SUPPORT THE WORK

GetWiki

Book of Nepos

ARTICLE SUBJECTS
aesthetics  →
being  →
complexity  →
database  →
enterprise  →
ethics  →
fiction  →
history  →
internet  →
knowledge  →
language  →
licensing  →
linux  →
logic  →
method  →
news  →
perception  →
philosophy  →
policy  →
purpose  →
religion  →
science  →
sociology  →
software  →
truth  →
unix  →
wiki  →
ARTICLE TYPES
essay  →
feed  →
help  →
system  →
wiki  →
ARTICLE ORIGINS
critical  →
discussion  →
forked  →
imported  →
original  →
Book of Nepos
[ temporary import ]
please note:
- the content below is remote from Wikipedia
- it has been imported raw for GetWiki
{{refimprove|date=February 2011}}{{italic title}}The Book of Nepos is a lost 3rd century Christian text written by an Egyptian bishop Nepos,Eusebius' Ecclesiastical History, Book VII, Chapter XXIV 1. which advocated for a strictly literal interpretation of the Bible against allegorical readings. This included especially a literal reading of the Book of Revelation, a minority position at the time.

Extant portions

The Book of Nepos no longer exists, and is known only indirectly through Eusebius, who quoted a work by Dionysius of Alexandria criticizing Nepos.BOOK, Thomas A. Robinson, Thomas Arthur Robinson, Who Were the First Christians?: Dismantling the Urban Thesis,weblink 1 December 2016, Oxford University Press, 978-0-19-062054-7, 161, Nepos of Arsinoë, New Catholic Encyclopedia, (2003).

Theology and reception

Nepos was a strict literalist (believing the entire Bible is true in a literal sense), and his text, also known as the Refutation of the Allegorisers or Refutation of the Allegorists was aimed at refuting the arguments of those who held that certain sections of the Bible were mere allegory.Eusebius' Ecclesiastical History, Book VII, Chapter XXIV 1-2. In particular, the text is aimed at discrediting the position, held by a minority of Christians at the time, that the book of Revelation should be interpreted allegorically rather than literally.Amongst the teachings in the text is the belief that Jesus would come to earth and physically reign as monarch for 1000 years during an age of righteous delight. This belief was regarded as fairly orthodox in the early church (e.g. it was held by Irenaeus, and Justin Martyr), however, the later church came to view Revelation as more allegorical. Indeed, Dionysius of Alexandria felt moved to write a text (On the Promises) against it, although he regarded Nepos highly and attempted to criticize the doctrine without insulting Nepos personally.The Book of Nepos was so popular within the villages around Alexandria that Dionysius went there in person to refute it.Eusebius' Ecclesiastical History, Book VII, Chapter XXIV 3. In deference to Nepos and the prior orthodoxy of strict literalism, he did so politely, entering a respectful dialogue with those from the village and contesting each of the arguments they took from the Book of Nepos in turn.

References

{{reflist}}{{Authority control}}{{Christian-book-stub}}

- content above as imported from Wikipedia
- "Book of Nepos" does not exist on GetWiki (yet)
- time: 3:52pm EDT - Mon, Jun 24 2019
[ this remote article is provided by Wikipedia ]
LATEST EDITS [ see all ]
GETWIKI 09 MAY 2016
GETWIKI 18 OCT 2015
M.R.M. Parrott
Biographies
GETWIKI 20 AUG 2014
GETWIKI 19 AUG 2014
GETWIKI 18 AUG 2014
Wikinfo
Culture
CONNECT