SUPPORT THE WORK

GetWiki

Studies on Hysteria

ARTICLE SUBJECTS
aesthetics  →
being  →
complexity  →
database  →
enterprise  →
ethics  →
fiction  →
history  →
internet  →
knowledge  →
language  →
licensing  →
linux  →
logic  →
method  →
news  →
perception  →
philosophy  →
policy  →
purpose  →
religion  →
science  →
sociology  →
software  →
truth  →
unix  →
wiki  →
ARTICLE TYPES
essay  →
feed  →
help  →
system  →
wiki  →
ARTICLE ORIGINS
critical  →
discussion  →
forked  →
imported  →
original  →
Studies on Hysteria
[ temporary import ]
please note:
- the content below is remote from Wikipedia
- it has been imported raw for GetWiki








factoids
Studies on Hysteria () is an 1895 book by Sigmund Freud, the founder of psychoanalysis, and the physician Josef Breuer. It consists of a joint introductory paper (reprinted from 1893); followed by five individual studies of "hysterics" – Breuer's famous case of Anna O. (real name: Bertha Pappenheim), seminal for the development of psychoanalysis, and four more by Freud—Ernest Jones, The life and Work of Sigmund Freud (1964) p. 223 including his evaluation of Emmy von N—BOOK, Micale, Mark S. (ed.), Dubor, Françoise (translator), Beyond the Unconscious: Essays of Henri F. Ellenberger in the History of Psychiatry,weblink 1993, Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey, 978-1-4008-6342-6, 10. The Story of "Emmy von N.": A Critical Study with New Documents, 273–290, subscription, Project MUSE, and finishing with a theoretical essay by Breuer and a more practice-oriented one on therapy by Freud.Ernest Jones, The life and Work of Sigmund Freud (1964) p. 223

Summary

Freud sees symptomology as stratified in an almost geological way, with the outermost strata being easily remembered and accepted, while “the deeper one goes the more difficult it is to recognise the recollections that are surfacing”.* Freud, Sigmund – Breuer, Joseph: Translated by Nicola Luckhurst trans, Studies in Hysteria. ( London 2004. {{ISBN|978-0-141-18482-1}}) p. 290

Reception and influence

Breuer's work with Bertha Pappenheim provided the founding impetus for psychoanalysis, as Freud himself would acknowledge.Peter Gay, Freud (1989) p. 63 In their preliminary (1893) paper, both men agreed that “the hysteric suffers mainly from reminiscences”.Peter Gay, Freud (1989) p. 71 Freud however would come to lay more stress on the causative role of sexuality in producing hysteria, as well as gradually repudiating Breuer's use of hypnosis as a means of treatment.Peter Gay, Freud (1989) p. 66-7 and p. 71 Some of the theoretical scaffolding of the Studies – "strangulated affect", hypnoid stateSigmund Freud: Five Lectures on Psycho-Analaysis (1995) p. 18–23. – would be abandoned with the crystallisation of psychoanalysis as an independent technique. However, many of Freud’s clinical observations – on mnenmic symbolsSigmund Freud: On Psychopathology (PFL 10) p. 91 or deferred actionSigmund Freud: Case Histories II (PFL 9), p. 278. for example – would continue to be confirmed in his later work. At the same time, Breuer’s theoretical essay, with its examination of the principle of constancy, and its differentiation of bound and mobile cathexis,Sigmund Freud: On Metapsychology (PFL 11), p. 277 and p. 298. would continue to inform Freud’s thinking as late as the twenties and the writing of Beyond the Pleasure Principle.At the time of its release, Studies on Hysteria tended to polarise opinion, both within and outside by the medical community.Ernest Jones, The life and Work of Sigmund Freud (1964) p. 223-4 While many were critical, Havelock Ellis offered an appreciative account, while a leading Viennese paper would characterise the work as “the kind of psychology used by poets”.Ernest Jones, The life and Work of Sigmund Freud (1964) p. 224 Studies on Hysteria received a positive review from psychiatrist Eugen Bleuler, although Bleuler nevertheless suggested that the results Freud and Breuer reported could have been the result of suggestion. The philosopher Mikkel Borch-Jacobsen and the psychologist Sonu Shamdasani comment that Studies on Hysteria gave Freud, "a certain local and international notoriety". Borch-Jacobsen and Shamdasani write that, contrary to what Freud and Breuer claimed, Freud "always knew that the treatment of Bertha Pappenheim...had not been an unmitigated success".BOOK, Borch-Jacobsen, Mikkel, Shamdasani, Sonu, The Freud Files: An Inquiry into the History of Psychoanalysis, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2012, 56, 107, 166, 978-0-521-72978-9,

Translations

There are currently three English translations of Studies on Hysteria, the first by A. A. Brill (1937), the second by James Strachey (1955), included in the Standard Edition, and the third by Nicola Luckhurst (2004).{{fact|date=February 2019}}

See also

{{columns-list|colwidth=22em| }}

References

{{reflist}}

Translations

  • Breuer, Joseph – Freud, Sigmund: Studies in Hysteria. Authorized Translation with an Introduction by A. A. Brill. (Nervous and Mental Disease Monograph Series No. 61.) Nervous and Mental Disease Publishing, New York 1937.
  • Breuer, Josef – Freud, Sigmund: Studies on Hysteria. Translated from the German and edited by James Strachey. (The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud, Vol. II.) Hogarth Press, London 1955.
  • Freud, Sigmund – Breuer, Joseph: Studies in Hysteria. Translated by Nicola Luckhurst. Penguin Books, London 2004. {{ISBN|978-0-141-18482-1}}

External links

{{Sigmund Freud}}

- content above as imported from Wikipedia
- "Studies on Hysteria" does not exist on GetWiki (yet)
- time: 4:47am EST - Mon, Nov 18 2019
[ this remote article is provided by Wikipedia ]
LATEST EDITS [ see all ]
GETWIKI 09 JUL 2019
Eastern Philosophy
History of Philosophy
GETWIKI 09 MAY 2016
GETWIKI 18 OCT 2015
M.R.M. Parrott
Biographies
GETWIKI 20 AUG 2014
GETWIKI 19 AUG 2014
CONNECT