GetWiki
Maxwell's equations
ARTICLE SUBJECTS
being →
database →
ethics →
fiction →
history →
internet →
language →
linux →
logic →
method →
news →
policy →
purpose →
religion →
science →
software →
truth →
unix →
wiki →
ARTICLE TYPES
essay →
feed →
help →
system →
wiki →
ARTICLE ORIGINS
critical →
forked →
imported →
original →
Maxwell's equations
please note:
- the content below is remote from Wikipedia
- it has been imported raw for GetWiki
{{About||thermodynamic relations|Maxwell relations|the history of the equations|History of Maxwell's equations|a general description of electromagnetism|Electromagnetism}}{{Electromagnetism|cTopic=Electrodynamics}}File:Warszawa_Centrum_Nowych_Technologii_UW-6.jpg|thumb|right|Maxwell's equations (mid-left) as featured on a monument in front of Warsaw University's Center of New Technologies]]Maxwell's equations are a set of coupled partial differential equations that, together with the Lorentz force law, form the foundation of classical electromagnetism, classical optics, and electric circuits. The equations provide a mathematical model for electric, optical, and radio technologies, such as power generation, electric motors, wireless communication, lenses, radar etc. Maxwell's equations describe how electric and magnetic fields are generated by charges, currents, and changes of the fields."Electric" and "magnetic" fields, according to the theory of relativity, are the components of a unique field. An important consequence of the equations is that they demonstrate how fluctuating electric and magnetic fields propagate at a constant speed (c) in a vacuum. Known as electromagnetic radiation, these waves may occur at various wavelengths to produce a spectrum of light from radio waves to γ-rays. The equations are named after the physicist and mathematician James Clerk Maxwell, who between 1861 and 1862 published an early form of the equations that included the Lorentz force law. Maxwell first used the equations to propose that light is an electromagnetic phenomenon.The equations have two major variants. The microscopic Maxwell equations have universal applicability but are unwieldy for common calculations. They relate the electric and magnetic fields to total charge and total current, including the complicated charges and currents in materials at the atomic scale. The "macroscopic" Maxwell equations define two new auxiliary fields that describe the large-scale behaviour of matter without having to consider atomic scale charges and quantum phenomena like spins. However, their use requires experimentally determined parameters for a phenomenological description of the electromagnetic response of materials.The term "Maxwell's equations" is often also used for equivalent alternative formulations. Versions of Maxwell's equations based on the electric and magnetic potentials are preferred for explicitly solving the equations as a boundary value problem, analytical mechanics, or for use in quantum mechanics. The covariant formulation (on spacetime rather than space and time separately) makes the compatibility of Maxwell's equations with special relativity manifest. Maxwell's equations in curved spacetime, commonly used in high energy and gravitational physics, are compatible with general relativity. In general relativity, however, they must enter, through its stress-energy tensor, into Einstein field equations that include the spacetime curvature. In fact, Einstein developed special and general relativity to accommodate the invariant speed of light, a consequence of Maxwell's equations, with the principle that only relative movement has physical consequences.Since the mid-20th century, it has been understood that Maxwell's equations are not exact, but a classical limit of the fundamental theory of quantum electrodynamics.{{TOC limit|4}}- the content below is remote from Wikipedia
- it has been imported raw for GetWiki
Conceptual descriptions
Gauss's law
Gauss's law describes the relationship between a static electric field and the electric charges that cause it: a static electric field points away from positive charges and towards negative charges, and the net outflow of the electric field through any closed surface is proportional to the charge enclosed by the surface. Picturing the electric field by its field lines, this means the field lines begin at positive electric charges and end at negative electric charges. 'Counting' the number of field lines passing through a closed surface yields the total charge (including bound charge due to polarization of material) enclosed by that surface, divided by dielectricity of free space (the vacuum permittivity).missing image!
- VFPt dipole magnetic1.svg|right|thumb|(Gauss's law for magnetism]]: magnetic field lines never begin nor end but form loops or extend to infinity as shown here with the magnetic field due to a ring of current.)
The Maxwellâ€“Faraday version of Faraday's law of induction describes how a time varying magnetic field creates ("induces") an electric field. In integral form, it states that the work per unit charge required to move a charge around a closed loop equals the rate of decrease of the magnetic flux through the enclosed surface.The dynamically induced electric field has closed field lines similar to a magnetic field, unless superposed by a static (charge induced) electric field. This aspect of electromagnetic induction is the operating principle behind many electric generators: for example, a rotating bar magnet creates a changing magnetic field, which in turn generates an electric field in a nearby wire.- VFPt dipole magnetic1.svg|right|thumb|(Gauss's law for magnetism]]: magnetic field lines never begin nor end but form loops or extend to infinity as shown here with the magnetic field due to a ring of current.)
Gauss's law for magnetism
Gauss's law for magnetism states that there are no "magnetic charges" (also called magnetic monopoles), analogous to electric charges.WEB,weblink Maxwell's equations, Jackson, John, Science Video Glossary, Berkeley Lab, Instead, the magnetic field due to materials is generated by a configuration called a dipole, and the net outflow of the magnetic field through any closed surface is zero. Magnetic dipoles are best represented as loops of current but resemble positive and negative 'magnetic charges', inseparably bound together, having no net 'magnetic charge'. In terms of field lines, this equation states that magnetic field lines neither begin nor end but make loops or extend to infinity and back. In other words, any magnetic field line that enters a given volume must somewhere exit that volume. Equivalent technical statements are that the sum total magnetic flux through any Gaussian surface is zero, or that the magnetic field is a solenoidal vector field.Faraday's law
File:Magnetosphere rendition.jpg -AmpÃ¨re's law with Maxwell's addition
missing image!
- Magnetic core.jpg -
Magnetic core memory (1954) is an application of AmpÃ¨re's law. Each core stores one bit of data.
AmpÃ¨re's law with Maxwell's addition states that magnetic fields can be generated in two ways: by electric current (this was the original "AmpÃ¨re's law") and by changing electric fields (this was "Maxwell's addition", which he called displacement current). In integral form, the magnetic field induced around any closed loop is proportional to the electric current plus displacement current (proportional to the rate of change of electric flux) through the enclosed surface.Maxwell's addition to AmpÃ¨re's law is particularly important: it makes the set of equations mathematically consistent for non static fields, without changing the laws of Ampere and Gauss for static fields.J. D. Jackson, Classical Electrodynamics, section 6.3 However, as a consequence, it predicts that a changing magnetic field induces an electric field and vice versa.Principles of physics: a calculus-based text, by R. A. Serway, J. W. Jewett, page 809. Therefore, these equations allow self-sustaining "electromagnetic waves" to travel through empty space (see electromagnetic wave equation).The speed calculated for electromagnetic waves, which could be predicted from experiments on charges and currents,The quantity we would now call {{math|{{frac|{{sqrt|Îµ{{sub|0}}Î¼{{sub|0}}}}}}}}, with units of velocity, was directly measured before Maxwell's equations, in an 1855 experiment by Wilhelm Eduard Weber and Rudolf Kohlrausch. They charged a leyden jar (a kind of capacitor), and measured the electrostatic force associated with the potential; then, they discharged it while measuring the magnetic force from the current in the discharge wire. Their result was {{val|3.107|e=8|ul=m/s}}, remarkably close to the speed of light. See Joseph F. Keithley, The story of electrical and magnetic measurements: from 500 B.C. to the 1940s, p. 115 exactly matches the speed of light; indeed, light is one form of electromagnetic radiation (as are X-rays, radio waves, and others). Maxwell understood the connection between electromagnetic waves and light in 1861, thereby unifying the theories of electromagnetism and optics.- Magnetic core.jpg -
Magnetic core memory (1954) is an application of AmpÃ¨re's law. Each core stores one bit of data.
Formulation in terms of electric and magnetic fields (microscopic or in vacuum version)
In the electric and magnetic field formulation there are four equations that determine the fields for given charge and current distribution. A separate law of nature, the Lorentz force law, describes how, conversely, the electric and magnetic field act on charged particles and currents. A version of this law was included in the original equations by Maxwell but, by convention, is included no longer. The vector calculus formalism below, due to Oliver Heaviside,Bruce J. Hunt (1991) The Maxwellians, chapter 5 and appendix, Cornell University PressWEB,weblink IEEEGHN: Maxwell's Equations, Ieeeghn.org, 2008-10-19, has become standard. It is manifestly rotation invariant, and therefore mathematically much more transparent than Maxwell's original 20 equations in x,y,z components. The relativistic formulations are even more symmetric and manifestly Lorentz invariant. For the same equations expressed using tensor calculus or differential forms, see alternative formulations.The differential and integral equations formulations are mathematically equivalent and are both useful. The integral formulation relates fields within a region of space to fields on the boundary and can often be used to simplify and directly calculate fields from symmetric distributions of charges and currents. On the other hand, the differential equations are purely local and are a more natural starting point for calculating the fields in more complicated (less symmetric) situations, for example using finite element analysis.BOOK, Partial differential equations and the finite element method, Å olÃn, Pavel, 2006, John Wiley and Sons, 978-0-471-72070-6, 273,weblinkKey to the notation
Symbols in bold represent vector quantities, and symbols in italics represent scalar quantities, unless otherwise indicated.The equations introduce the electric field, {{math|E}}, a vector field, and the magnetic field, {{math|B}}, a pseudovector field, each generally having a time and location dependence.The sources are- the total electric charge density (total charge per unit volume), {{math|Ï}}, and
- the total electric current density (total current per unit area), {{math|J}}.
- the permittivity of free space, {{math|Îµ0}}, and
- the permeability of free space, {{math|Î¼0}}, and
- the speed of light, c = frac{1}{sqrt{varepsilon_0mu_0}}
Differential equations
In the differential equations,- the nabla symbol, {{math|âˆ‡}}, denotes the three-dimensional gradient operator, del,
- the {{math|âˆ‡â‹…}} symbol (pronounced "del dot") denotes the divergence operator,
- the {{math|âˆ‡Ã—}} symbol (pronounced "del cross") denotes the curl operator.
Integral equations
In the integral equations,- {{math|Î©}} is any fixed volume with closed boundary surface {{math|âˆ‚Î©}}, and
- {{math|Î£}} is any fixed surface with closed boundary curve {{math|âˆ‚Î£}},
frac{d}{dt} iint_{Sigma} mathbf{B} cdot mathrm{d}mathbf{S} = iint_{Sigma} frac{partial mathbf{B}}{partial t} cdot mathrm{d}mathbf{S},,
- {hide}oiint
| intsubscpt={scriptstylepartial Omega }
| integrand={edih} is a surface integral over the boundary surface {{math|âˆ‚Î©}}, with the loop indicating the surface is closed
| integrand={edih} is a surface integral over the boundary surface {{math|âˆ‚Î©}}, with the loop indicating the surface is closed
- iiint_Omega is a volume integral over the volume {{math|Î©}},
- oint_{partial Sigma} is a line integral around the boundary curve {{math|âˆ‚Î£}}, with the loop indicating the curve is closed.
- iint_Sigma is a surface integral over the surface {{math|Î£}},
- The total electric charge {{math|Q}} enclosed in {{math|Î©}} is the volume integral over {{math|Î©}} of the charge density {{math|Ï}} (see the "macroscopic formulation" section below):
Q = iiint_Omega rho mathrm{d}V,
where {{math|dV}} is the volume element.
- The net electric current {{math|I}} is the surface integral of the electric current density {{math|J}} passing through a fixed surface, {{math|Î£}}:
I = iint_{Sigma} mathbf{J} cdot mathrm{d} mathbf{S},
where {{math|dS}} denotes the differential vector element of surface area {{math|S}}, normal to surface {{math|Î£}}. (Vector area is sometimes denoted by {{math|A}} rather than {{math|S}}, but this conflicts with the notation for magnetic potential).
Formulation in SI units convention
{| class="wikitable" style="text-align: center;"! scope="col" style="width: 15em;" | Name! scope="col" | Integral equations! scope="col" | Differential equations
| intsubscpt={scriptstylepartial Omega }
| integrand=mathbf{E}cdotmathrm{d}mathbf{S} = frac{1}{varepsilon_0} iiint_Omega rho ,mathrm{d}V
{edih}| nabla cdot mathbf{E} = frac {rho} {varepsilon_0}
| integrand=mathbf{E}cdotmathrm{d}mathbf{S} = frac{1}{varepsilon_0} iiint_Omega rho ,mathrm{d}V
{edih}| nabla cdot mathbf{E} = frac {rho} {varepsilon_0}
| intsubscpt = {scriptstyle partial Omega }
| integrand = mathbf{B}cdotmathrm{d}mathbf{S} = 0
{edih}| nabla cdot mathbf{B} = 0
| integrand = mathbf{B}cdotmathrm{d}mathbf{S} = 0
{edih}| nabla cdot mathbf{B} = 0
Formulation in Gaussian units convention
The definitions of charge, electric field, and magnetic field can be altered to simplify theoretical calculation, by absorbing dimensioned factors of {{math|Îµ0}} and {{math|Î¼0}} into the units of calculation, by convention. With a corresponding change in convention for the Lorentz force law this yields the same physics, i.e. trajectories of charged particles, or work done by an electric motor. These definitions are often preferred in theoretical and high energy physics where it is natural to take the electric and magnetic field with the same units, to simplify the appearance of the electromagnetic tensor: the Lorentz covariant object unifying electric and magnetic field would then contain components with uniform unit and dimension.BOOK, J. D. Jackson, Classical Electrodynamics, 3rd, 978-0-471-43132-9, 1975-10-17,weblink {{rp|vii}} Such modified definitions are conventionally used with the Gaussian (CGS) units. Using these definitions and conventions, colloquially "in Gaussian units",WEB,weblink
, Gaussian, SI and Other Systems of Units in Electromagnetic Theory
, Physics 221A, University of California, Berkeley lecture notes
, Littlejohn, Robert, Robert Grayson Littlejohn
, Fall 2007
, 2008-05-06
, the Maxwell equations become:BOOK
, Gaussian, SI and Other Systems of Units in Electromagnetic Theory
, Physics 221A, University of California, Berkeley lecture notes
, Littlejohn, Robert, Robert Grayson Littlejohn
, Fall 2007
, 2008-05-06
, David J Griffiths
, Introduction to electrodynamics
, 1999
, Third
, 559â€“562
, Prentice Hall
, 978-0-13-805326-0
,weblink
,
{| class="wikitable" style="text-align: center;"! scope="col" style="width: 15em;" | Name! scope="col" | Integral equations! scope="col" | Differential equations, Introduction to electrodynamics
, 1999
, Third
, 559â€“562
, Prentice Hall
, 978-0-13-805326-0
,weblink
,
| intsubscpt={scriptstylepartial Omega }
| integrand=mathbf{E}cdotmathrm{d}mathbf{S} = 4pi iiint_Omega rho ,mathrm{d}V
{edih}| nabla cdot mathbf{E} = 4pirho
| integrand=mathbf{E}cdotmathrm{d}mathbf{S} = 4pi iiint_Omega rho ,mathrm{d}V
{edih}| nabla cdot mathbf{E} = 4pirho
| intsubscpt = {scriptstyle partial Omega }
| integrand = mathbf{B}cdotmathrm{d}mathbf{S} = 0
{edih}| nabla cdot mathbf{B} = 0
| integrand = mathbf{B}cdotmathrm{d}mathbf{S} = 0
{edih}| nabla cdot mathbf{B} = 0
Relationship between differential and integral formulations
The equivalence of the differential and integral formulations are a consequence of the Gauss divergence theorem and the Kelvinâ€“Stokes theorem.Flux and divergence
File:Divergence theorem in EM.svg|thumb|Volume {{math|Î©}} and its closed boundary {{math|âˆ‚Î©}}, containing (respectively enclosing) a source {{math|(+)}} and sink {{math|(âˆ’)}} of a vector field {{math|F}}. Here, {{math|F}} could be the {{math|E}} field with source electric charges, but not the {{math|B}} field, which has no magnetic charges as shown. The outward unit normalunit normalAccording to the (purely mathematical) Gauss divergence theorem, the electric flux through the boundary surface {{math|âˆ‚Î©}} can be rewritten as
{hide}oiint
| intsubscpt={scriptstylepartial Omega }
| integrand=mathbf{E}cdotmathrm{d}mathbf{S} = iiint_{Omega} nabla cdot mathbf{E}, mathrm{d}V
{edih}
The integral version of Gauss's equation can thus be rewritten as
| integrand=mathbf{E}cdotmathrm{d}mathbf{S} = iiint_{Omega} nabla cdot mathbf{E}, mathrm{d}V
{edih}
iiint_{Omega} left(nabla cdot mathbf{E} - frac{rho}{epsilon_0}right) , mathrm{d}V = 0
{hide}oiint
| intsubscpt={scriptstylepartial Omega }
| integrand=mathbf{B}cdotmathrm{d}mathbf{S} = iiint_{Omega} nabla cdot mathbf{B}, mathrm{d}V = 0
{edih}.
which is satisfied for all {{math|Î©}} iff nabla cdot mathbf{B} = 0.| integrand=mathbf{B}cdotmathrm{d}mathbf{S} = iiint_{Omega} nabla cdot mathbf{B}, mathrm{d}V = 0
{edih}.
Circulation and curl
File:Curl theorem in EM.svg|thumb|Surface {{math|Î£}} with closed boundary {{math|âˆ‚Î£}}. {{math|F}} could be the {{math|E}} or {{math|B}} fields. Again, {{math|n}} is the unit normalunit normalBy the Kelvinâ€“Stokes theorem we can rewrite the line integrals of the fields around the closed boundary curve {{math|âˆ‚Î£}} to an integral of the "circulation of the fields" (i.e. their curls) over a surface it bounds, i.e.
oint_{partial Sigma} mathbf{B} cdot mathrm{d}boldsymbol{ell} = iint_Sigma (nabla times mathbf{B})cdot mathrm{d}mathbf{S},
iint_Sigma left(nabla times mathbf{B} - mu_0 left(mathbf{J} + epsilon_0 frac{partial mathbf{E}}{partial t}right)right)cdot mathrm{d}mathbf{S} = 0.
Charge conservation
The invariance of charge can be derived as a corollary of Maxwell's equations. The left-hand side of the modified Ampere's Law has zero divergence by the divâ€“curl identity. Expanding the divergence of the right-hand side, interchanging derivatives, and applying Gauss's law gives:
0 = nablacdot nablatimes mathbf{B} = mu_0left(nablacdot mathbf{J} + varepsilon_0frac{partial}{partial t}nablacdot mathbf{E}right) = mu_0left(nablacdot mathbf{J} +frac{partial rho}{partial t}right)
frac{partial rho}{partial t} + nabla cdot mathbf{J} = 0.
{{oiint| preintegral =frac{d}{dt}Q_Omega = frac{d}{dt} iiint_{Omega} rho mathrm{d}V = -| intsubscpt = {scriptstyle partial Omega }| integrand = mathbf{J} cdot {rm d}mathbf{S} = - I_{partial Omega}.
Vacuum equations, electromagnetic waves and speed of light
{{Further|Electromagnetic wave equation|Inhomogeneous electromagnetic wave equation|Sinusoidal plane-wave solutions of the electromagnetic wave equation|Helmholtz equation}}(File:Electromagneticwave3D.gif|thumb|This 3D diagram shows a plane linearly polarized wave propagating from left to right, defined by {{math|1=E = E0 sin(âˆ’Ï‰t + k â‹… r)}} and {{math|1=B = B0 sin(âˆ’Ï‰t + k â‹… r)}} The oscillating fields are detected at the flashing point. The horizontal wavelength is λ. {{math|1=E0 â‹… B0 = 0 = E0 â‹… k = B0 â‹… k}} )In a region with no charges ({{math|1=Ï = 0}}) and no currents ({{math|1=J = 0}}), such as in a vacuum, Maxwell's equations reduce to:
begin{align}
nabla cdot mathbf{E} &= 0 quad & nabla times mathbf{E} &= -frac{partialmathbf B}{partial t},
nabla cdot mathbf{B} &= 0 quad & nabla times mathbf{B} &= mu_0varepsilon_0 frac{partialmathbf E}{partial t}.
end{align}Taking the curl {{math|(âˆ‡Ã—)}} of the curl equations, and using the curl of the curl identity we obtain
nabla cdot mathbf{B} &= 0 quad & nabla times mathbf{B} &= mu_0varepsilon_0 frac{partialmathbf E}{partial t}.
begin{align}
mu_0varepsilon_0 frac{partial^2 mathbf{E}}{partial t^2} - nabla^2 mathbf{E} = 0
mu_0varepsilon_0 frac{partial^2 mathbf{B}}{partial t^2} - nabla^2 mathbf{B} = 0
end{align}The quantity mu_0varepsilon_0 has the dimension of (time/length)2. Definingc = (mu_0 varepsilon_0)^{-1/2}, the equations above have the form of the standard wave equations
mu_0varepsilon_0 frac{partial^2 mathbf{B}}{partial t^2} - nabla^2 mathbf{B} = 0
begin{align}
frac{1}{c^2} frac{partial^2 mathbf{E}}{partial t^2} - nabla^2 mathbf{E} = 0
frac{1}{c^2} frac{partial^2 mathbf{B}}{partial t^2} - nabla^2 mathbf{B} = 0
end{align}Already during Maxwell's lifetime, it was found that the known values for varepsilon_0 and mu_0 give c approx 2.998 times 10^8 , text{m/s}, then already known to be the speed of light in free space. This led him to propose that light and radio waves were propagating electromagnetic waves, since amply confirmed. In the old SI system of units, the values of mu_0 = 4pitimes 10^{-7} and c = 299 792 458 ,text{m/s} are defined constants, (which means that by definition varepsilon_0 = 8.854... times 10^{-12} ,text{F/m}) that define the ampere and the metre. In the new SI system, only c keeps its defined value, and the electron charge gets a defined value.
frac{1}{c^2} frac{partial^2 mathbf{B}}{partial t^2} - nabla^2 mathbf{B} = 0
v_text{p} = frac{1}sqrt{mu_0mu_text{r} varepsilon_0varepsilon_text{r}}
which is usuallyThere are cases (anomalous dispersion) where the phase velocity can exceed {{math|c}}, but the "signal velocity" will still be {{math|< c}} less than {{math|c}}.In addition, {{math|E}} and {{math|B}} are perpendicular to each other and to the direction of wave propagation, and are in phase with each other. A sinusoidal plane wave is one special solution of these equations. Maxwell's equations explain how these waves can physically propagate through space. The changing magnetic field creates a changing electric field through Faraday's law. In turn, that electric field creates a changing magnetic field through Maxwell's addition to AmpÃ¨re's law. This perpetual cycle allows these waves, now known as electromagnetic radiation, to move through space at velocity {{math|c}}.Macroscopic formulation
The above equations are the "microscopic" version of Maxwell's equations, expressing the electric and the magnetic fields in terms of the (possibly atomic-level) charges and currents present. This is sometimes called the "general" form, but the macroscopic version below is equally general, the difference being one of bookkeeping.The microscopic version is sometimes called "Maxwell's equations in a vacuum": this refers to the fact that the material medium is not built into the structure of the equations, but appears only in the charge and current terms. The microscopic version was introduced by Lorentz, who tried to use it to derive the macroscopic properties of bulk matter from its microscopic constituents.BOOK, Kimball Milton, J. Schwinger, Electromagnetic Radiation: Variational Methods, Waveguides and Accelerators, 18 June 2006, Springer Science & Business Media, 978-3-540-29306-4, {{rp|5}}"Maxwell's macroscopic equations", also known as Maxwell's equations in matter, are more similar to those that Maxwell introduced himself.{| class="wikitable" style="text-align: center;"! scope="col" style="width: 15em;" | Name! scope="col" | Integral equations (SI convention)! scope="col" | Differential equations (SI convention)! scope="col" | Differential equations (Gaussian convention)
| intsubscpt = {scriptstyle partial Omega }
| integrand = mathbf{D}cdotmathrm{d}mathbf{S} = iiint_Omega rho_text{f} ,mathrm{d}V
{edih}| nabla cdot mathbf{D} = rho_text{f}| nabla cdot mathbf{D} = 4pirho_text{f}
| integrand = mathbf{D}cdotmathrm{d}mathbf{S} = iiint_Omega rho_text{f} ,mathrm{d}V
{edih}| nabla cdot mathbf{D} = rho_text{f}| nabla cdot mathbf{D} = 4pirho_text{f}
| intsubscpt = {scriptstyle partial Omega }
| integrand = mathbf{B}cdotmathrm{d}mathbf{S} = 0
{edih}| nabla cdot mathbf{B} = 0| nabla cdot mathbf{B} = 0
| integrand = mathbf{B}cdotmathrm{d}mathbf{S} = 0
{edih}| nabla cdot mathbf{B} = 0| nabla cdot mathbf{B} = 0
& iint_{Sigma} mathbf{J}_text{f} cdot mathrm{d}mathbf{S} + frac{d}{dt} iint_{Sigma} mathbf{D} cdot mathrm{d}mathbf{S}
end{align}| nabla times mathbf{H} = mathbf{J}_text{f} + frac{partial mathbf{D}} {partial t}| nabla times mathbf{H} = frac{1}{c} left(4pimathbf{J}_text{f} + frac{partial mathbf{D}} {partial t} right)
begin{align}
Q &= Q_text{f} + Q_text{b} = iiint_Omega left(rho_text{f} + rho_text{b} right) , mathrm{d}V = iiint_Omega rho ,mathrm{d}V
I &= I_text{f} + I_text{b} = iint_Sigma left(mathbf{J}_text{f} + mathbf{J}_text{b} right) cdot mathrm{d}mathbf{S} = iint_Sigma mathbf{J} cdot mathrm{d}mathbf{S}
end{align}The cost of this splitting is that the additional fields {{math|D}} and {{math|H}} need to be determined through phenomenological constituent equations relating these fields to the electric field {{math|E}} and the magnetic field {{math|B}}, together with the bound charge and current.See below for a detailed description of the differences between the microscopic equations, dealing with total charge and current including material contributions, useful in air/vacuum;In some booksâ€”e.g., in U. Krey and A. Owen's Basic Theoretical Physics (Springer 2007)â€”the term effective charge is used instead of total charge, while free charge is simply called charge.and the macroscopic equations, dealing with free charge and current, practical to use within materials.I &= I_text{f} + I_text{b} = iint_Sigma left(mathbf{J}_text{f} + mathbf{J}_text{b} right) cdot mathrm{d}mathbf{S} = iint_Sigma mathbf{J} cdot mathrm{d}mathbf{S}
Bound charge and current
(File:Polarization and magnetization.svg|thumb|300px|Left: A schematic view of how an assembly of microscopic dipoles produces opposite surface charges as shown at top and bottom. Right: How an assembly of microscopic current loops add together to produce a macroscopically circulating current loop. Inside the boundaries, the individual contributions tend to cancel, but at the boundaries no cancelation occurs.)When an electric field is applied to a dielectric material its molecules respond by forming microscopic electric dipoles â€“ their atomic nuclei move a tiny distance in the direction of the field, while their electrons move a tiny distance in the opposite direction. This produces a macroscopic bound charge in the material even though all of the charges involved are bound to individual molecules. For example, if every molecule responds the same, similar to that shown in the figure, these tiny movements of charge combine to produce a layer of positive bound charge on one side of the material and a layer of negative charge on the other side. The bound charge is most conveniently described in terms of the polarization {{math|P}} of the material, its dipole moment per unit volume. If {{math|P}} is uniform, a macroscopic separation of charge is produced only at the surfaces where {{math|P}} enters and leaves the material. For non-uniform {{math|P}}, a charge is also produced in the bulk.See BOOK, David J. Griffiths, Introduction to Electrodynamics, third, 4.2.2, Prentice Hall, 1999, David J. Griffiths, for a good description of how {{math|P}} relates to the bound charge.Somewhat similarly, in all materials the constituent atoms exhibit magnetic moments that are intrinsically linked to the angular momentum of the components of the atoms, most notably their electrons. The connection to angular momentum suggests the picture of an assembly of microscopic current loops. Outside the material, an assembly of such microscopic current loops is not different from a macroscopic current circulating around the material's surface, despite the fact that no individual charge is traveling a large distance. These bound currents can be described using the magnetization {{math|M}}.See BOOK, David J. Griffiths, Introduction to Electrodynamics, third, 6.2.2, Prentice Hall, 1999, for a good description of how {{math|M}} relates to the bound current.The very complicated and granular bound charges and bound currents, therefore, can be represented on the macroscopic scale in terms of {{math|P}} and {{math|M}}, which average these charges and currents on a sufficiently large scale so as not to see the granularity of individual atoms, but also sufficiently small that they vary with location in the material. As such, Maxwell's macroscopic equations ignore many details on a fine scale that can be unimportant to understanding matters on a gross scale by calculating fields that are averaged over some suitable volume.Auxiliary fields, polarization and magnetization
The definitions (not constitutive relations) of the auxiliary fields are:
begin{align}
mathbf{D}(mathbf{r}, t) &= varepsilon_0 mathbf{E}(mathbf{r}, t) + mathbf{P}(mathbf{r}, t)
mathbf{H}(mathbf{r}, t) &= frac{1}{mu_0} mathbf{B}(mathbf{r}, t) - mathbf{M}(mathbf{r}, t)
end{align}where {{math|P}} is the polarization field and {{math|M}} is the magnetization field, which are defined in terms of microscopic bound charges and bound currents respectively. The macroscopic bound charge density {{math|Ïb}} and bound current density {{math|Jb}} in terms of polarization {{math|P}} and magnetization {{math|M}} are then defined as
mathbf{H}(mathbf{r}, t) &= frac{1}{mu_0} mathbf{B}(mathbf{r}, t) - mathbf{M}(mathbf{r}, t)
begin{align}
rho_text{b} &= -nablacdotmathbf{P}
mathbf{J}_text{b} &= nablatimesmathbf{M} + frac{partialmathbf{P}}{partial t}
end{align}If we define the total, bound, and free charge and current density by
mathbf{J}_text{b} &= nablatimesmathbf{M} + frac{partialmathbf{P}}{partial t}
begin{align}
rho &= rho_text{b} + rho_text{f},
mathbf{J} &= mathbf{J}_text{b} + mathbf{J}_text{f},
end{align}and use the defining relations above to eliminate {{math|D}}, and {{math|H}}, the "macroscopic" Maxwell's equations reproduce the "microscopic" equations.mathbf{J} &= mathbf{J}_text{b} + mathbf{J}_text{f},
Constitutive relations
In order to apply 'Maxwell's macroscopic equations', it is necessary to specify the relations between displacement field {{math|D}} and the electric field {{math|E}}, as well as the magnetizing field {{math|H}} and the magnetic field {{math|B}}. Equivalently, we have to specify the dependence of the polarization {{math|P}} (hence the bound charge) and the magnetization {{math|M}} (hence the bound current) on the applied electric and magnetic field. The equations specifying this response are called constitutive relations. For real-world materials, the constitutive relations are rarely simple, except approximately, and usually determined by experiment. See the main article on constitutive relations for a fuller description.BOOK, Andrew Zangwill, Modern Electrodynamics, 2013, Cambridge University Press, 978-0-521-89697-9, {{rp|44â€“45}}For materials without polarization and magnetization, the constitutive relations are (by definition){{rp|2}}
mathbf{D} = varepsilon_0mathbf{E}, quad mathbf{H} = frac{1}{mu_0}mathbf{B}
where {{math|Îµ0}} is the permittivity of free space and {{math|Î¼0}} the permeability of free space. Since there is no bound charge, the total and the free charge and current are equal.An alternative viewpoint on the microscopic equations is that they are the macroscopic equations together with the statement that vacuum behaves like a perfect linear "material" without additional polarization and magnetization.More generally, for linear materials the constitutive relations are{{rp|44â€“45}}
mathbf{D} = varepsilonmathbf{E},,quad mathbf{H} = frac{1}{mu}mathbf{B}
where {{math|Îµ}} is the permittivity and {{math|Î¼}} the permeability of the material. For the displacement field {{math|D}} the linear approximation is usually excellent because for all but the most extreme electric fields or temperatures obtainable in the laboratory (high power pulsed lasers) the interatomic electric fields of materials of the order of 1011 V/m are much higher than the external field. For the magnetizing field mathbf{H}, however, the linear approximation can break down in common materials like iron leading to phenomena like hysteresis. Even the linear case can have various complications, however. - For homogeneous materials, {{math|Îµ}} and {{math|Î¼}} are constant throughout the material, while for inhomogeneous materials they depend on location within the material (and perhaps time).{{citation|last=Kittel|first=Charles|title=Introduction to Solid State Physics|publisher=John Wiley & Sons, Inc.|year=2005|location=USA|edition=8th|isbn=978-0-471-41526-8|url=https://archive.org/details/isbn_9780471415268}}{{rp|463}}
- For isotropic materials, {{math|Îµ}} and {{math|Î¼}} are scalars, while for anisotropic materials (e.g. due to crystal structure) they are tensors.{{rp|421}}{{rp|463}}
- Materials are generally dispersive, so {{math|Îµ}} and {{math|Î¼}} depend on the frequency of any incident EM waves.{{rp|625}}{{rp|397}}
mathbf{J}_text{f} = sigma mathbf{E},.
Alternative formulations
{{For|an overview|Mathematical descriptions of the electromagnetic field}}{{For|the equations in quantum field theory|quantum electrodynamics}}Following is a summary of some of the numerous other mathematical formalisms to write the microscopic Maxwell's equations, with the columns separating the two homogeneous Maxwell equations from the two inhomogeneous ones involving charge and current. Each formulation has versions directly in terms of the electric and magnetic fields, and indirectly in terms of the electrical potential {{math|Ï†}} and the vector potential {{math|A}}. Potentials were introduced as a convenient way to solve the homogeneous equations, but it was thought that all observable physics was contained in the electric and magnetic fields (or relativistically, the Faraday tensor). The potentials play a central role in quantum mechanics, however, and act quantum mechanically with observable consequences even when the electric and magnetic fields vanish (Aharonovâ€“Bohm effect).Each table describes one formalism. See the main article for details of each formulation. SI units are used throughout.{|class="wikitable" style="text-align: center;"|+ Vector calculus! scope="column" | Formulation! scope="column" | Homogeneous equations! scope="column" | Inhomogeneous equations! Fields3D Euclidean space + time| begin{align}
nablacdotmathbf{B} = 0
end{align}begin{align}
nablatimesmathbf{E} + frac{partial mathbf{B}}{partial t} = 0
end{align}| begin{align}
nablacdotmathbf{E} &= frac{rho}{varepsilon_0}
end{align}begin{align}
nablatimesmathbf{B} - frac{1}{c^2}frac{partial mathbf{E}}{partial t} &= mu_0mathbf{J}
end{align}
mathbf B &= mathbf nabla times mathbf A
end{align}begin{align}
mathbf E &= - mathbf nabla varphi - frac{partial mathbf A}{partial t}
end{align}| begin{align}
-nabla^2 varphi - frac{partial}{partial t} left( mathbf nabla cdot mathbf A right) &= frac{rho}{varepsilon_0}
end{align}begin{align}
left( -nabla^2 + frac{1}{c^2}frac{partial^2}{partial t^2} right) mathbf A + mathbf nabla left( mathbf nabla cdot mathbf A + frac{1}{c^2} frac{partial varphi}{partial t} right) &= mu_0 mathbf{J}
end{align}
mathbf B &= mathbf nabla times mathbf A
end{align}begin{align}
mathbf E &= - mathbf nabla varphi - frac{partial mathbf A}{partial t}
end{align}begin{align}
mathbf nabla cdot mathbf A &= - frac{1}{c^2}frac{partial varphi}{partial t}
end{align}| begin{align}
left( -nabla^2 +frac{1}{c^2}frac{partial^2}{partial t^2} right) varphi &= frac{rho}{varepsilon_0}
end{align}begin{align}
left( -nabla^2 +frac{1}{c^2}frac{partial^2}{partial t^2} right) mathbf A &= mu_0 mathbf J
end{align}
partial_{[i} B_{jk]} &=
nabla_{[i} B_{jk]} &= 0
partial_{[i} E_{j]} + frac{partial B_{ij}}{partial t} &=
nabla_{[i} E_{j]} + frac{partial B_{ij}}{partial t} &= 0
end{align}|begin{align}
nabla_{[i} B_{jk]} &= 0
partial_{[i} E_{j]} + frac{partial B_{ij}}{partial t} &=
nabla_{[i} E_{j]} + frac{partial B_{ij}}{partial t} &= 0
frac{1}{sqrt{h}} partial_i sqrt{h} E^i &=
nabla_i E^i &= frac{rho}{epsilon_0}
-frac{1}{sqrt{h}}partial_i sqrt{h} B^{ij} - frac{1}{c^2} frac{partial}{partial t} E^j &= &
-nabla_iB^{ij} - frac{1}{c^2} frac{partial E^j}{partial t} &= mu_0 J^j
end{align}nabla_i E^i &= frac{rho}{epsilon_0}
-frac{1}{sqrt{h}}partial_i sqrt{h} B^{ij} - frac{1}{c^2} frac{partial}{partial t} E^j &= &
-nabla_iB^{ij} - frac{1}{c^2} frac{partial E^j}{partial t} &= mu_0 J^j
B_{ij} &= partial_{[i} A_{j]}
&= nabla_{[i} A_{j]}
end{align}begin{align}
&= nabla_{[i} A_{j]}
E_i &= -frac{partial A_i}{partial t} - partial_i phi
&= -frac{partial A_i}{partial t} - nabla_i phi
end{align}|begin{align}
&= -frac{partial A_i}{partial t} - nabla_i phi
-frac{1}{sqrt{h}} partial_i sqrt{h} left( partial^i phi + frac{partial A^i}{partial t} right) &=
-nabla_i nabla^i phi - frac{partial}{partial t} nabla_i A^i &= frac{rho}{epsilon_0}
- frac{1}{sqrt{h}} partial_i left( sqrt{h}h^{im}h^{jn} partial_{[m} A_{n]} right) + frac{1}{c^2} frac{partial}{partial t} left( frac{partial A^j}{partial t} + partial^j phi right) &=
- nabla_i nabla^i A^j + frac{1}{c^2} frac{partial^2 A^j}{partial t^2} + R_i^j A^i + nabla^j left( nabla_i A^i + frac{1}{c^2} frac{partial phi}{partial t} right) &= mu_0 J^j
end{align}
-nabla_i nabla^i phi - frac{partial}{partial t} nabla_i A^i &= frac{rho}{epsilon_0}
- frac{1}{sqrt{h}} partial_i left( sqrt{h}h^{im}h^{jn} partial_{[m} A_{n]} right) + frac{1}{c^2} frac{partial}{partial t} left( frac{partial A^j}{partial t} + partial^j phi right) &=
- nabla_i nabla^i A^j + frac{1}{c^2} frac{partial^2 A^j}{partial t^2} + R_i^j A^i + nabla^j left( nabla_i A^i + frac{1}{c^2} frac{partial phi}{partial t} right) &= mu_0 J^j
B_{ij} &= partial_{[i} A_{j]}
&= nabla_{[i} A_{j]}
E_i &= -frac{partial A_i}{partial t} - partial_i phi
&= -frac{partial A_i}{partial t} - nabla_i phi
nabla_i A^i &= - frac{1}{c^2} frac{partialphi}{partial t}
end{align}|begin{align}
&= nabla_{[i} A_{j]}
E_i &= -frac{partial A_i}{partial t} - partial_i phi
&= -frac{partial A_i}{partial t} - nabla_i phi
nabla_i A^i &= - frac{1}{c^2} frac{partialphi}{partial t}
-nabla_i nabla^i phi + frac{1}{c^2} frac{partial^2 phi }{partial t^2} &= frac{rho}{epsilon_0}
- nabla_i nabla^i A^j + frac{1}{c^2} frac{partial^2 A^j}{partial t^2} + R_i^j A^i &= mu_0 J^j
end{align}
- nabla_i nabla^i A^j + frac{1}{c^2} frac{partial^2 A^j}{partial t^2} + R_i^j A^i &= mu_0 J^j
Relativistic formulations
{{For|the equations in special relativity|classical electromagnetism and special relativity|covariant formulation of classical electromagnetism}}{{For|the equations in general relativity|Maxwell's equations in curved spacetime}}The Maxwell equations can also be formulated on a spacetime-like Minkowski space where space and time are treated on equal footing. The direct spacetime formulations make manifest that the Maxwell equations are relativistically invariant. Because of this symmetry electric and magnetic field are treated on equal footing and are recognised as components of the Faraday tensor. This reduces the four Maxwell equations to two, which simplifies the equations, although we can no longer use the familiar vector formulation. In fact the Maxwell equations in the space + time formulation are not Galileo invariant and have Lorentz invariance as a hidden symmetry. This was a major source of inspiration for the development of relativity theory. To repeat: the space + time formulation is not a non-relativistic approximation and it describes the same physics by simply renaming variables. For this reason the relativistic invariant equations are usually called the Maxwell equations as well.Each table describes one formalism.{|class="wikitable" style="text-align: center;"|+ Tensor calculus! scope="column" | Formulation! scope="column" | Homogeneous equations! scope="column" | Inhomogeneous equations! FieldsMinkowski space| partial_{[alpha} F_{betagamma]} = 0 | partial_alpha F^{alphabeta} = mu_0 J^beta
F_{alphabeta} &= 2partial_{[alpha} A_{beta]}
partial_alpha A^alpha &= 0
end{align}| partial_alphapartial^alpha A^beta = mu_0 J^betapartial_alpha A^alpha &= 0
partial_{[alpha} F_{betagamma]} &=
nabla_{[alpha} F_{betagamma]} &= 0
end{align}| begin{align}
nabla_{[alpha} F_{betagamma]} &= 0
frac{1}{sqrt{-g}} partial_alpha (sqrt{-g} F^{alphabeta}) &=
nabla_alpha F^{alphabeta} &= mu_0 J^beta
end{align}nabla_alpha F^{alphabeta} &= mu_0 J^beta
F_{alphabeta} &= 2partial_{[alpha} A_{beta]}
&= 2nabla_{[alpha} A_{beta]}
end{align}| begin{align}
&= 2nabla_{[alpha} A_{beta]}
frac{2}{sqrt{-g}} partial_alpha (sqrt{-g}g^{alphamu}g^{betanu}partial_{[mu}A_{nu]} ) &=
2nabla_alpha (nabla^{[alpha} A^{beta]} ) &= mu_0 J^beta
end{align}2nabla_alpha (nabla^{[alpha} A^{beta]} ) &= mu_0 J^beta
F_{alphabeta} &= 2partial_{[alpha} A_{beta]}
&= 2nabla_{[alpha} A_{beta]}
nabla_alpha A^{alpha} &= 0
end{align}| nabla_alphanabla^alpha A^{beta} - R^{beta}{}_{alpha} A^alpha = mu_0 J^beta&= 2nabla_{[alpha} A_{beta]}
nabla_alpha A^{alpha} &= 0
F &= mathrm{d} A
mathrm{d} {star} A &= 0
end{align}| {star} Box A = mu_0 J mathrm{d} {star} A &= 0
- In the tensor calculus formulation, the electromagnetic tensor {{math|F{{sub|Î±Î²}}}} is an antisymmetric covariant order 2 tensor; the four-potential, {{math|A{{sub|Î±}}}}, is a covariant vector; the current, {{math|J{{sup|Î±}}}}, is a vector; the square brackets, {{math|[ ]}}, denote antisymmetrization of indices; {{math|âˆ‚{{sub|Î±}}}} is the derivative with respect to the coordinate, {{math|x{{sup|Î±}}}}. In Minkowski space coordinates are chosen with respect to an inertial frame; {{math|1=(x{{sup|Î±}}) = (ct,x,y,z)}}, so that the metric tensor used to raise and lower indices is {{math|1=Î·{{sub|Î±Î²}} = diag(1,âˆ’1,âˆ’1,âˆ’1)}}. The d'Alembert operator on Minkowski space is {{math|1=â—» = âˆ‚{{sub|Î±}}âˆ‚{{sup|Î±}}}} as in the vector formulation. In general spacetimes, the coordinate system {{math|x{{sup|Î±}}}} is arbitrary, the covariant derivative {{math|âˆ‡{{sub|Î±}}}}, the Ricci tensor, {{math|R{{sub|Î±Î²}}}} and raising and lowering of indices are defined by the Lorentzian metric, {{math|g{{sub|Î±Î²}}}} and the d'Alembert operator is defined as {{math|1=â—» = âˆ‡{{sub|Î±}}âˆ‡{{sup|Î±}}}}. The topological restriction is that the second real cohomology group of the space vanishes (see the differential form formulation for an explanation). This is violated for Minkowski space with a line removed, which can model a (flat) spacetime with a point-like monopole on the complement of the line.
- In the differential form formulation on arbitrary space times, {{math|1=F = F{{sub|Î±Î²}}dx{{sup|Î±}} âˆ§ dx{{sup|Î²}}}} is the electromagnetic tensor considered as a 2-form, {{math|1=A = A{{sub|Î±}}dx{{sup|Î±}}}} is the potential 1-form, {{math|J}} is the current 3-form, {{math|d}} is the exterior derivative, and {star} is the Hodge star on forms defined (up to its an orientation, i.e. its sign) by the Lorentzian metric of spacetime. In the special case of 2-forms such as F, the Hodge star {star} depends on the metric tensor only for its local scale. This means that, as formulated, the differential form field equations are conformally invariant, but the Lorenz gauge condition breaks conformal invariance. The operator Box = (-{star} mathrm{d} {star} mathrm{d} - mathrm{d} {star} mathrm{d} {star}) is the d'Alembertâ€“Laplaceâ€“Beltrami operator on 1-forms on an arbitrary Lorentzian spacetime. The topological condition is again that the second real cohomology group is trivial. By the isomorphism with the second de Rham cohomology this condition means that every closed 2-form is exact.
Solutions
Maxwell's equations are partial differential equations that relate the electric and magnetic fields to each other and to the electric charges and currents. Often, the charges and currents are themselves dependent on the electric and magnetic fields via the Lorentz force equation and the constitutive relations. These all form a set of coupled partial differential equations which are often very difficult to solve: the solutions encompass all the diverse phenomena of classical electromagnetism. Some general remarks follow.As for any differential equation, boundary conditionsBOOK, Peter Monk
, Finite Element Methods for Maxwell's Equations
, 1 ff
, Oxford University Press
, Oxford UK
, 978-0-19-850888-5
,weblink
, 2003
, BOOK
, Finite Element Methods for Maxwell's Equations
, 1 ff
, Oxford University Press
, Oxford UK
, 978-0-19-850888-5
,weblink
, 2003
, Thomas B. A. Senior & John Leonidas Volakis
, Approximate Boundary Conditions in Electromagnetics
, 261 ff
, Institution of Electrical Engineers
, London UK
, 978-0-85296-849-9
,weblink
, 1995-03-01
, BOOK
, Approximate Boundary Conditions in Electromagnetics
, 261 ff
, Institution of Electrical Engineers
, London UK
, 978-0-85296-849-9
,weblink
, 1995-03-01
, T Hagstrom (BjÃ¶rn Engquist & Gregory A. Kriegsmann, Eds.)
, Computational Wave Propagation
, 1 ff
, Springer
, Berlin
, 978-0-387-94874-4
,weblink
, 1997
, and initial conditionsBOOK
, Computational Wave Propagation
, 1 ff
, Springer
, Berlin
, 978-0-387-94874-4
,weblink
, 1997
, Henning F. Harmuth & Malek G. M. Hussain
, Propagation of Electromagnetic Signals
, 17
, World Scientific
, Singapore
, 978-981-02-1689-4
,weblink
, 1994
, are necessary for a unique solution. For example, even with no charges and no currents anywhere in spacetime, there are the obvious solutions for which E and B are zero or constant, but there are also non-trivial solutions corresponding to electromagnetic waves. In some cases, Maxwell's equations are solved over the whole of space, and boundary conditions are given as asymptotic limits at infinity.BOOK
, Propagation of Electromagnetic Signals
, 17
, World Scientific
, Singapore
, 978-981-02-1689-4
,weblink
, 1994
, David M Cook
, The Theory of the Electromagnetic Field
, 2002
, 335 ff
, Courier Dover Publications
, Mineola NY
, 978-0-486-42567-2
,weblink
, In other cases, Maxwell's equations are solved in a finite region of space, with appropriate conditions on the boundary of that region, for example an artificial absorbing boundary representing the rest of the universe,BOOK
, The Theory of the Electromagnetic Field
, 2002
, 335 ff
, Courier Dover Publications
, Mineola NY
, 978-0-486-42567-2
,weblink
, Jean-Michel Lourtioz
, Photonic Crystals: Towards Nanoscale Photonic Devices
, 84
, Springer
, Berlin
, 978-3-540-24431-8
,weblink
, 2005-05-23
, S. G. Johnson, Notes on Perfectly Matched Layers, online MIT course notes (Aug. 2007). or periodic boundary conditions, or walls that isolate a small region from the outside world (as with a waveguide or cavity resonator).BOOK
, Photonic Crystals: Towards Nanoscale Photonic Devices
, 84
, Springer
, Berlin
, 978-3-540-24431-8
,weblink
, 2005-05-23
, S. F. Mahmoud
, Electromagnetic Waveguides: Theory and Applications
, Chapter 2
, Institution of Electrical Engineers
, London UK
, 978-0-86341-232-5
,weblink
, true
, 1991
, Jefimenko's equations (or the closely related LiÃ©nardâ€“Wiechert potentials) are the explicit solution to Maxwell's equations for the electric and magnetic fields created by any given distribution of charges and currents. It assumes specific initial conditions to obtain the so-called "retarded solution", where the only fields present are the ones created by the charges. However, Jefimenko's equations are unhelpful in situations when the charges and currents are themselves affected by the fields they create.Numerical methods for differential equations can be used to compute approximate solutions of Maxwell's equations when exact solutions are impossible. These include the finite element method and finite-difference time-domain method.BOOK
, Electromagnetic Waveguides: Theory and Applications
, Chapter 2
, Institution of Electrical Engineers
, London UK
, 978-0-86341-232-5
,weblink
, true
, 1991
, John Leonidas Volakis, Arindam Chatterjee & Leo C. Kempel
, Finite element method for electromagnetics : antennas, microwave circuits, and scattering applications
, 1998
, 79 ff
, Wiley IEEE
, New York
, 978-0-7803-3425-0
,weblink
, BOOK
, Finite element method for electromagnetics : antennas, microwave circuits, and scattering applications
, 1998
, 79 ff
, Wiley IEEE
, New York
, 978-0-7803-3425-0
,weblink
, Bernard Friedman
, Principles and Techniques of Applied Mathematics
, 1990
, Dover Publications
, Mineola NY
, 978-0-486-66444-6
,
BOOK
, Principles and Techniques of Applied Mathematics
, 1990
, Dover Publications
, Mineola NY
, 978-0-486-66444-6
,
, Taflove A & Hagness S C
, Computational Electrodynamics: The Finite-difference Time-domain Method
, 2005
, Chapters 6 & 7
, Artech House
, Boston MA
, 978-1-58053-832-9
,weblink
, true
, For more details, see Computational electromagnetics., Computational Electrodynamics: The Finite-difference Time-domain Method
, 2005
, Chapters 6 & 7
, Artech House
, Boston MA
, 978-1-58053-832-9
,weblink
, true
Overdetermination of Maxwell's equations
Maxwell's equations seem overdetermined, in that they involve six unknowns (the three components of {{math|E}} and {{math|B}}) but eight equations (one for each of the two Gauss's laws, three vector components each for Faraday's and Ampere's laws). (The currents and charges are not unknowns, being freely specifiable subject to charge conservation.) This is related to a certain limited kind of redundancy in Maxwell's equations: It can be proven that any system satisfying Faraday's law and Ampere's law automatically also satisfies the two Gauss's laws, as long as the system's initial condition does.BOOK, H FreistÃ¼hler & G Warnecke, Hyperbolic Problems: Theory, Numerics, Applications, 2001, 605,weblink 9783764367107, JOURNAL, Redundancy and superfluity for electromagnetic fields and potentials, American Journal of Physics, J Rosen, 48, 12, 1071, 10.1119/1.12289, 1980AmJPh..48.1071R, 1980, This explanation was first introduced by Julius Adams Stratton in 1941.BOOK, J. A. Stratton, Electromagnetic Theory,weblink 1941, McGraw-Hill Book Company, 1â€“6, 9780470131534, Although it is possible to simply ignore the two Gauss's laws in a numerical algorithm (apart from the initial conditions), the imperfect precision of the calculations can lead to ever-increasing violations of those laws. By introducing dummy variables characterizing these violations, the four equations become not overdetermined after all. The resulting formulation can lead to more accurate algorithms that take all four laws into account.JOURNAL, The Origin of Spurious Solutions in Computational Electromagnetics, B Jiang & J Wu & L. A. Povinelli, 10.1006/jcph.1996.0082, 1996, Journal of Computational Physics, 125, 1, 104, 1996JCoPh.125..104J, 2060/19950021305,weblink Both identities nablacdot nablatimes mathbf{B} equiv 0, nablacdot nablatimes mathbf{E} equiv 0, which reduce eight equations to six independent ones, are the true reason of overdetermination.BOOK, Steven, Weinberg, Gravitation and Cosmology, John Wiley, 1972, 978-0-471-92567-5, 161â€“162,weblink JOURNAL, Liu, Changli, 1002.0892, Explanation on Overdetermination of Maxwell's Equations, Physics and Engineering, 27, 3, 7â€“9, 2017, 2010arXiv1002.0892L, 10.3969/j.issn.1009-7104.2017.03.002, JOURNAL, On the equations of electrodynamics in a flat or curved spacetime and a possible interaction energy, Arminjon, Mayeul, Open Physics, 10.1515/phys-2018-0065, 2018, 16, 1, 488, 2018OPhy...16...65A, 1810.05520,Maxwell's equations as the classical limit of QED
Maxwell's equations and the Lorentz force law (along with the rest of classical electromagnetism) are extraordinarily successful at explaining and predicting a variety of phenomena; however they are not exact, but a classical limit of quantum electrodynamics (QED).Some observed electromagnetic phenomena are incompatible with Maxwell's equations. These include photonâ€“photon scattering and many other phenomena related to photons or virtual photons, "nonclassical light" and quantum entanglement of electromagnetic fields (see quantum optics). E.g. quantum cryptography cannot be described by Maxwell theory, not even approximately. The approximate nature of Maxwell's equations becomes more and more apparent when going into the extremely strong field regime (see Eulerâ€“Heisenberg Lagrangian) or to extremely small distances.Finally, Maxwell's equations cannot explain any phenomenon involving individual photons interacting with quantum matter, such as the photoelectric effect, Planck's law, the Duaneâ€“Hunt law, and single-photon light detectors. However, many such phenomena may be approximated using a halfway theory of quantum matter coupled to a classical electromagnetic field, either as external field or with the expected value of the charge current and density on the right hand side of Maxwell's equations.Variations
Popular variations on the Maxwell equations as a classical theory of electromagnetic fields are relatively scarce because the standard equations have stood the test of time remarkably well.Magnetic monopoles
Maxwell's equations posit that there is electric charge, but no magnetic charge (also called magnetic monopoles), in the universe. Indeed, magnetic charge has never been observed, despite extensive searches,See magnetic monopole for a discussion of monopole searches. Recently, scientists have discovered that some types of condensed matter, including spin ice and topological insulators, which display emergent behavior resembling magnetic monopoles. (See sciencemag.org and nature.com.) Although these were described in the popular press as the long-awaited discovery of magnetic monopoles, they are only superficially related. A "true" magnetic monopole is something where {{math|âˆ‡ â‹… B â‰ 0}}, whereas in these condensed-matter systems, {{math|1=âˆ‡ â‹… B = 0}} while only {{math|âˆ‡ â‹… H â‰ 0}}. and may not exist. If they did exist, both Gauss's law for magnetism and Faraday's law would need to be modified, and the resulting four equations would be fully symmetric under the interchange of electric and magnetic fields.{{rp|273â€“275}}See also
- Algebra of physical space
- Fresnel equations
- Gravitoelectromagnetism
- Interface conditions for electromagnetic fields
- Moving magnet and conductor problem
- Riemannâ€“Silberstein vector
- Spacetime algebra
- Wheelerâ€“Feynman absorber theory
Notes
{{Reflist|group="note"|1}}References
{{Reflist|30em}}
Further reading can be found in list of textbooks in electromagnetism
Historical publications
- weblink" title="web.archive.org/web/20081217035457weblink">On Faraday's Lines of Force â€“ 1855/56 Maxwell's first paper (Part 1 & 2) â€“ Compiled by Blaze Labs Research (PDF)
- [//upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/b/b8/On_Physical_Lines_of_Force.pdf On Physical Lines of Force â€“ 1861] Maxwell's 1861 paper describing magnetic lines of Force â€“ Predecessor to 1873 Treatise
- James Clerk Maxwell, "A Dynamical Theory of the Electromagnetic Field", Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London 155, 459â€“512 (1865). (This article accompanied a December 8, 1864 presentation by Maxwell to the Royal Society.)
- A Dynamical Theory Of The Electromagnetic Field â€“ 1865 Maxwell's 1865 paper describing his 20 Equations, link from Google Books.
- J. Clerk Maxwell (1873) A Treatise on Electricity and Magnetism
- Maxwell, J.C., A Treatise on Electricity And Magnetism â€“ Volume 1 â€“ 1873 â€“ Posner Memorial Collection â€“ Carnegie Mellon University
- Maxwell, J.C., A Treatise on Electricity And Magnetism â€“ Volume 2 â€“ 1873 â€“ Posner Memorial Collection â€“ Carnegie Mellon University
- Joseph Larmor (1897) "On a dynamical theory of the electric and luminiferous medium", Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. 190, 205â€“300 (third and last in a series of papers with the same name).
- Hendrik Lorentz (1899) "Simplified theory of electrical and optical phenomena in moving systems", Proc. Acad. Science Amsterdam, I, 427â€“43.
- Hendrik Lorentz (1904) "Electromagnetic phenomena in a system moving with any velocity less than that of light", Proc. Acad. Science Amsterdam, IV, 669â€“78.
- Henri PoincarÃ© (1900) "La thÃ©orie de Lorentz et le Principe de RÃ©action", Archives NÃ©erlandaises, V, 253â€“78.
- Henri PoincarÃ© (1902) La Science et l'HypothÃ¨se
- Henri PoincarÃ© (1905) "Sur la dynamique de l'Ã©lectron", Comptes Rendus de l'AcadÃ©mie des Sciences, 140, 1504â€“8.
- Catt, Walton and Davidson. "The History of Displacement Current". Wireless World, March 1979.
Further reading
- Imaeda, K. (1995), "Biquaternionic formulation of Maxwellâ€™s Equations and their solutions", Clifford Algebras and Spinor Structures (editorsâ€”RafaÅ‚ Ablamowicz, Pertti Lounesto) Springer; {{doi|10.1007/978-94-015-8422-7_16}}
External links
- {{springer|title=Maxwell equations|id=p/m063140}}
- maxwells-equations.com â€” An intuitive tutorial of Maxwell's equations.
- Mathematical aspects of Maxwell's equation are discussed on the weblink" title="archive.is/20060812140140weblink">Dispersive PDE Wiki.
Modern treatments
- Electromagnetism (ch. 11), B. Crowell, Fullerton College
- weblink" title="web.archive.org/web/20030803151533weblink">Lecture series: Relativity and electromagnetism, R. Fitzpatrick, University of Texas at Austin
- Electromagnetic waves from Maxwell's equations on Project PHYSNET.
- weblink" title="web.archive.org/web/20090324084439weblink">MIT Video Lecture Series (36 Ã— 50 minute lectures) (in .mp4 format) â€“ Electricity and Magnetism Taught by Professor Walter Lewin.
Other
- Feynman's derivation of Maxwell equations and extra dimensions
- Nature Milestones: Photons â€“ Milestone 2 (1861) Maxwell's equations
- content above as imported from Wikipedia
- "Maxwell's equations" does not exist on GetWiki (yet)
- time: 12:26am EDT - Thu, Sep 19 2019
- "Maxwell's equations" does not exist on GetWiki (yet)
- time: 12:26am EDT - Thu, Sep 19 2019
[ this remote article is provided by Wikipedia ]
LATEST EDITS [ see all ]
GETWIKI 09 JUL 2019
Eastern Philosophy
History of Philosophy
History of Philosophy
GETWIKI 09 MAY 2016
GetMeta:About
GetWiki
GetWiki
GETWIKI 18 OCT 2015
M.R.M. Parrott
Biographies
Biographies
GETWIKI 20 AUG 2014
GetMeta:News
GetWiki
GetWiki
GETWIKI 19 AUG 2014
© 2019 M.R.M. PARROTT | ALL RIGHTS RESERVED