SUPPORT THE WORK

GetWiki

Old English phonology

ARTICLE SUBJECTS
aesthetics  →
being  →
complexity  →
database  →
enterprise  →
ethics  →
fiction  →
history  →
internet  →
knowledge  →
language  →
licensing  →
linux  →
logic  →
method  →
news  →
perception  →
philosophy  →
policy  →
purpose  →
religion  →
science  →
sociology  →
software  →
truth  →
unix  →
wiki  →
ARTICLE TYPES
essay  →
feed  →
help  →
system  →
wiki  →
ARTICLE ORIGINS
critical  →
discussion  →
forked  →
imported  →
original  →
Old English phonology
[ temporary import ]
please note:
- the content below is remote from Wikipedia
- it has been imported raw for GetWiki
{{Short description|Pronunciation and sounds of Old English}}{{Self reference|For assistance with IPA transcriptions of Old English for Pseudopedia articles, see (Help:IPA/Old English).}}{{More footnotes|date=July 2010}}{{Old English topics}}{{English phonology topics}}{{IPA notice}}Old English phonology is necessarily somewhat speculative since Old English is preserved only as a written language. Nevertheless, there is a very large corpus of the language, and the orthography apparently indicates phonological alternations quite faithfully, so it is not difficult to draw certain conclusions about the nature of Old English phonology.Old English had a distinction between short and long (doubled) consonants, at least between vowels (as seen in {{wikt-lang|ang|sunne}} “sun” and {{wikt-lang|ang|sunu}} “son”, {{wikt-lang|ang|stellan}} “to put” and {{wikt-lang|ang|stelan}} “to steal“), and a distinction between short vowels and long vowels in stressed syllables. It had a larger number of vowel qualities in stressed syllables – {{IPA|/i y u e o æ É‘/}} and in some dialects {{IPA|/ø/}} – than in unstressed ones – {{IPA|/É‘ e u/}}. It had diphthongs that no longer exist in Modern English, which were {{IPA|/io̯ eo̯ æɑ̯/}}, with both short and long versions.

Phonology

Consonants

The inventory of consonant surface sounds (whether allophones or phonemes) of Old English is as shown below. Allophones are enclosed in parentheses.{| class=“wikitable” style=text-align:center|+ Consonants in Old English!! Labial! Dental! Alveolar! Post-alveolar! Palatal! Velar! Glottal! Nasal
m}}|n̥}}) {{IPAlink|n}}||ŋ}})|
! Stop
p}} {{IPAlink|b}}|t}} {{IPAlink|d}}tʃ}} ({{IPAlink|dʒ}})|k}} ({{IPAlink|ɡ}})|
! Fricative
f}} ({{IPAlink|v}})θ}} ({{IPAlink|ð}})s}} ({{IPAlink|z}})ʃ}}ç}})x}} {{IPA link|ɣ}}h}})
! Approximant||
l̥}}) {{IPAlink|l}}|j}}w̥}}) {{IPAlink|w}}|
! Trill||
({{IPAlinkr}}|||

Intervocalic voicing

The fricatives {{IPA|/f θ s/}} had voiced allophones {{IPA|[v ð z]}}, which occurred between vowels or a vowel and a voiced consonant when the preceding sound was stressed.
  • (’letter’) {{IPA|/ˈstæf/}}: {{IPA|[ˈstæf]}}
  • (’letters’) {{IPA|/ˈstÉ‘fÉ‘s/}} > {{IPA|[ˈstÉ‘vÉ‘s]}}
  • (’blacksmith’) {{IPA|/smiθ/}}: {{IPA|[smiθ]}}
  • (’blacksmiths’) {{IPA|/ˈsmiθɑs/}} > {{IPA|[ˈsmiðɑs]}}
  • (’house’ noun) {{IPA|/ˈhuːs/}}: {{IPA|[ˈhuːs]}}
  • (’to house’) {{IPA|/ˈhuːsiÉ‘n/}} > {{IPA|[ˈhuːziÉ‘n]}}
  • (’forth’) {{IPA|/forθ/}}: {{IPA|[forθ]}}
  • compare (’earth’) {{IPA|/ˈeo̯rθe/}} > {{IPA|[ˈeo̯rðe]}}
  • (’fathom’) {{IPA|/ˈfæθm/}} > {{IPA|[ˈfæðm]}}
Proto-Germanic {{PIE|*ð}} (a fricative allophone of {{PIE|*d}}) developed into the OE stop {{IPA|/d/}}, but Proto-Germanic {{PIE|*β}} (a fricative allophone of {{PIE|*b}}) developed into the OE fricative {{IPA|/f/}} (either its voiced allophone {{IPA|[v]}} or its voiceless allophone [f]).{{Harvnb|Hogg|1992|pp=108–111}}
  • PG {{PIE|fadÄ“r}} {{IPA|[ˈɸɑðɛːr]}} > OE {{IPA|/ˈfæder/}}
  • PG {{PIE|stabaz}} {{IPA|[ˈstɑβɑz]}} > OE stæf {{IPA|/ˈstæf/}}
    • PG {{PIE|habjanÄ…, habdÄ“}} > OE , {{IPA|[ˈhÉ‘bbÉ‘n]}}, {{IPA|[ˈhævde]}} ‘(to) have, had’

Dorsal consonants

Old English had a fairly large set of dorsal (postalveolar, palatal, velar) and glottal consonants: {{IPA|[k, tʃ, É¡, dÊ’, É£, j, ʃ, x, ç, h]}}. Typically only {{IPA|/k, tʃ, É£, j, ʃ, x/}} are analyzed as separate phonemes; {{IPA|[dÊ’]}} is considered an allophone of {{IPA|/j/}}, {{IPA|[É¡]}} an allophone of {{IPA|/É£/}}, and {{IPA|[h]}} and {{IPA|[ç]}} allophones of {{IPA|/x/}}.Historically, {{IPA|/tʃ, ʃ/}} developed from {{IPA|/k, sk/}} by palatalization, and some cases of {{IPA|/j/}} developed from palatalization of {{IPA|/É£/}}, while others developed from Proto-Germanic {{PIE|*j}}. (Although this palatalization occurred as a regular sound change, later vowel changes and borrowings meant that the occurrence of the palatal forms was no longer predictable, that is, the palatals and the velars had become separate phonemes.) Both the velars {{IPA|/k, É£/}} (including {{IPA|[É¡]}}) and the palatals {{IPA|/tʃ, j/}} (including {{IPA|[dÊ’]}}) are spelled as {{vr|}}, {{vr|}} in Old English manuscripts.In modern texts, the palatalized versions may be written with a dot above the letter: {{vr|}}, {{vr|}}. (As just mentioned, it would otherwise not generally be possible to predict whether a palatal or velar is meant, although there are certain common patterns; for example, {{vr|}} often has the palatalized sound before the front vowels {{vr|}}, {{vr|}}, {{vr|}}. Note that Old English had palatalized {{vr|g}} in certain words that have hard G in Modern English due to Old Norse influence, such as “give” and “gate”.){{IPA|/j/}} was pronounced as {{IPA|[j]}} in most cases, but as the affricate {{IPA|[dÊ’]}} after {{IPA|/n/}} or when geminated (fortition). The voiced velar fricative {{IPA|/É£/}} was pronounced as the stop {{IPA|[É¡]}} after {{IPA|/n/}} or when doubled. In late Old English, {{IPA|[É£]}} was devoiced to {{IPA|/x/}} at the ends of words. Because of this, and the palatalization referred to above, the phonemes {{IPA|/É£/}}, {{IPA|/j/}}, and {{IPA|/x/}} came to alternate in the inflectional paradigms of some words.
  • (’day’) {{IPA|/ˈdæj/}}
  • ({{sc|gen.sg}}) {{IPA|/ˈdæjes/}}
  • ({{sc|nom.pl}}) {{IPA|/ˈdɑɣɑs/}}
  • (’dawn’) {{IPA|[ˈdÉ‘É£uÅ‹É¡]}}
  • , (’castle’) {{IPA|/burÉ£/}} > {{IPA|/burx/}}
  • ({{sc|dat.pl}}) {{IPA|/ˈburÉ£um/}}
  • ({{sc|nom.pl}}) {{IPA|/byrj/}}
  • (’to sing’) {{IPA|/ˈsenjan/}} > {{IPA|[ˈsendÊ’É‘n]}} (from {{PIE|sangijan}})
  • (’bridge’) {{IPA|/bryjj/}} > {{IPA|[bryddÊ’]}} (from {{PIE|bruggjō}} < {{PIE|bruÉ£jō}})
In late Old English, {{IPA|[ɡ]}} appeared in initial position as well, and {{IPA|[ɣ]}} became an allophone of {{IPA|/ɡ/}}, occurring only after a vowel.{{IPA|[h, ç]}} are allophones of {{IPA|/x/}} occurring word-initially and after a front vowel respectively.
  • (’dog’) {{IPA|/xund/}} > {{IPA|[hund]}}
  • (’boy’) {{IPA|/knixt/}} > {{IPA|[kniçt]}}
The evidence for the allophone {{IPA|[ç]}} after front vowels is indirect, as it is not indicated in the orthography. Nevertheless, the fact that there was historically a fronting of {{PIE|*k}} to {{IPA|/tʃ/}} and of {{PIE|*ɣ}} to {{IPA|/j/}} after front vowels makes it very likely. Moreover, in late Middle English, {{IPA|/x/}} sometimes became {{IPA|/f/}} (e.g. tough, cough), but only after back vowels, never after front vowels. This is explained if we assume that the allophone {{IPA|[x]}} sometimes became {{IPA|[f]}} but the allophone {{IPA|[ç]}} never did.

Sonorants

{{IPA|[Å‹]}} is an allophone of {{IPA|/n/}} occurring before {{IPA|[k]}} and {{IPA|[É¡]}}. Words that have final {{IPA|/Å‹/}} in standard Modern English have the cluster {{IPA|[Å‹É¡]}} in Old English.
  • (’sink’) {{IPA|/ˈsinkÉ‘n/}} > {{IPA|[ˈsiÅ‹kÉ‘n]}}
  • (’ring’) {{IPA|/hrinÉ¡/}} > {{IPA|[rÌ¥iÅ‹É¡]}}
The exact nature of Old English {{IPA|/r/}} is not known. It may have been an alveolar approximant {{IPA|[ɹ]}}, as in most Modern English accents, an alveolar flap {{IPA|[ɾ]}}, or an alveolar trill {{IPA|[r]}}.{{IPA|/w, l, n, r/}} were pronounced as voiceless sonorants {{IPA|[ʍ, l̥, n̥, r̥]}} following {{IPA|/x/}}.
  • {{IPA|[ʍæt]}} (’what’)
  • {{IPA|[l̥ɑːf]}} (’bread’) (Modern English )
  • {{IPA|[nÌ¥utu]}} (’nut’)
  • {{IPA|[rÌ¥iÅ‹É¡]}} (’ring’)
However, it is also commonly theorized that the ⟨h⟩ in these sequences was unpronounced, and only stood for the voicelessness of the following sonorant.

Velarization

{{IPA|/l r/}} apparently had velarized allophones {{IPA|[É«]}} and {{IPA|[rË ]}}, or similar, when followed by another consonant or when geminated. This is suggested by the vowel shifts of breaking and retraction before {{IPA|/l r/}}, which could be cases of assimilation to a following velar consonant:
  • > > {{IPA|[ˈleo̯rË niÉ‘n]}} (’learn’)
  • > > {{IPA|[ˈeo̯rˠðe]}}
  • > {{IPA|[ˈfæɑ̯ɫɫɑn]}} (’to fall’)
Due to phonotactic constraints on initial clusters, ⟨wr⟩ and ⟨wl⟩ are thought by some to be digraphs representing these velarized sounds, in which case the distinction was phonemic:JOURNAL, Fisiak, Jacek, Jan 1967, The Old English ⟨wr-⟩ and ⟨wl-⟩, Linguistics (journal), Linguistics, 5, 32, 12–14, 10.1515/ling.1967.5.32.12, 143847822,
  • : {{IPA|[ˈrË iːdÉ‘n]}} “to grow”
  • : {{IPA|[ˈriːdÉ‘n]}} “to ride”
  • : {{IPA|[ˈɫiːtÉ‘n]}} “to look”
  • : {{IPA|[ˈliːtÉ‘n]}} “to bend”
However, this theory is inconsistent with orthoepic and orthographic evidence from the Early Modern English era,BOOK, Lass, Roger, 27 January 2000, The Cambridge History of the English Language Volume 3,books.google.com/books?id=CCvMbntWth8C, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 64, 9780521264761, Roger Lass,
as well as borrowings into and from Welsh, which has {{IPA|[wl]}} and {{IPA|[wr]}} as genuine initial clusters.

Vowels

Old English had a moderately large vowel system. In stressed syllables, both monophthongs and diphthongs had short and long versions, which were clearly distinguished in pronunciation. In unstressed syllables, vowels were reduced or elided, though not as much as in Modern English.

Monophthongs

Old English had seven or eight vowel qualities, depending on dialect, and each could appear as either a long or short monophthong. An example of a pair of words distinguished by vowel length is {{IPA|[god]}} (’god’) and {{IPA|[goːd]}} (’good’).{|class=“wikitable” style="text-align: center“|+ Monophthongs in Old English! rowspan=“2“|! colspan=“2” | Front! colspan=“2” | Back! unrounded! rounded! unrounded! rounded
! Close
i iː}} {{IPAu uː}}
! Mid
e eː}} {{IPAo oː}}
! Open
æ æː}} {{IPA|
The front mid rounded vowel {{IPA|/ø(ː)/}} occurs in the Anglian dialects, for instance, but merged into {{IPA|/e eː/}} in the West Saxon dialect.The long–short vowel pair {{IPA|/æ æː/}} developed into the Middle English vowels {{IPA|/a ɛː/}}, with two different vowel qualities distinguished by height, so they may have had different qualities in Old English as well.{{Harvnb|Hogg|1992|pp=85–86}}The short open back vowel {{IPA|/É‘/}} before nasals was probably rounded to {{IPA|[É’]}}. This is suggested by the fact that the word for “person”, for example, is spelled as or .In unstressed syllables, only three vowels, {{IPA|/É‘ e u/}}, were distinguished.{{Harvnb|Hogg|1992|pp=119–122}} Here {{IPA|/æ, e, i/}} were reduced to {{IPA|/e/}}; {{IPA|/É‘, o/}} were reduced to {{IPA|/É‘/}}, and {{IPA|/u/}} remained. Unstressed {{IPA|/e, u/}} were sometimes pronounced/ spelled as {{IPA|[i, o]}} in closed syllables, as in and .

Diphthongs

All dialects of Old English had diphthongs. Like monophthongs, diphthongs appear to have had short and long versions. In modern texts, long diphthongs are marked with a macron on the first letter. The short versions behave like short monophthongs, and the long versions like long monophthongs. Most Old English diphthongs consist of a front vowel followed by a back offglide; according to some analyses they were in fact front vowels followed by a velarized consonant.{{Harvnb|Hogg|1992|pp=101–105}}{{Harvnb|Schrijver|2014|pp=87–91}} The diphthongs tend to be height-harmonic, meaning that both parts of the diphthong had the same vowel height (high, mid or low).The Anglian dialects had the following diphthongs:{|class=“wikitable” style="text-align: center“|+ Diphthongs in Old English! Firstelement! Short(monomoraic)! Long(bimoraic)! Spelling(original)! Spelling(modern editions) ! High
iu̯}}iːu̯}}
! Mid
eo̯}}eːo̯}}
! Low
æɑ̯}}æːɑ̯}}
The high diphthongs and were not present in West Saxon, having merged into and . Early West Saxon, however, had an additional pair of long and short diphthongs written (distinguished as and in modern editions), which developed from i-mutation or umlaut of or , or . Scholars do not agree on how they were pronounced; they may have been {{IPA|[ie̯ iːe̯]}} or {{IPA|[iy̯ iːy̯]}}. They were apparently monophthongized by Alfred the Great’s time, to a vowel whose pronunciation is still uncertain, but is known as “unstable i”. This later went on to merge with {{IPA|/y yː/}}, according to spellings such as , for earlier and (’to believe’).Quirk, R., Wrenn, C.L., An Old English Grammar, Psychology Press, 1957, p. 140. (According to another interpretation, however, the “unstable i” may simply have been {{IPA|/i/}}, and the later {{IPA|/y/}} can be explained by the fact that Late West Saxon was not a direct descendant of Early West Saxon. See Old English dialects.) This produced additional instances of {{IPA|/y(ː)/}} alongside those that developed from i-mutation and from sporadic rounding of {{IPA|/i(ː)/}} in certain circumstances (e.g. ‘much’ from earlier , with rounding perhaps triggered by the rounded {{IPA|/m/}}). All instances of {{IPA|/y(ː)/}} were normally unrounded next to {{vr|}}, {{vr|}} and {{vr|}}, hence from earlier ‘to give’.

Origin of diphthongs

{{Further|Phonological history of Old English}}Old English diphthongs have several origins, either from Proto-Germanic or from Old English vowel shifts. Long diphthongs developed partly from the Proto-Germanic diphthongs {{PIE|*iu, *eu, *au}} and partly from the Old English vowel shifts, while the short diphthongs developed only from Old English vowel shifts. These are examples of diphthongs inherited from Proto-Germanic:
  • PG {{PIE|biumi}} > Anglian , West Saxon ‘[I] am’
  • PG {{PIE|deuzÄ…}} > OE ‘animal’ > Modern English deer
  • PG {{PIE|dauþuz}} > OE ‘death’
There are three vowel shifts that resulted in diphthongs: breaking, palatal diphthongization, and back mutation. Through breaking, Anglo-Frisian short {{PIE|*i, *e, *æ}} developed into the short diphthongs , , before {{IPA|/h, w/}} or a consonant cluster beginning with {{IPA|/r, l/}}, and Anglo-Frisian long {{PIE|*ī, *ǣ}} developed into the diphthongs and before {{IPA|/h/}}. Palatal diphthongization changed , and , , and , to the diphthongs , , , respectively after the palatalized consonants , , and (though this may have only been a spelling change). Back mutation changed , , and sometimes to , , and before a back vowel in the next syllable.
  • PG {{PIE|liznōjanÄ…}} > Anglo-Frisian {{PIE|lirnian}} > Anglian , West Saxon leornian ‘learn’ (breaking)
  • PG {{PIE|nāh}} > AF {{PIE|nÇ£h}} > Old English ‘near’ (breaking)
  • PG {{PIE|gebanÄ…}} > AF {{PIE|jefan}} > ‘give’ (palatal diphthongization)
  • PG {{PIE|sebun}} > AF {{PIE|sefon}} > OE ‘seven’ (back mutation)
Scholars disagree on whether short diphthongs are phonologically possible, and some say that Old English short diphthongs must actually have been centralized vowels. Hogg argues against this, saying that a length contrast in diphthongs exists in modern languages, such as Scots, in which the short diphthong in tide {{IPA|/təid/}} contrasts with the long diphthong in tied {{IPA|/taid/}}.Peter Schrijver has theorized that Old English breaking developed from language contact with Celtic. He says that two Celtic languages were spoken in Britain, Highland British Celtic, which was phonologically influenced by British Latin and developed into Welsh, Cornish, and Breton, and Lowland British Celtic, which was brought to Ireland at the time of the Roman conquest of Britain and became Old Irish. Lowland British Celtic had velarization like Old and Modern Irish, which gives preceding vowels a back offglide, and this feature was loaned by language contact into Old English, resulting in backing diphthongs.{{Harvnb|Schrijver|2014|pp=87–92}}

Phonotactics

Phonotactics is the study of the sequences of phonemes that occur in languages and the sound structures that they form. In this study it is usual to represent consonants in general with the letter C and vowels with the letter V, so that a syllable such as ‘be’ is described as having CV structure. The IPA symbol used to show a division between syllables is the dot {{IPA|[.]}}. Old English stressed syllables were structured as (C)3V(C)3; that is, up to three consonants in both the onset and coda with one vowel as the nucleus.

Onset

Onset clusters typically consist of a fricative {{IPA|/s, ʃ, f, θ/}} and a stop {{IPA|/p, t, k, b, d, É£/}}, although {{IPA|/s/}} is allowed as a third element before voiceless stops. The other onset consonants {{IPA|/j, tʃ, x, nÌ¥, rÌ¥, lÌ¥, ʍ/}} (and {{IPA|/rË , É«/}} if these are accepted as existing) always occur alone. Alternatively, the voiceless sonorants {{IPA|[nÌ¥, rÌ¥, lÌ¥, ʍ]}} can be analyzed as clusters of {{IPA|/x/}} and a voiced sonorant: {{IPA|/xn, xr, xl, xw/}}. Conversely, the clusters of {{IPA|/s/}} and a voiceless stop- {{IPA|/sp, st, sk/}} can be argued to be phonemic, although no analyses do so.{| class=“wikitable” style="text-align: center;“|+ Old English syllable-initial consonant clusters! rowspan=“2” | Firstconsonant !! rowspan=“2” | Middleconsonant !! colspan=“6” | Lastconsonant! -∅! {{IPA|-m}}! {{IPA|-n}}! {{IPA|-r}}! {{IPA|-l}}! {{IPA|-w}}
! rowspan=“11” | ∅-! -∅-|
m}}n}}r}}l}}w}}
! {{IPA|-p-}}
p}} —pr}}pl}} —
! {{IPA|-b-}}
b}}br}}bl}}
! {{IPA|-t-}}
t}}tr}} —tw}}
! {{IPA|-d-}}
d}}dr}}dw}}
! {{IPA|-k-}}
k}} —kn}}kr}}kl}}kw}}
! {{IPA|-É£-}}
ɡ}}ɡn}}ɡr}}ɡl}}| —
! {{IPA|ʃ-}}
ʃ}} —ʃr}} —
! {{IPA|f-}}
f}}| —fn}}fr}}fl}}| —
! {{IPA|θ-}}
θ}} —θr}}| —θw}}
! {{IPA|x-}}
h}}| —n̥}}r̥}}l̥}}ʍ}}
! rowspan=“4” | {{IPA|s-}}! -∅-
s}}sm}}sn}}| —sl}}sw}}
! {{IPA|-p-}}
sp}} —spr}}spl}}| —
! {{IPA|-t-}}
st}}str}} —
! {{IPA|-k-}}
sk}}skr}}
! colspan=“2” | Other
{{IPA|j, tʃ, rˠ/wr, ɫ/wl}}

Nucleus

The syllable nucleus was always a vowel.

Coda

{{Empty section|date=November 2021|small=left}}

Sound changes

Like Frisian, Old English underwent palatalization of the velar consonants {{IPA|/k ɣ/}} and fronting of the open vowel {{IPA|/ɑ ɑː/}} to {{IPA|/æ æː/}} in certain cases. It also underwent vowel shifts that were not shared with Old Frisian: smoothing, diphthong height harmonization, and breaking. Diphthong height harmonization and breaking resulted in the unique Old English diphthongs , , , .Palatalization yielded some Modern English word-pairs in which one word has a velar and the other has a palatal or postalveolar. Some of these were inherited from Old English (drink and drench, day and dawn), while others have an unpalatalized form loaned from Old Norse ( and ).

Dialects

{{anchor|Dialect differences}}{{see also|Phonological history of Old English#Dialects}}Old English had four major dialect groups: Kentish, West Saxon, Mercian, and Northumbrian. Kentish and West Saxon were the dialects spoken south of a line approximately following the course of the River Thames: Kentish in the easternmost portion of that area and West Saxon everywhere else. Mercian was spoken in the middle part of the country, separated from the southern dialects by the Thames and from Northumbrian by the River Humber. Mercian and Northumbrian are often grouped together as “Anglian”.The biggest differences occurred between West Saxon and the other groups. The differences occurred mostly in the front vowels, and particularly the diphthongs. (However, Northumbrian was distinguished from the rest by much less palatalization.{{citation needed|date=April 2015}} Forms in Modern English with hard {{IPA|/k/}} and {{IPA|/É¡/}} where a palatalized sound would be expected from Old English are due either to Northumbrian influence or to direct borrowing from Scandinavian. Note that, in fact, the lack of palatalization in Northumbrian was probably due to heavy Scandinavian influence.)The early history of Kentish was similar to Anglian, but sometime around the ninth century all of the front vowels , , (long and short) merged into (long and short). The further discussion concerns the differences between Anglian and West Saxon, with the understanding that Kentish, other than where noted, can be derived from Anglian by front-vowel merger. The primary differences were:
  • Original (post Anglo-Frisian brightening) was raised to in Anglian but remained in West Saxon. This occurred before other changes such as breaking, and did not affect caused by i-umlaut of . Hence, e.g., (’to divide’) < {{PIE|dailijan}} appears the same in both dialects, but West Saxon (’to sleep’) appears as slÄ“pan in Anglian. (Note the corresponding vowel difference in the spelling of “deal” < vs. “sleep” < Anglian .)
  • The West Saxon vowels /, caused by i-umlaut of long and short , , did not appear in Anglian. Instead, i-umlaut of and rare is spelled , and i-umlaut of remains as .
  • Breaking of short {{IPA|/æ/}} to ea did not happen in Anglian before {{IPA|/l/}}+consonant; instead, the vowel was retracted to {{IPA|/É‘/}}. When mutated by i-umlaut, it appears again as (vs. West Saxon ). Hence, Anglian (’cold’) vs. West Saxon .
  • Merger of and (long and short) occurred early in West Saxon, but much later in Anglian.
  • Many instances of diphthongs in Anglian, including the majority of cases caused by breaking, were turned back into monophthongs again by the process of “Anglian smoothing”, which occurred before , , , alone or preceded by or . This accounts for some of the most noticeable differences between standard (i.e. West Saxon) Old English and Modern English spelling. E.g. (’eye’) became in Anglian; (’near’) became Anglian , later raised to in the transition to Middle English by raising of before (hence in Modern English); (’nearest’) become Anglian , shortened to in late Old English by vowel-shortening before three consonants (hence next in Modern English).
Modern English derives mostly from the Anglian dialect rather than the standard West Saxon dialect of Old English. However, since London sits on the Thames near the boundary of the Anglian, West Saxon, and Kentish dialects, some West Saxon and Kentish forms have entered Modern English. For example, bury has its spelling derived from West Saxon and its pronunciation{{ambiguous|reason=the one that’s homophonous with “berry”, or the one that rhymes with “furry“?|date=January 2022}} from Kentish (see below).

Examples

The prologue to Beowulf:{| class=“wikitable”
[ˈʍæt weː ˈɡɑːrˠˌde.nɑ in ˈjæːɑ̯rˠˌdɑ.ɣum]}}
[ˈθeːo̯dˌky.niŋ.ɡɑ ˈθrym jeˈfru.non]}}
[huː θɑː ˈæ.ðe.liŋ.ɡɑs ˈel.len ˈfre.me.don]}}
[oft ˈʃyld ˈʃeː.viŋɡ ˈʃɑ.ðe.nɑ ˈθræːɑ̯.tum]}}
[ˈmɒ.ne.ɣum ˈmæːj.ðum ˈme.duˌset.lɑ ofˈtæːɑ̯x]}}
[ˈej.zo.de eo̯rˠɫ ˈsɪθ.θɑn ˈæː.rest wæɑ̯rˠθ]}}
[ˈfæːɑ̯ˌʃæɑ̯ft ˈfun.den heː θæs ˈfroː.vre jeˈbɑːd]}}
[weːo̯ks un.der woɫk.num ˈweo̯rˠðˌmyn.dum ˈθɑːx]}}
[oθ θæt him ˈæːj.ʍylt͡ʃ ˈθɑː.rɑ ymbˈsit.ten.drɑ]}}
[ˈo.ver ˈr̥ɒnˌrɑː.de ˈhyː.rɑn ʃoɫ.de]}}
[ˈɡom.bɑn ˈjyl.dɑn θæt wæs ɡoːd ˈky.niŋɡ]}}
{{Listen| filename = Ang-Our Father.ogg| title = Fæder Å«re| description = Recording of the Lord’s Prayer in reconstructed Old English}}The Lord’s Prayer:{| cellspacing=“10” style="white-space: wrap;”! Line || Original || IPA || Translation
[ˈfæ.der ˈuː.re θuː θe æɑ̯rt on ˈheo̯.vo.num]}}| Our father, you who are in heaven,
[siːy̯ θiːn ˈnɒ.mɑ jeˈhɑːɫ.ɣod]}}| May your name be hallowed.
[ˌtoː.beˈku.me θiːn ˈriː.t͡ʃe]}}| May your kingdom come,
[jeˈweo̯rˠ.ðe θiːn ˈwil.lɑ on ˈeo̯rˠ.ðan swɑː swɑː on ˈheo̯.vo.num]}}| Your will be done, on Earth as in heaven.
[ˈuːrˠ.ne ˈdæj.ʍɑmˌliː.kɑn hl̥ɑːf ˈse.le uːs toːˈdæj]}}| Give us our daily bread today,
[ɒnd forˠˈjiy̯f uːs ˈuː.re ˈɣyl.tɑs swɑː swɑː weː forˠˈjiy̯.vɑθ uː.rum ˈɣyl.ten.dum]}}| And forgive us our debts, as we forgive our debtors.
[ɒnd ne jeˈlæːd θuː uːs on ˈkost.nuŋ.ɡe ɑk ɑːˈliːy̯s uːs of ˈy.ve.le]}}| And do not lead us into temptation, but rescue us from evil.
[ˈsoːðˌliː.t͡ʃe]}}| Amen.

Notes

{{Reflist}}

References

  • BOOK, Baker, Peter S., Introduction to Old English, 2nd, Oxford, Blackwell, 2007, 978-1-4051-5272-3, registration,archive.org/details/isbn_9781405152723,
  • BOOK, Campbell, A., Old English Grammar, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 1959, 0-19-811943-7,
  • JOURNAL, Cercignani, Fausto, Fausto Cercignani, The Development of /k/ and /sk/ in Old English, Journal of English and Germanic Philology, 82, 3, 1983, 313–323, 27709191,
  • ENCYCLOPEDIA, Hogg, Richard M., Chapter 3: Phonology and Morphology, Hogg, Richard M., The Cambridge History of the English Language, 1: The Beginnings to 1066, Cambridge University Press, 1992, 978-0-521-26474-7, 10.1017/CHOL9780521264747, 67–168,
  • BOOK, Lass, Roger, Old English: A historical linguistic companion, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1994, 0-521-43087-9,
  • BOOK, Mitchell, Bruce, Robinson, Fred C., A Guide to Old English, 6th, Oxford, Blackwell, 2001, 0-631-22636-2,
  • BOOK, Schrijver, Peter, 2014, Language Contact and the Origins of the Germanic Languages, Routledge, 978-0-415-35548-3,

External links

{{Commons category|Anglo-Saxon pronunciation}}{{Authority control}}

- content above as imported from Wikipedia
- "Old English phonology" does not exist on GetWiki (yet)
- time: 5:08am EDT - Wed, May 22 2024
[ this remote article is provided by Wikipedia ]
LATEST EDITS [ see all ]
GETWIKI 21 MAY 2024
GETWIKI 09 JUL 2019
Eastern Philosophy
History of Philosophy
GETWIKI 09 MAY 2016
GETWIKI 18 OCT 2015
M.R.M. Parrott
Biographies
GETWIKI 20 AUG 2014
CONNECT