SUPPORT THE WORK

GetWiki

1936 United States presidential election in Kansas

ARTICLE SUBJECTS
aesthetics  →
being  →
complexity  →
database  →
enterprise  →
ethics  →
fiction  →
history  →
internet  →
knowledge  →
language  →
licensing  →
linux  →
logic  →
method  →
news  →
perception  →
philosophy  →
policy  →
purpose  →
religion  →
science  →
sociology  →
software  →
truth  →
unix  →
wiki  →
ARTICLE TYPES
essay  →
feed  →
help  →
system  →
wiki  →
ARTICLE ORIGINS
critical  →
discussion  →
forked  →
imported  →
original  →
1936 United States presidential election in Kansas
[ temporary import ]
please note:
- the content below is remote from Wikipedia
- it has been imported raw for GetWiki
{{Short description|Election in Kansas}}{{Use mdy dates|date=September 2023}}







factoids
{{col-2}}Roosevelt{{legend|#b9d7ff|40-50%}}{{legend|#86b6f2|50-60%}}{{legend|#4389e3|60-70%}}{{legend|#1666cb|70-80%}}{{col-2}}Landon{{legend|#f2b3be|40-50%}}{{legend|#e27f90|50-60%}}{{legend|#cc2f4a|60-70%}}{{col-end}}}}{{Elections in Kansas sidebar}}The 1936 United States presidential election in Kansas took place on November 3, 1936 as part of 1936 United States presidential election held in all forty-eight contemporary states. Kansas voters chose nine electors, or representatives to the Electoral College, who voted for President and Vice President.Kansas had been a powerfully Republican state during the 1920s (as it had been during its first quarter-century of statehood), although it did not possess the isolationist sentiment found in Appalachia or the Upper Midwest.Phillips, Kevin P.; The Emerging Republican Majority, pp. 420–426 {{ISBN|978-0-691-16324-6}} In 1928 large-scale anti-Catholic voting swept a state substantially part of the OzarkBible Belt”, so that whereas Kansas had been less anti-Democratic than more northerly Plains states in 1920 and 1924, it became Herbert Hoover’s best state in the entire nation in 1928.A major drought affected the Great Plains in the 1930s, producing dramatic swings against incumbent President Hoover in 1932, which were more overwhelming in Kansas than in states further north, though less so than in the traditionally Democratic Southern Plains that had been vehemently against Al Smith’s Catholic faith in 1928.Phillips, The Emerging Republican Majority; pp. 214, 317, 352 During Franklin Delano Roosevelt’s first term as President, Kansas twice elected Republican Governor Alfred Mossman Landon, who proved himself a skilled administrator, who was critical of the excesses of the Agricultural Adjustment Act and was the only GOP governor re-elected in 1934.Women in Congress, 1917–2006, p. 118 {{ISBN|0160767539}} Landon was to have relatively little trouble gaining the Republican nomination against the popular Roosevelt in 1936.Although some observers thought that Landon could bring back the West and Plains which had completely deserted Herbert Hoover in 1932,Trende, Sean; The Lost Majority: Why the Future of Government Is Up for Grabs – and Who Will Take It, p. 14 {{ISBN|1137000112}} Landon could not achieve this to any significant degree. Although he carried more than thirty counties that had supported Roosevelt in 1932, Landon did not make the hoped-for gains there,Savage, Sean J.; Roosevelt: The Party Leader, 1932–1945, p. 126 {{ISBN|0813157048}} and any gains he did make were offset by substantial losses in Kansas’ larger cities, where Landon’s later anti-New Deal rhetoric was unpopular. Landon consequently improved on Hoover’s 1932 showing by only 1.71 percentage points even in a state that had known him as governor, although Kansas was Landon’s fourth-best state by vote percentage behind Vermont, Maine and New Hampshire (the first two being the only states in the Union which Landon carried in the Electoral College).WEB,uselectionatlas.org/RESULTS/stats.php?year=1936&f=0&off=0&elect=0, 1936 Presidential Election Statistics, Dave Leip’s Atlas of U.S. Presidential Elections, 2018-03-05, This was the penultimate time Kansas voted for a Democratic presidential candidate—the only subsequent Democrat to win the state being Lyndon B. Johnson in his national landslide win in 1964.{{As of|2020|11|alt=As of the 2020 presidential election}}, this is the last occasion the following counties have voted for a Democratic presidential candidate: Chase, Cheyenne, Decatur, Graham, Greenwood, Harper, Kiowa, Lincoln, Marion, Meade, Mitchell, Morris,{{efn|Independent Ross Perot did tie Morris County with Republican George H. W. Bush in the 1992 election.}} Rawlins, Rooks, Scott and Seward.Sullivan, Robert David; ‘How the Red and Blue Map Evolved Over the Past Century’; America Magazine in The National Catholic Review; June 29, 2016

Results

{{U.S. presidential ticket box row|name=Franklin D. Roosevelt|party=Democratic|state=New York|pv=464,520|pv_pct=53.67%|ev=9|vp_name=John Nance Garner|vp_state=Texas}}{{U.S. presidential ticket box row|name=Alf Landon|party=Republican|state=Kansas|pv=397,727|pv_pct=45.95%|ev=0|vp_name=Frank Knox|vp_state=Illinois}}{{U.S. presidential ticket box row|name=Norman Thomas|party=Socialist|state=New York|pv=2,763|pv_pct=0.32%|ev=0|vp_name=George A. Nelson|vp_state=Wisconsin}}{{U.S. presidential ticket box row|name=William Lemke|party=Union|state=North Dakota|pv=497|pv_pct=0.06%|ev=0|vp_name=Thomas C. O’Brien|vp_state=Massachusetts}}

Results by county{|class“wikitable sortable mw-collapsible mw-collapsed” style@text-align:center”

! colspan=“12” |1936 United States presidential election in Kansas by countyScammon, Richard M. (compiler); America at the Polls: A Handbook of Presidential Election Statistics 1920–1964; pp. 167–168 {{ISBN|0405077114}}WEB, Géoelections,geoelections.free.fr/USA/elec_comtes/1936.htm, 1936 Presidential Election Popular Vote, (.xlsx file for €15 on request including full minor party figures)! rowspan=“2” |County! style="text-align:center;” colspan=“2“| Franklin Delano RooseveltDemocratic! style="text-align:center;” colspan=“2“| Alfred Mossman LandonRepublican! style="text-align:center;” colspan=“2“| Norman Mattoon ThomasSocialist! style="text-align:center;” colspan=“2“| William Frederick LemkeUnion! style="text-align:center;” colspan=“2“| Margin! rowspan=“2” style="text-align:center;” data-sort-type=“number“| Total votes cast! style="text-align:center;” data-sort-type=“number“| #! style="text-align:center;” data-sort-type=“number“| %! style="text-align:center;” data-sort-type=“number“| #! style="text-align:center;” data-sort-type=“number“| %! style="text-align:center;” data-sort-type=“number“| #! style="text-align:center;” data-sort-type=“number“| %! style="text-align:center;” data-sort-type=“number“| #! style="text-align:center;” data-sort-type=“number“| %! style="text-align:center;” data-sort-type=“number“| #! style="text-align:center;” data-sort-type=“number“| % style="text-align:center;” Allen 3,869 38.90% 6,071 61.05% 5 0.05% 0 0.00% -2,202 -22.14% 9,945 style="text-align:center;” Anderson 2,767 43.80% 3,452 54.64% 10 0.16% 89 1.41% -685 -10.84% 6,318 style="text-align:center;” Atchison 5,817 52.12% 5,312 47.60% 31 0.28% 0 0.00% 505 4.53% 11,160 style="text-align:center;” Barber 2,774 60.20% 1,816 39.41% 18 0.39% 0 0.00% 958 20.79% 4,608 style="text-align:center;” Barton 5,978 62.81% 3,534 37.13% 5 0.05% 0 0.00% 2,444 25.68% 9,517 style="text-align:center;” Bourbon 5,714 51.38% 5,402 48.58% 4 0.04% 0 0.00% 312 2.81% 11,120 style="text-align:center;” Brown 3,495 37.50% 5,814 62.38% 11 0.12% 0 0.00% -2,319 -24.88% 9,320 style="text-align:center;” Butler 9,283 59.84% 6,204 39.99% 27 0.17% 0 0.00% 3,079 19.85% 15,514 style="text-align:center;” Chase 1,706 51.31% 1,610 48.42% 9 0.27% 0 0.00% 96 2.89% 3,325 style="text-align:center;” Chautauqua 2,080 45.23% 2,506 54.49% 13 0.28% 0 0.00% -426 -9.26% 4,599 style="text-align:center;” Cherokee 7,894 58.88% 5,445 40.61% 69 0.51% 0 0.00% 2,449 18.27% 13,408 style="text-align:center;” Cheyenne 1,673 57.20% 1,241 42.43% 11 0.38% 0 0.00% 432 14.77% 2,925 style="text-align:center;” Clark 1,457 61.79% 899 38.13% 2 0.08% 0 0.00% 558 23.66% 2,358 style="text-align:center;” Clay 3,441 49.25% 3,525 50.45% 21 0.30% 0 0.00% -84 -1.20% 6,987 style="text-align:center;” Cloud 4,546 51.75% 4,208 47.90% 21 0.24% 10 0.11% 338 3.85% 8,785 style="text-align:center;” Coffey 2,662 40.47% 3,900 59.29% 16 0.24% 0 0.00% -1,238 -18.82% 6,578 style="text-align:center;” Comanche 1,428 60.43% 932 39.44% 3 0.13% 0 0.00% 496 20.99% 2,363 style="text-align:center;” Cowley 10,805 56.12% 8,378 43.51% 72 0.37% 0 0.00% 2,427 12.60% 19,255 style="text-align:center;” Crawford 12,974 59.96% 8,596 39.73% 66 0.31% 0 0.00% 4,378 20.23% 21,636 style="text-align:center;” Decatur 2,362 57.55% 1,727 42.08% 7 0.17% 8 0.19% 635 15.47% 4,104 style="text-align:center;” Dickinson 5,313 47.09% 5,936 52.61% 29 0.26% 5 0.04% -623 -5.52% 11,283 style="text-align:center;” Doniphan 2,749 41.91% 3,791 57.80% 19 0.29% 0 0.00% -1,042 -15.89% 6,559 style="text-align:center;” Douglas 4,961 37.08% 8,324 62.22% 94 0.70% 0 0.00% -3,363 -25.14% 13,379 style="text-align:center;” Edwards 1,986 58.71% 1,394 41.21% 3 0.09% 0 0.00% 592 17.50% 3,383 style="text-align:center;” Elk 2,059 46.55% 2,355 53.24% 9 0.20% 0 0.00% -296 -6.69% 4,423 style="text-align:center;” Ellis 4,834 74.73% 1,622 25.07% 13 0.20% 0 0.00% 3,212 49.65% 6,469 style="text-align:center;” Ellsworth 2,990 59.15% 2,058 40.71% 7 0.14% 0 0.00% 932 18.44% 5,055 style="text-align:center;” Finney 2,682 58.85% 1,863 40.88% 12 0.26% 0 0.00% 819 17.97% 4,557 style="text-align:center;” Ford 5,335 61.11% 3,378 38.69% 17 0.19% 0 0.00% 1,957 22.42% 8,730 style="text-align:center;” Franklin 4,503 42.73% 6,007 57.00% 28 0.27% 0 0.00% -1,504 -14.27% 10,538 style="text-align:center;” Geary 2,973 55.39% 2,382 44.38% 12 0.22% 0 0.00% 591 11.01% 5,367 style="text-align:center;” Gove 1,090 49.05% 1,107 49.82% 2 0.09% 23 1.04% -17 -0.77% 2,222 style="text-align:center;” Graham 1,734 54.15% 1,462 45.66% 6 0.19% 0 0.00% 272 8.49% 3,202 style="text-align:center;” Grant 616 56.41% 476 43.59% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 140 12.82% 1,092 style="text-align:center;” Gray 1,459 65.57% 764 34.34% 2 0.09% 0 0.00% 695 31.24% 2,225 style="text-align:center;” Greeley 388 49.43% 396 50.45% 1 0.13% 0 0.00% -8 -1.02% 785 style="text-align:center;” Greenwood 4,176 50.04% 4,146 49.68% 23 0.28% 0 0.00% 30 0.36% 8,345 style="text-align:center;” Hamilton 885 54.76% 720 44.55% 11 0.68% 0 0.00% 165 10.21% 1,616 style="text-align:center;” Harper 3,391 57.93% 2,441 41.70% 22 0.38% 0 0.00% 950 16.23% 5,854 style="text-align:center;” Harvey 5,357 54.44% 4,456 45.28% 28 0.28% 0 0.00% 901 9.16% 9,841 style="text-align:center;” Haskell 626 58.56% 442 41.35% 1 0.09% 0 0.00% 184 17.21% 1,069 style="text-align:center;” Hodgeman 1,162 59.71% 781 40.13% 3 0.15% 0 0.00% 381 19.58% 1,946 style="text-align:center;” Jackson 3,265 46.92% 3,680 52.88% 14 0.20% 0 0.00% -415 -5.96% 6,959 style="text-align:center;” Jefferson 3,105 45.39% 3,711 54.25% 25 0.37% 0 0.00% -606 -8.86% 6,841 style="text-align:center;” Jewell 2,780 41.72% 3,849 57.76% 35 0.53% 0 0.00% -1,069 -16.04% 6,664 style="text-align:center;” Johnson 6,108 41.97% 8,399 57.71% 37 0.25% 10 0.07% -2,291 -15.74% 14,554 style="text-align:center;” Kearny 716 54.53% 586 44.63% 11 0.84% 0 0.00% 130 9.90% 1,313 style="text-align:center;” Kingman 3,705 64.64% 2,014 35.14% 10 0.17% 3 0.05% 1,691 29.50% 5,732 style="text-align:center;” Kiowa 1,417 52.38% 1,280 47.32% 8 0.30% 0 0.00% 137 5.06% 2,705 style="text-align:center;” Labette 8,050 54.70% 6,610 44.92% 56 0.38% 0 0.00% 1,440 9.79% 14,716 style="text-align:center;” Lane 853 54.75% 682 43.77% 23 1.48% 0 0.00% 171 10.98% 1,558 style="text-align:center;” Leavenworth 7,996 48.17% 8,532 51.39% 73 0.44% 0 0.00% -536 -3.23% 16,601 style="text-align:center;” Lincoln 2,209 52.35% 2,001 47.42% 10 0.24% 0 0.00% 208 4.93% 4,220 style="text-align:center;” Linn 2,682 40.72% 3,872 58.78% 26 0.39% 7 0.11% -1,190 -18.07% 6,587 style="text-align:center;” Logan 908 48.63% 955 51.15% 4 0.21% 0 0.00% -47 -2.52% 1,867 style="text-align:center;” Lyon 7,340 54.68% 6,005 44.74% 59 0.44% 19 0.14% 1,335 9.95% 13,423 style="text-align:center;” Marion 4,207 49.93% 4,185 49.67% 34 0.40% 0 0.00% 22 0.26% 8,426 style="text-align:center;” Marshall 5,238 46.81% 5,929 52.98% 1 0.01% 22 0.20% -691 -6.18% 11,190 style="text-align:center;” McPherson 6,256 56.65% 4,744 42.96% 44 0.40% 0 0.00% 1,512 13.69% 11,044 style="text-align:center;” Meade 1,394 53.31% 1,218 46.58% 3 0.11% 0 0.00% 176 6.73% 2,615 style="text-align:center;” Miami 4,601 49.52% 4,676 50.33% 14 0.15% 0 0.00% -75 -0.81% 9,291 style="text-align:center;” Mitchell 3,289 53.82% 2,781 45.51% 41 0.67% 0 0.00% 508 8.31% 6,111 style="text-align:center;” Montgomery 11,535 49.79% 11,565 49.92% 67 0.29% 0 0.00% -30 -0.13% 23,167 style="text-align:center;” Morris 2,805 50.31% 2,751 49.35% 17 0.30% 2 0.04% 54 0.97% 5,575 style="text-align:center;” Morton 876 57.59% 636 41.81% 9 0.59% 0 0.00% 240 15.78% 1,521 style="text-align:center;” Nemaha 4,175 51.09% 3,903 47.76% 10 0.12% 84 1.03% 272 3.33% 8,172 style="text-align:center;” Neosho 5,611 49.10% 5,777 50.55% 40 0.35% 0 0.00% -166 -1.45% 11,428 style="text-align:center;” Ness 2,002 60.26% 1,302 39.19% 18 0.54% 0 0.00% 700 21.07% 3,322 style="text-align:center;” Norton 2,307 44.71% 2,829 54.83% 24 0.47% 0 0.00% -522 -10.12% 5,160 style="text-align:center;” Osage 4,224 49.78% 4,232 49.87% 30 0.35% 0 0.00% -8 -0.09% 8,486 style="text-align:center;” Osborne 2,200 44.19% 2,765 55.54% 13 0.26% 0 0.00% -565 -11.35% 4,978 style="text-align:center;” Ottawa 2,785 55.33% 2,230 44.31% 18 0.36% 0 0.00% 555 11.03% 5,033 style="text-align:center;” Pawnee 2,814 61.49% 1,753 38.31% 9 0.20% 0 0.00% 1,061 23.19% 4,576 style="text-align:center;” Phillips 2,154 40.20% 3,193 59.59% 11 0.21% 0 0.00% -1,039 -19.39% 5,358 style="text-align:center;” Pottawatomie 3,284 44.39% 3,977 53.76% 13 0.18% 124 1.68% -693 -9.37% 7,398 style="text-align:center;” Pratt 3,871 66.43% 1,946 33.40% 10 0.17% 0 0.00% 1,925 33.04% 5,827 style="text-align:center;” Rawlins 2,029 59.61% 1,364 40.07% 11 0.32% 0 0.00% 665 19.54% 3,404 style="text-align:center;” Reno 14,203 62.03% 8,607 37.59% 86 0.38% 0 0.00% 5,596 24.44% 22,896 style="text-align:center;” Republic 3,427 47.07% 3,830 52.61% 15 0.21% 8 0.11% -403 -5.54% 7,280 style="text-align:center;” Rice 4,905 59.49% 3,318 40.24% 22 0.27% 0 0.00% 1,587 19.25% 8,245 style="text-align:center;” Riley 4,104 39.93% 6,077 59.13% 66 0.64% 31 0.30% -1,973 -19.20% 10,278 style="text-align:center;” Rooks 2,235 50.97% 2,150 49.03% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 85 1.94% 4,385 style="text-align:center;” Rush 2,482 58.83% 1,733 41.08% 4 0.09% 0 0.00% 749 17.75% 4,219 style="text-align:center;” Russell 3,736 62.43% 2,241 37.45% 7 0.12% 0 0.00% 1,495 24.98% 5,984 style="text-align:center;” Saline 7,872 56.30% 6,061 43.35% 50 0.36% 0 0.00% 1,811 12.95% 13,983 style="text-align:center;” Scott 1,096 63.57% 625 36.25% 3 0.17% 0 0.00% 471 27.32% 1,724 style="text-align:center;” Sedgwick 39,503 64.39% 21,654 35.29% 196 0.32% 0 0.00% 17,849 29.09% 61,353 style="text-align:center;” Seward 1,997 64.23% 1,108 35.64% 4 0.13% 0 0.00% 889 28.59% 3,109 style="text-align:center;” Shawnee 22,942 53.49% 19,785 46.13% 160 0.37% 1 0.00% 3,157 7.36% 42,888 style="text-align:center;” Sheridan 1,442 57.66% 1,007 40.26% 7 0.28% 45 1.80% 435 17.39% 2,501 style="text-align:center;” Sherman 1,814 59.89% 1,159 38.26% 56 1.85% 0 0.00% 655 21.62% 3,029 style="text-align:center;” Smith 2,847 46.25% 3,292 53.48% 17 0.28% 0 0.00% -445 -7.23% 6,156 style="text-align:center;” Stafford 3,212 62.12% 1,939 37.50% 20 0.39% 0 0.00% 1,273 24.62% 5,171 style="text-align:center;” Stanton 458 59.48% 311 40.39% 1 0.13% 0 0.00% 147 19.09% 770 style="text-align:center;” Stevens 1,023 59.13% 701 40.52% 6 0.35% 0 0.00% 322 18.61% 1,730 style="text-align:center;” Sumner 7,966 61.57% 4,946 38.23% 26 0.20% 1 0.01% 3,020 23.34% 12,939 style="text-align:center;” Thomas 2,168 63.99% 1,200 35.42% 16 0.47% 4 0.12% 968 28.57% 3,388 style="text-align:center;” Trego 1,783 63.43% 1,012 36.00% 16 0.57% 0 0.00% 771 27.43% 2,811 style="text-align:center;” Wabaunsee 2,235 44.18% 2,809 55.52% 15 0.30% 0 0.00% -574 -11.35% 5,059 style="text-align:center;” Wallace 492 42.38% 658 56.68% 11 0.95% 0 0.00% -166 -14.30% 1,161 style="text-align:center;” Washington 3,355 40.95% 4,809 58.70% 28 0.34% 0 0.00% -1,454 -17.75% 8,192 style="text-align:center;” Wichita 637 58.39% 448 41.06% 5 0.46% 1 0.09% 189 17.32% 1,091 style="text-align:center;” Wilson 3,816 43.93% 4,829 55.59% 42 0.48% 0 0.00% -1,013 -11.66% 8,687 style="text-align:center;” Woodson 1,884 44.05% 2,374 55.51% 19 0.44% 0 0.00% -490 -11.46% 4,277 style="text-align:center;” Wyandotte 38,101 58.98% 26,239 40.62% 256 0.40% 0 0.00% 11,862 18.36% 64,596 style="text-align:center;“!Totals!!464,520!!53.67%!!397,727!!45.95%!!2,763{{efn|The Thomas total include 18 absentee votes that were not assigned to any county.Scammon; America at the Polls, p. 175}}!!0.32%!!497!!0.06%!!66,793!!7.72%!!865,507

See also

Notes

{{Notelist}}

References

{{Reflist|2}}{{State Results of the 1936 U.S. presidential election}}{{United States elections}}

- content above as imported from Wikipedia
- "1936 United States presidential election in Kansas" does not exist on GetWiki (yet)
- time: 6:01am EDT - Wed, May 22 2024
[ this remote article is provided by Wikipedia ]
LATEST EDITS [ see all ]
GETWIKI 21 MAY 2024
GETWIKI 09 JUL 2019
Eastern Philosophy
History of Philosophy
GETWIKI 09 MAY 2016
GETWIKI 18 OCT 2015
M.R.M. Parrott
Biographies
GETWIKI 20 AUG 2014
CONNECT