SUPPORT THE WORK

GetWiki

Software Freedom Law Center

ARTICLE SUBJECTS
aesthetics  →
being  →
complexity  →
database  →
enterprise  →
ethics  →
fiction  →
history  →
internet  →
knowledge  →
language  →
licensing  →
linux  →
logic  →
method  →
news  →
perception  →
philosophy  →
policy  →
purpose  →
religion  →
science  →
sociology  →
software  →
truth  →
unix  →
wiki  →
ARTICLE TYPES
essay  →
feed  →
help  →
system  →
wiki  →
ARTICLE ORIGINS
critical  →
discussion  →
forked  →
imported  →
original  →
Software Freedom Law Center
[ temporary import ]
please note:
- the content below is remote from Wikipedia
- it has been imported raw for GetWiki








factoids
The Software Freedom Law Center (SFLC) is an organization that provides pro bono legal representation and related services to not-for-profit developers of free software/open source software. It was launched in February 2005 with Eben Moglen as chairman. Initial funding of US$4 million was pledged by Open Source Development Labs. A news article stated:Moglen expects – in fact, plans for – a large turnover in the staff. After five years, he anticipates 20 to 30 lawyers will have passed through the Center. By the time these alumni move on, Moglen hopes that its members will have the expertise to advise both communities and corporations alike. It will also create a loose association whose members can consult with each other as necessary.WEB,weblink Archived copy, 2006-11-14, yes,weblink" title="web.archive.org/web/20061114183437weblink">weblink 2006-11-14,

GPL version 3

SFLC represented and advised the Free Software Foundation, one of its principal clients, throughout the process of drafting and public discussion of version 3 of the GNU General Public License (GPLv3) during 2005–2007. Along with FSF president Richard M. Stallman, SFLC director Eben Moglen and then-SFLC counsel Richard Fontana were principal authors of GPLv3, LGPLv3, and the GNU Affero GPL.SFLC Provides Ongoing GPLv3 Legal Support to FSF"And Now … Life After GPLv3" (Freedom Now)Richard Fontana

BusyBox Litigation

During 2007 and 2008, SFLC filed a series of copyright infringement lawsuits against various defendants, on behalf of Erik Andersen and Rob Landley, the principal developers of BusyBox. These lawsuits claimed violations of version 2 of the GNU General Public License (GPLv2).On September 20, 2007, SFLC filed a lawsuit against Monsoon Multimedia, Inc.SFLC notice on the lawsuit filed against Monsoon Multimedia, Inc. alleging that Monsoon had violated GPLv2 by including BusyBox code in their Monsoon Multimedia HAVA line of products LinuxWatch: WEB,weblink The device behind the GPL's first U.S. legal test,weblink" title="archive.is/20130128045440weblink">weblink 2013-01-28, yes, without releasing BusyBox source code. This is believed to be the first U.S. court case in which the complaint concerned a GPL violation.LinuxWatch: First U.S. GPL lawsuit filed{{dead link|date=December 2017 |bot=InternetArchiveBot |fix-attempted=yes }} On October 30, 2007, an SFLC press release announced that the lawsuit had been settled with Monsoon agreeing to comply with the GPL and pay a sum of money to the plaintiffs.BusyBox Developers and Monsoon Multimedia Agree to Dismiss GPL LawsuitOn November 20, 2007, SFLC filed a lawsuit against Xterasys Corporation and High-Gain Antennas, LLC.Second Round of GPL Infringement Lawsuits Filed on Behalf of BusyBox Developers On December 17, 2007, SFLC announced a settlement with Xterasys; the company agreed to stop product shipments until it published complete source code for the GPL code and to pay an undisclosed sum to the plaintiffs.BusyBox Developers and Xterasys Corporation Agree to Settle GPL Lawsuit The suit against High-Gain Antennas was settled on March 6, 2008, with the company agreeing to comply with GPL and paying an undisclosed sum to the plaintiffs.BusyBox Developers and High-Gain Antennas Agree to Dismiss GPL LawsuitOn December 7, 2007 SFLC filed a lawsuit against Verizon Communications, Inc.BusyBox Developers File GPL Infringement Lawsuit Against Verizon Communications alleging that Verizon had violated GPLv2 by distributing BusyBox in the Actiontec MI424WR MoCA wireless routers bundled with the FiOS fiber optic bandwidth service, without providing corresponding source code. A settlement announced on March 17, 2008, included an agreement to comply with the GPL and an undisclosed sum paid to the plaintiffs.BusyBox Developers Agree To End GPL Lawsuit Against VerizonOn June 10, 2008, SFLC announced the filing of lawsuits against Bell Microproducts, Inc. and Super Micro Computer, Inc.SFLC Files Another Round of GPL Violation Lawsuits on Behalf of BusyBox DevelopersOn December 14, 2009, SFLC announced the filing of a lawsuit on behalf of its clients, Software Freedom Conservancy and Erik Andersen, against 14 companies, including Best Buy, Samsung, and Westinghouse alleging these companies had violated GPLv2 by distributing BusyBox in some of their products without releasing BusyBox source code.GPLv2 copyright suit targets 14 firms on linuxgizmos.com by Eric Brown (Dec 14, 2009)Best Buy, Samsung, Westinghouse, And Eleven Other Brands Named In SFLC Lawsuit on softwarefreedom.org For instance, Samsung released its LN52A650 TV firmware in 2010,weblink" title="web.archive.org/web/20100210133921weblink">Visual Display - Open Source on samsung.com "Please download the links below We use GPLv2 and LGPLv2.1, not GPLv3 and LGPLv3. Open Source License Notice License Agreement LN52A750.zip" (archived 2010)Samsung-Ln52b630 manualThe Software Freedom Conservancy, Inc. & Mr. Erik Andersen vs BestBuy, Samung, Westinghouse, JVC, Western Digital, Bosch, Phoebe Micro, Humax, ... (New York, 2009) which was used later as the base for the community SamyGO project.By 21 September 2013, all of the defendant companies had agreed on settlement terms with the plaintiffs, except for Westinghouse, against whom default judgment was entered.WEB,weblink Docket for Software Freedom Conservancy, Inc. v. Best Buy Co., Inc., CourtListener, en, 2017-02-28,

Cisco lawsuit

On December 11, 2008, SFLC announced the filing of a lawsuit on behalf of its client, the Free Software Foundation, against Cisco Systems, Inc. SFLC Files Lawsuit against Cisco on Behalf of the FSF This lawsuit was filed on the behalf of the Free Software Foundation, and is the first suit ever initiated by the FSF.Free Software Foundation Files Suit Against Cisco For GPL Violations On May 20, 2009, the parties announced a settlement.

Staff

{{As of|2015|3}}, SFLC's staff included:WEB,weblink Team, Software Freedom Law Center, 2014-04-27,
  • Eben Moglen, President and Executive Director
  • Mishi Choudhary, Legal Director
  • Jonathan D. Bean, Counsel
  • Albert Cahn, Counsel
  • Daniel Gnoutcheff, Systems Administrator
  • Tanisha Madrid-Batista, Business Manager

Directors

{{As of|2015|2}}, SFLC's directors were:

Former staff



,weblink
,weblink" title="archive.is/20130201184739weblink">weblink
, yes
, 2013-02-01
, Justin C. Colannino, Ropes and Gray
, 2012-11-22
, Ropes and Gray
,
,
,
, 2012-11-12
, Ropes and Gray
, WEB,weblink Justin Colannino, Associate, Ropes and Gray, LLP, 2012-11-22, O'Reilly and Associates, date = 2012-07-19, O'Reilly and Associates,
Counsel
  • Aaron Williamson, Counsel
  • Marc Jones, Counsel

Clients

References

{{Reflist|colwidth=30em}}

External links

{{FOSS}}

- content above as imported from Wikipedia
- "Software Freedom Law Center" does not exist on GetWiki (yet)
- time: 12:21pm EDT - Wed, Apr 24 2019
[ this remote article is provided by Wikipedia ]
LATEST EDITS [ see all ]
GETWIKI 09 MAY 2016
GETWIKI 18 OCT 2015
M.R.M. Parrott
Biographies
GETWIKI 20 AUG 2014
GETWIKI 19 AUG 2014
GETWIKI 18 AUG 2014
Wikinfo
Culture
CONNECT