GetWiki

}}Frans van Mieris the Elder (16 April 1635{{snd}}12 March 1681), was a Dutch Golden Age genre and portrait painter. The leading member of a Leiden family of painters, his sons Jan (1660–1690) and Willem (1662–1747) and his grandson Frans van Mieris the Younger (1689–1763) were also accomplished genre painters.

Biography

Frans was born and died in Leiden, where his father Jan Bastiaans van Mieris was a goldsmith, carver of rubies and diamond setter.{{in lang|nl}} Frans van Mieris biography in De groote schouburgh der Nederlantsche konstschilders en schilderessen (1718) by Arnold Houbraken, courtesy of the Digital Library for Dutch Literature His father wished to train him to his own business, but Frans preferred drawing, and studied with Jacob Toorenvliet's father, Abraham Toorenvliet, a glazier who kept a school of design. From his own father's shop he became familiar with the ways and dress of people of distinction. His eye was fascinated in turn by the sheen of jewelry and stained glass; and, though he soon left Toorenvliet for the workshops of Gerard Dou and Abraham van den Tempel, he acquired the Leiden fijnschilder manner over the Amsterdam finish of the disciples of Rembrandt.{{EB1911|inline=y|wstitle=Mieris|volume=18|page=425}}He seldom chose panels of which the size exceeded 12 to 15 inches, and whenever his name is attached to a picture above that size it is reasonable to assign it to his son Willem or to some other imitator. Unlike Dou when he first left Rembrandt, or Jan Steen when he started on an independent career, Mieris never ventured to design figures as large as life. Characteristic of his art in its minute proportions is a shiny brightness and metallic polish.File:Frans van Mieris (I) - The Music Lesson - WGA15633.jpg|thumb|left|The Music Lesson, National Museum of Serbia, BelgradeBelgradeThe subjects which he treated best are those in which he illustrated the habits or actions of the wealthier classes; but he sometimes succeeded in homely incidents and in portrait, and not infrequently he ventured on allegory.Allegory with boy blowing bubbles - Rijksmuseum, Amsterdam WEB,weblink Allegorie op de vergankelijkheid - Rijksmuseum Amsterdam - National Museum for Art and History, 2009-10-30, 2011-06-09,weblink" title="web.archive.org/web/20110609070955weblink">weblink dead, He repeatedly painted the satin skirt which Ter Borch brought into fashion, and he often rivalled Ter Borch in the faithful rendering of rich and highly coloured woven tissues. But he remained below Ter Borch and Metsu, because he had not their delicate perception of harmony or their charming mellowness of touch and tint, and he fell behind Gerard Dou, because he was hard and had not his feeling for effect by concentrated light and shade. In the form of his composition, which sometimes represents the framework of a window enlivened with greenery, and adorned with bas-reliefs within which figures are seen to the waist, his model is certainly Dou.It questionable whether Houbraken has accurately recorded this master's birthday. One of his best-known pieces, a party of ladies and gentlemen at an oyster luncheon, in the Hermitage at St Petersburg, bears the date of 1650. Celebrated alike for composition and finish, it would prove that Mieris had reached his prime at the age of fifteen. Another beautiful example, the "Doctor Feeling a Lady's Pulse" in the gallery of Vienna, is dated 1656; and Waagen, in one of his critical essays, justly observes that it is a remarkable production for a youth of twenty-one. In 1657 Mieris was married at Leiden in the presence of Jan Potheuck, a painter, and this is the earliest written record of his existence on which we can implicitly rely. Of the numerous panels by Mieris, at least twenty-nine (such as Young Woman Stringing Pearls) are dated—the latest being an allegory, long in the Ruhl collection at Cologne, illustrating what he considered the kindred vices of drinking, smoking and dicing, in the year 1680. Mieris had numerous and distinguished patrons. He received valuable commissions from Archduke Leopold, the elector-palatine, and Cosimo III de' Medici, Grand Duke of Tuscany. His practice was large and lucrative, but never engendered in him either carelessness or neglect. If there be a difference between the painter's earlier and later work, it is that the former was clearer and more delicate in flesh, whilst the latter was often darker and more livid in the shadows. When he died his clients naturally went over to his son Willem, who in turn bequeathed his painting-room to his son Frans. But neither Willem nor Frans van Mieris the Younger equalled Frans the elder.The pictures of all the generations of the Mieris family were successfully imitated by A. D. Snaphaan, who lived at Leipzig and was patronized by the court of Anhalt-Dessau. To those who would study his deceptive form of art a visit to the collection of Wörlitz near Dessau may afford instruction.

Theft

In early June 2007, A Cavalier (Self Portrait), dated to 1657–1659, was stolen from the Art Gallery of New South Wales in Sydney, Australia. The 20 cm by 16 cm (6 inches by 8 inches)"Art Crime Alert: Masterwork Stolen in Australia", July 30, 2007, U.S. Federal Bureau of Investigation. Fetched from URL on 19 May 2011. painting had been donated to the Art Gallery of NSW in 1993 by media figure and philanthropist, James Fairfax.Dutch masterpiece snatched from NSW gallery; 'Expert' snatched masterpiece from NSW gallery ABC News Online, accessed 14 June 2007

References

{{Reflist}}

External links

{{Commons category|Frans van Mieris (I)}}{{NIE Poster|Mieris}}

• Selfportrait with cittern
• Art Gallery of New South Wales - collection search {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100719001655weblink |date=2010-07-19 }}
• Works and literature

{{Authority control (arts)}}