SUPPORT THE WORK

GetWiki

The Two Cultures

ARTICLE SUBJECTS
aesthetics  →
being  →
complexity  →
database  →
enterprise  →
ethics  →
fiction  →
history  →
internet  →
knowledge  →
language  →
licensing  →
linux  →
logic  →
method  →
news  →
perception  →
philosophy  →
policy  →
purpose  →
religion  →
science  →
sociology  →
software  →
truth  →
unix  →
wiki  →
ARTICLE TYPES
essay  →
feed  →
help  →
system  →
wiki  →
ARTICLE ORIGINS
critical  →
discussion  →
forked  →
imported  →
original  →
The Two Cultures
[ temporary import ]
please note:
- the content below is remote from Wikipedia
- it has been imported raw for GetWiki
{{Short description|Lecture and book by C. P. Snow}}{{Use British English|date=June 2014}}{{Use dmy dates|date=February 2020}}{{Italic title}}







factoids
"The Two Cultures"Snow, Charles Percy (1959), "weblink" title="web.archive.org/web/20170508085255weblink">The Two Cultures (The Rede Lecture)". is the first part of an influential 1959 Rede Lecture by British scientist and novelist C. P. Snow which were published in book form as The Two Cultures and the Scientific Revolution the same year.BOOK, Snow, Charles Percy, The Two Cultures, 2001, 1959, Cambridge University Press, London, 978-0-521-45730-9, 3, registration,weblink Its thesis was that science and the humanities which represented "the intellectual life of the whole of western society" had become split into "two cultures" and that this division was a major handicap to both in solving the world's problems.

The lecture

The talk was delivered 7 May 1959 in the Senate House, Cambridge, and subsequently published as The Two Cultures and the Scientific Revolution. The lecture and book expanded upon an article by Snow published in the New Statesman of 6 October 1956, also entitled "The Two Cultures".{{Sfn | Snow | 2013}} Published in book form, Snow's lecture was widely read and discussed on both sides of the Atlantic, leading him to write a 1963 follow-up, The Two Cultures: And a Second Look: An Expanded Version of The Two Cultures and the Scientific Revolution.BOOK, The Two Cultures: And a Second Look: An Expanded Version of The Two Cultures and the Scientific Revolution, Snow, Charles Percy, Cambridge University Press, 1963, Snow's position can be summed up by an often-repeated part of the essay:I now believe that if I had asked an even simpler question – such as, What do you mean by mass, or acceleration, which is the scientific equivalent of saying, Can you read? – not more than one in ten of the highly educated would have felt that I was speaking the same language. So the great edifice of modern physics goes up, and the majority of the cleverest people in the western world have about as much insight into it as their neolithic ancestors would have had.}}In 2008, The Times Literary Supplement included The Two Cultures and the Scientific Revolution in its list of the 100 books that most influenced Western public discourse since the Second World War.NEWS,weblink London, The Times, The hundred most influential books since the war, 30 December 2008, Snow's Rede Lecture condemned the British educational system as having, since the Victorian era, over-rewarded the humanities (especially Latin and Greek) at the expense of scientific and engineering education, despite such achievements having been so decisive in winning the Second World War for the Allies.JOURNAL, CP Snow's Two Cultures Revisited, Jardine, Lisa, Lisa Jardine, Christ's College Magazine, 2010, 48–57,weblink 13 February 2012, dead,weblink" title="web.archive.org/web/20120417151018weblink">weblink 17 April 2012, Jardine's 2009 C. P. Snow Lecture honored the 50th anniversary of Snow's Rede Lecture. She places Snow's lecture into its historical context, and emphasizes the expansion of certain elements of the Rede Lecture in Snow's Godkin Lectures at Harvard University in 1960. These were ultimately published as BOOK, Science and Government, New American Library, 1962, This in practice deprived British elites (in politics, administration, and industry) of adequate preparation to manage the modern scientific world. By contrast, Snow said, German and American schools sought to prepare their citizens equally in the sciences and humanities, and better scientific teaching enabled these countries' rulers to compete more effectively in a scientific age. Later discussion of The Two Cultures tended to obscure Snow's initial focus on differences between British systems (of both schooling and social class) and those of competing countries.

Implications and influence

The literary critic F. R. Leavis called Snow a "public relations man" for the scientific establishment in his essay Two Cultures?: The Significance of C. P. Snow, published in The Spectator in 1962. The article attracted a great deal of negative correspondence in the magazine's letters pages.JOURNAL, Kimball, Roger,weblink The Two Cultures' today: On the C. P. Snow–F. R. Leavis controversy, The New Criterion, 12 February 1994, In his 1963 book Snow appeared to revise his thinking and was more optimistic about the potential of a mediating third culture. This concept was later picked up in John Brockman's (The Third Culture: Beyond the Scientific Revolution). Introducing a reprint of The Two Cultures, Stefan Collini has argued that the passage of time has done much to reduce the cultural divide Snow noticed, but has not removed it entirely.{{cn|date=February 2022}}Stephen Jay Gould's The Hedgehog, the Fox, and the Magister's Pox provides a different perspective. Assuming the dialectical interpretation, it argues that Snow's concept of "two cultures" is not only off the mark, it is a damaging and short-sighted viewpoint, and that it has perhaps led to decades of unnecessary fence-building.Simon Critchley, in Continental Philosophy: A Very Short Introduction suggests:{{Sfn | Critchley | 2001 | p = 49}}That is, Critchley argues that what Snow said represents a resurfacing of a discussion current in the mid-nineteenth century. Critchley describes the Leavis contribution to the making of a controversy as "a vicious ad hominem attack"; going on to describe the debate as "a familiar clash in English cultural history" citing also T. H. Huxley and Matthew Arnold.{{Sfn | Critchley | 2001 | p = 51}}{{Sfn | Collini | 1993 | p = xxxv}}In his opening address at the Munich Security Conference in January 2014, the Estonian president Toomas Hendrik Ilves said that the current problems related to security and freedom in cyberspace are the culmination of absence of dialogue between "the two cultures": "Today, bereft of understanding of fundamental issues and writings in the development of liberal democracy, computer geeks devise ever better ways to track people... simply because they can and it's cool. Humanists on the other hand do not understand the underlying technology and are convinced, for example, that tracking meta-data means the government reads their emails."Ilves, Toomas Hendrik: "Rebooting Trust? Freedom vs Security in Cyberspace {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140223112412weblink |date=23 February 2014 }}" Opening address at Munich Security Conference Cyber 31 January 2014. 31.01.2014.

Antecedents

Contrasting scientific and humanistic knowledge is a repetition of the Methodenstreit of 1890 German universities.{{Citation | last = Brint | first = Steven G | year = 2002 | title = The Future of the City of Intellect: The Changing American University | url =weblink | pages = 212–3 | publisher = Stanford University Press | quote = positivism-versus-interpretation language [...] these fractal distinctions are generally quite old. Most of them have been around at least since the celebrated Methodenstreit of the German universities in the late nineteenth century. CP Snow's "two cultures" argument captures a later instantiation of them. [...] In negotiating the complexities of social scientific and humanistic knowledge, it is extremely helpful to have a dichotomy like positivism versus interpretation, because it saves our having to remember the exact degree of positivism of any scholarly group. [...] Every single social science discipline has internal debates about positivism/interpretation, narrative/analysis, and so on. The narrative/analytic debate may look very different in economics, anthropology, and English. But underneath all the surface differences it is quite similar.| isbn = 9780804745314 }} A quarrel in 1911 between Benedetto Croce and Giovanni Gentile on the one hand and Federigo Enriques on the other one is believed to have had enduring effects in the separation of the two cultures in Italy and to the predominance of the views of (objective) idealism over those of (logical) positivism.BOOK, Dauben, Joseph W., Scriba, Christoph J., Writing the History of Mathematics: Its Historical Development,weblink 2002, Springer Science & Business Media, 978-3-7643-6167-9, 422, In the social sciences it is also commonly proposed as the quarrel of positivism versus interpretivism.

See also

References

{{Reflist |33em}}

Further reading

  • Burguete, Maria, and Lam, Lui, eds. (2008). Science Matters: Humanities as Complex Systems. World Scientific: Singapore. {{ISBN|978-981-283-593-2}}
  • JOURNAL, James, Frank A. J. L., Introduction: Some Significances of the Two Cultures Debate, Interdisciplinary Science Reviews, 29 November 2016, 41, 2–3, 107–117, 10.1080/03080188.2016.1223651, 2016ISRv...41..107J,weblink free, .
  • Andrew Sinclair, The Red and the Blue. Intelligence, Treason and the Universities (Coronet Books, Hodder and Stoughten, U.K. 1987) 211 pages {{ISBN|0-340-41687-4}}

External links

  • {{Citation | publisher = BBC Radio 4 | type = discussion | title = The Two Cultures | first = Melvyn | last = Bragg | author-link = Melvyn Bragg | url =weblink | place = UK}}.
  • {{Citation |title= Continental Philosophy: A Very Short Introduction | last= Critchley | first= Simon | publisher = Oxford University Press |year=2001 |isbn=978-0-19-285359-2 |url =https://books.google.com/books?id=syhsLJ1eMOEC}}.
  • {{Citation | contribution = Introduction | title=The Two Cultures | editor-last =Snow | editor-first = Charles Percy |last =Collini |first =Stefan |publisher=Cambridge University Press |year=1993 | isbn= 978-0-521-06520-7}}
  • {{Citation | first = Timothy | last = Ferris | url =weblink | title = The World of the Intellectual vs. The World of the Engineer | newspaper = Wired | date = 13 October 2011}}.
  • {{Citation | url =weblink | first = Phillip | last = Griffiths | title = 'Two Cultures' Today | date = 13 September 1995 | publisher = St Andrews | place = UK}}.
  • {{Citation | first = Richard David | last = Precht | author-link = Richard David Precht | publisher = Google You tube | url =weblink | contribution = Natural Sciences and Humanities: Genesis of two Worlds | format = Webvideo | title = ZAKlessons | year = 2013}}..
  • {{Citation | newspaper = Seed | url =weblink | archive-url =weblink" title="web.archive.org/web/20090510065231weblink">weblink | url-status = unfit | archive-date = 10 May 2009 | title = Are We Beyond the Two Cultures? | date = 7 May 2009}}.
{{Authority control}}

- content above as imported from Wikipedia
- "The Two Cultures" does not exist on GetWiki (yet)
- time: 6:06pm EDT - Wed, May 01 2024
[ this remote article is provided by Wikipedia ]
LATEST EDITS [ see all ]
GETWIKI 23 MAY 2022
GETWIKI 09 JUL 2019
Eastern Philosophy
History of Philosophy
GETWIKI 09 MAY 2016
GETWIKI 18 OCT 2015
M.R.M. Parrott
Biographies
GETWIKI 20 AUG 2014
CONNECT