Atheism in Hinduism

aesthetics  →
being  →
complexity  →
database  →
enterprise  →
ethics  →
fiction  →
history  →
internet  →
knowledge  →
language  →
licensing  →
linux  →
logic  →
method  →
news  →
perception  →
philosophy  →
policy  →
purpose  →
religion  →
science  →
sociology  →
software  →
truth  →
unix  →
wiki  →
essay  →
feed  →
help  →
system  →
wiki  →
critical  →
discussion  →
forked  →
imported  →
original  →
Atheism in Hinduism
[ temporary import ]
please note:
- the content below is remote from Wikipedia
- it has been imported raw for GetWiki
{{short description|Atheism in Hinduism}}{{Atheism sidebar|types}}{{Hindu philosophy}}{{EngvarB|date=July 2015}} {{Use dmy dates|date=July 2015}}Atheism (Sanskrit: , {{IAST|nir-īśvara-vāda}}, lit. "statement of no Lord", "doctrine of godlessness") or disbelief in God or gods has been a historically propounded viewpoint in many of the orthodox and heterodox streams of Indian philosophy.WEB,weblink The Speaking Tree – The Atheistic Roots of Hindu Philosophy, The Times of India, 22 May 2004, Daga, Mahesh, There are six major orthodox (astika) schools of Hindu philosophy—Nyaya, Vaisheshika, Samkhya, Yoga, Mīmāṃsā and Vedanta, and five major heterodox (nāstika) schools of Śramaṇa—Jain, Buddhist, Ajivika, Ajñana, and Cārvāka. The four most studied nāstika schools, those rejecting the doctrine of Vedas, are Jainism, Buddhism, Cārvāka, and Ājīvika.WEB,weblink The tradition of atheism in India goes back 2,000 years. I'm proud to be a part of that, The Daily Mail, Palash Krishna Mehrotra, 29 August 2015, BOOK, An Introduction to Hinduism, Flood, Gavin, Cambridge University Press, 1996, 81-7596-028-0, Cambridge, 82, 224–49, {{Citation|title=Dominion Status : Written for the 'Daily Mail'|work=India : Speeches and an Introduction|publisher=Thornton Butterworth, Ltd.|isbn=9781472581334|doi=10.5040/|year=1931}}Among the various orthodox schools of Hindu philosophy, Samkhya, Yoga and Mimamsa, while not rejecting either the Vedas or Brahman,WEB,weblink Why Indian philosophy is incomplete without atheism, Daily O, 27 August 2015, Hari Ravikumar, typically reject a personal god, creator God, or a God with attributes.Some schools of thought view the path of atheism as a valid one but difficult to follow in matters of spirituality.BOOK, Chakravarti, Sitansu, Hinduism, a way of life, Motilal Banarsidass, 1991, 71,weblink 978-81-208-0899-7, According to Hinduism, the path of the atheist is a very difficult one to follow in matters of spirituality, though it is a valid one.,


The Sanskrit term {{IAST|Āstika}} ("pious, orthodox") refers to the systems of thought which admit the validity of the Vedas.BOOK, Pruthi, Vedic civilization – Culture and civilization series, Discovery Publishing House, 2004, 214,weblink 978-81-7141-875-6, Sanskrit {{IAST|asti}} means "there is", and {{IAST|Āstika}} (per Pāṇini 4.2.60) derives from the verb, meaning "one who says {{IAST|'asti'}}". Technically, in Hindu philosophy the term {{IAST|Āstika}} refers only to acceptance of authority of Vedas, not belief in the existence of God.BOOK, Kapoor, Subodh, The Systems of Indian Philosophy, Genesis Publishing Pvt Ltd, 6,weblink 978-81-7755-887-6, December 2004, However, even when philosophers professed allegiance to the Vedas, their allegiance did little to fetter the freedom of their speculative ventures.WEB,weblink Indian philosophy, Encyclopedia Britannica, en, 2019-07-19, On the contrary, the acceptance of the authority of the Vedas was a convenient way for a philosopher's views to become acceptable to the orthodox, even if a thinker introduced a wholly new idea. Thus, the Vedas could be cited to corroborate a wide diversity of views; they were used by the Vaisheshika thinkers (i.e., those who believe in ultimate particulars, both individual souls and atoms) as much as by the Advaita Vedanta philosophers.

Historical development

The Rig Veda, the oldest of the Vedas, deals with significant skepticism around the fundamental question of a creator God and the creation of the universe. It does not, at many instances, categorically accept the existence of a creator God. Nasadiya Sukta (Creation Hymn) in the tenth chapter of the Rig Veda states:BOOK, World scriptures: an introduction to comparative religions, Kramer, Kenneth, 978-0-8091-2781-8, 1986,weblink 34, WEB, Subodh Varma,weblink The gods came afterwards, Times of India, May 6, 2011, 2011-06-09, The Brihadaranyaka, Isha, Mundaka (in which Brahman is everything and "no-thing") and especially the Chandogya Upanishads have also been interpreted as atheistic because of their stress on the subjective self.BOOK, Bhatt, Chetan, Liberation and purity: race, new religious movements and the ethics of postmodernity, Routledge, 1997, 160,weblink 978-1-85728-424-9, Mimamsa was a realistic, pluralistic school of philosophy which was concerned with the exegesis of the Vedas.{{citation|last=Vitsaxis|first=Vassilis|title=Thought and Faith: The concept of divinity|url=|year=2009|publisher=Somerset Hall Press|isbn=978-1-935244-05-9|pages=517–518}} The core text of the school was the Purva Mimamsa Sutras of Jaimini (c. 200 BCE–200 CE). Mimamsa philosophers believed that the revelation of the Vedas was sacred, authorless (apaurusheyatva) and infallible, and that it was essential to preserve the sanctity of the Vedic ritual to maintain dharma (cosmic order).Encyclopædia Britannica (2007){{citation|last=King|first=Richard|title=Indian Philosophy: An Introduction to Hindu and Buddhist Thought|url=|year=1999|publisher=Edinburgh University Press|isbn=978-0-7486-0954-3 }}{{rp|52–53}} As a consequence of the belief in sanctity of the ritual, Mimamsas rejected the notion of God in any form. Later commentators of the Mimamsa sutras such as Prabhākara (c. 7th century CE) advanced arguments against the existence of God.{{citation|last=Bales|first=Eugene F.|title=A Ready Reference to Philosophy East and West|url=|year=1987|publisher=University Press of America|isbn=978-0-8191-6640-1|page=198 }}{{citation|last=Warder|first=Anthony Kennedy|title=A Course In Indian Philosophy|url=|year=1998|publisher=Motilal Banarsidass|isbn=978-81-208-1244-4|page=187 }} The early Mimamsa not only did not accept God but said that human action itself was enough to create the necessary circumstances for the enjoyment of its fruits.BOOK, Sarvepalli Radhakrishnan, Poolla Tirupati Raju, The concept of man: a study in comparative philosophy, Allen & Unwin, 1960, 305,weblink Sarvepalli Radhakrishnan, Samkhya is not fully atheisticBOOK, Dasgupta, Surendranath, A history of Indian philosophy, Volume 1, Motilal Banarsidass Publ., 1992, 258,weblink 978-81-208-0412-8, and strongly dualistic{{citation |last = Michaels |first = Axel |title = Hinduism: Past and Present |year = 2004 |publisher = Princeton University Press |location = Princeton, New Jersey |url =weblink |isbn = 0-691-08953-1 |page=264 }}{{citation |last = Sen Gupta |first = Anima |year = 1986 | title = The Evolution of the Samkhya School of Thought |publisher = South Asia Books |location = New Delhi | isbn = 81-215-0019-2 |page =6 }} orthodox (Astika) school of Indian Hindu philosophy. The earliest surviving authoritative text on classical Samkhya philosophy is the Samkhyakarika (c. 350–450 CE) of Iśvarakṛṣṇa.{{rp|63}} The Samkhyakarika is silent on the issue of Isvara's existence or nonexistence, although first millennium commentators such as Gaudapada understand the text as compatible with some concept of God. However, the Samkhya Sutra (14th c. CE) and its commentaries explicitly attempt to disprove God's existence through reasoned argument.BOOK, Nicholson, Andrew J., Hindu Disproofs of God: Refuting Vedāntic Theism in the Sāṃkhya Sūtra, Oxford Handbook of Indian Philosophy, 2016,weblink subscription, Jonardon, Ganeri, 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199314621.013.29,

Arguments against existence of God in Hindu philosophy

Mimamsas argued that there was no need to postulate a maker for the world, just as there was no need for an author to compose the Vedas or a God to validate the rituals.BOOK, Religious truth, Robert, Neville,weblink 51, 9780791447789, January 2001, They further thought that the Gods named in the Vedas had no physical existence apart from the mantras that speak their names. In this regard, the power of the mantras was what was seen as the power of Gods.BOOK, The perfectibility of human nature in eastern and western thought, Harold, Coward, Harold Coward,weblink 114, 9780791473368, 7 February 2008, Mimamsas reasoned that an incorporeal God could not author the Vedas, for he would not have the organs of speech to utter words. An embodied God could not author the Vedas either because such a God would be subject to the natural limitations of sensory knowledge and therefore, would not be able to produce supernatural revelations like the Vedas.{{citation |last1=Cowell|first1=E. B.|last2=Gough|first2=A. E.|title=The Sarva-Darsana-Samgraha or Review of the Different Systems of Hindu Philosophy: Trubner's Oriental Series|url=|year=2001|publisher=Taylor & Francis|isbn=978-0-415-24517-3 |pages=189–191 }}Samkhya gave the following arguments against the idea of an eternal, self-caused, creator God:
  • If the existence of karma is assumed, the proposition of God as a moral governor of the universe is unnecessary. For, if God enforces the consequences of actions then he can do so without karma. If however, he is assumed to be within the law of karma, then karma itself would be the giver of consequences and there would be no need of a God.
  • Even if karma is denied, God still cannot be the enforcer of consequences. Because the motives of an enforcer God would be either egoistic or altruistic. Now, God's motives cannot be assumed to be altruistic because an altruistic God would not create a world so full of suffering. If his motives are assumed to be egoistic, then God must be thought to have desire, as agency or authority cannot be established in the absence of desire. However, assuming that God has desire would contradict God's eternal freedom which necessitates no compulsion in actions. Moreover, desire, according to Samkhya, is an attribute of prakriti and cannot be thought to grow in God. The testimony of the Vedas, according to Samkhya, also confirms this notion.
  • Despite arguments to the contrary, if God is still assumed to contain unfulfilled desires, this would cause him to suffer pain and other similar human experiences. Such a worldly God would be no better than Samkhya's notion of higher self.
  • Furthermore, there is no proof of the existence of God. He is not the object of perception, there exists no general proposition that can prove him by inference and the testimony of the Vedas speak of prakriti as the origin of the world, not God.
Therefore, Samkhya maintained not only that the various cosmological, ontological and teleological arguments could not prove God, but that God as normally understood—an omnipotent, omniscient, omnibenevolent creator who is free from suffering—cannot exist.The Indian Nobel Prize-winner Amartya Sen, in an interview with Pranab Bardhan for the California Magazine published in the July–August 2006 edition by the University of California, Berkeley states:"The Arguing Indian" California MagazineAccording to Markandey Katju, former Chairman of the Press Council of India and former judge of the Supreme Court of India, "...there are six classical systems of Indian philosophy, Nyaya, Vaisheshik, Sankya, Yoga, Purva Mimansa and Uttar Mimansa, and three non-classical systems, Buddhism, Jainism and Charvak. Out of these nine systems eight of them are atheistic as there is no place for God in them. Only the ninth one, that is Uttar Mimansa, which is also called Vedanta, has a place for God in it."WEB,weblink What is India? A blogpost by Justice Katju, 4 February 2012, WEB,weblink What is India? A speech by Justice Katju at Jawaharlal Nehru University on November 14, 2011,

Notable Hindu atheists

, Towards Understanding Communalism
, Pramod
, Kumar
, Centre for Research in Rural and Industrial Development
, Chandigarh
, 1992
, 978-81-85835-17-4
, 27810012
, VD Savarkar was publicly an atheist. Even when he was the Hindu Mahasabha leader he used to publicly announce and advertise lectures on atheism, on why god is not there and why all religions are false. That is why when defining Hindutva, he said, Hindutva is not defined by religion and tried to define it in a non-religious term: Punyabhoomi.
, 348, BOOK
, Time Warps: The Insistent Politics of Silent and Evasive Pasts
, Ashis
, Nandy
, Orient Longman
, Delhi
, 2003
, 978-81-7824-071-8
, 49616949
, 71
, {{citation |last=Quack|first=Johannes|title=Disenchanting India:Organized Rationalism and Criticism of Religion in India: Organized Rationalism and Criticism of Religion in India|url=|year=2011|publisher=Oxford University Press|isbn=978-0-19-981260-8|page=263}}
  • Shreela Flather, Baroness Flather of Windsor and Maidenhead (1934– ), the first Hindu woman in British politics. She has described herself as a "Hindu atheist". Broadly, she is an atheist with affinity to secular aspects of Hindu culture such as dress and diet.BBC NewsWEB,weblink Baroness Flather accused of 'bigotry' over her views on marriages in Pakistani community, 7 July 2015,
  • Osho openly proclaimed that God is the biggest lie ever told to humankind.weblink

See also



External links

{{Indian Philosophy|state=collapsed}}

- content above as imported from Wikipedia
- "Atheism in Hinduism" does not exist on GetWiki (yet)
- time: 10:59am EST - Thu, Dec 05 2019
[ this remote article is provided by Wikipedia ]
LATEST EDITS [ see all ]
Eastern Philosophy
History of Philosophy
M.R.M. Parrott