George I of Great Britain

aesthetics  →
being  →
complexity  →
database  →
enterprise  →
ethics  →
fiction  →
history  →
internet  →
knowledge  →
language  →
licensing  →
linux  →
logic  →
method  →
news  →
perception  →
philosophy  →
policy  →
purpose  →
religion  →
science  →
sociology  →
software  →
truth  →
unix  →
wiki  →
essay  →
feed  →
help  →
system  →
wiki  →
critical  →
discussion  →
forked  →
imported  →
original  →
George I of Great Britain
[ temporary import ]
please note:
- the content below is remote from Wikipedia
- it has been imported raw for GetWiki
{{Use British English|date=October 2012}}{{Use dmy dates|date=October 2012}}

{{efnThroughout George's life, Great Britain used the Old Style and New Style dates Julian calendar. Hanover adopted the Old Style and New Style dates>New Style Gregorian calendar on 1 March 1700 (N.S.) / 19 February 1700 (O.S.). Old Style is used for dates in this article unless otherwise indicated; however, years are assumed to start from 1 January and not 25 March, which was the English New Year.}}| coronation = 20 October 1714| cor-type = britainAnne, Queen of Great Britain>AnneGeorge II of Great Britain>George IIPrime Minister of the United Kingdom>Prime Minister| regent = Robert WalpoleElectorate of Brunswick-Lüneburg>Elector of Hanover11 June 1727}}{{efn|name=note}}Ernest Augustus, Elector of Brunswick-Lüneburg>Ernest AugustusGeorge II of Great Britain>George IISophia Dorothea of Celle1694|end=divorced}} {edih}| issue-link = #Issue| issue-pipe = more...House of Hanover>Hanover| father = Ernest Augustus, Elector of Hanover| mother = Sophia of the PalatinateOld Style and New Style dates>N.S.)Hanover, Electorate of Brunswick-Lüneburg>Brunswick-Lüneburg, Holy Roman EmpireOld Style and New Style dates>N.S.)Schloss Osnabrück), Osnabrück| burial_date = 4 August 1727Leineschloss, Hanover; later Herrenhausen Palace>Herrenhausen, Hanover| signature = George I Signature.svgProtestantLATHBURYAUTHORLINK=THOMAS LATHBURYURL=HTTPS://BOOKS.GOOGLE.COM/?ID=15E5AAAAMAAJPUBLISHER=JOHN HENRY AND JAMES PARKERPAGE=430, George I. remained a Lutheran as long as he lived, and had his German chaplain; but he conformed on some occasions with the Church of England. George II. was in the same position. Though Lutherans, they exercised acts of supremacy in the Church of England; and the common opinion was, that there was no opposition between the views of the two Churches, }}George I (George Louis; ; 28 May 1660 – 11 June 1727){{efn|name=note}} was King of Great Britain and Ireland from 1 August 1714 and ruler of the Duchy and Electorate of Brunswick-Lüneburg (Hanover) in the Holy Roman Empire from 23 January 1698 until his death in 1727.George was born in Hanover and inherited the titles and lands of the Duchy of Brunswick-Lüneburg from his father and uncles. A succession of European wars expanded his German domains during his lifetime; he was ratified as prince-elector of Hanover in 1708. At the age of 54, after the death of his second cousin Anne, Queen of Great Britain (r. 1702–1714), George ascended the British throne as the first monarch of the House of Hanover. Although over fifty Roman Catholics were closer to Anne by primogeniture, the Act of Settlement 1701 disqualified Catholics from inheriting the British throne; George was Anne's closest living Protestant relative. In reaction, Jacobites attempted, but failed, to depose George and replace him with James Francis Edward Stuart, Anne's Catholic half-brother.During George's reign, the powers of the monarchy diminished and Britain began a transition to the modern system of cabinet government led by a prime minister. Towards the end of his reign, actual political power was held by Robert Walpole, now recognised as Britain's first de facto prime minister. George died of a stroke on a trip to his native Hanover, where he was buried. He was the last British monarch to be buried outside the United Kingdom.

Early life

George was born on 28 May 1660 in the city of Hanover in the Duchy of Brunswick-Lüneburg in the Holy Roman Empire.{{efn|The story that George I died in the same room as that in which he was born at Osnabrück (in, for example, Le Grand Dictionnaire Historique of 1759) is contradicted by the Electress Sophia in her Memoiren der Herzogin Sophie nachmals Kurfürstin von Hannover (ed. A. Köcher, Leipzig, 1879, pp. 1 and 68) who says that her two eldest sons were born at Hanover, and by four notifications from Hanover to the court at Wolfenbüttel preserved in the Wolfenbüttel state archives.BOOK, L'Allemagne Dynastique, Tome III, 1981, Alain Giraud, Le Perreux, French, 978-2-901138-03-7, 85, Michel, Alain, F. et B., Huberty, Giraud, Magdelaine, }} He was the eldest son of Ernest Augustus, Duke of Brunswick-Lüneburg, and his wife, Sophia of the Palatinate. Sophia was the granddaughter of King James I of England through her mother, Elizabeth of Bohemia.BOOK, Weir, Alison, Alison Weir (historian), Britain's Royal Families: The Complete Genealogy, Revised edition, 1996, Random House, 978-0-7126-7448-5, 272–276, For the first year of his life, George was the only heir to the German territories of his father and three childless uncles. George's brother, Frederick Augustus, was born in 1661, and the two boys (known as Görgen and Gustchen by the family) were brought up together. Their mother was absent for almost a year (1664–65) during a long convalescent holiday in Italy, but corresponded regularly with her sons' governess and took a great interest in their upbringing, even more so upon her return.BOOK, Hatton, Ragnhild, Ragnhild Hatton, George I: Elector and King, 1978, Thames and Hudson, London, 978-0-500-25060-0, 26–28, Sophia bore Ernest Augustus another four sons and a daughter. In her letters, Sophia describes George as a responsible, conscientious child who set an example to his younger brothers and sisters.Hatton, p. 29By 1675 George's eldest uncle had died without issue, but his remaining two uncles had married, putting George's inheritance in jeopardy as his uncles' estates might pass to their own sons, should they have had any, instead of to George. George's father took him hunting and riding, and introduced him to military matters; mindful of his uncertain future, Ernest Augustus took the fifteen-year-old George on campaign in the Franco-Dutch War with the deliberate purpose of testing and training his son in battle.Hatton, p. 34In 1679 another uncle died unexpectedly without sons, and Ernest Augustus became reigning Duke of Calenberg-Göttingen, with his capital at Hanover. George's surviving uncle, George William of Celle, had married his mistress in order to legitimise his only daughter, Sophia Dorothea, but looked unlikely to have any further children. Under Salic law, where inheritance of territory was restricted to the male line, the succession of George and his brothers to the territories of their father and uncle now seemed secure. In 1682, the family agreed to adopt the principle of primogeniture, meaning George would inherit all the territory and not have to share it with his brothers.Hatton, p. 30


File:George I as Prince of Hanover.jpg|thumb|left|George in 1680, aged 20, when he was Prince of Hanover. After a painting by Sir Godfrey Kneller.]]The same year, George married his first cousin, Sophia Dorothea of Celle, thereby securing additional incomes that would have been outside Salic laws. The marriage of state was arranged primarily as it ensured a healthy annual income and assisted the eventual unification of Hanover and Celle. His mother at first opposed the marriage because she looked down on Sophia Dorothea's mother, Eleonore (who came from lower nobility), and because she was concerned by Sophia Dorothea's legitimated status. She was eventually won over by the advantages inherent in the marriage.Hatton, pp. 36, 42In 1683 George and his brother Frederick Augustus served in the Great Turkish War at the Battle of Vienna, and Sophia Dorothea bore George a son, George Augustus. The following year, Frederick Augustus was informed of the adoption of primogeniture, meaning he would no longer receive part of his father's territory as he had expected. This led to a breach between father and son, and between the brothers, that lasted until Frederick Augustus's death in battle in 1690. With the imminent formation of a single Hanoverian state, and the Hanoverians' continuing contributions to the Empire's wars, Ernest Augustus was made an Elector of the Holy Roman Empire in 1692. George's prospects were now better than ever as the sole heir to his father's electorate and his uncle's duchy.Hatton, pp. 43–46Sophia Dorothea had a second child, a daughter named after her, in 1687, but there were no other pregnancies. The couple became estranged—George preferred the company of his mistress, Melusine von der Schulenburg, and Sophia Dorothea had her own romance with the Swedish Count Philip Christoph von Königsmarck. Threatened with the scandal of an elopement, the Hanoverian court, including George's brothers and mother, urged the lovers to desist, but to no avail. According to diplomatic sources from Hanover's enemies, in July 1694 the Swedish count was killed, possibly with George's connivance, and his body thrown into the river Leine weighted with stones. The murder was claimed to have been committed by four of Ernest Augustus's courtiers, one of whom, Don Nicolò Montalbano, was paid the enormous sum of 150,000 thalers, about one hundred times the annual salary of the highest-paid minister.Hatton, pp. 51–61 Later rumours supposed that Königsmarck was hacked to pieces and buried beneath the Hanover palace floorboards.BOOK, Michael, Farquhar, A Treasury of Royal Scandals, 2001, New York, Penguin Books, 978-0-7394-2025-6, 152, However, sources in Hanover itself, including Sophia, denied any knowledge of Königsmarck's whereabouts.George's marriage to Sophia Dorothea was dissolved, not on the grounds that either of them had committed adultery, but on the grounds that Sophia Dorothea had abandoned her husband. With her father's agreement, George had Sophia Dorothea imprisoned in Ahlden House in her native Celle, where she stayed until she died more than thirty years later. She was denied access to her children and father, forbidden to remarry and only allowed to walk unaccompanied within the mansion courtyard. She was, however, endowed with an income, establishment, and servants, and allowed to ride in a carriage outside her castle under supervision.Hatton, pp. 60–64 Melusine von der Schulenburg acted as George's hostess openly from 1698 until his death, and they had three daughters together, born in 1692, 1693 and 1701.

Electoral reign

File:George I Elector of Hanover.jpg|thumb|George in 1706, when he was Elector of HanoverElector of HanoverErnest Augustus died on 23 January 1698, leaving all of his territories to George with the exception of the Prince-Bishopric of Osnabrück, an office he had held since 1661.{{efn|The Prince-Bishopric was not an hereditary title; instead it alternated between Protestant and Roman Catholic incumbents.}} George thus became Duke of Brunswick-Lüneburg (also known as Hanover, after its capital) as well as Archbannerbearer and a Prince-Elector of the Holy Roman Empire.WEB,weblink Hanover, Schemmel, B,, 21 August 2007, His court in Hanover was graced by many cultural icons such as the mathematician and philosopher Gottfried Leibniz and the composers George Frideric Händel and Agostino Steffani.Shortly after George's accession to his paternal duchy, Prince William, Duke of Gloucester, who was second-in-line to the English and Scottish thrones, died. By the terms of the English Act of Settlement 1701, George's mother, Sophia, was designated as the heir to the English throne if the then reigning monarch, William III, and his sister-in-law, Anne, died without surviving issue. The succession was so designed because Sophia was the closest Protestant relative of the British royal family. Fifty-six Catholics with superior hereditary claims were bypassed.BOOK, Schama, Simon, A History of Britain – The British Wars 1603–1776, 2001, BBC Worldwide Ltd, 978-0-563-53747-2, 336, The likelihood of any of them converting to Protestantism for the sake of the succession was remote; some had already refused.Hatton, p. 74In August 1701 George was invested with the Order of the Garter and, within six weeks, the nearest Catholic claimant to the thrones, the former king James II, died. William III died the following March and was succeeded by Anne. Sophia became heiress presumptive to the new Queen of England. Sophia was in her seventy-first year, thirty-five years older than Anne, but she was very fit and healthy and invested time and energy in securing the succession either for herself or for her son.Hatton, pp. 75–76 However, it was George who understood the complexities of English politics and constitutional law, which required further acts in 1705 to naturalise Sophia and her heirs as English subjects, and to detail arrangements for the transfer of power through a Regency Council.Hatton, pp. 77–78 In the same year, George's surviving uncle died and he inherited further German dominions: the Principality of Lüneburg-Grubenhagen, centred at Celle.Hatton, p. 90File:Hanover1720.png|thumb|left|Sketch map of Hanover, c. 1720, showing the relative locations of Hanover, Brunswick-Wolfenbüttel, and the Prince-Bishopric of Osnabrück. During George's lifetime Hanover acquired Lauenburg and Bremen-VerdenBremen-VerdenShortly after George's accession in Hanover, the War of the Spanish Succession broke out. At issue was the right of Philip, the grandson of King Louis XIV of France, to succeed to the Spanish throne under the terms of King Charles II of Spain's will. The Holy Roman Empire, the United Dutch Provinces, England, Hanover and many other German states opposed Philip's right to succeed because they feared that the French House of Bourbon would become too powerful if it also controlled Spain. As part of the war effort, George invaded his neighbouring state, Brunswick-Wolfenbüttel, which was pro-French, writing out some of the battle orders himself. The invasion succeeded with few lives lost. As a reward, the prior Hanoverian annexation of the Duchy of Saxe-Lauenburg by George's uncle was recognised by the British and Dutch.Hatton, pp. 86–89In 1706 the Elector of Bavaria was deprived of his offices and titles for siding with Louis against the Empire. The following year, George was invested as an Imperial Field Marshal with command of the imperial army stationed along the Rhine. His tenure was not altogether successful, partly because he was deceived by his ally, the Duke of Marlborough, into a diversionary attack, and partly because Emperor Joseph I appropriated the funds necessary for George's campaign for his own use. Despite this, the German princes thought he had acquitted himself well. In 1708 they formally confirmed George's position as a Prince-Elector in recognition of, or because of, his service. George did not hold Marlborough's actions against him; he understood they were part of a plan to lure French forces away from the main attack.Hatton, pp. 101–104, 122In 1709 George resigned as field marshal, never to go on active service again. In 1710 he was granted the dignity of Arch-Treasurer of the Empire,Hatton, p. 104 an office formerly held by the Elector Palatine; the absence of the Elector of Bavaria allowed a reshuffling of offices.WEB,weblink Holy Roman Empire, Velde, François R., 26 September 2006, 20 August 2007, The emperor's death in 1711 threatened to destroy the balance of power in the opposite direction, so the war ended in 1713 with the ratification of the Treaty of Utrecht. Philip was allowed to succeed to the Spanish throne but removed from the French line of succession, and the Elector of Bavaria was restored.

Accession in Great Britain and Ireland

File:George I Oval.jpg|thumb|George c.1714, the year of his succession, as painted by Sir Godfrey Kneller ]]Though both England and Scotland recognised Anne as their queen, only the English Parliament had settled on Sophia, Electress of Hanover, as the heir presumptive. The Parliament of Scotland (the Estates) had not formally settled the succession question for the Scottish throne. In 1703, the Estates passed a bill declaring that their selection for Queen Anne's successor would not be the same individual as the successor to the English throne, unless England granted full freedom of trade to Scottish merchants in England and its colonies. At first Royal Assent was withheld, but the following year Anne capitulated to the wishes of the Estates and assent was granted to the bill, which became the Act of Security 1704. In response the English Parliament passed measures that threatened to restrict Anglo-Scottish trade and cripple the Scottish economy if the Estates did not agree to the Hanoverian succession.BOOK, Whatley, Christopher A., Bought and Sold for English Gold?: Explaining the Union of 1707, Second edition, 2001, Tuckwell Press, East Linton, Scotland, 978-1-86232-140-3, BOOK, Riley, P.W.J., The Union of England and Scotland: A Study in Anglo-Scottish Politics of the Eighteenth Century, 1978, Rowman and Littlefield, Totowa, New Jersey, 978-0-8476-6155-8, Eventually, in 1707, both Parliaments agreed on an Act of Union, which united England and Scotland into a single political entity, the Kingdom of Great Britain, and established the rules of succession as laid down by the Act of Settlement 1701.{{UK-LEG|path=aep/Ann/6/11/contents|title=Union with Scotland Act 1706}} The union created the largest free trade area in 18th-century Europe.WEB,weblink The Treaty of Union, The Scottish Parliament, 20 August 2007,weblink" title="">weblink 18 May 2007, Whig politicians believed Parliament had the right to determine the succession, and to bestow it on the nearest Protestant relative of the Queen, while many Tories were more inclined to believe in the hereditary right of the Catholic Stuarts, who were nearer relations. In 1710, George announced that he would succeed in Britain by hereditary right, as the right had been removed from the Stuarts, and he retained it. "This declaration was meant to scotch any Whig interpretation that parliament had given him the kingdom [and] ... convince the Tories that he was no usurper."Hatton, p. 119George's mother, the Electress Sophia, died on 28 May 1714{{efn|8 June in the New Style Gregorian calendar adopted by Hanover in 1700.}} at the age of 83. She had collapsed in the gardens at Herrenhausen after rushing to shelter from a shower of rain. George was now Queen Anne's heir presumptive. He swiftly revised the membership of the Regency Council that would take power after Anne's death, as it was known that Anne's health was failing and politicians in Britain were jostling for power.Hatton, p. 108 She suffered a stroke, which left her unable to speak, and died on 1 August 1714. The list of regents was opened, the members sworn in, and George was proclaimed King of Great Britain and Ireland.Hatton, p. 109 Partly due to contrary winds, which kept him in The Hague awaiting passage,Hatton, p. 123 he did not arrive in Britain until 18 September. George was crowned at Westminster Abbey on 20 October. His coronation was accompanied by rioting in over twenty towns in England.BOOK, Paul Kleber, Monod, Jacobitism and the English People, 1688–1788, Cambridge University Press, 1993, 173–178, 978-0-521-44793-5, George mainly lived in Great Britain after 1714, though he visited his home in Hanover in 1716, 1719, 1720, 1723 and 1725;Hatton, p. 158 in total George spent about one fifth of his reign as king in Germany.Gibbs, G. C. (September 2004; online edn, January 2006) "George I (1660–1727)", Oxford Dictionary of National Biography, Oxford University Press, {{doi|10.1093/ref:odnb/10538}}. Retrieved 30 July 2007 (subscription required) A clause in the Act of Settlement that forbade the British monarch from leaving the country without Parliament's permission was unanimously repealed in 1716.BOOK, Plumb, J. H., John H. Plumb, The First Four Georges, 1956, During all but the first of the king's absences power was vested in a Regency Council rather than in his son, George Augustus, Prince of Wales.WEB,weblink George I, Official web site of the British monarchy, 18 April 2016, 30 December 2015,

Wars and rebellions

File:George I Vertue Kneller.jpg|thumb|George in 1718, by George Vertue, after Sir Godfrey Kneller ]]Within a year of George's accession the Whigs won an overwhelming victory in the general election of 1715. Several members of the defeated Tory Party sympathised with the Jacobites, who sought to replace George with Anne's Catholic half-brother, James Francis Edward Stuart (called "James III and VIII" by his supporters and "the Pretender" by his opponents). Some disgruntled Tories sided with a Jacobite rebellion, which became known as "The Fifteen". James's supporters, led by Lord Mar, an embittered Scottish nobleman who had previously served as a secretary of state, instigated rebellion in Scotland where support for Jacobitism was stronger than in England. "The Fifteen", however, was a dismal failure; Lord Mar's battle plans were poor, and James arrived late with too little money and too few arms. By the end of the year the rebellion had all but collapsed. In February 1716, facing defeat, James and Lord Mar fled to France. After the rebellion was defeated, although there were some executions and forfeitures, George acted to moderate the Government's response, showed leniency, and spent the income from the forfeited estates on schools for Scotland and paying off part of the national debt.Hatton, pp. 174–79George's distrust of the Tories aided the passing of power to the Whigs.BOOK, Williams, Basil, Basil Williams (historian), Revised by C. H. Stuart, 1962, The Whig Supremacy 1714–1760. Second edition, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 151–152, Whig dominance grew to be so great under George that the Tories did not return to power for another half-century. After the election, the Whig-dominated Parliament passed the Septennial Act 1715, which extended the maximum duration of Parliament to seven years (although it could be dissolved earlier by the Sovereign).WEB,weblink Septennial Act 1715 (c.38), The UK Statute Law Database, Ministry of Justice, 20 August 2007, yes,weblink 30 September 2007, dmy, Thus Whigs already in power could remain in such a position for a greater period of time.JOURNAL, Lease, Owen C., The Septennial Act of 1716, The Journal of Modern History, 1950, 22, 42–47, 10.1086/237317, After his accession in Great Britain, George's relationship with his son (which had always been poor) worsened. George Augustus, Prince of Wales, encouraged opposition to his father's policies, including measures designed to increase religious freedom in Britain and expand Hanover's German territories at Sweden's expense.Hatton, pp. 199–202 In 1717 the birth of a grandson led to a major quarrel between George and the Prince of Wales. The king, supposedly following custom, appointed the Lord Chamberlain, the Duke of Newcastle, as one of the baptismal sponsors of the child. The king was angered when the Prince of Wales, disliking Newcastle, verbally insulted the Duke at the christening, which the Duke misunderstood as a challenge to a duel. The Prince was told to leave the royal residence, St. James's Palace.Hatton, pp. 207–208 The Prince's new home, Leicester House, became a meeting place for the king's political opponents.BOOK, Dickinson, Harry T., Walpole and the Whig Supremacy, 1973, The English Universities Press, London, 978-0-340-11515-2, 52, George and his son were later reconciled at the insistence of Robert Walpole and the desire of the Princess of Wales, who had moved out with her husband but missed her children, who had been left in the king's care. But after the quarrel at the baptism, father and son were never again on cordial terms.JOURNAL, Arkell, R. L., George I's Letters to His Daughter, The English Historical Review, 1937, 52, 492–499, 10.1093/ehr/LII.CCVII.492, George was active in directing British foreign policy during his early reign. In 1717 he contributed to the creation of the Triple Alliance, an anti-Spanish league composed of Great Britain, France and the Dutch Republic. In 1718 the Holy Roman Empire was added to the body, which became known as the Quadruple Alliance. The subsequent War of the Quadruple Alliance involved the same issue as the War of the Spanish Succession. The Treaty of Utrecht (1713) had recognised the grandson of King Louis XIV of France, Philip, as king of Spain on the condition that he gave up his rights to succeed to the French throne. But upon Louis XIV's death in 1715, Philip sought to overturn the treaty.Spain supported a Jacobite-led invasion of Scotland in 1719, but stormy seas allowed only about three hundred Spanish troops to reach Scotland.Hatton, p. 239 A base was established at Eilean Donan Castle on the west Scottish coast in April, only to be destroyed by British ships a month later.BOOK, Lenman, Bruce, The Jacobite Risings in Britain 1689–1746, 1980, Eyre Methuen, London, 978-0-413-39650-1, 192–193, Jacobite attempts to recruit Scottish clansmen yielded a fighting force of only about a thousand men. The Jacobites were poorly equipped and were easily defeated by British artillery at the Battle of Glen Shiel.BOOK, Szechi, Daniel, The Jacobites: Britain and Europe 1688–1788, 1994, Manchester University Press, Manchester and New York, 978-0-7190-3774-0, 109–110, The clansmen dispersed into the Highlands, and the Spaniards surrendered. The invasion never posed any serious threat to George's government. With the French now fighting against him, Philip's armies fared poorly. As a result, the Spanish and French thrones remained separate. Simultaneously, Hanover gained from the resolution of the Great Northern War, which had been caused by rivalry between Sweden and Russia for control of the Baltic. The Swedish territories of Bremen and Verden were ceded to Hanover in 1719, with Hanover paying Sweden monetary compensation for the loss of territory.Hatton, p. 238


File:10 Münzkabinett (8).JPG|thumb|A 1714 silver medallion from the reign of George I, referring to his accession in Great Britain. The Saxon SteedSaxon SteedFile:George I Quarter Guinea 641648.jpg|thumb|A 1718 quarter-guinea coin from the reign of George I, showing him in profile]]In Hanover, the king was an absolute monarch. All government expenditure above 50 thalers (between 12 and 13 British pounds), and the appointment of all army officers, all ministers, and even government officials above the level of copyist, was in his personal control. By contrast in Great Britain, George had to govern through Parliament.Williams, pp. 13–14In 1715 when the Whigs came to power, George's chief ministers included Sir Robert Walpole, Lord Townshend (Walpole's brother-in-law), Lord Stanhope and Lord Sunderland. In 1717 Lord Townshend was dismissed, and Walpole resigned from the Cabinet over disagreements with their colleagues;Dickinson, p. 49 Lord Stanhope became supreme in foreign affairs, and Lord Sunderland the same in domestic matters.BOOK, Carswell, John, 1960, The South Sea Bubble, London, Cresset Press, 72, Lord Sunderland's power began to wane in 1719. He introduced a Peerage Bill that attempted to limit the size of the House of Lords by restricting new creations. The measure would have solidified Sunderland's control of the House by preventing the creation of opposition peers, but it was defeated after Walpole led the opposition to the bill by delivering what was considered "the most brilliant speech of his career".Hatton, pp. 244–246 Walpole and Townshend were reappointed as ministers the following year and a new, supposedly unified, Whig government formed.Greater problems arose over financial speculation and the management of the national debt. Certain government bonds could not be redeemed without the consent of the bondholder and had been issued when interest rates were high; consequently each bond represented a long-term drain on public finances, as bonds were hardly ever redeemed.Carswell, p. 103 In 1719 the South Sea Company proposed to take over £31 million (three fifths) of the British national debt by exchanging government securities for stock in the company.Carswell, p. 104; Hatton, p. 249 and Williams, p. 176 The Company bribed Lord Sunderland, George's mistress Melusine von der Schulenburg, and Lord Stanhope's cousin, Charles Stanhope, who was Secretary of the Treasury, to support their plan.Carswell, p. 115 and Hatton, p. 251 The Company enticed bondholders to convert their high-interest, irredeemable bonds to low-interest, easily tradeable stocks by offering apparently preferential financial gains.Carswell, pp. 151–152; Dickinson, p. 58; and Hatton, p. 250 Company prices rose rapidly; the shares had cost £128 on 1 January 1720,BOOK, Erleigh, Viscount, Gerald Isaacs, 2nd Marquess of Reading, 1933, The South Sea Bubble, Manchester, Peter Davies Ltd, 65, but were valued at £500 when the conversion scheme opened in May.Erleigh, p. 70 On 24 June the price reached a peak of £1,050.Dickinson, p. 58; Erleigh, pp. 77, 104; and Hatton, p. 251 The company's success led to the speculative flotation of other companies, some of a bogus nature,Dickinson, p. 59 and Erleigh, pp. 72, 90–96 and the Government, in an attempt to suppress these schemes and with the support of the Company, passed the Bubble Act.Dickinson, p. 59 and Erleigh, pp. 99–100 With the rise in the market now halted,Dickinson, p. 59 uncontrolled selling began in August, which caused the stock to plummet to £150 by the end of September. Many individuals—including aristocrats—lost vast sums and some were completely ruined.Erleigh, pp. 112–117 George, who had been in Hanover since June, returned to London in November—sooner than he wanted or was usual—at the request of the ministry.Erleigh, p. 125 and Hatton, p. 254The economic crisis, known as the South Sea Bubble, made George and his ministers extremely unpopular.Erleigh, pp. 147–155 and Williams, p. 177 In 1721 Lord Stanhope, though personally innocent,Erleigh, p. 129; Hatton, p. 255 and Williams, p. 176BOOK, Black, Jeremy, Jeremy Black (historian), Walpole in Power, 2001, Sutton Publishing, Stroud, Gloucestershire, UK, 978-0-7509-2523-5, 20, collapsed and died after a stressful debate in the House of Lords, and Lord Sunderland resigned from public office.Sunderland, however, retained a degree of personal influence with George until his sudden death in 1722 allowed the rise of Sir Robert Walpole. Walpole became de facto Prime Minister, although the title was not formally applied to him (officially, he was First Lord of the Treasury and Chancellor of the Exchequer). His management of the South Sea crisis, by rescheduling the debts and arranging some compensation, helped the return to financial stability.Black, pp. 19–20, and Dickinson, pp. 61–62 Through Walpole's skilful management of Parliament, George managed to avoid direct implication in the Company's fraudulent actions.Dickinson, p. 63 Claims that George had received free stock as a bribee.g. Black, pp. 19–20 are not supported by evidence; indeed receipts in the Royal Archives show that he paid for his subscriptions and that he lost money in the crash.Hatton, pp. 251–253

Later years

(File:George-I lafontaine2.jpg|thumb|left|1720s portrait of George by Georg Wilhelm Lafontaine)As requested by Walpole, George revived the Order of the Bath in 1725, which enabled Walpole to reward or gain political supporters by offering them the honour.WEB,weblink Order of the Bath, Official website of the British monarchy, 7 September 2009, yes,weblink" title="">weblink 2 January 2012, dmy, Walpole became extremely powerful and was largely able to appoint ministers of his own choosing. Unlike his predecessor, Queen Anne, George rarely attended meetings of the cabinet; most of his communications were in private, and he only exercised substantial influence with respect to British foreign policy. With the aid of Lord Townshend, he arranged for the ratification by Great Britain, France and Prussia of the Treaty of Hanover, which was designed to counterbalance the Austro-Spanish Treaty of Vienna and protect British trade.Hatton, p. 274George, although increasingly reliant on Walpole, could still have replaced his ministers at will. Walpole was actually afraid of being removed from office towards the end of George I's reign,"George I" (1911). Encyclopædia Britannica, 11th edition. London: Cambridge University Press. but such fears were put to an end when George died during his sixth trip to his native Hanover since his accession as king. He suffered a stroke on the road between Delden and Nordhorn on 9 June 1727,Hatton, p. 282 and was taken by carriage to the Prince-Bishop's palace at Osnabrück{{efn|His younger brother, Ernest Augustus, Duke of York and Albany, was Prince-Bishop of Osnabrück from 1715 until 1728.}} where he died in the early hours before dawn on 11 June 1727.{{efn|22 June in the New Style Gregorian calendar adopted by Hanover in 1700.}} He was buried in the chapel of Leine Palace in Hanover, but his remains were moved to the chapel at Herrenhausen Gardens after World War II. Leine Palace had burnt out entirely after British aerial bombings and the king's remains, along with his parents', were moved to the 19th-century mausoleum of King Ernest Augustus in the Berggarten.Helmut Knocke, Hugo Thielen: Mausoleum in: Hannover. Kunst- und Kultur-Lexikon, 4. Ed. 2007, p. 92.George was succeeded by his son, George Augustus, who took the throne as George II. It was widely assumed, even by Walpole for a time, that George II planned to remove Walpole from office but was prevented from doing so by his wife, Caroline of Ansbach. However, Walpole commanded a substantial majority in Parliament and George II had little choice but to retain him or risk ministerial instability.Black, pp. 29–31, 53, and 61 In subsequent reigns the power of the prime minister increased further at the expense of the power of the sovereign.


File:GeorgeIThornhill.jpg|thumb|George surrounded by his family, in a painting by James ThornhillJames Thornhill(File:Georg I. Ludwig (George Louis), Kurfürst von Braunschweig-Lüneburg, König von Großbritannien und Irland und Titularkönig von Frankreich, Skulptur vom Bildhauer Carl (Karl) Rangenier, um 1862, Welfenschloss Hannover.jpg|upright|thumb|Statue of George I by Carl Rangenier in Hanover)George was ridiculed by his British subjects;Hatton, p. 291 some of his contemporaries, such as Lady Mary Wortley Montagu, thought him unintelligent on the grounds that he was wooden in public.Hatton, p. 172 Though he was unpopular in Great Britain due to his supposed inability to speak English, such an inability may not have existed later in his reign as documents from that time show that he understood, spoke and wrote English.Hatton, p. 131 He certainly spoke fluent German and French, good Latin, and some Italian and Dutch. His treatment of his wife, Sophia Dorothea, became something of a scandal.BOOK, Ashley, Mike, The Mammoth Book of British Kings and Queens, 1998, Robinson, London, 978-1-84119-096-9, 672, The British perceived him as too German, and in the opinion of historian Ragnhild Hatton, wrongly assumed that he had a succession of German mistresses.Hatton, pp. 132–136 However, in mainland Europe, he was seen as a progressive ruler supportive of the Enlightenment who permitted his critics to publish without risk of severe censorship, and provided sanctuary to Voltaire when the philosopher was exiled from Paris in 1726. European and British sources agree that George was reserved, temperate and financially prudent; George disliked to be in the public light at social events, avoided the royal box at the opera and often travelled incognito to the house of a friend to play cards. Despite some unpopularity, the Protestant George I was seen by most of his subjects as a better alternative to the Roman Catholic pretender James. William Makepeace Thackeray indicates such ambivalent feelings as he wrote: }}Writers of the nineteenth century, such as Thackeray, Sir Walter Scott and Lord Mahon, were reliant on biased first-hand accounts published in the previous century such as Lord Hervey's memoirs, and looked back on the Jacobite cause with romantic, even sympathetic, eyes. They in turn, influenced British authors of the first half of the twentieth century such as G. K. Chesterton, who introduced further anti-German and anti-Protestant bias into the interpretation of George's reign. However, in the wake of World War II continental European archives were opened to historians of the later twentieth century and nationalistic anti-German feeling subsided. George's life and reign were re-explored by scholars such as Beattie and Hatton, and his character, abilities and motives re-assessed in a more generous light.BOOK, Smith, Hannah, Georgian Monarchy: Politics and Culture, 1714–1760, 2006, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 978-0-521-82876-5, 3–9, John H. Plumb noted that: }}Yet the character of George I remains elusive; he was in turn genial and affectionate in private letters to his daughter, and then dull and awkward in public. Perhaps his own mother summed him up when "explaining to those who regarded him as cold and overserious that he could be jolly, that he took things to heart, that he felt deeply and sincerely and was more sensitive than he cared to show." Whatever his true character, he ascended a precarious throne, and either by political wisdom and guile, or through accident and indifference, he left it secure in the hands of the Hanoverians and of Parliament.

Titles, styles and arms

Titles and styles


As King his arms were: Quarterly, I, Gules three lions passant guardant in pale Or (for England) impaling Or a lion rampant within a tressure flory-counter-flory Gules (for Scotland); II, Azure three fleurs-de-lis Or (for France); III, Azure a harp Or stringed Argent (for Ireland); IV, tierced per pale and per chevron (for Hanover), I Gules two lions passant guardant Or (for Brunswick), II Or a semy of hearts Gules a lion rampant Azure (for Lüneburg), III Gules a horse courant Argent (for Westphalia), overall an escutcheon Gules charged with the crown of Charlemagne Or (for the dignity of Archtreasurer of the Holy Roman Empire).Williams, p. 12BOOK, Louda, Jiří, Maclagan, Michael, Lines of Succession: Heraldry of the Royal Families of Europe, 1999, Little, Brown, London, 978-1-85605-469-0, 29, BOOK, Pinches, John Harvey, John Pinches, Pinches, Rosemary, The Royal Heraldry of England, Heraldry Today, 1974, Hollen Street Press, Slough, Buckinghamshire, 978-0-900455-25-4, 203, {| border="0" align="center" width="75%" style="table-layout:fixed"!(File:Coat of Arms of George I Louis, Elector of Hanover (1698-1708).svg|center|90px)!(File:Coat of Arms of George I Louis, Elector of Hanover (1708-1714).svg|center|90px)!(File:Coat of Arms of Great Britain (1714-1801).svg|center|200px)|Arms of George I Louis as Elector-Designate of Hanover 1689–1708|Arms of George I Louis as Elector of Hanover 1708–1714|Coat of Arms of George I as King of Great Britain 1714–1727">

Issue{| class"wikitable"

!Name!! Birth!! Death!!MarriageBy his wife, Sophia Dorothea of Celle:George II of Great Britain>|married 1705 Caroline of Ansbach; had issueSophia Dorothea of Hanover>|married 1706 Frederick William, Margrave of Brandenburg (later Frederick William I of Prussia); had issueBy his mistress, Melusine von der Schulenburg:Charles VI, Holy Roman Emperor, in 1722Kilburn, Matthew (2004; online edition January 2008) "Schulenburg, (Ehrengard) Melusine von der, suo jure duchess of Kendal and suo jure duchess of Munster (1667–1743)", Oxford Dictionary of National Biography, Oxford University Press, {{doi>10.1093/ref:odnb/24834}} {{ODNBsub}}Melusina von der Schulenburg, Countess of Walsingham>(Petronilla) Melusina von der Schulenburg16931778created Countess of Walsingham for life; married 1733 Philip Stanhope, 4th Earl of Chesterfield; no issueJohn Cannon (historian) (2004; online edition September 2012) "Petronilla Melusina Stanhope, suo jure countess of Walsingham, and countess of Chesterfield (1693–1778)", Oxford Dictionary of National Biography, Oxford University Press, {{doi>10.1093/ref:odnb/24835}} {{ODNBsub}}|married 1722 Albrecht Wolfgang, Count of Schaumburg-LippeDates in this table are New Style.

Family tree

{{familytree/start}}{{familytree |border=0| | | | | |Jim|y|Anne| |Jim=James VI and I|Anne=Anne of Denmark}}{{familytree |border=0| | | | | |,|-|-|^|-|-|.|}}{{familytree |border=0| | | | |Charlie| | | |Betty|y|Fred| | |George|y|Anne|Charlie=Charles I of England|Betty=Elizabeth of Bohemia|George=George, Duke of Brunswick-Lüneburg|Fred=Frederick V, Elector Palatine|Anne=Anne Eleonore of Hesse-Darmstadt}}{{familytree | |,|-|-|-|+|-|-|-|.| | | |!| | | | | | |,|-|^|-|.|}}{{familytree |border=0|Mary| |Charlie| |Jim| |Sophia|~|~|y|~|Ernest| |George| |Jim=James II of England|Charlie=Charles II of England|Mary=Mary, Princess Royal|Sophia=Sophia of Hanover|Ernest=Ernest Augustus, Elector of Brunswick-Lüneburg|George=George William, Duke of Brunswick-Lüneburg}}{{familytree | |!| | | |,|-|-|-|+|-|-|-|.| | | |!| | | | | | |!|}}{{familytree |border=0|Bill|~|Mary| |Anne| |Jim| |George|~|~|~|~|Sophia|Bill=William III of England|Mary=Mary II of England|Anne=Anne, Queen of Great Britain|Jim=James Francis Edward|George=George I of Great Britain|Sophia=Sophia Dorothea of Celle}}{{familytree | | | | | | | | | |!| | | | | | | |}}{{familytree |border=0| | | | | | | | |Will| | | | | | | | | | |Will=William, Duke of Gloucester}}{{familytree/end}}






  • BOOK, Black, Jeremy, Jeremy Black (historian), Walpole in Power, 2001, Sutton Publishing, Stroud, Gloucestershire, 978-0-7509-2523-5,
  • BOOK, Carswell, John, J. P. Carswell, 1960, The South Sea Bubble, London, Cresset Press,
  • BOOK, Dickinson, Harry T., Introduced by A. L. Rowse, Walpole and the Whig Supremacy, 1973, The English Universities Press, London, 978-0-340-11515-2,
  • BOOK, Erleigh, Viscount, Gerald Isaacs, 2nd Marquess of Reading, 1933, The South Sea Bubble, Manchester, Peter Davies Ltd,
  • Gibbs, G. C. (September 2004; online edn, January 2006) "George I (1660–1727)", Oxford Dictionary of National Biography, Oxford University Press, {{doi|10.1093/ref:odnb/10538}}. Retrieved 30 July 2007 (subscription required)
  • BOOK, Hatton, Ragnhild, Ragnhild Hatton, George I: Elector and King, 1978, Thames and Hudson, London, 978-0-500-25060-0,
  • BOOK, Plumb, J. H., John H. Plumb, The First Four Georges, 1956,
  • BOOK, Williams, Basil, Basil Williams (historian), Revised by C. H. Stuart, 1962, The Whig Supremacy 1714–1760. Second edition, Oxford, Oxford University Press,

Further reading

  • JOURNAL, Beattie, John M., J. M. Beattie, The Court of George I and English Politics, 1717–1720, English Historical Review, 81, 318, 1966, 26–37, 559897,
    • BOOK, Beattie, John M., The English Court in the Reign of George I, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1967,
  • BOOK, Black, Jeremy, Politics and Foreign Policy in the Age of George I, 1714–1727, 2014, Ashgate, Burlington, Vermont, 978-1-409-43140-4,
  • BOOK, Bultmann, William A., Early Hanoverian England (1714–1760): Some Recent Writings, Elizabeth, Chapin Furber, Changing views on British history: essays on historical writing since 1939, Harvard University Press, 1966, 181–205,
  • BOOK, Marlow, Joyce, Introduction by Antonia Fraser, The life and times of George I, 1973, Weidenfeld and Nicolson, London, 978-0-297-76592-9,
  • BOOK, Michael, Wolfgang, Wolfgang Michael, Translated/adapted by Lewis Namier, England under George I (2 volumes), 1936–39,
  • BOOK, Smith, Hannah, Georgian Monarchy: Politics and Culture, 1714–1760, Cambridge University Press, 2006,

External links

  • {{UK National Archives ID|F41970}}
  • {{NPG name|name=King George I}}
{{English, Scottish and British monarchs}}{{Rulers of Hanover}}{{Kingdom of Great Britain}}{{featured article}}{{Authority control}}

- content above as imported from Wikipedia
- "George I of Great Britain" does not exist on GetWiki (yet)
- time: 1:41pm EDT - Tue, Jul 23 2019
[ this remote article is provided by Wikipedia ]
LATEST EDITS [ see all ]
Eastern Philosophy
History of Philosophy
M.R.M. Parrott