gnosis
{{Refimprove|date=October 2008}}{{otheruses4|the concept of gnosis|the magazine|Gnosis (magazine)|the alien race|Xenosaga}}
Gnosis (from one of the
Greek words for
knowledge, γνώσις) is the spiritual knowledge of a
saint or
mystically enlightened human being. In the cultures of the term (
Byzantine and
Hellenic)
gnosis was a special knowledge or
insight into the infinite, divine and uncreated in all and above all,
(1) rather than knowledge strictly into the finite, natural or material world which is called
Epistemological knowledge.
(2) Gnosis is a
transcendent as well as
mature understanding.
(3) It indicates direct spiritual experiential knowledge
(4) and
intuitive knowledge, rather than that from rational or reasoned thinking.In the formation of early Christianity, various
sectarian groups, labeled "gnostics" by their opponents, emphasised spiritual knowledge (
gnosis) over
faith (
pistis) in the teachings of the established community of Christians. These sectarians considered the most
essential part of the process of
salvation to be this personal knowledge, in contrast to faith in
ecclesiastical authority. These break away groups were branded
heretics by the
fathers of the early church due to teaching this type of authority rejection referred to as
antinomianism. The knowledge of these sectarian groups is contested by Eastern Orthodox theology as speculative knowledge derived from religio-philosophical systems rather than knowledge derived from
revelation as
insight (
noesis) coming from faith.
(5) As such the gnostic sects made a duality out of the difference between the activities of the nous (or spirit) called noesis (insight) and pistis (
faith).
Etymology
Gnosis is a Greek word, originally used in specifically Platonic philosophical contexts.
Plato, for example, uses the terms
gnostikoi’ and
gnostike episteme in the text called
Politikos. The word means the knowledge to influence and control,
Gnostike episteme also was used to indicate one's
aptitude. The terms do not appear to indicate any mystic,
esoteric or hidden meaning in the works of Plato, but instead expressed a sort of higher intelligence and ability analogous to talent.
(6) The term is used throughout Greek philosophy as a technical term for experience knowledge (see
gnosiology) in contrast to theoretical knowledge or
epistemology. The term is also related to the study of knowledge retention or memory (also see
cognition). In relation to
ontic or
ontological, which is how something actually is.
The Gnostic sects
Among the
sectarian gnostics,
gnosis was first and foremost a matter of self-knowledge which was considered the path leading to the goal of enlightenment. Through such self-knowledge and personal purification (virtuous living) the adept is led to direct knowledge of God. Later,
Valentinius (Valentinus), taught that gnosis was the privileged
Gnosis kardias "knowledge of the heart" or "
insight" about the
spiritual nature of the
cosmos, that brought about
salvation to the
pneumatics— the name given to those believed to have reached the final goal of sanctity. Gnosis was distinct from the secret teachings revealed to initiates once they had reached a certain level of progression akin to arcanum. Rather, these teachings were paths to obtain
gnosis.(See e.g. "fukasetsu", or
ineffability, a quality of realization common to many, if not most, esoteric traditions; see also
Jung on the difference between
sign and
symbol.) Gnosis from this perspective being analogous, to the same meaning as the words
occult and arcana.
(7)The Gnostics in the Early Christian Era
{{seealso|Samuel Angus}}During the early formation of Christianity, church authorities exerted considerable amounts of energy attempting to weed out what were considered to be false doctrines (i.e.
Irenaeus'
On the Detection and Overthrow of False Gnosis). The gnostics (as one
sectarian group) held views which were incompatible with the emerging Ante-Nicene community. Among Christian
heresiologists, the concept of
false gnosis was used to denote different
Pagan,
Jewish or
Christian belief systems (i.e. the
Eleusinian Mysteries or
Glycon) and their various teachings of what was deemed
(8)religio-philosophical systems of knowledge
(9) as opposed to authentic
gnosis (
see below, Gnosis among the Greek Fathers). The sectarians used gnosis or secret knowledge to reject the traditions of the established community or church. Authorities throughout the community criticizing this
antinomianism as inconsistent with the communities teachings. Sectarians and followers of
gnosticism being first rejected by the Jewish communities of the Mediterranean (see the
Notzrim 139–67 BCE) then the Christian communities and finally by the late Hellenistic philosophical communities (see
Neoplatonism and Gnosticism).
In the writings of the Greek Fathers
{{seealso|Noetic Consciousness}}The
fathers of early Christianity used the word
gnosis to mean spiritual knowledge, in specific knowledge of the divine. This usage to a degree being analogous with the modern usage of the word mysticism. This positive usage was to contrast it with the use of the word by gnostic sectarians. This use carried over from
Hellenic philosophy into
Greek Orthodoxy as a critical characteristic of
ascetic practices via
St Clement of Alexandria,
Irenaeus,
Hippolytus of Rome,
Hegesippus, and
Origen. Gnosis here meant
intuitive knowledge, spiritual knowledge, heart knowledge (
kardiognosis), memory of an experience of God and or the divine. As such it was emphasized that such knowledge is not secret knowledge but rather a maturing,
transcendent form of knowledge derived from
contemplation (
theoria resulting from practice of
hesychasm), since gnosis can not truly be derived from gnosis but rather gnosis can only be derived from theoria.
(10) Gnosis thus plays an important role in relation to
theosis (deification/personal relationship with God) and
theoria (revelation of the divine, vision of God).
(11) Gnosis, as the proper use of the noetic faculty plays an important role in Eastern Orthodox theology. Its importance in the economy of salvation is discussed periodically in the
Philokalia where as direct, personal knowledge of God (
noesis also see
Noema) it is distinguished from ordinary epistemological knowledge (speculative philosophy).
Hellenic philosophy
The
Neoplatonic philosophers, including
Plotinus, rejected followers of
gnosticism as being un-
Hellenistic and anti-
Plato due to their
vilification of Plato's creator of the universe (the
demiurge),
(12) arriving at
dystheism as the solution to the
problem of evil, taking all their truths over from Plato.
(13) Plotinus did express that gnosis, via
contemplation, was the highest goal of the philosopher toward
henosis.
Eric Voegelin
Eric Voegelin, partially building on the concept of gnosis as used by the Plato and the followers of Gnosticism, along with how it was defined by
Hans Jonas,
(14) defined the gnosis
(15) of the followers of Gnosticism
(16) as religious philosophical teachings that are the foundations of cults. Voegelin identified a number of similarities between ancient Gnosticism and those held by a number of modernist political theories, particularly
communism and
nazism. Voegelin identified the root of the Gnostic impulse as
alienation, that is, a sense of disconnection with society, and a belief that this disconnection is the result of the inherent disorder, or even evil, of the world. This alienation has two effects:
- The belief that the disorder of the world can be transcended by extraordinary insight, learning, or knowledge, called a Gnostic Speculation by Voegelin (the Gnostics themselves referred to this as gnosis).
- The desire to create and implement a policy to actualize the speculation, or as Voegelin described it, to Immanentize the Eschaton, to create a sort of heaven on earth within history by triggering the apocalypse.
Voegelin’s conception of
gnosis and his analysis of Gnosticism in general has come under criticism from recent research, including that of Professor
Eugene Webb of the University of Washington. Webb, a researcher and teacher in the field of the
study of religion, has written several academic monographs on Voegelin’s thought and a book devoted to the exposition of his philosophy as a whole.
(17) In a recent article entitled "Voegelin’s Gnosticism Reconsidered", Webb puts Voegelin’s use of the terms gnosis and Gnosticism under close scrutiny. Webb explains that Voegelin’s concept of Gnosticism was conceived "not primarily to describe ancient phenomena but to help us understand some modern ones for which the evidence is a great deal clearer."
(18) Webb then goes on to state his belief that today "the category (of Gnosticism) is of limited usefulness for the purpose to which he put it…and the fact that the idea of Gnosticism as such has become so problematic and complex in recent years must at the very least undercut Voegelin’s effort to trace a historical line of descent from ancient sources to the modern phenomena he tried to use them to illuminate."
(19)See also
References
-
[St. Symeon the New Theologian in Practical & Theological Discourses, 1.1 The Philokalia Volume Four: When men search for God with their bodily eyes they find Him nowhere, for He is invisible. But for those who ponder in the Spirit He is present everywhere. He is in all, yet beyond all]
-
[University of Athens - Department of Theology]
-
[Αποτελέσματα αναζητήσεως : knowledge]
-
[The Philokalia Volume Four glossary pg 434 Spiritual Knowledge (γνώσις) :the knowledge of the intellect (q.v.). As such, it is knowledge inspired by God, as insight (noesis) or (revelational, intuitive knowledge (see gnosiology) and so linked with contemplation and immediate spiritual perception.]
-
[" Orthodox Dogmatic Theology: A Concise Exposition Protopresbyter Michael Pomazansky Appendix II The Heresies which disturbed the church in the first millennium Pg 376 Gnosticism The foundation of the Gnostic system is the idea of the creation of a higher religio-philosophical knowledge (gnosis) by uniting Greek philosophy and the philosophy of the learned Alexandrian Jew Philo with the Eastern religions, especially the religion of Zoroaster. Section reprinted here due to not being included in the online version weblink]
-
[Cooper and Hutchinson. "Introduction to Politikos". Cooper, John M. & Hutchinson, D. S. (Eds.) (1997). Plato: Complete Works, Hackett Publishing Co., Inc. ISBN 0-87220-349-2.]
-
[III The Mystery-Religions were systems of gnosis akin, and forming a stage to, those mevements to which the name of Gnosticism became attached pg 52 The Mystery religions: A Study in the Religious Background of Early Christianity By Samuel AngusPublished by Courier Dover Publications, 1975ISBN 0486231240, 9780486231242 weblink]
-
[III The Mystery-Religions were systems of gnosis akin, and forming a stage to, those movements to which the name of Gnosticism became attached pg 52 The Mystery religions: A Study in the Religious Background of Early Christianity By Samuel AngusPublished by Courier Dover Publications, 1975ISBN 0486231240, 9780486231242 weblink]
-
[ i.e. "Each of the Nine Ecumenical Councils condemned specific heresies of their time exactly because they deviated from this cure by attempting to transform the medical practice of the Church into systems of philosophical and mystical speculations and practices."weblink]
-
[Glossary of terms from the Philokalia pg 434 the knowledge of the intellect as distinct from that of the reason(q.v.). Knowledge inspired by God, and so linked with contemplation (q.v.) and immediate spiritual perception.]
-
[The Mystical Theology of the Eastern Church, SVS Press, 1997. (ISBN 0-913836-31-1) James Clarke & Co Ltd, 2002. (ISBN 0-227-67919-9) pg 218]
-
[They claimed to be a privileged caste of beings, in whom alone God was interested, and who were saved not by their own efforts but by some dramatic and arbitrary divine proceeding; and this, Plotinus claimed, led to immorality. Worst of all, they despised and hated the material universe and denied it's goodness and the goodness of its maker. For a Platonist, is utter blasphemy -- and all the worse because it obviously derives to some extent from the sharply other-worldly side of Plato's own teaching (e.g. in the Phaedo). At this point in his attack Plotinus comes very close in some ways to the orthodox Christian opponents of Gnosticism, who also insist that this world is the work of God in his goodness. But, here as on the question of salvation, the doctrine which Plotinus is defending is as sharply opposed on other ways to orthodox Christianity as to Gnosticism: for he maintains not only the goodness of the material universe but also it's eternity and it's divinity. A.H. Armstrong introduction to II 9. Against the Gnostics Pages 220-222 ]
-
[The teaching of the Gnostics seems to him untraditional, irrational and immoral. They despise and revile the ancient Platonic teachings and claim to have a new and superior wisdom of their own: but in fact anything that is true in their teaching COMES FROM PLATO, and all they have done themselves is to add senseless complications and pervert the true traditional doctrine into a melodramatic, superstitious fantasy designed to feed their own delusions of grandeur. They reject the only true way of salvation through wisdom and virtue, the slow patient study of truth and pursuit of perfection by men who respect the wisdom of the ancients and know their place in the universe. A.H. Armstrong introduction to II 9. Against the Gnostics Pages 220-222 ]
-
[The Collected Works of Eric Voegelin By Eric Voegelin, Ellis Sandoz, Gilbert Weiss, William Petropulos Published by Louisiana State University Press, 1989 ISBN 0807118265, 9780807118269 weblink]
-
[Glossary of Voegelin terms online weblink Gnosis "Knowledge". Originally a general term in Greek for knowledge of various sorts. Later, especially with the Gnostic movement of the early Christian era, a purported direct, immediate apprehension or vision of truth without the need for critical reflection; the special gift of a spiritual and cognitive elite. According to Voegelin, the claim to gnosis may take intellectual, emotional, and volitional forms." [Webb 1981:282]]
-
[Glossary of Voegelin terms online weblink Gnosticism "A type of thinking that claims absolute cognitive mastery of reality. Relying as it does on a claim to gnosis, gnosticism considers its knowledge not subject to criticism. As a religious or quasi-religious movement, gnosticism may take transcendentalizing (as in the case of the Gnostic movement of late antiquity) or immanentizing forms (as in the case of Marxism)." [Webb 1981:282]]
-
[Eric Voegelin: Philosopher of History, Seattle and London: University of Washington Press, 1981.]
-
[Webb, E; Voegelin’s “Gnosticism” Reconsidered; Political Science Reviewer; 34; 2005]
-
[Webb, E; "Voegelin’s “Gnosticism” Reconsidered"; Political Science Reviewer; 34; 2005]
GnosisGnosisΓνώσιςGnosticismoGnoseGnosisGnosticismoGnosisGnozaGnoseГнозисGnosticizmusГнозаGnosisGnosisГнозис
(...as imported from WP)
article has not been saved locally