Ecological niche modelling does not support climatically-driven dinosaur diversity decline before the Cretaceous/Paleogene mass extinction, Nature Communications, 10, 1, 1â14, 10.1038/s41467-019-08997-2, 30842410, 6403247, 2019NatCo..10.1091C, or a gradual decline.JOURNAL, Lloyd, G.T., 2012, A refined modelling approach to assess the influence of sampling on palaeobiodiversity curves: new support for declining Cretaceous dinosaur richness, Biology Letters, 8, 1, 123â126, 10.1098/rsbl.2011.0210, 21508029, 3259943, 1376734, JOURNAL, Sakamoto, M., Benton, M.J., Venditti, C., 2016, Dinosaurs in decline tens of millions of years before their final extinction, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 113, 18, 5036â5040, 10.1073/pnas.1521478113, 27092007, 4983840, 2016PNAS..113.5036S, free, End-Cretaceous trends in diversity may have varied between dinosaur lineages: it has been suggested that sauropods were not in decline, while ornithischians and theropods were in decline.JOURNAL, Barrett, P.M., McGowan, A.J., Page, V., 2009, Dinosaur diversity and the rock record, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 276, 1667, 2667â2674, 10.1098/rspb.2009.0352, 19403535, 2686664, JOURNAL, Upchurch, P., Mannion, P.D., Benson, R.B., Butler, R.J., Carrano, M.T., 2011, Geological and anthropogenic controls on the sampling of the terrestrial fossil record: a case study from the Dinosauria, Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 358, 1, 209â240, 10.1144/SP358.14, 2011GSLSP.358..209U, 130777837,Impact eventFile:LWA with Walt.JPG|thumb|upright|Luis (left) and his son Walter Alvarez (right) at the K-T Boundary in GubbioGubbioFile:Chicxulub radar topography.jpg|thumb|The Chicxulub Crater at the tip of the Yucatán Peninsula; the impactor that formed this crater may have caused the dinosaur extinctionextinctionThe bolide impact hypothesis, first brought to wide attention in 1980 by Walter Alvarez, Luis Alvarez, and colleagues, attributes the K-Pg extinction event to a bolide (extraterrestrial projectile) impact.{{harvnb|Randall|2015}} Alvarez and colleagues proposed that a sudden increase in iridium levels, recorded around the world in rock deposits at the CretaceousâPaleogene boundary, was direct evidence of the impact. Shocked quartz, indicative of a strong shockwave emanating from an impact, was also found worldwide.JOURNAL, Bohor, B.F., Modreski, P.J., Foord, E.E., 1987, Shocked quartz in the Cretaceous-Tertiary boundary clays: Evidence for a global distribution, Science, 236, 4802, 705â709, 10.1126/science.236.4802.705, 17748309, 1987Sci...236..705B, 31383614,zenodo.org/record/1230978, The actual impact site remained elusive until a crater measuring {{convert|180|km|mi|abbr=on}} wide was discovered in the Yucatán Peninsula of southeastern Mexico, and was publicized in a 1991 paper by Alan Hildebrand and colleagues.JOURNAL, Hildebrand, A.R., Penfield, G.T., Kring, D.A., Pilkington, M., Camargo, Z.A., Jacobsen, S.B., Boynton, W.V., 1991, Chicxulub crater: a possible Cretaceous/Tertiary boundary impact crater on the Yucatan Peninsula, Mexico, Geology, 19, 9, 867â871, 10.1130/0091-7613(1991)0192.3.CO;2, 1991Geo....19..867H, Now, the bulk of the evidence suggests that a bolide {{convert|5|to|15|km|mi|frac=2|abbr=off|sp=us}} wide impacted the Yucatán Peninsula 66 million years ago, forming this crater and creating a “kill mechanism” that triggered the extinction event.JOURNAL, Schulte, P., Alegret, L., Arenillas, I., Arz, J.A., Barton, P.J., Bown, P.R., Bralower, T.J., Christeson, G.L., Claeys, P., Cockell, C.S., Collins, G.S., A., Deutsch, T.J., Goldin, K., Goto, J.M., Grajales-Nishimura, R.A.F., Grieve, S.P.S., Gulick, K.R., Johnson, W., Kiessling, C., Koeberl, D.A., Kring, K.G., MacLeod, T., Matsui, J., Melosh, A., Montanari, J.V., Morgan, C.R., Neal, D.J., Nichols, R.D., Norris, E., Pierazzo, G., Ravizza, M., Rebolledo-Vieyra, W., Uwe Reimold, E., Robin, T., Salge, R.P., Speijer, A.R., Sweet, J., Urrutia-Fucugauchi, V., Vajda, M.T., Whalen, P.S., Willumsen, 2010, The Chicxulub asteroid impact and mass extinction at the Cretaceous-Paleogene boundary, Science, 327, 5970, 1214â1218, 10.1126/science.1177265, 20203042, 2010Sci...327.1214S, 2659741,lirias.kuleuven.be/handle/123456789/264213, JOURNAL, Kring, D. A., 2007, The Chicxulub impact event and its environmental consequences at the CretaceousâTertiary boundary, Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, 255, 1â2, 4â21, 10.1016/j.palaeo.2007.02.037, 2007PPP...255....4K, JOURNAL, Chiarenza, A.A., Farnsworth, A., Mannion, P.D., Lunt, D.J., Valdes, P.J., Morgan, J.V., Joanna Morgan, Allison, P.A., 2020, Asteroid impact, not volcanism, caused the end-Cretaceous dinosaur extinction, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 117, 29, 17084â17093, 10.1073/pnas.2006087117, 32601204, 7382232, 2020PNAS..11717084C, free, Within hours, the Chicxulub impact would have created immediate effects such as earthquakes,JOURNAL, Ivanov, B.A., 2005, Numerical Modeling of the Largest Terrestrial Meteorite Craters, Solar System Research, 39, 5, 381â409, 10.1007/s11208-005-0051-0, 2005SoSyR..39..381I, 120305483, tsunamis,JOURNAL, Matsui, T., Imamura, F., Tajika, E., Nakano, Y., Fujisawa, Y., 2002, Generation and propagation of a tsunami from the Cretaceous-Tertiary impact event, Geological Society of America Special Papers, 356, 69â78, 10.1130/0-8137-2356-6.69, 978-0-8137-2356-3, and a global firestorm that likely killed unsheltered animals and started wildfires.JOURNAL, Robertson, D.S., McKenna, M.C., Malcolm McKenna, Toon, O.B., Owen Toon, Hope, S., Lillegraven, J.A., 3, 2004, Survival in the first hours of the Cenozoic,webh01.ua.ac.be/funmorph/raoul/macroevolutie/Robertson2004.pdf, dead, Geological Society of America Bulletin, 116, 5â6, 760â768, 2004GSAB..116..760R, 10.1130/B25402.1, 0016-7606,webh01.ua.ac.be/funmorph/raoul/macroevolutie/Robertson2004.pdf," title="web.archive.org/web/20120918141759webh01.ua.ac.be/funmorph/raoul/macroevolutie/Robertson2004.pdf,">web.archive.org/web/20120918141759webh01.ua.ac.be/funmorph/raoul/macroevolutie/Robertson2004.pdf, September 18, 2012, June 15, 2011, JOURNAL, Robertson, D.S., Lewis, W.M., Sheehan, P.M., Toon, O.B., 2013, K-Pg extinction: Reevaluation of the heat-fire hypothesis, Journal of Geophysical Research: Biogeosciences, 118, 1, 329â336, 10.1002/jgrg.20018, 2013JGRG..118..329R, 17015462, free, However, it would also have had longer-term consequences for the environment. Within days, sulfate aerosols released from rocks at the impact site would have contributed to acid rain and ocean acidification.JOURNAL, Pope, K.O., Baines, K.H., Ocampo, A.C., Ivanov, B.A., 1997, Energy, volatile production, and climatic effects of the Chicxulub Cretaceous/Tertiary impact, Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets, 102, E9, 21645â21664, 10.1029/97JE01743, 11541145, 1997JGR...10221645P, 8447773, free, Soot aerosols are thought to have spread around the world over the ensuing months and years; they would have cooled the surface of the Earth by reflecting thermal radiation, and greatly slowed photosynthesis by blocking out sunlight, thus creating an impact winter.JOURNAL, Kaiho, K., Oshima, N., Adachi, K., Adachi, Y., Mizukami, T., Fujibayashi, M., Saito, R., 2016, Global climate change driven by soot at the K-Pg boundary as the cause of the mass extinction, Scientific Reports, 6, 1, 1â13, 10.1038/srep28427, 27414998, 4944614, 2016NatSR...628427K, JOURNAL, Lyons, S.L., Karp, A.T., Bralower, T.J., Grice, K., Schaefer, B., Gulick, S.P., Morgan, J.V., Joanna Morgan, Freeman, K.H., 2020, Organic matter from the Chicxulub crater exacerbated the KâPg impact winter, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 117, 41, 25327â25334, 10.1073/pnas.2004596117, 32989138, 7568312, 2020PNAS..11725327L, free, (This role was ascribed to sulfate aerosols until experiments demonstrated otherwise.JOURNAL, Ohno, S., Kadono, T., Kurosawa, K., Hamura, T., Sakaiya, T., Shigemori, K., Hironaka, Y., Sano, T., Watari, T., Otani, K., Matsui, T., Sugita, S., 2014, Production of sulphate-rich vapour during the Chicxulub impact and implications for ocean acidification, Nature Geoscience, 7, 4, 279â282, 10.1038/ngeo2095, 2014NatGe...7..279O, ) The cessation of photosynthesis would have led to the collapse of food webs depending on leafy plants, which included all dinosaurs save for grain-eating birds.Deccan TrapsPossible Paleocene survivorsNon-avian dinosaur remains have occasionally been found above the K-Pg boundary. In 2000, Spencer Lucas and colleagues reported the discovery of a single hadrosaur right femur in the San Juan Basin of New Mexico, and described it as evidence of Paleocene dinosaurs. The rock unit in which the bone was discovered has been dated to the early Paleocene epoch, approximately 64.8 million years ago. If the bone was not re-deposited by weathering action, it would provide evidence that some dinosaur populations survived at least half a million years into the Cenozoic. Other evidence includes the presence of dinosaur remains in the Hell Creek Formation up to {{convert|1.3|m|ft|abbr=on}} above the CretaceousâPaleogene boundary, representing 40,000 years of elapsed time. This has been used to support the view that the K-Pg extinction was gradual. However, these supposed Paleocene dinosaurs are considered by many other researchers to be reworked, that is, washed out of their original locations and then re-buried in younger sediments.JOURNAL, Lucas, S.G., Sullivan, R.M., Cather, S.M., Jasinski, S.E., Fowler, D.W., Heckert, A.B., Spielmann, J.A., Hunt, A.P., 2009, No definitive evidence of Paleocene dinosaurs in the San Juan Basin, Palaeontologia Electronica, 12, 2, 8A, JOURNAL, Renne, P.R., Goodwin, M.B., 2012, Direct U-Pb dating of Cretaceous and Paleocene dinosaur bones, San Juan Basin, New Mexico: COMMENT, Geology, 40, 4, e259, 10.1130/G32521C.1, 2012Geo....40E.259R, free, JOURNAL, Lofgren, D.L., Hotton, C.L., Runkel, A.C., 1990, Reworking of Cretaceous dinosaurs into Paleocene channel, deposits, upper Hell Creek Formation, Montana, Geology, 18, 9, 874â877, 10.1130/0091-7613(1990)0182.3.CO;2, 1990Geo....18..874L, The age estimates have also been considered unreliable.JOURNAL, Koenig, A.E., Lucas, S.G., Neymark, L.A., Heckert, A.B., Sullivan, R.M., Jasinski, S.E., Fowler, D.W., 2012, Direct U-Pb dating of Cretaceous and Paleocene dinosaur bones, San Juan Basin, New Mexico: COMMENT, Geology, 40, 4, e262, 10.1130/G32154C.1, 2012Geo....40E.262K, free,Cultural depictionsFile:Iguanodon Crystal Palace.jpg|thumb|Outdated Iguanodon statues created by Benjamin Waterhouse Hawkins for the Crystal Palace ParkCrystal Palace ParkFile:Winsor McCay (1914)Gertie the Dinosaur.webm|thumb|right|alt=Animated film of a trained dinosaur.|thumbtime=16:46|Gertie the Dinosaur (1914) by Winsor McCayWinsor McCayBy human standards, dinosaurs were creatures of fantastic appearance and often enormous size. As such, they have captured the popular imagination and become an enduring part of human culture. The entry of the word “dinosaur” into the common vernacular reflects the animals’ cultural importance: in English, “dinosaur” is commonly used to describe anything that is impractically large, obsolete, or bound for extinction.Public enthusiasm for dinosaurs first developed in Victorian England, where in 1854, three decades after the first scientific descriptions of dinosaur remains, a menagerie of lifelike dinosaur sculptures was unveiled in London’s Crystal Palace Park. The Crystal Palace dinosaurs proved so popular that a strong market in smaller replicas soon developed. In subsequent decades, dinosaur exhibits opened at parks and museums around the world, ensuring that successive generations would be introduced to the animals in an immersive and exciting way. The enduring popularity of dinosaurs, in its turn, has resulted in significant public funding for dinosaur science, and has frequently spurred new discoveries. In the United States, for example, the competition between museums for public attention led directly to the Bone Wars of the 1880s and 1890s, during which a pair of feuding paleontologists made enormous scientific contributions.The popular preoccupation with dinosaurs has ensured their appearance in literature, film, and other media. Beginning in 1852 with a passing mention in Charles Dickens{{’}} Bleak House, dinosaurs have been featured in large numbers of fictional works. Jules Verne’s 1864 novel Journey to the Center of the Earth, Sir Arthur Conan Doyle’s 1912 book The Lost World, the 1914 animated film Gertie the Dinosaur (featuring the first animated dinosaur), the iconic 1933 film King Kong, the 1954 Godzilla and its many sequels, the best-selling 1990 novel Jurassic Park by Michael Crichton and its 1993 film adaptation are just a few notable examples of dinosaur appearances in fiction. Authors of general-interest non-fiction works about dinosaurs, including some prominent paleontologists, have often sought to use the animals as a way to educate readers about science in general. Dinosaurs are ubiquitous in advertising; numerous companies have referenced dinosaurs in printed or televised advertisements, either in order to sell their own products or in order to characterize their rivals as slow-moving, dim-witted, or obsolete.BOOK, Lee, Newton, Madej, Krystina, Disney Stories, Early Animation: Gags and Situations, 2012, 17â24, 10.1007/978-1-4614-2101-6_3, 978-1-4614-2100-9, 192335675,See also
Notes{{Reflist|group=note}}References
Bibliography
Further reading{hide}Library resources box
|onlinebooks=yes
|by=no |lcheading= Dinosaurs |label=Dinosaurs {edih}
|
- content above as imported from Wikipedia
- "dinosaur" does not exist on GetWiki (yet)
- time: 7:15am EDT - Wed, May 22 2024
- "dinosaur" does not exist on GetWiki (yet)
- time: 7:15am EDT - Wed, May 22 2024
[ this remote article is provided by Wikipedia ]
LATEST EDITS [ see all ]
GETWIKI 21 MAY 2024
The Illusion of Choice
Culture
Culture
GETWIKI 09 JUL 2019
Eastern Philosophy
History of Philosophy
History of Philosophy
GETWIKI 09 MAY 2016
GetMeta:About
GetWiki
GetWiki
GETWIKI 18 OCT 2015
M.R.M. Parrott
Biographies
Biographies
GETWIKI 20 AUG 2014
GetMeta:News
GetWiki
GetWiki
© 2024 M.R.M. PARROTT | ALL RIGHTS RESERVED