Battle of Manzikert

aesthetics  →
being  →
complexity  →
database  →
enterprise  →
ethics  →
fiction  →
history  →
internet  →
knowledge  →
language  →
licensing  →
linux  →
logic  →
method  →
news  →
perception  →
philosophy  →
policy  →
purpose  →
religion  →
science  →
sociology  →
software  →
truth  →
unix  →
wiki  →
essay  →
feed  →
help  →
system  →
wiki  →
critical  →
discussion  →
forked  →
imported  →
original  →
Battle of Manzikert
[ temporary import ]
please note:
- the content below is remote from Wikipedia
- it has been imported raw for GetWiki
{{Use dmy dates|date=August 2018}}

conflict Battle of Manzikert | partof = the Byzantine–Seljuq wars| image = 131 Bataille de Malazgirt.jpg| image_size = 250px| caption = In this 15th-century French miniature depicting the Battle of Manzikert, the combatants are clad in contemporary Western European armour.| date = 26 August 1071

Theme of IberiaNesbitt, John and Eric McGeer. Catalogue Of Byzantine Seals At Dumbarton Oaks And In The Fogg Museum Of Art. 1st ed. Washington, DC: N.p., 2001. Print.Church, Kenneth. From Dynastic Principality To Imperial District. 1st ed. 2001. Print./Armeniac Theme>Byzantine ArmeniaThe Cambridge Medieval History. — Cambridge University Press, 1986. — vol. 6. — p. 791: "In 1071, five years after Hastings, the Byzantine army, the oldest and best trained military force in Europe, was destroyed in battle with the Seljuq Turks at Manzikert in Armenia."Steven Runciman. A History of the Crusades. — Cambridge University Press, 1987. — vol. 1. — p. 62-63: "With this large but untrustworthy army Romanus set out in the spring of 1071 to reconquer Armenia. As he was leaving the capital the news came through from Italy that Bary, the last Byzantine possession in the peninsula, had fallen to the Normans. The chroniclers tell in tragic detail of the Emperor's march eastward along the great Byzantine military road. His intention was to capture and garrison the Armenian fortresses before the Turkish army should come up from the south. Alp Arslan was in Syria, near Aleppo, when he heard of the Byzantine advance. He realized how vital was the challenge; and he hurried northward to meet the Emperor. Romanus entered Armenia along the southern branch of the upper Euphrates. Near Manzikert he divided his forces."(present-day Malazgirt, Turkey)Seljuk Empire>Seljuk victory
    combatant1 Byzantine Empire
    combatant2 Seljuk Empire
    Romanos IV{{surrendered}}Nikephoros Bryennios the Elder>Nikephoros BryenniosTheodore AlyatesAndronikos DoukasAlp ArslanAfshin BeyArtuk BeySuleiman ibn Qutulmish>Kutalmışoğlu SuleymanHaldonp=173}}(Orig. 40,000; half deserted before battle. Turkic mercenaries defected to the Seljuk side)DATE= URL=HTTPS://DEREMILITARI.ORG/2013/09/THE-BATTLE-OF-MANZIKERT-MILITARY-DISASTER-OR-POLITICAL-FAILURE/ POSTSCRIPT=, {{Harvnb2001|p=172}}Haldonp=180}}.-8,000 killed4,000 captured20,000 deserted{{Harvnb2001|p=173}}| casualties2 = unknown}}{{Campaignbox Byzantine-Seljuk War}}The Battle of Manzikert was fought between the Byzantine Empire and the Seljuk Empire on 26 August 1071 near Manzikert, theme of Iberia (modern Malazgirt in Muş Province, Turkey). The decisive defeat of the Byzantine army and the capture of the Emperor Romanos IV Diogenes played an important role in undermining Byzantine authority in Anatolia and Armenia,JOURNAL, Holt, Peter Malcolm, Lambton, Ann Katharine Swynford, Lewis, Bernard, yes, The Cambridge History of Islam, 1977, 231–232, harv, and allowed for the gradual Turkification of Anatolia. Many of the Turks, who had been travelling westward during the 11th century, saw the victory at Manzikert as an entrance to Asia Minor.Barber, Malcolm. “The Crusader States” Yale University Press. 2012. {{ISBN|978-0-300-11312-9}}. Page 9The brunt of the battle was borne by the professional soldiers from the eastern and western tagmata, as large numbers of mercenaries and Anatolian levies fled early and survived the battle. The fallout from Manzikert was disastrous for the Byzantines, resulting in civil conflicts and an economic crisis that severely weakened the Byzantine Empire's ability to adequately defend its borders.BOOK, Norwich, John Julius, A Short History of Byzantium, New York, Vintage Books, 1997, 241, 0-679-45088-2, This led to the mass movement of Turks into central Anatolia—by 1080, an area of {{convert|78000|km2|sqmi}} had been gained by the Seljuk Turks. It took three decades of internal strife before Alexius I (1081 to 1118) restored stability to Byzantium. Historian Thomas Asbridge says: "In 1071, the Seljuqs crushed an imperial army at the Battle of Manzikert (in eastern Asia Minor), and though historians no longer consider this to have been an utterly cataclysmic reversal for the Greeks, it still was a stinging setback."Thomas S. Asbridge The Crusades (2010) p 27 It was the first time in history a Byzantine Emperor had become the prisoner of a Muslim commander.Alp Arslan, the lion of Manzikert


    Although the Byzantine Empire had remained strong and powerful in the Middle Ages,BOOK, Konstam, Angus, Angus Konstam, The Crusades, London, Mercury Books, 2004, 40, 0-8160-4919-X, it began to decline under the reign of the militarily incompetent Constantine IX and again under Constantine X—a brief two-year period of reform under Isaac I merely delayed the decay of the Byzantine army.BOOK, Norwich, John Julius, John Julius Norwich, A Short History of Byzantium, New York, Vintage Books, 1997, 236, 0-679-45088-2, About 1053 Constantine IX disbanded what the 11th century Greek historian John Skylitzes calls the "Iberian Army", which consisted of 50,000 men and it was turned{{Clarify |date=July 2019 |reason=Grammatically incorrect and unclear; should 'turned' be 'termed'?}} as a contemporary Droungarios of the Watch. Skylitzes' contemporaries, the former officials Michael Attaleiates and Kekaumenos, agree that by demobilizing these soldiers Constantine did catastrophic harm to the Empire's eastern defenses. Constantine made a truce with the Seljuks that lasted until 1064, but a large Seljuk army under Alp Arslan attacked the theme of Iberia and took Ani; after a siege of 25 days, they captured the city and slaughtered its population.(File:Wikisource-logo.svg|link=|13x13px) Baynes, T.S., ed. (1878), "(wikisource:Encyclopædia Britannica, Ninth Edition/Anni|Anni)", Encyclopædia Britannica, 2 (9th ed.), New York: Charles Scribner's Sons, p. 72 In 1068 Romanos IV took power, and after some speedy military reforms entrusted Manuel Comnenus (nephew of Isaac I Comnenus) to lead an expedition against the Seljuks. Manuel captured Hierapolis Bambyce in Syria, next thwarted a Turkish attack against Iconium with a counter-attack, but was then defeated and captured by the Seljuks under the Sultan Alp Arslan. Despite his success Alp Arslan was quick to seek a peace treaty with the Byzantines, signed in 1069; he saw the Fatimids in Egypt as his main enemy and had no desire to be diverted by unnecessary hostilities.In February 1071, Romanos sent envoys to Alp Arslan to renew the 1069 treaty, and keen to secure his northern flank against attack, Alp Arslan happily agreed. Abandoning the siege of Edessa, he immediately led his army to attack Fatimid-held Aleppo. However, the peace treaty had been a deliberate distraction: Romanos now led a large army into Armenia to recover the lost fortresses before the Seljuks had time to respond.


    Accompanying Romanos was Andronicus Ducas, son of his rival, John Ducas. The army consisted of about {{formatnum:5000}} professional Byzantine troops from the western provinces and probably about the same number from the eastern provinces. This included 500 Frankish and Norman mercenaries under Roussel de Bailleul, some Turkic (Uz and Pecheneg) and Bulgarian mercenaries, infantry under the duke of Antioch, a contingent of Georgian and Armenian troops and some (but not all) of the Varangian Guard to total around 40,000 men.J. Haldon, The Byzantine Wars, 180 The quantity of the provincial troops had declined in the years prior to Romanos, as the government diverted funding to mercenaries who were judged less likely to be involved in politics and could be disbanded after use to save money.File:AlpArslan.PNG|thumb|left|Alp Arslan led the Seljuq Turks to victory against the Byzantine annexation of Manzikert in 1071.]]The march across Asia Minor was long and difficult and Romanos did not endear himself to his troops by bringing a luxurious baggage train along with him. The local population also suffered some plundering by his Frankish mercenaries, whom he was obliged to dismiss. The expedition rested at Sebasteia on the river Halys, reaching Theodosiopolis in June 1071. There, some of his generals suggested continuing the march into Seljuk territory and catching Alp Arslan before he was ready. Others, including Nicephorus Bryennius, suggested they wait and fortify their position. It was decided to continue the march.{{cn|date=August 2018}}Thinking that Alp Arslan was either further away or not coming at all, Romanos marched towards Lake Van, expecting to retake Manzikert rather quickly and the nearby fortress of Khliat if possible. Alp Arslan was already in the area, however, with allies and {{formatnum:30000}} cavalry from Aleppo and Mosul. Alp Arslan's scouts knew exactly where Romanos was, while Romanos was completely unaware of his opponent's movements.{{cn|date=August 2018}}File:Malazkirt Manzikert battle campaign map 1071.png|thumbnail|Having made peace with the Byzantines, the Seljuks intended to attack Egypt, until Alp Arslan learned in Aleppo of the Byzantine advance. He returned north and met the Byzantines north of Lake VanLake VanRomanos ordered his general Joseph Tarchaniotes to take some of the regular troops and the Varangians and accompany the Pechenegs and Franks to Khliat, while Romanos and the rest of the army marched to Manzikert. This split the forces into halves of about 20,000 men each. It is unknown what happened to the army sent off with Tarchaniotes — according to Islamic sources, Alp Arslan smashed this army, yet Roman sources make no mention of any such encounter and Attaliates suggests that Tarchaniotes fled at the sight of the Seljuk Sultan — an unlikely event considering the reputation of the Roman general. Either way, Romanos' army was reduced to less than half his planned 40,000 men.


    Alp Arslan summoned his army and delivered a speech by appearing in a white robe similar to an Islamic funeral shroud in the morning of the battle.Carole Hillenbrand (2007), Turkish Myth and Muslim Symbol: The Battle of Manzikert This was an encouraging message that he was ready to die in battle. Romanos was unaware of the loss of Tarchaneiotes and continued to Manzikert, which he easily captured on 23 August; the Seljuks responded with heavy incursions of bowmen.J. Norwich, Byzantium: The Apogee, 238 The next day, some foraging parties under Bryennios discovered the Seljuk army and were forced to retreat back to Manzikert. Romanos sent the Armenian general Basilakes and some cavalry, as Romanos did not believe this was Alp Arslan's full army. The cavalry was destroyed and Basilakes taken prisoner. Romanos drew up his troops into formation and sent the left wing out under Bryennios, who was almost surrounded by the quickly approaching Turks and was forced to retreat once more. The Seljuk forces hid among the nearby hills for the night, making it nearly impossible for Romanos to counterattack.BOOK, Konstam, Angus, The Crusades, London, Mercury Books, 2004, 41, 0-8160-4919-X, File:Byzantium vs Seljuk c 1071.png|thumb|300px|Byzantine territory (purple), Byzantine attacks (red) and Seljuk attacks (green)]]On 25 August, some of Romanos' Turkic mercenaries came into contact with their Seljuk kin and deserted. Romanos then rejected a Seljuk peace embassy. He wanted to settle the eastern question and the persistent Turkic incursions and settlements with a decisive military victory, and he understood that raising another army would be both difficult and expensive. The Emperor attempted to recall Tarchaneiotes, who was no longer in the area. There were no engagements that day, but on 26 August the Byzantine army gathered itself into a proper battle formation and began to march on the Turkish positions, with the left wing under Bryennios, the right wing under Theodore Alyates, and the centre under the emperor. At that moment, a Turkish soldier said to Alp Arslan, "My Sultan, the enemy army is approaching", and Alp Arslan is said to have replied, "Then we are also approaching them". Andronikos Doukas led the reserve forces in the rear—a foolish mistake, considering the loyalties of the Doukids. The Seljuks were organized into a crescent formation about four kilometres away.BOOK, Norwich, John Julius, A Short History of Byzantium, New York, Vintage Books, 1997, 239, 0-679-45088-2, Seljuk archers attacked the Byzantines as they drew closer; the centre of their crescent continually moved backwards while the wings moved to surround the Byzantine troops.The Byzantines held off the arrow attacks and captured Alp Arslan's camp by the end of the afternoon. However, the right and left wings, where the arrows did most of their damage, almost broke up when individual units tried to force the Seljuks into a pitched battle; the Seljuk cavalry simply disengaged when challenged, the classic hit and run tactics of steppe warriors. With the Seljuks avoiding battle, Romanos was forced to order a withdrawal by the time night fell. However, the right wing misunderstood the order, and Doukas, as a rival of Romanos, deliberately ignored the emperor and marched back to the camp outside Manzikert, rather than covering the emperor's retreat. With the Byzantines thoroughly confused, the Seljuks seized the opportunity and attacked.BOOK, Grant, R.G., Battle a Visual Journey Through 5000 Years of Combat, London, Dorling Kindersley, 2005, 77, 1-74033-593-7, The Byzantine right wing was almost immediately routed, thinking they were betrayed either by the Armenians or the army's Turkish auxiliaries. Some authors suppose that Armenians were the first to flee and they all managed to get away, while by contrast the Turkish auxiliaries remained loyal to the end.BOOK, Byzantine Armies, 886–1118, Ian, Heath, Angus, McBride, 1979, London, Osprey, 27, 0-85045-306-2, {{Google books, yes, RgkpDKYvb48C, 27, }} Other sources suggest that Armenian infantry were stoutly resisting and not turning tail and did not abandon the emperor as many had. When Romanos saw the boldness of the Armenian foot soldiers, he displayed great affection for them and promised them unheard of rewards. In the end, the emperor's personal troops and these Armenian foot soldiers suffered the heaviest casualties in the Byzantine army.Nicolle, David. Manzikert 1071: The breaking of Byzantium. Osprey Publishing (20 August 2013), pp. 80–81. {{ISBN|978-1780965031}} The left wing under Bryennios held out a little longer but was also soon routed.BOOK, Norwich, John Julius, A Short History of Byzantium, New York, Vintage Books, 1997, 240, 0-679-45088-2, The remnants of the Byzantine centre, including the Emperor and the Varangian Guard, were encircled by the Seljuks. Romanos was injured and taken prisoner by the Seljuks. The survivors were the many who fled the field and were pursued throughout the night, but not beyond that; by dawn, the professional core of the Byzantine army had been destroyed whilst many of the peasant troops and levies who had been under the command of Andronikus had fled.

    Captivity of Romanos Diogenes

    File:BnF Fr232 fol323 Alp Arslan Romanus.jpg|thumb|right|200px|Alp Arslan humiliating Emperor Romanos IV. From a 15th-century illustrated French translation of Boccaccio's De Casibus Virorum IllustriumDe Casibus Virorum IllustriumWhen Emperor Romanos IV was conducted into the presence of Alp Arslan, the Sultan refused to believe that the bloodied and tattered man covered in dirt was the mighty Emperor of the Romans. After discovering his identity, Alp Arslan placed his boot on the Emperor's neck and forced him to kiss the ground. A famous conversation is also reported to have taken place:Peoples, R. Scott (2013) Crusade of Kings Wildside Press LLC, 2008. p. 13. {{ISBN|0-8095-7221-4}}, {{ISBN|978-0-8095-7221-2}}(File:Manzikert.jpg|250px|thumb|left|Aftermath of the Battle of Manzikert, a diorama at the Istanbul Military Museum)
    Alp Arslan: "What would you do if I were brought before you as a prisoner?" Romanos: "Perhaps I'd kill you, or exhibit you in the streets of Constantinople." Alp Arslan: "My punishment is far heavier. I forgive you, and set you free."
    Alp Arslan treated Romanos with considerable kindness and again offered the terms of peace that he had offered prior to the battle.According to Ibn al-Adim, in the presence of Arslan, Romanos blamed the raids of Rashid al-Dawla Mahmud into Byzantine territory for his interventions in Muslim territories which eventually led to the Battle of Manzikert.BOOK, Carole Hillenbrand, Carole Hillenbrand, Turkish Myth and Muslim Symbol: The Battle of Manzikert, 2007, Edinburgh University Press, 9780748625727, 78, illustrated, Romanos remained a captive of the Sultan for a week. During this time, the Sultan allowed Romanos to eat at his table whilst concessions were agreed upon: Antioch, Edessa, Hierapolis, and Manzikert were to be surrendered. This would have left the vital core of Anatolia untouched. A payment of 10 million gold pieces demanded by the Sultan as a ransom for Romanos was deemed as too high by the latter, so the Sultan reduced its short-term expense by asking for 1.5 million gold pieces as an initial payment instead, followed by an annual sum of {{formatnum:360000}} gold pieces. Plus, a marriage alliance was prepared between Alp Arslan's son and Romanos’ daughter. The Sultan then gave Romanos many presents and an escort of two emirs and one hundred Mamluks on his route to Constantinople.Shortly after his return to his subjects, Romanos found his rule in serious trouble. Despite attempts to raise loyal troops, he was defeated three times in battle against the Doukas family and was deposed, blinded, and exiled to the island of Proti. He died soon after as a result of an infection caused by an injury during his brutal blinding. Romanos' final foray into the Anatolian heartland, which he had worked so hard to defend, was a public humiliation.


    File:Aftermath of Manzikert.png|300px|thumb|The Turks did not move into AnatoliaAnatoliaWhile Manzikert was a long-term strategic catastrophe for Byzantium, it was by no means the massacre that historians earlier presumed. Modern scholars estimate that Byzantine losses were relatively low,BOOK, Haldon, John, Byzantium at War 600–1453, New York, Osprey, 2000, 46, 0-415-96861-5, BOOK, Mikaberidze, Alexander, Conflict and Conquest in the Islamic World: A Historical Encyclopedia, ABC-CLIO, 2011, 563, 1-59884-336-2, considering that many units survived the battle intact and were fighting elsewhere within a few months, and most Byzantine prisoners of war were later released. Certainly, all the commanders on the Byzantine side (Doukas, Tarchaneiotes, Bryennios, de Bailleul, and, above all, the Emperor) survived and took part in later events.BOOK, Norwich, John Julius, A Short History of Byzantium, New York, Vintage Books, 1997, 240–3, 0-679-45088-2, . Andronikus returned to the capital, Tarchaneiotes did not take part, Bryennios and all the others, including Romanos, took part in the ensuing civil war. The battle did not directly change the balance of power between the Byzantines and the Seljuks, however the ensuing civil war within the Byzantine Empire did, to the advantage of the Seljuks.Doukas had escaped with no casualties and quickly marched back to Constantinople, where he led a coup against Romanos and proclaimed Michael VII as basileus. Bryennios also lost a few men in the rout of his wing. The Seljuks did not pursue the fleeing Byzantines, nor did they recapture Manzikert itself at this point. The Byzantine army regrouped and marched to Dokeia, where they were joined by Romanos when he was released a week later. The most serious loss materially seems to have been the emperor's extravagant baggage train.The result of this disastrous defeat was, in simplest terms, the loss of the Eastern Roman Empire's Anatolian heartland. John Julius Norwich says in his trilogy on the Byzantine Empire that the defeat was "its death blow, though centuries remained before the remnant fell. The themes in Anatolia were literally the heart of the empire, and within decades after Manzikert, they were gone." In his smaller book, A Short History of Byzantium, Norwich describes the battle as "the greatest disaster suffered by the Empire in its seven and a half centuries of existence".BOOK, Norwich, John Julius, A Short History of Byzantium, New York, Vintage Books, 1997, 242, 0-679-45088-2, Sir Steven Runciman, in his "History of the Crusades", noted that "The Battle of Manzikert was the most decisive disaster in Byzantine history. The Byzantines themselves had no illusions about it. Again and again their historians refer to that dreadful day."Anna Komnene, writing a few decades after the actual battle, wrote:}}Years and decades later, Manzikert came to be seen as a disaster for the Empire; later sources therefore greatly exaggerate the numbers of troops and the number of casualties. Byzantine historians would often look back and lament the "disaster" of that day, pinpointing it as the moment the decline of the Empire began. It was not an immediate disaster, but the defeat showed the Seljuks that the Byzantines were not invincible—they were not the unconquerable, millennium-old Roman Empire (as both the Byzantines and Seljuks still called it). The usurpation of Andronikos Doukas also politically destabilized the empire and it was difficult to organize resistance to the Turkish migrations that followed the battle. Finally, while intrigue and the deposition of Emperors had taken place before, the fate of Romanos was particularly horrific, and the destabilization caused by it also rippled through the empire for centuries.(File:11 13th century Asia Minor Turkish Invasions.png|thumbnail|320px|Settlements and regions affected during the first wave of Turkish invasions in Asia Minor (until 1204).)What followed the battle was a chain of events—of which the battle was the first link—that undermined the Empire in the years to come. They included intrigues for the throne, the fate of Romanos, and Roussel de Bailleul attempting to carve himself an independent kingdom in Galatia with his {{formatnum:3000}} Frankish, Norman, and German mercenaries. He defeated the Emperor's uncle John Doukas, who had come to suppress him, advancing toward the capital to destroy Chrysopolis (Ãœsküdar) on the Asian coast of the Bosphorus. The Empire finally turned to the spreading Seljuks to crush de Bailleul (which they did). However the Turks ransomed him back to his wife, and it was not before the young general Alexios Komnenos pursued him that he was captured. These events all interacted to create a vacuum that the Turks filled. Their choice in establishing their capital in Nikaea (Iznik) in 1077 could possibly be explained by a desire to see if the Empire's struggles could present new opportunities.In hindsight, both Byzantine and contemporary historians are unanimous in dating the decline of Byzantine fortunes to this battle. As Paul K. Davis writes, "Byzantine defeat severely limited the power of the Byzantines by denying them control over Anatolia, the major recruiting ground for soldiers. Henceforth, the Muslims controlled the region. The Byzantine Empire was limited to the area immediately around Constantinople, and the Byzantines were never again a serious military force."Paul K. Davis, 100 Decisive Battles from Ancient Times to the Present: The World's Major Battles and How They Shaped History (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999), p. 118. It is also interpreted as one of the root causes for the later Crusades, in that the First Crusade of 1095 was originally a western response to the Byzantine emperor's call for military assistance after the loss of Anatolia.BOOK, Madden, Thomas, Crusades The Illustrated History, Ann Arbor, University of Michigan P, 2005, 35, 0-8476-9429-1, From another perspective, the West saw Manzikert as a signal that Byzantium was no longer capable of being the protector of Eastern Christianity or of Christian pilgrims to the Holy Places in the Middle East. Delbrück considers the importance of the battle to be exaggerated, but the evidence makes clear that it resulted in the Empire being unable to put an effective army into the field for many years to come.ENCYCLOPEDIA, Delbrück, Hans, Geschichte der Kriegskunst im Rahmen der politischen Geschichte, 1923, 2nd, Walter de Gruyter, Berlin, 3. Teil: Das Mittelalter, 209–210,weblink Hans Delbrück, 22 April 2012, German, 7. Kapitel: Byzanz, Chapter 7: Byzantium, The Battle of Myriokephalon, also known as the Myriocephalum, has been compared to the Battle of Manzikert as a pivotal point in the decline of the Byzantine Empire.For example, BOOK, Speros, Vryonis, The Decline of Medieval Hellenism in Asia Minor: and the process of Islamization from the eleventh through the fifteenth century, Berkeley, University of California, 1971, 125, 0-520-01597-5, In both battles, separated by over a hundred years, an expansive Byzantine army was ambushed by a more elusive Seljuk opponent. The implications of Myriocephalum were initially limited, however, thanks to Manuel I Komnenos holding on to power. The same could not be said of Romanos, whose enemies "martyred a courageous and upright man", and as a result "the Empire ... would never recover".BOOK, Norwich, John Julius, A Short History of Byzantium, New York, Vintage Books, 1997, 243, 0-679-45088-2,

    Cultural references

    (File:Camlica-2018-06-14.jpg|thumb|right|180px|Çamlıca Mosque, Istanbul)The largest mosque in Turkey, the Çamlıca Mosque of Istanbul has four minarets that span 107.1 metres, a measurement that refers to the Battle of Manzikert (1071).NEWS,weblink Turkey’s largest mosque opens its doors in Istanbul, 8 March 2019, Gulf Times, DPA, Istanbul,

    See also





    Further reading

    • BOOK, Haldon, John, The Byzantine Wars: Battles and Campaigns of the Byzantine Era, 2001, Tempus, Stroud, 0-7524-1795-9, harv,
    • BOOK, Treadgold, Warren, A History of the Byzantine State and Society, 1997, Stanford University Press, Stanford, 0-8047-2421-0, harv,
    • JOURNAL, Runciman, Steven, Steven Runciman, A History of the Crusades, One, 1951, Harper & Row, New York, harv,
    • BOOK, Norwich, John Julius, Byzantium: The Apogee, 1991, Viking, London, 0-670-80252-2, harv,
    • BOOK, Carey, Brian Todd, Allfree, Joshua B., Cairns, John, yes, Warfare in the Medieval World, 2006, Pen & Sword Books, Barnsley, 1-84415-339-8, harv,
    • BOOK, Konstam, Angus, Historical Atlas of The Crusades, 2004, Mercury, London, 1-904668-00-3, harv,
    • BOOK, Madden, Thomas, Crusades The Illustrated History, 2005, The University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, MI, 0-472-03127-9, harv,
    • BOOK, Konus, Fazli, Selçuklular Bibliyografyası, 2006, Çizgi Kitabevi, Konya, 975-8867-88-1, harv,

    External links

    {{Coord|39|08|41|N|42|32|21|E|source:glwiki_region:TR|display=title}}{{good article}}

    - content above as imported from Wikipedia
    - "Battle of Manzikert" does not exist on GetWiki (yet)
    - time: 12:13am EDT - Wed, Aug 21 2019
    [ this remote article is provided by Wikipedia ]
    LATEST EDITS [ see all ]
    GETWIKI 09 JUL 2019
    Eastern Philosophy
    History of Philosophy
    GETWIKI 09 MAY 2016
    GETWIKI 18 OCT 2015
    M.R.M. Parrott
    GETWIKI 20 AUG 2014
    GETWIKI 19 AUG 2014