SUPPORT THE WORK

GetWiki

Loaded question

ARTICLE SUBJECTS
aesthetics  →
being  →
complexity  →
database  →
enterprise  →
ethics  →
fiction  →
history  →
internet  →
knowledge  →
language  →
licensing  →
linux  →
logic  →
method  →
news  →
perception  →
philosophy  →
policy  →
purpose  →
religion  →
science  →
sociology  →
software  →
truth  →
unix  →
wiki  →
ARTICLE TYPES
essay  →
feed  →
help  →
system  →
wiki  →
ARTICLE ORIGINS
critical  →
discussion  →
forked  →
imported  →
original  →
Loaded question
[ temporary import ]
please note:
- the content below is remote from Wikipedia
- it has been imported raw for GetWiki
{{Short description|Question containing an unjustified assumption}}A loaded question is a form of complex question that contains a controversial assumption (e.g., a presumption of guilt).BOOK, Bassham, Gregory, 2004, Critical Thinking, McGraw-Hill, 9780072879599,weblink Such questions may be used as a rhetorical tool: the question attempts to limit direct replies to be those that serve the questioner's agenda. The traditional example is the question "Have you stopped beating your wife?" Whether the respondent answers yes or no, they will admit to having beaten their wife at some time in the past. Thus, these facts are presupposed by the question, and in this case an entrapment, because it narrows the respondent to a single answer, and the fallacy of many questions has been committed. The fallacy relies upon context for its effect: the fact that a question presupposes something does not in itself make the question fallacious. Only when some of these presuppositions are not necessarily agreed to by the person who is asked the question does the argument containing them become fallacious. Hence, the same question may be loaded in one context, but not in the other. For example, the previous question would not be loaded if it were asked during a trial in which the defendant had already admitted to beating his wife.Douglas N. Walton, Informal logic: a handbook for critical argumentation, Cambridge University Press, 1989, {{ISBN|0-521-37925-3}}, pp. 36–37This informal fallacy should be distinguished from that of begging the question,WEB, Fallacy: Begging the Question, The Nizkor Project,weblink January 22, 2008, dead,weblink" title="web.archive.org/web/20190310182956weblink">weblink March 10, 2019, which offers a premise whose plausibility depends on the truth of the proposition asked about, and which is often an implicit restatement of the proposition.BOOK, Carroll, Robert Todd, Robert Todd Carroll, 31 July 2003, The Skeptic's Dictionary, John Wiley & Sons, 0-471-27242-6, 51,weblink

Defense

A common way out of this argument is not to answer the question (e.g. with a simple 'yes' or 'no'), but to challenge the assumption behind the question. To use an earlier example, a good response to the question "Have you stopped beating your wife?" would be "I have never beaten my wife".BOOK, Layman, C. Stephen, 2003, The Power of Logic, 158, This removes the ambiguity of the expected response, therefore nullifying the tactic. However, the asker may respond to a challenge by accusing the one who answers of dodging the question.

Historical examples

Diogenes Laërtius wrote a brief biography of the philosopher Menedemus in which he relates that:JOURNAL, Walton, Douglas N., Douglas N. Walton, November 1999, The fallacy of many questions: on the notions of complexity, loadedness and unfair entrapment in interrogative theory, Argumentation, 13, 4, 379–383, 10.1023/A:1007727929716, 141720470,weblink 2020-04-25,weblink" title="web.archive.org/web/20181221135816weblink">weblink 2018-12-21, dead, {{Blockquote|[O]nce when Alexinus asked him whether he had left off beating his father, he said, "I have not beaten him, and I have not left off;" and when he said further that he ought to put an end to the doubt by answering explicitly yes or no, "It would be absurd," he rejoined, "to comply with your conditions, when I can stop you at the entrance."BOOK, Laertius, Diogenes, Yonge, Charles Duke, 1853, The Lives and Opinions of Eminent Philosophers, London, H.G. Bohn, 109, 3123020, }}For another example, the 2009 referendum on corporal punishment in New Zealand asked: "Should a smack as part of good parental correction be a criminal offence in New Zealand?" Murray Edridge, of Barnardos New Zealand, criticized the question as "loaded and ambiguous" and claimed "the question presupposes that smacking is a part of good parental correction".NEWS, June 15, 2009, Anti-smacking debate goes to referendum, 3 News,weblink 2010-02-03, {{Dead link|date=March 2020 |bot=InternetArchiveBot |fix-attempted=yes}}

See also

{{div col|colwidth=30em}} {{div col end}}

References

{{Reflist|30em}}

External links

{{Fallacies}}{{Authority control}}

- content above as imported from Wikipedia
- "Loaded question" does not exist on GetWiki (yet)
- time: 2:48pm EDT - Thu, Apr 25 2024
[ this remote article is provided by Wikipedia ]
LATEST EDITS [ see all ]
GETWIKI 23 MAY 2022
GETWIKI 09 JUL 2019
Eastern Philosophy
History of Philosophy
GETWIKI 09 MAY 2016
GETWIKI 18 OCT 2015
M.R.M. Parrott
Biographies
GETWIKI 20 AUG 2014
CONNECT