SUPPORT THE WORK

GetWiki

function composition

ARTICLE SUBJECTS
news  →
unix  →
wiki  →
ARTICLE TYPES
feed  →
help  →
wiki  →
ARTICLE ORIGINS
function composition
[ temporary import ]
- the content below is remote from Wikipedia
- it has been imported raw for GetWiki
{{short description|Operation on mathematical functions}}{{about|the mathematical concept|the computer science concept|Function composition (computer science)}}{{redirect-distinguish|Ring operator|operator ring|operator assistance}}{{Use dmy dates|date=May 2019|cs1-dates=y}}{{Functions}}In mathematics, function composition is an operation {{math|â€‰âˆ˜â€‰}} that takes two functions {{math|f}} and {{math|g}}, and produces a function {{math|1=h = g â€‰âˆ˜ â€‰f}} such that {{math|1=h(x) = g(f(x))}}. In this operation, the function {{math|g}} is applied to the result of applying the function {{math|f}} to {{math|x}}. That is, the functions {{math|fâ€‰: X â†’ Y}} and {{math|gâ€‰: Y â†’ Z}} are composed to yield a function that maps {{math|x}} in domain {{math|X}} to {{math|g(f(x))}} in codomain {{math|Z}}.Intuitively, if {{math|z}} is a function of {{math|y}}, and {{math|y}} is a function of {{math|x}}, then {{math|z}} is a function of {{math|x}}. The resulting composite function is denoted {{math|gâ€‰âˆ˜â€‰f : X â†’ Z}}, defined by {{math|1=(gâ€‰âˆ˜â€‰fâ€‰)(x) = g(f(x))}} for all {{math|x}} in {{math|X}}.The notation {{math|gâ€‰âˆ˜â€‰f}} is read as "{{math|g}} of {{math|f}} ", "{{math|g}} after {{math|f}} ", "{{math|g}} circle {{math|f}} ", "{{math|g}} round {{math|f}} ", "{{math|g}} about {{math|f}} ", "{{math|g}} composed with {{math|f}} ", "{{math|g}} following {{math|f}} ", "{{math|f}} then {{math|g}}", or "{{math|g}} on {{math|f}} ", or "the composition of {{math|g}} and {{math|f}} ". Intuitively, composing functions is a chaining process in which the output of function {{math|f}} feeds the input of function {{math|g}}.The composition of functions is a special case of the composition of relations, sometimes also denoted by circ. As a result, all properties of composition of relations are true of composition of functions, such as the property of associativity.Composition of functions is different from multiplication of functions (if defined at all), and has some quite different properties; in particular, composition of functions is not commutative.WEB, 2020-01-16, 3.4: Composition of Functions,weblink 2020-08-28, Mathematics LibreTexts, en,

Examples

(File:Example for a composition of two functions.svg|thumb|Concrete example for the composition of two functions.)
• Composition of functions on a finite set: If {{math|1=f = {(1, 1), (2, 3), (3, 1), (4, 2)} }}, and {{math|1=g = {(1, 2), (2, 3), (3, 1), (4, 2)} }}, then {{math|1=g âˆ˜ f = {(1, 2), (2, 1), (3, 2), (4, 3)} }}, as shown in the figure.
• Composition of functions on an infinite set: If {{math|f: R â†’ R}} (where {{math|R}} is the set of all real numbers) is given by {{math|1=f(x) = 2x + 4}} and {{math|g: R â†’ R}} is given by {{math|1=g(x) = x3}}, then: {{block indent|text={{math|1=(f âˆ˜ g)(x) = f(g(x)) = f(x3) = 2x3 + 4}}, and}} {{block indent|text={{math|1=(g âˆ˜ f)(x) = g(f(x)) = g(2x + 4) = (2x + 4)3}}.}}
• If an airplane's altitude at time {{mvar|t}} is {{math|a(t)}}, and the air pressure at altitude {{mvar|x}} is {{math|p(x)}}, then {{math|(p âˆ˜ a)(t)}} is the pressure around the plane at time {{mvar|t}}.

Properties

The composition of functions is always associativeâ€”a property inherited from the composition of relations. That is, if {{mvar|f}}, {{mvar|g}}, and {{mvar|h}} are composable, then {{math|1=f âˆ˜ (gâ€‰âˆ˜â€‰h) = (fâ€‰âˆ˜â€‰g) âˆ˜ h}}.WEB, Weisstein, Eric W., Composition,weblink 2020-08-28, mathworld.wolfram.com, en, Since the parentheses do not change the result, they are generally omitted.In a strict sense, the composition {{math|1=gâ€‰âˆ˜â€‰f}} is only meaningful if the codomain of {{mvar|f}} equals the domain of {{mvar|g}}; in a wider sense, it is sufficient that the former be an improper subset of the latter.Moreover, it is often convenient to tacitly restrict the domain of {{mvar|f}}, such that {{mvar|f}} produces only values in the domain of {{mvar|g}}. For example, the composition {{math|1=gâ€‰âˆ˜â€‰f}} of the functions {{math|fâ€‰: R â†’ (âˆ’âˆž,+9] }} defined by {{math|1=f(x) = 9 âˆ’ x2}} and {{math|gâ€‰: [0,+âˆž) â†’ R}} defined by g(x) = sqrt x can be defined on the interval {{math|[âˆ’3,+3]}}.Image:Absolute value composition.svg|thumb|upright=1|Compositions of two real functions, the absolute value and a cubic functioncubic functionThe functions {{mvar|g}} and {{mvar|f}} are said to commute with each other if {{math|1=gâ€‰âˆ˜â€‰f = fâ€‰âˆ˜â€‰g}}. Commutativity is a special property, attained only by particular functions, and often in special circumstances. For example, {{math|1={{abs|x}} + 3 = {{abs|x + 3}}}} only when {{math|x â‰¥ 0}}. The picture shows another example.The composition of one-to-one (injective) functions is always one-to-one. Similarly, the composition of onto (surjective) functions is always onto. It follows that the composition of two bijections is also a bijection. The inverse function of a composition (assumed invertible) has the property that {{math|1=(fâ€‰âˆ˜â€‰g)âˆ’1 = gâˆ’1âˆ˜ fâˆ’1}}.Derivatives of compositions involving differentiable functions can be found using the chain rule. Higher derivatives of such functions are given by FaÃ  di Bruno's formula.

Composition monoids

Suppose one has two (or more) functions {{math|f: X â†’ X,}} {{math|g: X â†’ X}} having the same domain and codomain; these are often called transformations. Then one can form chains of transformations composed together, such as {{math|f âˆ˜ f âˆ˜ g âˆ˜ f}}. Such chains have the algebraic structure of a monoid, called a transformation monoid or (much more seldom) a composition monoid. In general, transformation monoids can have remarkably complicated structure. One particular notable example is the de Rham curve. The set of all functions {{math|f: X â†’ X}} is called the full transformation semigroup or symmetric semigroup on {{mvar|X}}. (One can actually define two semigroups depending how one defines the semigroup operation as the left or right composition of functions.)(File:SVG skew and rotation.svg|thumb|Composition of a {{w|shear mapping}} (red) and a clockwise rotation by 45Â° (green). On the left is the original object. Above is shear, then rotate. Below is rotate, then shear.)If the transformations are bijective (and thus invertible), then the set of all possible combinations of these functions forms a transformation group; and one says that the group is generated by these functions. A fundamental result in group theory, Cayley's theorem, essentially says that any group is in fact just a subgroup of a permutation group (up to isomorphism).The set of all bijective functions {{math|f: X â†’ X}} (called permutations) forms a group with respect to function composition. This is the symmetric group, also sometimes called the composition group.In the symmetric semigroup (of all transformations) one also finds a weaker, non-unique notion of inverse (called a pseudoinverse) because the symmetric semigroup is a regular semigroup.

Functional powers

If {{math|Y âŠ† X}}, then {{math|f: Xâ†’Y}} may compose with itself; this is sometimes denoted as {{math|f 2}}. That is:{{block indent|em=1.5|text={{math|1=(f âˆ˜ f)(x) = f(f(x)) = f 2(x)}}}}{{block indent|em=1.5|text={{math|1=(f âˆ˜ f âˆ˜ f)(x) = f(f(f(x))) = f 3(x)}}}}{{block indent|em=1.5|text={{math|1=(f âˆ˜ f âˆ˜ f âˆ˜ f)(x) = f(f(f(f(x)))) = f 4(x)}}}}More generally, for any natural number {{math|n â‰¥ 2}}, the {{mvar|n}}th functional power can be defined inductively by {{math|1=fn = f âˆ˜ fnâˆ’1 = fnâˆ’1 âˆ˜ f}}, a notation introduced by Hans Heinrich BÃ¼rmann{{cn|date=August 2020|reason=The fact is undisputable, but for historical completeness, let's find BÃ¼rmann's original work on this and add here as a citation. It must be dated significantly before 1813 (according to Herschel in 1820 und Cajori in 1929.)}} and John Frederick William Herschel. Repeated composition of such a function with itself is called iterated function.
• By convention, {{math|f 0}} is defined as the identity map on {{math|f }}'s domain, {{math|idX}}.
• If {{math|1=Y = X}} and {{math|f: X â†’ X}} admits an inverse function {{math|f âˆ’1}} (sometimes called Â«minus first iterationÂ»{{cn|date=October 2023}}), negative functional powers {{math|f âˆ’n}} are defined for {{math|n > 0}} as the negated power of the inverse function: {{math|1=f âˆ’n = (f âˆ’1)n}}.
Note: If {{mvar|f}} takes its values in a ring (in particular for real or complex-valued {{math|f }}), there is a risk of confusion, as {{math|fn}} could also stand for the {{mvar|n}}-fold product of {{mvar|f}}, e.g. {{math|1=f 2(x) = f(x) Â· f(x)}}. For trigonometric functions, usually the latter is meant, at least for positive exponents. For example, in trigonometry, this superscript notation represents standard exponentiation when used with trigonometric functions:{{math|1=sin2(x) = sin(x) Â· sin(x)}}.However, for negative exponents (especially −1), it nevertheless usually refers to the inverse function, e.g., {{math|1=tanâˆ’1 = arctan â‰  1/tan}}.In some cases, when, for a given function {{mvar|f}}, the equation {{math|1=g âˆ˜ g = f}} has a unique solution {{mvar|g}}, that function can be defined as the functional square root of {{mvar|f}}, then written as {{math|1=g = f 1/2}}.More generally, when {{math|1=g'n = f}} has a unique solution for some natural number {{math|n > 0}}, then {{math|fm/n}} can be defined as {{math|g'm}}.Under additional restrictions, this idea can be generalized so that the iteration count becomes a continuous parameter; in this case, such a system is called a flow, specified through solutions of SchrÃ¶der's equation. Iterated functions and flows occur naturally in the study of fractals and dynamical systems.To avoid ambiguity, some mathematicians{{cn|date=August 2020|reason=Origin? Example authors?}} choose to use {{math|âˆ˜}} to denote the compositional meaning, writing {{math|f{{i sup|âˆ˜n}}(x)}} for the {{mvar|n}}-th iterate of the function {{math|f(x)}}, as in, for example, {{math|f{{i sup|âˆ˜3}}(x)}} meaning {{math|f(f(f(x)))}}. For the same purpose, {{math|f{{i sup|[n]}}(x)}} was used by Benjamin Peirce whereas Alfred Pringsheim and Jules Molk suggested {{math|{{i sup|n}}f(x)}} instead.

Alternative notations

Many mathematicians, particularly in group theory, omit the composition symbol, writing {{math|gf}} for {{math|g âˆ˜ f}}.In the mid-20th century, some mathematicians decided that writing "{{math|g âˆ˜ fâ€‰}}" to mean "first apply {{mvar|f}}, then apply {{mvar|g}}" was too confusing and decided to change notations. They write "{{math|xf }}" for "{{math|f(x)}}" and "{{math|(xf)g}}" for "{{math|g(f(x))}}". This can be more natural and seem simpler than writing functions on the left in some areas â€“ in linear algebra, for instance, when {{mvar|x}} is a row vector and {{mvar|f}} and {{mvar|g}} denote matrices and the composition is by matrix multiplication. This alternative notation is called postfix notation. The order is important because function composition is not necessarily commutative (e.g. matrix multiplication). Successive transformations applying and composing to the right agrees with the left-to-right reading sequence.Mathematicians who use postfix notation may write "{{math|fg}}", meaning first apply {{mvar|f}} and then apply {{mvar|g}}, in keeping with the order the symbols occur in postfix notation, thus making the notation "{{math|fg}}" ambiguous. Computer scientists may write "{{math|f ; g}}" for this, thereby disambiguating the order of composition. To distinguish the left composition operator from a text semicolon, in the Z notation the â¨¾ character is used for left relation composition. Since all functions are binary relations, it is correct to use the [fat] semicolon for function composition as well (see the article on composition of relations for further details on this notation).

Composition operator

Given a function {{math|g}}, the composition operator {{math|Cg}} is defined as that operator which maps functions to functions as C_g f = f circ g.Composition operators are studied in the field of operator theory.

In programming languages

Function composition appears in one form or another in numerous programming languages.

Multivariate functions

Partial composition is possible for multivariate functions. The function resulting when some argument {{math|x'i}} of the function {{mvar|f}} is replaced by the function {{mvar|g}} is called a composition of {{mvar|f}} and {{mvar|g}} in some computer engineering contexts, and is denoted {{math|1=f {{!}}x'i = g}}f|_{x_i = g} = f (x_1, ldots, x_{i-1}, g(x_1, x_2, ldots, x_n), x_{i+1}, ldots, x_n).When {{mvar|g}} is a simple constant {{mvar|b}}, composition degenerates into a (partial) valuation, whose result is also known as restriction or co-factor.f|_{x_i = b} = f (x_1, ldots, x_{i-1}, b, x_{i+1}, ldots, x_n).In general, the composition of multivariate functions may involve several other functions as arguments, as in the definition of primitive recursive function. Given {{mvar|f}}, a {{mvar|n}}-ary function, and {{mvar|n}} {{mvar|m}}-ary functions {{math|g1, ..., g'n}}, the composition of {{mvar|f}} with {{math|g1, ..., g'n}}, is the {{mvar|m}}-ary functionh(x_1,ldots,x_m) = f(g_1(x_1,ldots,x_m),ldots,g_n(x_1,ldots,x_m)).This is sometimes called the generalized composite or superposition of f with {{math|g1, ..., g'n}}. The partial composition in only one argument mentioned previously can be instantiated from this more general scheme by setting all argument functions except one to be suitably chosen projection functions. Here {{math|g1, ..., g'n}} can be seen as a single vector/tuple-valued function in this generalized scheme, in which case this is precisely the standard definition of function composition.A set of finitary operations on some base set X is called a clone if it contains all projections and is closed under generalized composition. A clone generally contains operations of various arities. The notion of commutation also finds an interesting generalization in the multivariate case; a function f of arity n is said to commute with a function g of arity m if f is a homomorphism preserving g, and vice versa i.e.:f(g(a_{11},ldots,a_{1m}),ldots,g(a_{n1},ldots,a_{nm})) = g(f(a_{11},ldots,a_{n1}),ldots,f(a_{1m},ldots,a_{nm})).A unary operation always commutes with itself, but this is not necessarily the case for a binary (or higher arity) operation. A binary (or higher arity) operation that commutes with itself is called medial or entropic.

Generalizations

Composition can be generalized to arbitrary binary relations.If {{math|R âŠ† X Ã— Y}} and {{math|S âŠ† Y Ã— Z}} are two binary relations, then their composition {{math|Râˆ˜S}} is the relation defined as {{math|{(x, z) âˆˆ X Ã— Z : âˆƒy âˆˆ Y. (x, y) âˆˆ R âˆ§ (y, z) âˆˆ S}{{void}}}}.Considering a function as a special case of a binary relation (namely functional relations), function composition satisfies the definition for relation composition. A small circle {{math|Râˆ˜S}} has been used for the infix notation of composition of relations, as well as functions. When used to represent composition of functions (g circ f)(x) = g(f(x)) however, the text sequence is reversed to illustrate the different operation sequences accordingly.The composition is defined in the same way for partial functions and Cayley's theorem has its analogue called the Wagnerâ€“Preston theorem.The category of sets with functions as morphisms is the prototypical category. The axioms of a category are in fact inspired from the properties (and also the definition) of function composition. The structures given by composition are axiomatized and generalized in category theory with the concept of morphism as the category-theoretical replacement of functions. The reversed order of composition in the formula {{math|1=(fâ€‰âˆ˜â€‰g)âˆ’1 = (gâˆ’1 âˆ˜ fâ€‰âˆ’1)}} applies for composition of relations using converse relations, and thus in group theory. These structures form dagger categories.The standard "foundation" for mathematics starts with sets and their elements. It is possible to start differently, by axiomatising not elements of sets but functions between sets. This can be done by using the language of categories and universal constructions.. . . the membership relation for sets can often be replaced by the composition operation for functions. This leads to an alternative foundation for Mathematics upon categories -- specifically, on the category of all functions. Now much of Mathematics is dynamic, in that it deals with morphisms of an object into another object of the same kind. Such morphisms (like functions) form categories, and so the approach via categories fits well with the objective of organizing and understanding Mathematics. That, in truth, should be the goal of a proper philosophy of Mathematics.- Saunders Mac Lane, (Mathematics, Form and Function|Mathematics: Form and Function)WEB, Saunders Mac Lane - Quotations,weblink 2024-02-13, Maths History, en,

Typography

The composition symbol {{math|âˆ˜}} is encoded as {{unichar|2218|ring operator|html=}}; see the Degree symbol article for similar-appearing Unicode characters. In TeX, it is written circ.

Notes

{{Reflist|group="nb"|refs=Some authors use {{math|fâ€‰âˆ˜â€‰g : X â†’ Z}}, defined by {{math|1=(fâ€‰âˆ˜â€‰gâ€‰)(x) = g(f(x))}} instead. This is common when a postfix notation is used, especially if functions are represented by exponents, as, for instance, in the study of group actions. See BOOK, John D., Dixon, Brian, Mortimer, Permutation groups, 1996, Springer, 0-387-94599-7, 5,weblink The strict sense is used, e.g., in category theory, where a subset relation is modelled explicitly by an inclusion function.Alfred Pringsheim's and Jules Molk's (1907) notation {{math|{{i sup|n}}f(x)}} to denote function compositions must not be confused with Rudolf von Bitter Rucker's (1982) notation {{math|{{i sup|n}}x}}, introduced by Hans Maurer (1901) and Reuben Louis Goodstein (1947) for tetration, or with David Patterson Ellerman's (1995) {{math|{{i sup|n}}x}} pre-superscript notation for roots.}}

References

(xviii+367+1 pages including 1 addenda page) (NB. ISBN and link for reprint of 2nd edition by Cosimo, Inc., New York, USA, 2013.)JOURNAL, John Frederick William, Herschel, John Frederick William Herschel, On a Remarkable Application of Cotes's Theorem, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, Royal Society of London, printed by W. Bulmer and Co., Cleveland-Row, St. James's, sold by G. and W. Nicol, Pall-Mall, London, 103, Part 1, 1813, 1812-11-12, 107384, 8â€“26 [10], 10.1098/rstl.1813.0005, 118124706, BOOK, John Frederick William, Herschel, John Frederick William Herschel, A Collection of Examples of the Applications of the Calculus of Finite Differences, Part III. Section I. Examples of the Direct Method of Differences, Cambridge, UK, Printed by J. Smith, sold by J. Deighton & sons, 1820, 1â€“13 [5â€“6],weblink 2020-08-04, live,weblink 2020-08-04, weblink (NB. Inhere, Herschel refers to his REF, Herschel, 1813, 1813 work, plain, and mentions Hans Heinrich BÃ¼rmann's older work.)BOOK, Benjamin, Peirce, Benjamin Peirce, Curves, Functions and Forces, I, new, Boston, USA, 1852, 203, BOOK, Giuseppe, Peano, Giuseppe Peano, Formulaire mathÃ©matique, fr, IV, 1903, 229, BOOK, Alfred, Pringsheim, Alfred Pringsheim, Jules, Molk, Jules Molk, EncyclopÃ©die des sciences mathÃ©matiques pures et appliquÃ©es, fr, Part I, I, 1907, 195, }}

- content above as imported from Wikipedia
- "function composition" does not exist on GetWiki (yet)
- time: 6:29pm EDT - Sat, May 18 2024
[ this remote article is provided by Wikipedia ]
LATEST EDITS [ see all ]
GETWIKI 23 MAY 2022
GETWIKI 09 JUL 2019
Eastern Philosophy
History of Philosophy
GETWIKI 09 MAY 2016
GETWIKI 18 OCT 2015
M.R.M. Parrott
Biographies
GETWIKI 20 AUG 2014
CONNECT