SUPPORT THE WORK

GetWiki

Proto-Indo-Iranian language

ARTICLE SUBJECTS
aesthetics  →
being  →
complexity  →
database  →
enterprise  →
ethics  →
fiction  →
history  →
internet  →
knowledge  →
language  →
licensing  →
linux  →
logic  →
method  →
news  →
perception  →
philosophy  →
policy  →
purpose  →
religion  →
science  →
sociology  →
software  →
truth  →
unix  →
wiki  →
ARTICLE TYPES
essay  →
feed  →
help  →
system  →
wiki  →
ARTICLE ORIGINS
critical  →
discussion  →
forked  →
imported  →
original  →
Proto-Indo-Iranian language
[ temporary import ]
please note:
- the content below is remote from Wikipedia
- it has been imported raw for GetWiki
{{short description|Reconstructed proto-language}}{{cleanup lang|date=June 2021}}







factoids
{{Indo-European topics}}Proto-Indo-Iranian, also called Proto-Indo-Iranic or Proto-Aryan,BOOK, Peter Bellwood, Immanuel Ness, The Global Prehistory of Human Migration,books.google.com/books?id=2HMTBwAAQBAJ, 10 November 2014, John Wiley & Sons, 978-1-118-97059-1, is the reconstructed proto-language of the Indo-Iranian branch of Indo-European. Its speakers, the hypothetical Proto-Indo-Iranians, are assumed to have lived in the late 3rd millennium BC, and are often connected with the Sintashta culture of the Eurasian Steppe and the early Andronovo archaeological horizon.Proto-Indo-Iranian was a satem language, likely removed less than a millennium from its ancestor, the late Proto-Indo-European language, and in turn removed less than a millennium from Vedic Sanskrit (of the Rigveda)ENCYCLOPEDIA, Proto-Indo-European verb-finality: Reconstruction, typology, validation, Hans Henrich, Hock, Hans Henrich Hock, Proto-Indo-European Syntax and its Development, Leonid, Kulikov, Nikolaos, Lavidas, John Benjamins, 2015, and Old Avestan (of the Gathas), its descendants.It is the ancestor of Indo-Aryan languages, the Iranian languages, and the Nuristani languages, predominantly spoken in the Southern Asian subregion of Eurasia.

Descriptive phonology{| class“wikitable” style@text-align: center;“|+ Proto-Indo-Iranian consonant segments

! rowspan=“2” colspan=“2” |! rowspan=“2” | Labial! colspan=“2” | Coronal! colspan=“2” | Palatal! rowspan=“2” | Velar! rowspan=“2” | Laryngeal! dental/alveolar! post-alveolar! first! second! rowspan=“3” | Plosive || voiceless! voiced! aspirated! rowspan=“2” | Fricative || voiceless| |! voiced| ||! colspan=“2” | Nasal ||! colspan=“2” | Liquid| ||! colspan=“2” | Semivowel||| {| class=“wikitable” style="text-align: center;“|+ PII vowel segments! High! LowIn addition to the vowels, , and could function as the syllabic core.

Two palatal series

Proto-Indo-Iranian is hypothesized to have contained two series of stops or affricates in the palatal to postalveolar region.Burrow, pp. 78–79 The phonetic nature of this contrast is not clear, and hence they are usually referred to as the primary or first series (*ć *ȷ́ *ȷ́ʰ, continuing Proto-Indo-European palatovelar *ḱ *ǵ *ǵʰ) and the second or secondary series (*č *Ç° *Ç°Ê°, continuing Proto-Indo-European plain and labialized velars, *k, *g, *gÊ° and *kÊ·, *gÊ·, *gÊ·Ê°, in palatalizing contexts).The following table shows the most common reflexes of the two series (Proto-Iranian is the hypothetical ancestor to the Iranian languages, including Avestan and Old Persian):BOOK, The Indo-European Languages, Anna Giacalone, Ramat, illustrated, London ; New York, Routledge, 1998, 0-415-06449-X,books.google.com/books?id=vwUMNCYbLL0C, 134, BOOK, The Indo-Aryan Languages, George, Cardona, Dhanesh Jain, London ; New York, Routledge, 2003, 0-7007-1130-9,books.google.com/books?id=mK4kEuDXySIC, 24, {| class=“wikitable” style="text-align: center; vertical-align: center;“! PII! Proto-Indo-Aryan! Sanskrit! Proto-Iranian! Avestan! Old Persian! Nuristani[É•]}})[É•]}})[ts]}}) / Å¡[dÊ‘]}})[dÊ‘]}}) z d j ({{IPA|[dz]}}) / z[dʑʱ]}})[ɦ]}})[tÉ•]}})[tÉ•]}})[ɖʐ]}})[dÊ‘]}}) Ç° Ç° Ç° / ž[ɖʐʱ]}})[ɦ]}})

Laryngeal

Proto-Indo-European is usually hypothesized to have had three to four laryngeal consonants, each of which could occur in either syllabic or non-syllabic positions. In Proto-Indo-Iranian, the laryngeals merged as one phoneme /*H/. Beekes suggests that some instances of this /*H/ survived into Rigvedic Sanskrit and Avestan as unwritten glottal stops as evidenced by metrics.Beekes (1988), p. 50

Accent

Like Proto-Indo-European and Vedic Sanskrit (and also Avestan, though it was not written downBeekes, p. 55), Proto-Indo-Iranian had a pitch accent system similar to present-day Japanese, conventionally indicated by an acute accent over the accented vowel.

Historical phonology

The most distinctive phonological change separating Proto-Indo-Iranian from Proto-Indo-European is the collapse of the ablauting vowels *e, *o into a single vowel, Proto-Indo-Iranian *a (but see Brugmann’s law). Grassmann’s law, Bartholomae’s law, and the Ruki sound law were also complete in Proto-Indo-Iranian.A fuller list of some of the hypothesized sound changes from Proto-Indo-European to Proto-Indo-Iranian follows:
  • The Satem shift, consisting of two sets of related changes. The PIE palatals ḱ ǵ ǵʰ are fronted or affricated, eventually resulting in PII ć, ȷ́, ȷ́ʰ, while the PIE labiovelars kÊ· gÊ· gÊ·Ê° merge with the velars k g gÊ°.Burrow, pp. 74–75{| class=“wikitable” style="text-align: center;”
! PIE! PII! Sanskrit! Avestan! Latin! English!Glossary*ḱm̥tóm}} *ǵónu}}*ǵʰimós}}*kʷós}}*gʷṓws}}*gʷʰormós}}
  • The PIE liquids {{PIE|l}} {{PIE|r}} {{PIE|lÌ¥}} {{PIE|rÌ¥}} merge as {{PIE|r}} {{PIE|rÌ¥}}.Fortson, p. 182{| class=“wikitable” style="text-align: center;”
! PIE! PII! Sanskrit! Avestan! Latin! English!Glossary*ḱléwos}} *wĺ̥kʷos}} *gʷʰormós}}
  • The PIE syllabic nasals {{PIE|mÌ¥}} {{PIE|nÌ¥}} merge with .{| class=“wikitable” style="text-align: center;”
! PIE! pre-PII! PII! Sanskrit! Avestan! Latin!English! Glossary*déḱm̥}}*gʷm̥tós}}*n̥bʰrós}}
  • Bartholomae’s law: an aspirate immediately followed by a voiceless consonant becomes voiced stop + voiced aspirate. In addition, dÊ° + t > dᶻdÊ°.Fortson, p. 181{| class=“wikitable” style="text-align: center;”
! PIE! PII! Sanskrit! Avestan!English! Glossary*ubʰtós}}*wr̥dʰtós}}*dʰéwgʰti}}
  • The Ruki rule: s is retracted to Å¡ when immediately following a liquid (r rÌ¥ l lÌ¥), a high vowel (i u), a PIE velar (ḱ ǵ ǵʰ k g gÊ° kÊ· gÊ· gÊ·Ê°) or the syllabic laryngeal HÌ¥.F. B. J. Kuiper. 1976. “Old East Iranian dialects.” Indo-Iranian Journal 18, p. 242. Its allophone z likewise becomes ž.{| class=“wikitable” style="text-align: center;”
! PIE! PII! Sanskrit! Avestan! Latin!English! Glossary*wisós}}*ḱeHs-}}*ǵéwseti}}*kʷsép-}}*plúsis}}*nisdós}}
  • Before a dental occlusive, ć becomes Å¡ and ȷ́ becomes ž. ȷ́ʰ also becomes ž, with aspiration of the occlusive.Burrow, p. 91{| class=“wikitable” style="text-align: center;”
! PIE! pre-PII! PII! Sanskrit! Avestan! Latin!English! Glossary*h₁oḱtṓ}}*dr̥ḱtós}}*mr̥ǵt-}}*uǵʰtós}}
  • The sequence ćš was simplified to Å¡Å¡.Burrow, pp. 92–94{| class=“wikitable” style="text-align: center;”
! PIE! pre-PII! PII! Sanskrit! Avestan! Latin!English! Glossary*h₂éḱs-}}
  • The “second palatalization” or “law of palatals”: k g gÊ° develop palatal allophones č Ç° Ç°Ê° before the front vowels i, e. through an intermediate kʲ gʲ gʲʰ.
{| class=“wikitable” style="text-align: center;”! PIE! pre-PII! PII! Sanskrit! Avestan! Latin!English! Glossary*-kÊ·e}}*gÊ·ih₃wós}}*gʷʰénti}}
  • Brugmann’s law: o or ó in an open syllable lengthens to ā.Fortson, p. 183{| class=“wikitable” style="text-align: center;”
! PIE! pre-PII! PII! Sanskrit! Avestan! Latin! Glossary*deh₃tórm̥}}
  • The vowels e o merge with a. Similarly, Ä“, ō merge with ā. This has the effect of giving full phonemic status to the second palatal series č Ç° Ç°Ê°.{| class=“wikitable” style="text-align: center;”
! PIE! PII! Sanskrit! Avestan! Latin!English! Glossary*dédeh₃ti}}*h₃dónts}}*bʰréh₂tēr}}*wṓkʷs}}
  • In certain positions, laryngeals were vocalized to i. This preceded the second palatalization.Beekes, pp. 85–86Lubotsky, p. 53


* Following a consonant, and preceding a consonant cluster{| class=“wikitable” style="text-align: center;”
! PIE! PII! Sanskrit! Avestan! Latin! English/Glossary*ph₂tréy}}
* Following a consonant and word-final{| class=“wikitable”
! PIE! PII! Sanskrit! Avestan! Glossary*-medÊ°hâ‚‚}}
  • The Indo-European laryngeals all merged into one phoneme H, which may have been a glottal stop. This was probably contemporary with the merging of e and o with a.get ref{| class=“wikitable” style="text-align: center;”
! PIE! PII! Sanskrit! Avestan! Latin! English*ph₂tḗr}}
  • According to Lubotsky’s Law, H disappeared when followed by a voiced nonaspirated stop and another consonant:Beekes, pp. 88–89{| class=“wikitable” style="text-align: center;”
! PIE! PII! Sanskrit! Avestan! Glossary*bʰéh₂geti}}

Subsequent sound changes

Among the sound changes from Proto-Indo-Iranian to Indo-Aryan is the loss of the voiced sibilant *z; among those to Proto-Iranian is the de-aspiration of the PIE voiced aspirates.{| class=“wikitable”
|+ Proto-Indo-European and Indo-Iranian Phonological Correspondences“Indo-Iranian Languages.” Encyclopedia of Indo-European Culture. Ed. J.P. Mallory and D.Q. Adams. Chicago: Fitzroy Dearborn, 1997. pp. 305.
! colspan=2 | PIE || O.Indc/VS || Av || PIE || OInd/VS || Av
|-
| *p || > || p || p || *ph̥₂tḗr “father” || pitā́ “father” || pitar- “father”
|-
| *b || > || b || b || *bél- “strong” || bálam “strength” || —
|-
| *bÊ° || > || bh || b || *bÊ°réhâ‚‚tÄ“r “brother” || bhrā́tār- “brother” || brātar- “brother
|-
| *t || > || t || t || *tuHóm “thou” || tuvám “thou” || tvÉ™m “thou”
|-
| *d || > || d || d || *dóru “wood” || dā́ru “wood” || dāru- “wood”
|-
| *dÊ° || > || dh || d || *dÊ°oHnéhâ‚‚- “grain” || dhānā́- “grain” || dāna- “grain”
|-
| *ḱ || > || Å› || s || *déḱmÌ¥ “ten” || dáśa “ten” || dasa “ten”
|-
| *ǵ || > || j || z || *ǵónu “knee” || jā́nu “knee” || zānu- “knee”
|-
| *ǵʰ || > || h || z || *ǵʰimós “cold” || himá- “cold, frost” || zÉ™maka- “winterstorm”
|-
| rowspan=2|*k || rowspan=2|> || rowspan=2|k ~ c || rowspan=2|x ~ č || *kruhâ‚‚rós “bloody” || krÅ«rá- “bloody” || xrÅ«ra- “bloody”
|-
| *téket “may he run” || — || tačatÌ° “may he run”
|-
| rowspan=2|*g || rowspan=2|> || rowspan=2|g ~ j || rowspan=2|g ~ Ç° || *h₂éuges- “strength” || ójas- “strength” || aoÇ°ah “strength”
|-
| *hâ‚‚ugrós “strong” || ugrá- “strong” || ugra- “strong”
|-
| rowspan=2|*gÊ° || rowspan=2|> || rowspan=2|gh ~ h || rowspan=2|g ~ Ç° || *dlÌ¥Hgʰós “long” || dÄ«rghá- “long” || darÉ™ga- “long”
|-
| *dleHgÊ°istos “longest” || drā́ghiṣṭha || draÇ°iÅ¡ta- “longest”
|-
| rowspan=2|*kÊ· || rowspan=2|> || rowspan=2|k ~ c || rowspan=2|k ~ č || *kʷós “who” || káḥ “who” || kō “who”
|-
| *kÊ·e “and” || ca “and” || ́ča “and”
|-
| rowspan=2|*gÊ· || rowspan=2|> || rowspan=2|g ~ j || rowspan=2|g ~ Ç° || *gÊ·ou- “cow” || gav- “cow” || gau- “cow”
|-
| *gÊ·ih₃wós “alive” || jÄ«vá- “alive” || OPer: Ç°Ä«va- “living”
|-
| rowspan=2|*gÊ·Ê° || rowspan=2|> || rowspan=2|gh ~ h || rowspan=2|g ~ Ç° || *gÊ·Ê°nénti “strike” (pl.) || ghnánti “strike” (pl.) || —
|-
| *gʷʰénti “strikes” || hánti “strikes” || Ç°ainti “strikes”
|-
| rowspan=2|*s || rowspan=2|> || rowspan=2|s || rowspan=2|s ~ h || *septmÌ¥ “seven” || saptá “seven” || hapta “seven”
|-
| *h₁ésti “is” || ásti “is” || asti “is”
|-
| *y || > || y || y || *yugóm “yoke” || yugam “yoke” || yuga- “yoke”
|-
| *w || > || v || v || *wéǵʰeti “drives, rides” || váhati “drives” || vazaiti “travels”
|-
| *m || > || m || m || *méhâ‚‚tÄ“r “mother” || mātár- “mother” || mātar- “mother”
|-
| *n || > || n || n || *nós “us” || nas “us” || nō “us”
|-
| *l || > || l ~ r || r || *kÊ·eleti “moves” || carati “moves” || caraiti “moves”
|-
| *r || > || r || r || *bÊ°réhâ‚‚tÄ“r “brother” || bhrā́tār- “brother” || brātar- “brother
|-
| *nÌ¥ || > || a || a || *nÌ¥- “un-” || a- “un-” || a- “un-”
|-
| *mÌ¥ || > || a || a || *ḱmÌ¥tóm “hundred” || Å›atám “hundred” || satÉ™m “hundred”
|-
| *lÌ¥ || > || rÌ¥ || É™rÉ™r || *wĺ̥kÊ·os “wolf” || vÅ•Ì¥ka- “wolf” || vÉ™hrka- “wolf”
|-
| *rÌ¥ || > || rÌ¥ || É™rÉ™r || *ḱŕ̥d- “heart” || hÅ•Ì¥d- “heart” || zÉ™rÉ™d- “heart”
|-
| *i || > || i || i || *linékÊ·ti “leaves” || riṇákti “leaves” || irinaxti “releases”
|-
| *e || > || a || a || *déḱmÌ¥ “ten” || dáśa “ten” || dasa “ten”
|-
| *Ä“ || > || ā || ā || *hâ‚‚nḗr “man” || nā “man” || nā “man”
|-
| *a || > || a || a || *h₂éǵeti “drives” || ájati “drives” || azaiti “drives”
|-
| *ā || > || ā || ā || *méhâ‚‚tÄ“r “mother” || mātā́ “mother” || mātar- “mother”
|-
| rowspan=2|*o || rowspan=2|> || rowspan=2|a ~ ā || rowspan=2|a ~ ā || *ǵómbÊ°os “tooth, peg” || jā́mbha- “tooth, tusk” || —
|-
| *ǵónu “knee” || jānu “knee” || zānu- “knee”
|-
| *ō || > || ā || ā || *dÊ°oHnéhâ‚‚- “grain” || dhānā́- “grain” || dāna- “grain”
|-
| *u || > || u || u || *yugóm “yoke” || yugám “yoke” || yuga- “yoke”
|-
| *Å« || > || Å« || Å« || *mū́s “mouse” || mū́ṣ- “mouse” || NPer mÅ«s “mouse”
|-
| *h₁ || > || ∅ || ∅ || *h₁ésti “is” || ásti “is” || asti “is”
|-
| *hâ‚‚ || > || ∅ || ∅ || *hâ‚‚Å•Ì¥tḱos “bear” || Å•Ì¥ká¹£a- “bear” || arəša- “bear”
|-
| *h₃ || > || ∅ || ∅ || *h₃ókÊ·s(i) “eye” || áká¹£i “eye” || aÅ¡i “eye”
|-
| *hâ‚„ || > || ∅ || ∅ || *h₄órǵʰis “testicle” || — || É™rÉ™zi- “testicle”
|}{|class=“wikitable”
!Proto-Indo-Iranian ||Old Iranian (Av, OP) ||Vedic Sanskritaspa, OP asa >Ashva>áśvabāga >|bhāgábrātar >|bhrā́trÌ¥bÅ«miÅ¡ >BhÅ«mi>bhū́mi-maṣ̌iia, OP martiya >|mártyamā̊, OP māha >|mā́svaÅ‹har >|vásara “morning”Asha>aṣ̌a, OP arta rÌ¥tádraoγa, OP drauga >|drógha “using malicious words”haoma >Soma (drink)>sóma-

Morphology

Proto-Indo-Iranian has preserved much of the morphology of Proto-Indo-European: thematic and athematic inflection in both nouns and verbs, all three numbers of singular, dual and plural, all the tense, mood and voice categories in the verb, and the cases in the noun.An important innovation in the noun is the creation of a genitive plural ending *-nām used with vowel stems. In verbs, the chief innovation is the creation of a passive conjugation with the suffix *-yá, with middle inflection.Fortson p. 205

See also

References

{{reflist}}

Bibliography

, , , ,
  • Alexander Lubotsky, “The Indo-Iranian substratum” in Early Contacts between Uralic and Indo-European, ed. Carpelan et al., Helsinki (2001).
  • Asko Parpola, ‘The formation of the Aryan branch of Indo-European’, in Blench and Spriggs (eds), Archaeology and Language III, London and New York (1999).

Further reading

Contacts between Indo-Iranian and Uralic:
  • BOOK, Kuz’Mina, E.E., J.P. Mallory, Indo-Iranian contacts with other linguistic groups, The Origin of the Indo-Iranians, Leiden, The Netherlands, Brill, 2007, 199-204, 10.1163/ej.9789004160545.i-763.53,
  • BOOK, On the emergence, contacts and dispersal of Proto-Indo-European, Proto-Uralic and Proto-Aryan in an archaeological perspective, Christian, Carpelan, Asko, Parpola, Language and Prehistory of the Indo-European Peoples: A Cross-Disciplinary Perspective, Adam Hyllested, Benedicte Nielsen Whitehead, Thomas Olander, Birgit Anette Olsen, Copenhagen, Museum Tusculanums Forlag, 2017, 77-87, 9788763545310, Copenhagen Studies in Indo-European, 7,
  • JOURNAL, Parpola, Asko, Asko Parpola, 2017a, Finnish vatsa ~ Sanskrit vatsá and the formation of Indo-Iranian and Uralic languages, Suomalais-Ugrilaisen Seuran Aikakauskirja, 96, 245–286, 10.33340/susa.70229,www.sgr.fi/susa/96/susa96parpola.pdf,
  • Holopainen, Sampsa (2019). Indo-Iranian borrowings in Uralic: Critical overview of sound substitutions and distribution criterion. Helsinki: University of Helsinki. PhD thesis.
  • JOURNAL, Holopainen, Sampsa, 2020, Indo-Iranian loanwords in Finnic - A critical overview, Acta Linguistica Petropolitana. Труды института лингвистических исследований, 3, XVI, 613-668,cyberleninka.ru/article/n/indo-iranian-loanwords-in-finnic-a-critical-overview, Access date: 11.05.2024.
  • Bjørn Rasmus G. Indo-European loanwords and exchange in Bronze Age Central and East Asia: Six new perspectives on prehistoric exchange in the Eastern Steppe Zone. Evol Hum Sci. 2022 Apr 22;4:e23. {{doi|10.1017/ehs.2022.16}} PMID: 37599704; PMCID: PMC10432883.
  • BOOK, Sámmol Ánte, Luobbal Sámmol, Proto-Uralic, Marianne Bakró-Nagy, Johanna Laakso, Elena Skribnik, The Oxford Guide to the Uralic Languages, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2022, 3–27 [25-26], 10.1093/oso/9780198767664.003.0001, Accessed 10 May 2024.
  • BOOK, Holopainen, S., The RUKI Rule in Indo-Iranian and the Early Contacts with Uralic, Internal and External Causes of Language Change: The Naxos Papers, Nikolaos Lavidas, Alexander Bergs, Elly van Gelderen, Ioanna Sitaridou, Springer Nature, 2023, 315–346, 9783031309762, 10.1007/978-3-031-30976-2_11,

External links

{{Indo-Iranian languages}}{{Persian language}}

- content above as imported from Wikipedia
- "Proto-Indo-Iranian language" does not exist on GetWiki (yet)
- time: 3:06am EDT - Wed, May 22 2024
[ this remote article is provided by Wikipedia ]
LATEST EDITS [ see all ]
GETWIKI 21 MAY 2024
GETWIKI 09 JUL 2019
Eastern Philosophy
History of Philosophy
GETWIKI 09 MAY 2016
GETWIKI 18 OCT 2015
M.R.M. Parrott
Biographies
GETWIKI 20 AUG 2014
CONNECT