# GetWiki

*infinitesimal*

ARTICLE SUBJECTS

being →

database →

ethics →

fiction →

history →

internet →

language →

linux →

logic →

method →

news →

policy →

purpose →

religion →

science →

software →

truth →

unix →

wiki →

ARTICLE TYPES

essay →

feed →

help →

system →

wiki →

ARTICLE ORIGINS

critical →

forked →

imported →

original →

infinitesimal

[ temporary import ]

**please note:**

- the content below is remote from Wikipedia

- it has been imported raw for GetWiki

**infinitesimals**are things so small that there is no way to measure them. The insight with exploiting infinitesimals was that entities could still retain certain specific properties, such as angle or slope, even though these entities were quantitatively smallweblink The word

*infinitesimal*comes from a 17th-century Modern Latin coinage

*infinitesimus*, which originally referred to the "infinite-th" item in a sequence. Infinitesimals are a basic ingredient in the procedures of infinitesimal calculus as developed by Leibniz, including the law of continuity and the transcendental law of homogeneity. In common speech, an infinitesimal object is an object that is smaller than any feasible measurement, but not zero in sizeâ€”or, so small that it cannot be distinguished from zero by any available means. Hence, when used as an adjective, "infinitesimal" means "extremely small". To give it a meaning, it usually must be compared to another infinitesimal object in the same context (as in a derivative). Infinitely many infinitesimals are summed to produce an integral.The concept of infinitesimals was originally introduced around 1670 by either Nicolaus Mercator or Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz.*{{citation

| last1 = Katz | first1 = Mikhail

| author1-link = Mikhail Katz

| last2 = Sherry | first2 = David

| author2-link =

| arxiv = 1205.0174

| doi = 10.1007/s10670-012-9370-y

| issue =

| journal = Erkenntnis

| pages =

| title = Leibniz's Infinitesimals: Their Fictionality, Their Modern Implementations, and Their Foes from Berkeley to Russell and Beyond

| volume =

| year = 2012}} Archimedes used what eventually came to be known as the method of indivisibles in his work

The use of infinitesimals by Leibniz relied upon heuristic principles, such as the law of continuity: what succeeds for the finite numbers succeeds also for the infinite numbers and vice versa; and the transcendental law of homogeneity that specifies procedures for replacing expressions involving inassignable quantities, by expressions involving only assignable ones. The 18th century saw routine use of infinitesimals by mathematicians such as Leonhard Euler and Joseph-Louis Lagrange. Augustin-Louis Cauchy exploited infinitesimals both in defining continuity in his | author1-link = Mikhail Katz

| last2 = Sherry | first2 = David

| author2-link =

| arxiv = 1205.0174

| doi = 10.1007/s10670-012-9370-y

| issue =

| journal = Erkenntnis

| pages =

| title = Leibniz's Infinitesimals: Their Fictionality, Their Modern Implementations, and Their Foes from Berkeley to Russell and Beyond

| volume =

| year = 2012}} Archimedes used what eventually came to be known as the method of indivisibles in his work

*The Method of Mechanical Theorems*to find areas of regions and volumes of solids.Netz, Reviel; Saito, Ken; Tchernetska, Natalie: A new reading of Method Proposition 14: preliminary evidence from the Archimedes palimpsest. I. SCIAMVS 2 (2001), 9â€“29. In his formal published treatises, Archimedes solved the same problem using the method of exhaustion. The 15th century saw the work of Nicholas of Cusa, further developed in the 17th century by Johannes Kepler, in particular calculation of area of a circle by representing the latter as an infinite-sided polygon. Simon Stevin's work on decimal representation of all numbers in the 16th century prepared the ground for the real continuum. Bonaventura Cavalieri's method of indivisibles led to an extension of the results of the classical authors. The method of indivisibles related to geometrical figures as being composed of entities of codimension 1. John Wallis's infinitesimals differed from indivisibles in that he would decompose geometrical figures into infinitely thin building blocks of the same dimension as the figure, preparing the ground for general methods of the integral calculus. He exploited an infinitesimal denoted 1/âˆž in area calculations.*Cours d'Analyse*, and in defining an early form of a Dirac delta function. As Cantor and Dedekind were developing more abstract versions of Stevin's continuum, Paul du Bois-Reymond wrote a series of papers on infinitesimal-enriched continua based on growth rates of functions. Du Bois-Reymond's work inspired both Ã‰mile Borel and Thoralf Skolem. Borel explicitly linked du Bois-Reymond's work to Cauchy's work on rates of growth of infinitesimals. Skolem developed the first non-standard models of arithmetic in 1934. A mathematical implementation of both the law of continuity and infinitesimals was achieved by Abraham Robinson in 1961, who developed non-standard analysis based on earlier work by Edwin Hewitt in 1948 and Jerzy ÅoÅ› in 1955. The hyperreals implement an infinitesimal-enriched continuum and the transfer principle implements Leibniz's law of continuity. The standard part function implements Fermat's adequality.Vladimir Arnold wrote in 1990:

Nowadays, when teaching analysis, it is not very popular to talk about infinitesimal quantities. Consequently present-day students are not fully in command of this language. Nevertheless, it is still necessary to have command of it.ArnolÊ¹d, V. I.

*Huygens and Barrow, Newton and Hooke. Pioneers in mathematical analysis and catastrophe theory from evolvents to quasicrystals*. Translated from the Russian by Eric J. F. Primrose. BirkhÃ¤user Verlag, Basel, 1990. p. 27## History of the infinitesimal

The notion of infinitely small quantities was discussed by the Eleatic School. The Greek mathematician Archimedes (c.287 BCâ€“c.212 BC), in*The Method of Mechanical Theorems*, was the first to propose a logically rigorous definition of infinitesimals.Archimedes,

*The Method of Mechanical Theorems*; see Archimedes Palimpsest His Archimedean property defines a number

*x*as infinite if it satisfies the conditions |

*x*|>1, |

*x*|>1+1, |

*x*|>1+1+1, ..., and infinitesimal if

*x*â‰ 0 and a similar set of conditions holds for

*x*and the reciprocals of the positive integers. A number system is said to be Archimedean if it contains no infinite or infinitesimal members.The English mathematician John Wallis introduced the expression 1/âˆž in his 1655 book

*Treatise on the Conic Sections*. The symbol, which denotes the reciprocal, or inverse, of âˆž, is the symbolic representation of the mathematical concept of an infinitesimal. In his

*Treatise on the Conic Sections*Wallis also discusses the concept of a relationship between the symbolic representation of infinitesimal 1/âˆž that he introduced and the concept of infinity for which he introduced the symbol âˆž. The concept suggests a thought experiment of adding an infinite number of parallelograms of infinitesimal width to form a finite area. This concept was the predecessor to the modern method of integration used in integral calculus. The conceptual origins of the concept of the infinitesimal 1/âˆž can be traced as far back as the Greek philosopher Zeno of Elea, whose Zeno's dichotomy paradox was the first mathematical concept to consider the relationship between a finite interval and an interval approaching that of an infinitesimal-sized interval.Infinitesimals were the subject of political and religious controversies in 17th century Europe, including a ban on infinitesimals issued by clerics in Rome in 1632.BOOK, Infinitesimal: How a Dangerous Mathematical Theory Shaped the Modern World, Amir Alexander, 978-0374176815, 2014, Scientific American / Farrar, Straus and Giroux, Prior to the invention of calculus mathematicians were able to calculate tangent lines using Pierre de Fermat's method of adequality and RenÃ© Descartes' method of normals. There is debate among scholars as to whether the method was infinitesimal or algebraic in nature. When Newton and Leibniz invented the calculus, they made use of infinitesimals, Newton's

*fluxions*and Leibniz'

*differential*. The use of infinitesimals was attacked as incorrect by Bishop Berkeley in his work

*The Analyst*.George Berkeley,

*The Analyst; or a discourse addressed to an infidel mathematician*Mathematicians, scientists, and engineers continued to use infinitesimals to produce correct results. In the second half of the nineteenth century, the calculus was reformulated by Augustin-Louis Cauchy, Bernard Bolzano, Karl Weierstrass, Cantor, Dedekind, and others using the (Îµ, Î´)-definition of limit and set theory. While the followers of Cantor, Dedekind, and Weierstrass sought to rid analysis of infinitesimals, and their philosophical allies like Bertrand Russell and Rudolf Carnap declared that infinitesimals are

*pseudoconcepts*, Hermann Cohen and his Marburg school of neo-Kantianism sought to develop a working logic of infinitesimals.Thomas Mormann; Mikhail Katz. Infinitesimals as an issue of neo-Kantian philosophy of science. HOPOS: The Journal of the International Society for the History of Philosophy of Science 3 (2013), no. 2, 236â€“280. {{doi|10.1086/671348}}. {{JSTOR|10.1086/671348}}. {{arXiv|1304.1027}}. The mathematical study of systems containing infinitesimals continued through the work of Levi-Civita, Giuseppe Veronese, Paul du Bois-Reymond, and others, throughout the late nineteenth and the twentieth centuries, as documented by Philip Ehrlich (2006). In the 20th century, it was found that infinitesimals could serve as a basis for calculus and analysis; see hyperreal number.

## First-order properties

In extending the real numbers to include infinite and infinitesimal quantities, one typically wishes to be as conservative as possible by not changing any of their elementary properties. This guarantees that as many familiar results as possible are still available. Typically*elementary*means that there is no quantification over sets, but only over elements. This limitation allows statements of the form "for any number x..." For example, the axiom that states "for any number

*x*,

*x*+ 0 =

*x*" would still apply. The same is true for quantification over several numbers, e.g., "for any numbers

*x*and

*y*,

*xy*=

*yx*." However, statements of the form "for any

*set*

*S*of numbers ..." may not carry over. Logic with this limitation on quantification is referred to as first-order logic.The resulting extended number system cannot agree with the reals on all properties that can be expressed by quantification over sets, because the goal is to construct a non-Archimedean system, and the Archimedean principle can be expressed by quantification over sets. One can conservatively extend any theory including reals, including set theory, to include infinitesimals, just by adding a countably infinite list of axioms that assert that a number is smaller than 1/2, 1/3, 1/4 and so on. Similarly, the completeness property cannot be expected to carry over, because the reals are the unique complete ordered field up to isomorphism.We can distinguish three levels at which a nonarchimedean number system could have first-order properties compatible with those of the reals:

- An ordered field obeys all the usual axioms of the real number system that can be stated in first-order logic. For example, the commutativity axiom
*x*+*y*=*y*+*x*holds. - A real closed field has all the first-order properties of the real number system, regardless of whether they are usually taken as axiomatic, for statements involving the basic ordered-field relations +, Ã—, and â‰¤. This is a stronger condition than obeying the ordered-field axioms. More specifically, one includes additional first-order properties, such as the existence of a root for every odd-degree polynomial. For example, every number must have a cube root.
- The system could have all the first-order properties of the real number system for statements involving
*any*relations (regardless of whether those relations can be expressed using +, Ã—, and â‰¤). For example, there would have to be a sine function that is well defined for infinite inputs; the same is true for every real function.

## Number systems that include infinitesimals

### Formal series

#### Laurent series

An example from category 1 above is the field of Laurent series with a finite number of negative-power terms. For example, the Laurent series consisting only of the constant term 1 is identified with the real number 1, and the series with only the linear term*x*is thought of as the simplest infinitesimal, from which the other infinitesimals are constructed. Dictionary ordering is used, which is equivalent to considering higher powers of

*x*as negligible compared to lower powers. David O. TallWEB,weblink Infinitesimals in Modern Mathematics, Jonhoyle.com, 2011-03-11, yes,weblink" title="web.archive.org/web/20110713115815weblink">weblink 2011-07-13, refers to this system as the super-reals, not to be confused with the superreal number system of Dales and Woodin. Since a Taylor series evaluated with a Laurent series as its argument is still a Laurent series, the system can be used to do calculus on transcendental functions if they are analytic. These infinitesimals have different first-order properties than the reals because, for example, the basic infinitesimal

*x*does not have a square root.

#### The Levi-Civita field

The Levi-Civita field is similar to the Laurent series, but is algebraically closed. For example, the basic infinitesimal x has a square root. This field is rich enough to allow a significant amount of analysis to be done, but its elements can still be represented on a computer in the same sense that real numbers can be represented in floating point.Khodr Shamseddine, "Analysis on the Levi-Civia Field: A Brief Overview,"weblink{{dead link|date=November 2017 |bot=InternetArchiveBot |fix-attempted=yes }}#### Transseries

The field of transseries is larger than the Levi-Civita field.G. A. Edgar, "Transseries for Beginners,"weblink An example of a transseries is:
e^sqrt{lnln x}+lnln x+sum_{j=0}^infty e^x x^{-j},

where for purposes of ordering *x*is considered infinite.

### Surreal numbers

Conway's surreal numbers fall into category 2. They are a system designed to be as rich as possible in different sizes of numbers, but not necessarily for convenience in doing analysis. Certain transcendental functions can be carried over to the surreals, including logarithms and exponentials, but most, e.g., the sine function, cannot{{fact|date=May 2017}}. The existence of any particular surreal number, even one that has a direct counterpart in the reals, is not known a priori, and must be proved.{{clarify|date=May 2017}}### Hyperreals

The most widespread technique for handling infinitesimals is the hyperreals, developed by Abraham Robinson in the 1960s. They fall into category 3 above, having been designed that way so all of classical analysis can be carried over from the reals. This property of being able to carry over all relations in a natural way is known as the transfer principle, proved by Jerzy ÅoÅ› in 1955. For example, the transcendental function sin has a natural counterpart *sin that takes a hyperreal input and gives a hyperreal output, and similarly the set of natural numbers mathbb{N} has a natural counterpart ^*mathbb{N}, which contains both finite and infinite integers. A proposition such as forall n in mathbb{N}, sin npi=0 carries over to the hyperreals as forall n in {}^*mathbb{N}, {}^*!!sin npi=0 .### Superreals

The superreal number system of Dales and Woodin is a generalization of the hyperreals. It is different from the super-real system defined by David Tall.### Dual numbers

In linear algebra, the dual numbers extend the reals by adjoining one infinitesimal, the new element Îµ with the property Îµ2 = 0 (that is, Îµ is nilpotent). Every dual number has the form*z*=

*a*+

*b*Îµ with

*a*and

*b*being uniquely determined real numbers.One application of dual numbers is automatic differentiation. This application can be generalized to polynomials in n variables, using the Exterior algebra of an n-dimensional vector space.

### Smooth infinitesimal analysis

Synthetic differential geometry or smooth infinitesimal analysis have roots in category theory. This approach departs from the classical logic used in conventional mathematics by denying the general applicability of the law of excluded middle â€“ i.e.,*not*(

*a*â‰

*b*) does not have to mean

*a*=

*b*. A

*nilsquare*or

*nilpotent*infinitesimal can then be defined. This is a number

*x*where

*x*2 = 0 is true, but

*x*= 0 need not be true at the same time. Since the background logic is intuitionistic logic, it is not immediately clear how to classify this system with regard to classes 1, 2, and 3. Intuitionistic analogues of these classes would have to be developed first.

## Infinitesimal delta functions

Cauchy used an infinitesimal alpha to write down a unit impulse, infinitely tall and narrow Dirac-type delta function delta_alpha satisfying int F(x)delta_alpha(x) = F(0) in a number of articles in 1827, see Laugwitz (1989). Cauchy defined an infinitesimal in 1821 (Cours d'Analyse) in terms of a sequence tending to zero. Namely, such a null sequence becomes an infinitesimal in Cauchy's and Lazare Carnot's terminology.Modern set-theoretic approaches allow one to define infinitesimals via the ultrapower construction, where a null sequence becomes an infinitesimal in the sense of an equivalence class modulo a relation defined in terms of a suitable ultrafilter. The article by Yamashita (2007) contains a bibliography on modern Dirac delta functions in the context of an infinitesimal-enriched continuum provided by the hyperreals.## Logical properties

The method of constructing infinitesimals of the kind used in nonstandard analysis depends on the model and which collection of axioms are used. We consider here systems where infinitesimals can be shown to exist.In 1936 Maltsev proved the compactness theorem. This theorem is fundamental for the existence of infinitesimals as it proves that it is possible to formalise them. A consequence of this theorem is that if there is a number system in which it is true that for any positive integer*n*there is a positive number

*x*such that 0

**- content above as imported from Wikipedia**

- "

- time: 4:06pm EST - Sun, Nov 18 2018

- "

__infinitesimal__" does not exist on GetWiki (yet)- time: 4:06pm EST - Sun, Nov 18 2018

[ this remote article is provided by Wikipedia ]

LATEST EDITS [ see all ]

GETWIKI 09 MAY 2016

GETWIKI 18 OCT 2015

GETWIKI 20 AUG 2014

GETWIKI 19 AUG 2014

GETWIKI 18 AUG 2014

© 2018 M.R.M. PARROTT | ALL RIGHTS RESERVED