SUPPORT THE WORK

GetWiki

United Nations Security Council Resolution 1973

ARTICLE SUBJECTS
aesthetics  →
being  →
complexity  →
database  →
enterprise  →
ethics  →
fiction  →
history  →
internet  →
knowledge  →
language  →
licensing  →
linux  →
logic  →
method  →
news  →
perception  →
philosophy  →
policy  →
purpose  →
religion  →
science  →
sociology  →
software  →
truth  →
unix  →
wiki  →
ARTICLE TYPES
essay  →
feed  →
help  →
system  →
wiki  →
ARTICLE ORIGINS
critical  →
discussion  →
forked  →
imported  →
original  →
United Nations Security Council Resolution 1973
[ temporary import ]
please note:
- the content below is remote from Wikipedia
- it has been imported raw for GetWiki
{{Short description|2011 resolution against Libya during the civil war}}{{Use dmy dates|date=March 2021}}







factoids
{{Legend>#F77200|Libya}}}}Resolution 1973 was adopted by the United Nations Security Council on 17 March 2011 in response to the First Libyan Civil War. The resolution formed the legal basis for military intervention in the Libyan Civil War, demanding "an immediate ceasefire" and authorizing the international community to establish a no-fly zone and to use all means necessary short of foreign occupation to protect civilians.NEWS, Roth, Richard, U. N. Security Council approve no-fly zone in Libya,weblink 18 March 2011, CNN, The Security Council resolution was proposed by France, Lebanon, and the United Kingdom.WEB,weblink Security Council authorizes 'all necessary measures' to protect civilians in Libya, 17 March 2011, United Nations News Centre, NEWS, Libya: UN backs action against Colonel Gaddafi,weblink 18 March 2011, BBC News, Ten Security Council members voted in the affirmative (Bosnia and Herzegovina, Colombia, Gabon, Lebanon, Nigeria, Portugal, South Africa, and permanent members France, the United Kingdom, and the United States). Five (Brazil, Germany, and India, and permanent members China and Russia) abstained, with none opposed.NEWS, Libya: Nigeria votes in favour of no-fly resolution,weblink Vanguard (Nigeria), 18 March 2011,

Resolution

Key points

The resolution, adopted under Chapter VII of the United Nations Charter:
  • demands the immediate establishment of a ceasefire and a complete end to violence and all attacks against, and abuses of, civilians;
  • imposes a no-fly zone over Libya;
  • authorizes "all necessary measures [...] to protect civilians and civilian populated areas under threat of attack in the Libyan Arab Jamahiriya, including Benghazi, while excluding a foreign occupation force of any form on any part of Libyan territory";
  • strengthens the arms embargo and particularly action against mercenaries, by allowing for forcible inspections of ships and planes;
  • imposes a ban on all Libyan-designated flights;
  • imposes an asset freeze on assets owned by the Libyan authorities, and reaffirms that such assets should be used for the benefit of the Libyan people;
  • extends the travel ban and assets freeze of United Nations Security Council Resolution 1970 to a number of additional individuals and Libyan entities;
  • establishes a panel of experts to monitor and promote sanctions implementation.

Voting{| classwikitable

! width="33%" | Approved (10) !! width="34%" | Abstained (5) !! width="33%" | Opposed (0) valign=top|
  • {{flagcountry|BIH}}
  • {{flagcountry|COL}}
  • {{flagcountry|FRA}}
  • {{flagcountry|GAB}}
  • {{flagcountry|LBN}}
  • {{flagcountry|NGA}}
  • {{flagcountry|PRT}}
  • {{flagcountry|RSA}}
  • {{flagcountry|UK}}
  • {{flagcountry|USA}}|
  • {{flagcountry|BRA}}
  • {{flagcountry|CHN}}
  • {{flagcountry|DEU}}
  • {{flagcountry|IND}}
  • {{flagcountry|RUS|name=Russian Federation}}|
* Permanent members of the Security Council are in bold.
Permanent members China and Russia had reservations about the no-fly zone, including the practicalities of enforcing such a zone and concerns about the use of force when other means had not been exhausted, but had noted requests by the Arab League and the "special situation" in Libya and therefore abstained.NEWS, China opposed UN resolution on Libya,weblinkweblink" title="web.archive.org/web/20121105020432weblink">weblink dead, 5 November 2012, The Times of India, 18 March 2011, African members of the Security Council condemned the actions of the Libyan regime and supported the text.NEWS, Africa defies AU chief's support for Ghaddafi,weblink 18 March 2011, Afrol News, The following day, Chancellor Angela Merkel said that Germany would not take part in the military operation, but added: "We unreservedly share the aims of this resolution. Our abstention should not be confused with neutrality."BBC (retrieved 18 March 2011) However, her foreign minister Guido Westerwelle had publicly stated his opposition to the resolution.NEWS, Germany won't send forces to Libya, foreign minister declares,weblink The Guardian, 17 March 2011, India abstained because it perceived the resolution as being based on uncertain information (lack of "credible information on the situation on the ground in Libya") and as being too open-ended (lacking "clarity about details of enforcement measures, including who and with what assets will participate and how these measures will be exactly carried out").CONFERENCE, UNSC 6498th Meeting,weblink 17 March 2011, UNSC, 5–6, Brazil too abstained noting the fundamental contradiction in using force to achieve an "immediate end to violence and the protection of civilians". They believed that the use of force "may have the unintended effect of exacerbating tensions on the ground and causing more harm than good to the very same civilians we are committed to protecting". The Brazilian Ambassador Mrs. Viotti further observed that "...an important aspect of the popular movement in North Africa and the Middle East is their spontaneous, homegrown nature. We are also concerned about the possibility that the use of military force, as called for in paragraph 4 of today's resolution, could change that narrative in ways that may have serious repercussions for the situation in Libya and beyond."

Libyan response

On 18 March, Muammar Gaddafi's government announced that they would comply with the resolution and implement a ceasefire.WEB,weblink Libya declares ceasefire, New Statesman, However, it quickly became clear that no ceasefire had in fact been implemented.NEWS, Gadhafi blasts 'crusader' aggression after strikes,weblink NBC News, 22 October 2011, Libyan opposition forces in Benghazi cheered and fired guns and fireworks into the air as the resolution was adopted.NEWS, UN backs action against Colonel Gaddafi,weblink BBC News, 22 October 2011, 18 March 2011, A few hours before issuing the resolution, Gaddafi warned the opposition with a speech saying, "We are coming tonight, and there will be no mercy".MAGAZINE,weblink Gaddafi Warns Benghazi Rebels: We Are Coming, And There'll Be No Mercy, Tharoor, Ishaan, 17 March 2011, Time, 16 September 2016,

Implementation

{{See also|2011 military intervention in Libya}}File:Usaf-ec-130j-transmitting-on-6877-0-khz-libya-20-march-2011.ogg|thumb|US Air Force Lockheed EC-130J aircraft broadcasts a naval blockade warning message to Libyan ports during Operation Odyssey DawnOperation Odyssey DawnMilitary intervention in Libya began on 19 March, as fighter jets of the French Air Force destroyed several pro-Gaddafi vehicles advancing on rebel stronghold Benghazi. U.S. and British submarines then fired over 110 Tomahawk cruise missiles at targets throughout Libya, severely disabling the regime's air defense capability and allowing a wider enforcement of the no-fly zone to begin. A coalition of 10 states from Europe and the Middle East initially participated in the intervention, later expanding to 17. On 31 March, NATO assumed command of the operation. The intervention succeeded in preventing pro-Gaddafi forces from capturing Benghazi. {{webarchive |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110323145516weblink |date=23 March 2011 }}On 24 August, it was acknowledged for the first time that special forces troops from Britain,Thomas Harding, Gordon Rayner and Damien McElroy Libya: SAS leads hunt for Gaddafi, 24 August 2011 Italy, France, Jordan, Qatar,Hunt is on for safe houses where dictator can lie low | News—Evening Standard and the UAE had intervened on the ground in Libyan territory, stepping up operations in Tripoli and other cities.Barbara Starr Foreign forces in Libya helping rebel forces advance, 24 August 2011 This has been questioned as a possible violation of Resolution 1973George Grant Special Forces in Libya: A Breach of UNSCR 1973?, 25 August 2011 although the use of special forces is not prohibited by the resolution.

See also

References

{{reflist|2}}

External links

{{wikinews|UN Security Council approves Libya no-fly zone}} {{UNSCR 2011}}{{Arab Spring}}{{2011 Libyan civil war}}

- content above as imported from Wikipedia
- "United Nations Security Council Resolution 1973" does not exist on GetWiki (yet)
- time: 6:00pm EDT - Wed, May 01 2024
[ this remote article is provided by Wikipedia ]
LATEST EDITS [ see all ]
GETWIKI 23 MAY 2022
GETWIKI 09 JUL 2019
Eastern Philosophy
History of Philosophy
GETWIKI 09 MAY 2016
GETWIKI 18 OCT 2015
M.R.M. Parrott
Biographies
GETWIKI 20 AUG 2014
CONNECT