# GetWiki

*Formal proof*

ARTICLE SUBJECTS

being →

database →

ethics →

fiction →

history →

internet →

language →

linux →

logic →

method →

news →

policy →

purpose →

religion →

science →

software →

truth →

unix →

wiki →

ARTICLE TYPES

essay →

feed →

help →

system →

wiki →

ARTICLE ORIGINS

critical →

forked →

imported →

original →

Formal proof

[ temporary import ]

**please note:**

- the content below is remote from Wikipedia

- it has been imported raw for GetWiki

**formal proof**or

**derivation**is a finite sequence of sentences (called well-formed formulas in the case of a formal language), each of which is an axiom, an assumption, or follows from the preceding sentences in the sequence by a rule of inference. If the set of assumptions is empty, then the last sentence in a formal proof is called a theorem of the formal system. The notion of theorem is not in general effective, therefore there may be no method by which we can always find a proof of a given sentence or determine that none exists. The concept of natural deduction is a generalization of the concept of proof.The Cambridge Dictionary of Philosophy,

*deduction*The theorem is a syntactic consequence of all the well-formed formulas preceding it in the proof. For a well-formed formula to qualify as part of a proof, it must be the result of applying a rule of the deductive apparatus of some formal system to the previous well-formed formulae in the proof sequence. Formal proofs often are constructed with the help of computers in interactive theorem proving. Significantly, these proofs can be checked automatically, also by computer. Checking formal proofs is usually simple, while the problem of

*finding*proofs (automated theorem proving) is usually computationally intractable and/or only semi-decidable, depending upon the formal system in use.

## Background

### Formal language

*formal language*is a set of finite sequences of symbols. Such a language can be defined without reference to any meanings of any of its expressions; it can exist before any interpretation is assigned to it – that is, before it has any meaning. Formal proofs are expressed in some formal languages.

### Formal grammar

A*formal grammar*(also called

*formation rules*) is a precise description of the well-formed formulas of a formal language. It is synonymous with the set of strings over the alphabet of the formal language which constitute well formed formulas. However, it does not describe their semantics (i.e. what they mean).

### Formal systems

A*formal system*(also called a

*logical calculus*, or a

*logical system*) consists of a formal language together with a deductive apparatus (also called a

*deductive system*). The deductive apparatus may consist of a set of transformation rules (also called

*inference rules*) or a set of axioms, or have both. A formal system is used to derive one expression from one or more other expressions.

### Interpretations

An*interpretation*of a formal system is the assignment of meanings to the symbols, and values to the sentences of a formal system. The study of interpretations is called formal semantics.

*Giving an interpretation*is synonymous with ''constructing a model.

## See also

## References

{{reflist}}## External links

- WEB, A Special Issue on Formal Proof,weblink Notices of the American Mathematical Society, December 2008,
- weblink" title="web.archive.org/web/20090908075745weblink">2Ï€ix.com: Logic Part of a series of articles covering mathematics and logic.
- Archive of Formal Proofs
- Mizar Home Page

**- content above as imported from Wikipedia**

- "

- time: 8:26pm EST - Tue, Dec 11 2018

- "

__Formal proof__" does not exist on GetWiki (yet)- time: 8:26pm EST - Tue, Dec 11 2018

[ this remote article is provided by Wikipedia ]

LATEST EDITS [ see all ]

GETWIKI 09 MAY 2016

GETWIKI 18 OCT 2015

GETWIKI 20 AUG 2014

GETWIKI 19 AUG 2014

GETWIKI 18 AUG 2014

© 2018 M.R.M. PARROTT | ALL RIGHTS RESERVED