SUPPORT THE WORK

GetWiki

special pleading

ARTICLE SUBJECTS
aesthetics  →
being  →
complexity  →
database  →
enterprise  →
ethics  →
fiction  →
history  →
internet  →
knowledge  →
language  →
licensing  →
linux  →
logic  →
method  →
news  →
perception  →
philosophy  →
policy  →
purpose  →
religion  →
science  →
sociology  →
software  →
truth  →
unix  →
wiki  →
ARTICLE TYPES
essay  →
feed  →
help  →
system  →
wiki  →
ARTICLE ORIGINS
critical  →
discussion  →
forked  →
imported  →
original  →
special pleading
[ temporary import ]
please note:
- the content below is remote from Wikipedia
- it has been imported raw for GetWiki
{{short description|Informal fallacy}}{{about|the informal fallacy|the legal concept|Special pleader||}}Special pleading is an informal fallacy wherein one cites something as an exception to a general or universal principle, without justifying the special exception.WEB
,weblink
,weblink
, dead
, May 23, 2019
, special pleading
, English Oxford Living Dictionaries
, Oxford University Press
, 23 May 2019
, Argument in which the speaker deliberately ignores aspects that are unfavourable to their point of view., BOOK
, Damer
, T. Edward
, Attacking Faulty Reasoning: A Practical Guide to Fallacy-free Arguments
, Cengage Learning
, 2008
, 6
, 122–124
, 978-0-495-09506-4, {{citation
|last=Engel
|first=S. Morris
|title=Fallacies and Pitfalls of Language: The Language Trap|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=jue4i6VVly0C&pg=PA102
|year=1994
|publisher=Courier Dover Publications
|isbn=978-0-486-28274-9
|page=102}}WEB
,weblink
, Logical Fallacies Handlist
, Wheeler
, Dr. L. Kip
, Carson-Newman University (Study Guide)
, Room 309 in the English Department suite of Henderson 311
, 23 May 2019
, Special Pleading, in which the writer creates a universal principle, then insists that principle does not for some reason apply to the issue at hand., WEB
,weblink
, Special Pleading
, Dowden
, Bradley
, Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy
, California State University, Sacramento
, 23 May 2019
, [A] form of inconsistency in which the reasoner doesn't apply [their] principles consistently…[T]he fallacy of applying a general principle to various situations but not applying it to a special situation that interests the arguer even though the general principle properly applies to that special situation, too., It is the application of a double standard.WEB
,weblink
, Fallacious Reasoning and Propaganda Techniques
, LaMorte
, Wayne W.
, Persuasive Messages
, Boston University School of Public Health
, 23 May 2019
, Special Pleading: committed by applying a double standard exemplified in choice of words., WEB
,weblink
, Logical fallacies or fallacies in argumentation
, Slick
, Matt
, 18 May 2008
, Christian Apologetics and Research Ministry
, Christian Apologetics and Research Ministry
, 23 May 2019
, Special Pleading (double standard) - Applying a standard to another that is different from a standard applied to oneself.,
In the classic distinction among material fallacies, cognitive fallacies, and formal fallacies, special pleading most likely falls within the category of a cognitive fallacy, because it would seem to relate to "(wikt:lip service|lip service)", rationalization, and diversion (abandonment of discussion). Special pleading also often resembles the "appeal to" logical fallacies.This division is found in introductory texts such as Fallacy: The Counterfeit of Argument, W. Ward Fearnside, Prentice-Hall, Inc., 1959. {{OCLC|710677}}WEB
,weblink
, Special Pleading
, Bruce Thompson's Fallacy Page
, Critical Thinking (PHIL 200) [study guide]
, Palomar College
, 23 May 2019
, The argument defends a position by claiming that the opponent lacks the necessary perspective (experiences or credentials) to appreciate the position (or the arguments in support of it). This lack allegedly makes the opponent unqualified to critique the position... [t]his extreme version of Special Pleading is a tactic often used to argue that no action can be judged morally wrong, since no one has the perspective to be able to judge another person's moral code... [e.g.] Association fallacy#Honor by association, 'My opponent can't know what's best for our fair community. He wasn't born and raised here, like I was.',
In medieval philosophy, it was not presumed that wherever a distinction is claimed, a relevant basis for the distinction should exist and be substantiated. Special pleading subverts a presumption of existential import.{{Citation needed|reason=Sources on such a broad claim about (Presumably Western) Medieval philosophy are necessary, see edit notes|date=April 2022}}{{Explain|date=April 2022}}

Examples

A difficult case is when a possible criticism is made relatively immune to investigation. This immunity may take the forms of:
  • unexplained claims of exemption from principles commonly thought relevant to the subject matter
    • Example: I'm not relying on faith in small probabilities here. These are slot machines, not roulette wheels. They are different.
  • creation of an ad-hoc exception to prevent the rule from backfiring against the claim:
    • Example: Everyone has a duty to help the police do their job, no matter who the suspect is. That is why we must support investigations into corruption in the police department. No person is above the law. Of course, if the police come knocking on my door to ask about my neighbors and the robberies in our building, I know nothing. I’m not about to rat on anybody.
  • "You aren't like me, so you do not even have a right to think about or hold opinions on my plight."WEB


,weblink
, Special Pleading
, Bruce Thompson's Fallacy Page
, Critical Thinking (PHIL 200) [study guide]
, Palomar College
, 23 May 2019
, ‘You aren't like me, so you do not even have a right to think about or hold opinions on my plight’... [t]he fallacy of Special Pleading presupposes that some differences are so great that the human capacity of empathy cannot cross them.,
    • Example: Keep your advice to yourself. If you didn't grow up the way I did, then you can't understand.

Statistical

This variation occurs when the interpretation of the relevant statistic is "massaged" by looking for ways to reclassify or requantify data from one portion of results, but not applying the same scrutiny to other categories.{{citation |title = Historians' Fallacies: Toward A Logic of Historical Thought |publisher= HarperCollins |isbn= 978-0-06-131545-9 |year=1970 |location= New York |oclc= 185446787 |series= Harper torchbooks |edition= first |first= D. H. |last= Fischer |author-link= David Hackett Fischer |pages= 110–113 |url=weblink}}

See also

References

{{Reflist}}

External links

{{Fallacies}}{{Pseudoscience}}

- content above as imported from Wikipedia
- "special pleading" does not exist on GetWiki (yet)
- time: 2:43pm EDT - Wed, May 15 2024
[ this remote article is provided by Wikipedia ]
LATEST EDITS [ see all ]
GETWIKI 23 MAY 2022
GETWIKI 09 JUL 2019
Eastern Philosophy
History of Philosophy
GETWIKI 09 MAY 2016
GETWIKI 18 OCT 2015
M.R.M. Parrott
Biographies
GETWIKI 20 AUG 2014
CONNECT