SUPPORT THE WORK

GetWiki

molecular clock

ARTICLE SUBJECTS
aesthetics  →
being  →
complexity  →
database  →
enterprise  →
ethics  →
fiction  →
history  →
internet  →
knowledge  →
language  →
licensing  →
linux  →
logic  →
method  →
news  →
perception  →
philosophy  →
policy  →
purpose  →
religion  →
science  →
sociology  →
software  →
truth  →
unix  →
wiki  →
ARTICLE TYPES
essay  →
feed  →
help  →
system  →
wiki  →
ARTICLE ORIGINS
critical  →
discussion  →
forked  →
imported  →
original  →
molecular clock
[ temporary import ]
please note:
- the content below is remote from Wikipedia
- it has been imported raw for GetWiki
{{Evolutionary biology}}The molecular clock is figurative term for a technique that uses the mutation rate of biomolecules to deduce the time in prehistory when two or more life forms diverged. The biomolecular data used for such calculations are usually nucleotide sequences for DNA or amino acid sequences for proteins. The benchmarks for determining the mutation rate are often fossil or archaeological dates. The molecular clock was first tested in 1962 on the hemoglobin protein variants of various animals, and is commonly used in molecular evolution to estimate times of speciation or radiation. It is sometimes called a gene clock or an evolutionary clock.

Early discovery and genetic equidistance

The notion of the existence of a so-called "molecular clock" was first attributed to Émile Zuckerkandl and Linus Pauling who, in 1962, noticed that the number of amino acid differences in hemoglobin between different lineages changes roughly linearly with time, as estimated from fossil evidence.BOOK, Emile Zuckerkandl, Zuckerkandl, E. and Linus Pauling, Pauling, L.B., 1962, Horizons in Biochemistry, Molecular disease, evolution, and genic heterogeneity, Kasha, M. and Pullman, B (editors), 189–225, Academic Press, New York, They generalized this observation to assert that the rate of evolutionary change of any specified protein was approximately constant over time and over different lineages (known as the molecular clock hypothesis (MCH)).The genetic equidistance phenomenon was first noted in 1963 by Emanuel Margoliash, who wrote: "It appears that the number of residue differences between cytochrome c of any two species is mostly conditioned by the time elapsed since the lines of evolution leading to these two species originally diverged. If this is correct, the cytochrome c of all mammals should be equally different from the cytochrome c of all birds. Since fish diverges from the main stem of vertebrate evolution earlier than either birds or mammals, the cytochrome c of both mammals and birds should be equally different from the cytochrome c of fish. Similarly, all vertebrate cytochrome c should be equally different from the yeast protein."JOURNAL, 10.1073/pnas.50.4.672, Margoliash E, PRIMARY STRUCTURE AND EVOLUTION OF CYTOCHROME C, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 50, 4, 672–9, October 1963, 14077496, 221244, 1963PNAS...50..672M, For example, the difference between the cytochrome c of a carp and a frog, turtle, chicken, rabbit, and horse is a very constant 13% to 14%. Similarly, the difference between the cytochrome c of a bacterium and yeast, wheat, moth, tuna, pigeon, and horse ranges from 64% to 69%. Together with the work of Emile Zuckerkandl and Linus Pauling, the genetic equidistance result directly led to the formal postulation of the molecular clock hypothesis in the early 1960s.JOURNAL, Kumar S, Molecular clocks: four decades of evolution, Nat. Rev. Genet., 6, 8, 654–62, August 2005, 16136655, 10.1038/nrg1659, Similarly, Vincent Sarich and Allan Wilson in 1967 demonstrated that molecular differences among modern Primates in albumin proteins showed that approximately constant rates of change had occurred in all the lineages they assessed.JOURNAL, Sarich, V M, Wilson, A C, July 1967, Rates of albumin evolution in primates., Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 58, 1, 142–148, 0027-8424, 4962458, 335609, 10.1073/pnas.58.1.142, The basic logic of their analysis involved recognizing that if one species lineage had evolved more quickly than a sister species lineage since their common ancestor, then the molecular differences between an outgroup (more distantly related) species and the faster-evolving species should be larger (since more molecular changes would have accumulated on that lineage) than the molecular differences between the outgroup species and the slower-evolving species. This method is known as the relative rate test. Sarich and Wilson's paper reported, for example, that human (Homo sapiens) and chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes) albumin immunological cross-reactions suggested they were about equally different from Ceboidea (New World Monkey) species (within experimental error). This meant that they had both accumulated approximately equal changes in albumin since their shared common ancestor. This pattern was also found for all the primate comparisons they tested. When calibrated with the few well-documented fossil branch points (such as no Primate fossils of modern aspect found before the K-T boundary), this led Sarich and Wilson to argue that the human-chimp divergence probably occurred only ~4-6 million years ago.JOURNAL, Immunological Time Scale for Hominid Evolution, Science, 158, 3805, 1200–1203, 1722843, Sarich, Vincent M., Wilson, Allan C., 1967, 10.1126/science.158.3805.1200,

Relationship with neutral theory

The observation of a clock-like rate of molecular change was originally purely phenomenological. Later, the work of Motoo KimuraJOURNAL, Kimura, Motoo, 1968, Evolutionary rate at the molecular level, Nature, 217, 624–626, 10.1038/217624a0, 5637732, 5129, 1968Natur.217..624K, developed the neutral theory of molecular evolution, which predicted a molecular clock. Let there be N individuals, and to keep this calculation simple, let the individuals be haploid (i.e. have one copy of each gene). Let the rate of neutral mutations (i.e. mutations with no effect on fitness) in a new individual be mu. The probability that this new mutation will become fixed in the population is then 1/N, since each copy of the gene is as good as any other. Every generation, each individual can have new mutations, so there are muN new neutral mutations in the population as a whole. That means that each generation, mu new neutral mutations will become fixed. If most changes seen during molecular evolution are neutral, then fixations in a population will accumulate at a clock-rate that is equal to the rate of neutral mutations in an individual.

Calibration

The molecular clock alone can only say that one time period is twice as long as another: it cannot assign concrete dates. For viral phylogenetics and ancient DNA studies—two areas of evolutionary biology where it is possible to sample sequences over an evolutionary timescale—the dates of the intermediate samples can be used to more precisely calibrate the molecular clock. However, most phylogenies require that the molecular clock be calibrated against independent evidence about dates, such as the fossil record.JOURNAL, Benton, M. J., Donoghue, P. C. J., yes, 2007, Paleontological evidence to date the Tree of Life, Molecular Biology & Evolution, 24, 26–53, 10.1093/molbev/msl150, 17047029, 1, There are two general methods for calibrating the molecular clock using fossil data: node calibration and tip calibration.JOURNAL, Donoghue, P.C.J., Ziheng, Y., yes, 2016, The evolution of methods for establishing evolutionary timescales, Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B, 10.1098/rstb.2016.0020, 27325838, 4920342, 1, 371, 20160020,

Node calibration

Sometimes referred to as node dating, node calibration is a method for phylogeny calibration that is done by placing fossil constraints at nodes. A node calibration fossil is the oldest discovered representative of that clade, which is used to constrain its minimum age. Due to the fragmentary nature of the fossil record, the true most recent common ancestor of a clade will likely never be found. In order to account for this in node calibration analyses, a maximum clade age must be estimated. Determining the maximum clade age is challenging because it relies on negative evidence—the absence of older fossils in that clade. There are a number of methods for deriving the maximum clade age using birth-death models, fossil stratigraphic distribution analyses, or taphonomic controls.JOURNAL, O'Reilly, J. E., Mario D. R., yes, 2015, Dating Tips for Divergence-Time Estimation, Trends in Genetics, 31, 637–650, 10.1016/j.tig.2015.08.001, 26439502, 11, Alternatively, instead of a maximum and a minimum, a prior probability of the divergence time can be established and used to calibrate the clock. There are several prior probability distributions including normal, lognormal, exponential, gamma, uniform, etc.) that can be used to express the probability of the true age of divergence relative to the age of the fossil;JOURNAL, Drummond, A., Suchard, M. A., 2012, Bayesian phylogenetics with BEAUti and the BEAST 1.7, Molecular Biology and Evolution, 29, 8, 1969–1973, 10.1093/molbev/mss075, 22367748, 3408070, however, there are very few methods for estimating the shape and parameters of the probability distribution empirically.JOURNAL, Claramunt, S., Cracraft, J., A new time tree reveals Earth history's imprint on the evolution of modern birds, Sci Adv, 2015, 1, 11, 10.1126/sciadv.1501005, 4730849, 26824065, e1501005, 2015SciA....1E1005C, The placement of calibration nodes on the tree informs the placement of the unconstrained nodes, giving divergence date estimates across the phylogeny. Historical methods of clock calibration could only make use of a single fossil constraint (non-parametric rate smoothing),JOURNAL, Sanderson, M., 1997, A nonparametric approach to estimating divergence times in the absence of rate constancy,weblink Molecular Biology and Evolution, 14, 12, 1218–1231, 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a025731, while modern analyses (BEASTJOURNAL, Drummond, A., Rambaut, A., 2007, BEAST: Bayesian evolutionary analysis by sampling trees, BMC Evolutionary Biology, 7, 214, 10.1186/1471-2148-7-214, 17996036, 2247476, and (sourceforge:projects/r8s/|r8s)JOURNAL, Sanderson, M., 2003, r8s: inferring absolute rates of molecular evolution and divergence times in the absence of a molecular clock,weblink Bioinformatics, 19, 2, 301–302, 10.1093/bioinformatics/19.2.301, ) allow for the use of multiple fossils to calibrate the molecular clock. Simulation studies have shown that increasing the number of fossil constraints increases the accuracy of divergence time estimation.JOURNAL, Zheng Y., Wiens J. J., yes, 2015, Do missing data influence the accuracy of divergence-time estimation with BEAST?, Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 85, 41–49, 10.1016/j.ympev.2015.02.002, 25681677, 1,

Tip calibration

Sometimes referred to as tip dating, tip calibration is a method of molecular clock calibration in which fossils are treated as taxa and placed on the tips of the tree. This is achieved by creating a matrix that includes a molecular dataset for the extant taxa along with a morphological dataset for both the extinct and the extant taxa. Unlike node calibration, this method reconstructs the tree topology and places the fossils simultaneously. Molecular and morphological models work together simultaneously, allowing morphology to inform the placement of fossils. Tip calibration makes use of all relevant fossil taxa during clock calibration, rather than relying on only the oldest fossil of each clade. This method does not rely on the interpretation of negative evidence to infer maximum clade ages.

Total evidence dating

This approach to tip calibration goes a step further by simultaneously estimating fossil placement, topology, and the evolutionary timescale. In this method, the age of a fossil can inform its phylogenetic position in addition to morphology. By allowing all aspects of tree reconstruction to occur simultaneously, the risk of biased results is decreased. This approach has been improved upon by pairing it with different models. One current method of molecular clock calibration is total evidence dating paired with the fossilized birth-death (FBD) model and a model of morphological evolution.JOURNAL, Heath, T. A., Huelsenbeck, J. P., yes, 2014, The fossilized birth–death process for coherent calibration of divergence-time estimates, PNAS, 111, E2957–E2966, 10.1073/pnas.1319091111, 25009181, 29, 4115571, 1310.2968, 2014PNAS..111E2957H, The FBD model is novel in that it allows for “sampled ancestors,” which are fossil taxa that are the direct ancestor of a living taxon or lineage. This allows fossils to be placed on a branch above an extant organism, rather than being confined to the tips.JOURNAL, Gavryushkina, A., Heath, T. A., Ksepka, D. T., Stadler, T., Welch, D., Drummond, A. J., yes, 2016, Bayesian Total-Evidence Dating Reveals the Recent Crown Radiation of Penguins, Systematic Biology, 66, 1–17, 10.1093/sysbio/syw060, 28173531, 5410945, 1, 1506.04797,

Methods

Bayesian methods can provide more appropriate estimates of divergence times, especially if large datasets—such as those yielded by phylogenomics—are employed.JOURNAL, Dos Reis, M., Inoue, J., Hasegawa, M., Asher, R. J., Donoghue, P. C. J., Yang, Z., 10.1098/rspb.2012.0683, Phylogenomic datasets provide both precision and accuracy in estimating the timescale of placental mammal phylogeny, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 279, 1742, 3491–3500, 2012, 22628470, 3396900,

Non-constant rate of molecular clock

Sometimes only a single divergence date can be estimated from fossils, with all other dates inferred from that. Other sets of species have abundant fossils available, allowing the MCH of constant divergence rates to be tested. DNA sequences experiencing low levels of negative selection showed divergence rates of 0.7–0.8% per Myr in bacteria, mammals, invertebrates, and plants.JOURNAL, Ochman H, Wilson AC, J Mol Evol, 1987, 74–86, Evolution in bacteria: evidence for a universal substitution rate in cellular genomes, 26, 10.1007/BF02111283, 3125340, 1–2, 1987JMolE..26...74O, In the same study, genomic regions experiencing very high negative or purifying selection (encoding rRNA) were considerably slower (1% per 50 Myr).In addition to such variation in rate with genomic position, since the early 1990s variation among taxa has proven fertile ground for research too,JOURNAL, Douzery, E.J.P., Delsuc, F., Stanhope, M.J. and Huchon, D., 2003, Local molecular clocks in three nuclear genes: divergence times for rodents and other mammals, and incompatibility among fossil calibrations, Journal of Molecular Evolution, 57, S201–S213, 10.1007/s00239-003-0028-x, 15008417, 2003JMolE..57S.201D, even over comparatively short periods of evolutionary time (for example mockingbirdsJOURNAL, Hunt, J.S., Bermingham, E., and Ricklefs, R.E., 2001, Molecular systematics and biogeography of Antillean thrashers, tremblers, and mockingbirds (Aves: Mimidae), Auk (journal), Auk, 118, 1, 35–55, 10.1642/0004-8038(2001)118[0035:MSABOA]2.0.CO;2, 0004-8038, ). Tube-nosed seabirds have molecular clocks that on average run at half speed of many other birds,JOURNAL, Rheindt, F. E., Austin, J., yes, 2005, Major analytical and conceptual shortcomings in a recent taxonomic revision of the Procellariiformes - A reply to Penhallurick and Wink (2004), Emu (journal), Emu, 105, 2, 181–186,weblink 10.1071/MU04039, possibly due to long generation times, and many turtles have a molecular clock running at one-eighth the speed it does in small mammals, or even slower.JOURNAL, Avise, J.C., Bowen, W., Lamb, T., Meylan, A.B. and Bermingham, E., 1 May 1992, Mitochondrial DNA Evolution at a Turtle's Pace: Evidence for Low Genetic Variability and Reduced Microevolutionary Rate in the Testudines, Molecular Biology and Evolution, 9, 3, 457–473,weblink 1584014, 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a040735, Effects of small population size are also likely to confound molecular clock analyses. Researchers such as Francisco Ayala have more fundamentally challenged the molecular clock hypothesis.JOURNAL, Ayala, F.J., 1999, Molecular clock mirages, BioEssays, 21, 1, 71–75,weblinkweblink" title="archive.today/20121216135641weblink">weblink yes, 2012-12-16, 10.1002/(SICI)1521-1878(199901)21:13.0.CO;2-B, 10070256, JOURNAL, Schwartz, J. H., Maresca, B., yes, 2006, Do Molecular Clocks Run at All? A Critique of Molecular Systematics, Biological Theory, 1, 357–371, 10.1162/biot.2006.1.4.357,weblink Science Daily, 4, 10.1.1.534.4502, According to Ayala's 1999 study, five factors combine to limit the application of molecular clock models:
  • Changing generation times (If the rate of new mutations depends at least partly on the number of generations rather than the number of years)
  • Population size (Genetic drift is stronger in small populations, and so more mutations are effectively neutral)
  • Species-specific differences (due to differing metabolism, ecology, evolutionary history, ...)
  • Change in function of the protein studied (can be avoided in closely related species by utilizing non-coding DNA sequences or emphasizing silent mutations)
  • Changes in the intensity of natural selection.
File:Molecular evolution bamboos.svg|thumb|300px|left|alt=Phylogram showing three groups, one of which has strikingly longer branches than the two others|Woody bamboos (tribes Arundinarieae and Bambuseae) have long generation times and lower mutation rates, as expressed by short branches in the phylogenetic tree, than the fast-evolving herbaceous bamboos (OlyreaeOlyreaeMolecular clock users have developed workaround solutions using a number of statistical approaches including maximum likelihood techniques and later Bayesian modeling. In particular, models that take into account rate variation across lineages have been proposed in order to obtain better estimates of divergence times. These models are called relaxed molecular clocksJOURNAL, Drummond, A.J., Ho, S.Y.W., Phillips, M.J. and Rambaut A., 2006, Relaxed Phylogenetics and Dating with Confidence, Public Library of Science, PLoS Biology, 4, 5, e88, 10.1371/journal.pbio.0040088, 16683862, 1395354, {{open access}} because they represent an intermediate position between the 'strict' molecular clock hypothesis and Joseph Felsenstein's many-rates modelJOURNAL, 11675604, 10.1007/s002390010234, 53, 4–5, Taking variation of evolutionary rates between sites into account in inferring phylogenies, J Mol Evol, 447–55, 2001, Felsenstein, J, 2001JMolE..53..447F, and are made possible through MCMC techniques that explore a weighted range of tree topologies and simultaneously estimate parameters of the chosen substitution model. It must be remembered that divergence dates inferred using a molecular clock are based on statistical inference and not on direct evidence.The molecular clock runs into particular challenges at very short and very long timescales. At long timescales, the problem is saturation. When enough time has passed, many sites have undergone more than one change, but it is impossible to detect more than one. This means that the observed number of changes is no longer linear with time, but instead flattens out. Even at intermediate genetic distances, with phylogenetic data still sufficient to estimate topology, signal for the overall scale of the tree can be weak under complex likelihood models, leading to highly uncertain molecular clock estimates.Marshall, D. C., et al. 2016. Inflation of molecular clock rates and dates: molecular phylogenetics, biogeography, and diversification of a global cicada radiation from Australasia (Hemiptera: Cicadidae: Cicadettini). Systematic Biology 65(1):16–34.At very short time scales, many differences between samples do not represent fixation of different sequences in the different populations. Instead, they represent alternative alleles that were both present as part of a polymorphism in the common ancestor. The inclusion of differences that have not yet become fixedleads to a potentially dramatic inflation of the apparent rate of the molecular clock at very short timescales.JOURNAL, 10.1093/molbev/msi145, Ho SY, Phillips MJ, Cooper A, Drummond AJ, 2005, Time dependency of molecular rate estimates and systematic overestimation of recent divergence times, Molecular Biology & Evolution, 22, 7, 1561–1568, 15814826, JOURNAL, Peterson GI, Masel J, 2009, Quantitative Prediction of Molecular Clock and Ka/Ks at Short Timescales, Molecular Biology & Evolution, 19661199, 26, 11, 2912466, 2595–2603, 10.1093/molbev/msp175,

Uses

The molecular clock technique is an important tool in molecular systematics, the use of molecular genetics information to determine the correct scientific classification of organisms or to study variation in selective forces. Knowledge of approximately constant rate of molecular evolution in particular sets of lineages also facilitates establishing the dates of phylogenetic events, including those not documented by fossils, such as the divergence of living taxa and the formation of the phylogenetic tree. In these cases—especially over long stretches of time—the limitations of MCH (above) must be considered; such estimates may be off by 50% or more.

See also

References

{{Reflist|2}}

Further reading

  • JOURNAL, Morgan, G.J., 1998, Emile Zuckerkandl, Linus Pauling, and the Molecular Evolutionary Clock, 1959-1965, Journal of the History of Biology, 31, 2, 155–178, 10.1023/A:1004394418084, 11620303,
  • BOOK, Emile Zuckerkandl, Zuckerkandl, E. and Linus Pauling, Pauling, L.B., 1965, Evolving Genes and Proteins, Evolutionary divergence and convergence in proteins, Bryson, V.and Vogel, H.J. (editors), 97–166, Academic Press, New York,
  • JOURNAL, San Mauro, D., Molecular systematics: a synthesis of the common methods and the state of knowledge, Cellular & Molecular Biology Letters
    pages = 311–341author2=Agorreta, A. pmid = 20213503 issue = 2,

    External links

    • weblink" title="web.archive.org/web/20100525101859weblink">Allan Wilson and the molecular clock
    • weblink" title="web.archive.org/web/20090213150149weblink">Molecular clock explanation of the molecular equidistance phenomenon
    • weblink" title="web.archive.org/web/20061107013958weblink">Date-a-Clade service for the molecular tree of life
    {{Chronology}}{{Use dmy dates|date=August 2010}}


    - content above as imported from Wikipedia
    - "molecular clock" does not exist on GetWiki (yet)
    - time: 5:47pm EDT - Mon, Mar 18 2019
[ this remote article is provided by Wikipedia ]
LATEST EDITS [ see all ]
GETWIKI 09 MAY 2016
GETWIKI 18 OCT 2015
M.R.M. Parrott
Biographies
GETWIKI 20 AUG 2014
GETWIKI 19 AUG 2014
GETWIKI 18 AUG 2014
Wikinfo
Culture
CONNECT